From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1679
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| number | 1679 |
| organ | SC |
| date | 16 May |
| year | 2006 |
| meeting | 5,439 |
| code | S/RES/1679 |
| document | https://undocs.org/S/RES/1679(2006) |
| for | 15 |
| abstention | 0 |
| against | 0 |
| subject | The situation in Sudan |
| result | Adopted |
| image | Darfur_refugee_camps_map.png |
| caption | Refugee camps near the Chad–Sudan border |
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1679, adopted unanimously on May 16, 2006, after recalling resolutions 1556 (2004), 1564 (2004), 1574 (2004), 1590 (2005), 1591 (2005), 1593 (2005), 1663 (2005) and 1665 (2006) on the situation in Sudan, the Council endorsed a decision by the African Union Peace and Security Council to move ahead with a United Nations peacekeeping force in Darfur as soon as possible.
After the adoption of Resolution 1679, China said it would not support any further resolutions against Sudan under Chapter VII authority, unless approval of the Sudanese government was obtained.
Resolution
Observations
In the preamble of the resolution, the Council expressed concern over the consequences of the prolonged conflict in Darfur on the civilian population and reiterated that all parties had to end the violence immediately. There was also concern that the conflict may affect the rest of Sudan and neighbouring Chad, with the Council noting the deteriorating relations between the two countries.
Meanwhile, the members of the Council commended political efforts to resolve the crisis in Darfur led by the African Union. Furthermore, the efforts of the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) were welcomed, despite "exceptionally difficult circumstances". The Council envisaged a follow-on United Nations operation in Darfur with African participation.
Acts
Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council called upon parties to the Darfur Peace Agreement to respect commitments they had made and immediately implement the agreement, while those that had not signed the agreement were urged to do so. It expressed its intention to consider sanctions against any party or individual that would obstruct the implementation of the agreement.
The African Union was asked to consult with the United Nations, international organisations and countries on measures to strengthen AMIS's capacity to enforce security arrangements from the Darfur Peace Agreement, while endorsing the African Union's decision to transform its operation into a United Nations operation. All decisions relating to the new operation would be discussed with those party to the peace agreement.
Finally, the resolution requested the Secretary-General Kofi Annan to submit recommendations on the mandate, structure, strength, cost and potential participants of the United Nations operation in Darfur, within a week of an assessment mission returning.
References
References
- (May 16, 2006). "Security Council endorses African Union decision on need for concrete steps in transition to United Nations operation in Darfur".
- (2010). "The international politics of mass atrocities: the case of Darfur". Taylor & Francis.
- Matthews, Max W.. (2008). "Tracking the Emergence of a New International Norm: The Responsibility to Protect and the Crisis in Darfur". Boston College International and Comparative Law Review.
- McCormack, T.. (2009). "Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Volume 9; Volume 2006". T.M.C. Asser Press.
- (16 May 2006). "UN begins Darfur peacekeeper move".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about United Nations Security Council Resolution 1679 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report