Webb v. United States

Background

In 1914, Congress passed the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act to limit the spread of opioids and cocaine. As Governor-General of the Philippines, Francis Burton Harrison proposed the act as an indirect restriction on the importation of drugs from Asian countries into the United States. The act required that "every person who produces, imports, manufactures, compounds, deals in, dispenses, distributes, or gives away any of the aforesaid drugs shall pay to the said collector a special tax at the rate of $1 per year" (), allowing the federal government to monitor the sale of such drugs.

Under this act, the federal government convicted a physician and pharmacist in Memphis, Tennessee, for routinely providing individuals with whatever amount of morphine was requested, rather than applying their medical expertise to tailor prescriptions around actual need.

Supreme Court

Having upheld the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act as a valid use of a federal power earlier that day in United States v. Doremus, Associate Justice William R. Day reasoned that allowing Webb to escape prosecution for widespread distribution of morphine simply because he was a physician would undermine the law's legislative intent.

Chief Justice Edward Douglass White dissented based on his minority view in United States v. Doremus that the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act was an unconstitutional encroachment on the police power left to state governments in violation of the Tenth Amendment.

References

References

1. Bonnie, R.J. et al. ''Criminal Law, Second Edition.'' Foundation Press, New York: 2004, p. 263
2. (17 December 1914). "Harrison Narcotics Tax Act".
3. {{Cite court. (3 March 1919)
4. {{Cite court. (3 March 1919)