From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Wandering officer
Police officer who frequently transfers between police departments
Police officer who frequently transfers between police departments
In law enforcement in the United States, a wandering officer, referred to colloquially as a gypsy cop, is a police officer who frequently transfers between police departments, having a record of misconduct or unsuitable job performance.
History of the term
In use since the 1980s, the phrase entered public parlance in the 2000s after the infamous Tulia drug stings, where itinerant lawman Tom Coleman allegedly set up innocent people, most of them black, as part of a long-term undercover operation. Several other high-profile cases in states include those in Texas and Alaska that involved officers who served with adversity in close to 20 agencies in 15 years or less, yet they continued to evade administrative action as they went from agency to agency, sometimes serving as little as 30 days at one department, despite blatant misconduct and compelling signs of unsuitability to serve as peace officers. More recently in 2016 following a civil rights lawsuit against Ferguson police officer Freddie Boyd, he was found to have had a string of complaints filed against him from over 10 years earlier, including pistol whipping a child and falsifying police reports, from when he worked for the city of St. Louis. Law enforcement agency heads privately refer to the practice of giving a problematic officer a good recommendation in order to get rid of the officer while avoiding litigation, as "pass the trash".
The term comes from the Romani people popularly known as "Gypsies", who are stereotypically said to always be travelling and thus never get to settle down in a local community, just like how a gypsy cop never gets to stay at any given police department for long. Some dictionaries recommend against using the word gypsy as a modifier with negative connotations, because such use could be considered a slur against the Romani people.
Causes
Fragmentation
The United States has a highly decentralized and fragmented system of law enforcement, with around 18,000 law enforcement agencies, and is regulated separately in the 50 states, plus US territories, the federal and local level as well. Hiring and disciplinary standards vary greatly between police departments, the majority of which are small in size. There is no national database of dismissed officers, who may or may not be de-certified to practice law enforcement by their jurisdictional regulatory agency, often called POST (Peace Officer Standards and Training) agencies, or by a similar agency. Some states have established a state-level database or taken other administrative measures to try to prevent dismissed officers from being rehired, but these databases are not centralized, nor do they have uniform prerequisites. The large population and land area of the country makes it further harder to notice these cases; an officer may have moved hundreds of miles away to join another agency and the new agency would be unlikely to have learned of the case in the media.
Incentives for hiring
Wandering officers usually move from agency to agency as lateral transfers, or law enforcement officers that have already been trained and certified. They are often preferred over new recruits as the hiring process is simplified. Some smaller agencies knowingly hire gypsy cops because they have difficulty in recruiting suitable officers. That may be because of a smaller population to recruit from, lower pay, limited training and growth potential, less exciting police activity and even less prestige. The vacancy of even one officer in a small agency of fewer than 10 officers can create substantial hardships on an agency that must provide 24-hour coverage to the community it serves. The agencies have a great incentive to fill the vacancy quickly, even if it means hiring someone unsuitable.
Incentives for concealing a misconduct dismissal
Problem officers are often allowed to resign in seemingly good standing and then go to another unsuspecting agency with a good recommendation from a previous chief or sheriff, who is eager to get rid of the problem officer. In other cases, small agencies with limited budgets may fear a costly lawsuit if they dismiss an officer through a formal disciplinary process. An officer who is facing a misconduct dismissal will often threaten the agency and its governmental entity with costly, lengthy, and unflattering litigation for wrongful discipline or wrongful unfit or adverse termination and make such claims public. An officer finally can often negotiate a positive departure from an agency once they realize that they can no longer continue to work there. They can leave with an apparent clean and positive record and the agency is simply relieved to be rid of the officer, who goes to another unsuspecting agency.
Attempts to report problem officers by agencies can be overruled and overturned by administrative law hearings and actions. Such a ruling can be interpreted as a rebuke of the agency and can be a basis for the officer to litigate against the reporting agency. Fear of this potential outcome is also a factor in many agency heads simply taking the path of least resistance and giving a separating officer a positive report of separation.
Most states have a consolidated retirement system for state, county and municipal peace officers, which is unaffected by transfers between agencies so long as continued employment occurs and can thus further provide incentive for both good and bad officers to move frequently between agencies.
References
References
- Rappaport, Ben Grunwald & John. "The Wandering Officer".
- (June 12, 2020). "The Problem with "Wandering" Police Officers".
- (May 26, 2020). "'Wandering' Cops Pose Risk to Communities: Study".
- "Analysis | What happens when a police officer gets fired? Very often another police agency hires them.". Washington Post.
- Williams, Timothy. (September 10, 2016). "Cast-Out Police Officers Are Often Hired in Other Cities". The New York Times.
- (August 3, 2017). "Fired/Rehired: Police chiefs are often forced to put officers fired for misconduct back on the streets". Washington Post.
- Friedersdorf, Conor. (December 2, 2014). "How Police Unions and Arbitrators Keep Abusive Cops on the Street". The Atlantic.
- (2011). "Police ethics: crisis in law enforcement". Chares C. Thomas.
- (27 September 2016). "Push to keep "gypsy cops" with questionable pasts off the streets". CBS News.
- "Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States". Human Rights Watch.
- Stott, Kim. (1983-10-30). "State Lawmen Work To Stop "Gypsy Cops'".
- Mangold, Tom. (2003-03-01). "Texas narcotics investigations flawed".
- (September 27, 2016). "Push to keep "gypsy cops" with questionable pasts off the streets".
- (2007). "The new Partridge dictionary of slang and unconventional English". Routledge.
- (1998). "Merriam-Webster's pocket guide to English usage.". Merriam-Webster.
- Garner, Bryan A.. (2009). "Garner's modern American usage". Oxford University Press.
- Baskin, [by] H.E. Wedeck with the assistance of Wade. (1973). "Dictionary of gypsy life and lore". Philosophical Library.
- Garner, Bryan A.. (2011). "A dictionary of modern legal usage". Oxford University Press.
- (2002). "Dictionary of race, ethnicity and culture". Sage.
- (June 26, 2020). "A national registry of problem police officers would require major changes by states".
- (24 April 2019). "Fired for a felony, again for perjury. Meet the new police chief.".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Wandering officer — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report