Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
sports

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

UEFA Respect Fair Play ranking

Football culture aspect under UEFA leagues body


Summary

Football culture aspect under UEFA leagues body

The UEFA Respect Fair Play ranking was used by UEFA from 1995 to the 2015–16 season to grant three berths for the first qualifying round of the UEFA Europa League. Since that time it has granted a monetary prize to winning associations.

Qualification system

1995–1998

The three highest-performing associations in the UEFA Fair Play ranking were given an extra UEFA Cup berth for the best-finishing team in their top division who have not qualified for the following season's UEFA Champions League, UEFA Cup Winners' Cup or UEFA Cup. Which round the teams started from depended on their association's UEFA coefficient.

1999–2008

The highest-finishing club in the Fair Play rankings of a qualifying association, not yet participating in either the UEFA Champions League or the UEFA Cup (the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup became defunct after 1998–99), were potential contenders for the three remaining berths. The club from the association which won the Fair Play ranking qualified automatically for the First Qualifying Round of the UEFA Cup. The two other associations were drawn from the rest that have reached the threshold of minimum games and had a score of at least 8.0.

2009–2015

The three highest placed national associations in the UEFA Respect Fair Play ranking each automatically gained an extra qualification berth for the first qualifying round of the UEFA Europa League, providing they exceeded the threshold of games played, and had a minimum average score of 8.0. These berths were then allocated to the highest placed club in that association's own Fair Play league that had not yet qualified a UEFA competition.

2015–present

Based upon a UEFA Executive Committee decision, approved in December 2014, from the 2015–16 season onwards, Fair Play no longer grants entry to the Europa League, instead only netting the victorious association a cash prize to be put towards "fair play or respect-themed projects". It is assessed on three categories: overall fair play, year-on-year fair play (most improved association) and spectator behaviour, with each association being scored and an association being declared the winner for each category. No association can win more than one category, meaning that on receiving one category award, an association becomes ineligible to win either of the other two, with the three categories being ranked in importance so that it can be determined which category takes preference.

Ranking

All representative teams from a football association are responsible for the score of the Fair Play ranking of that association. This includes matches of all national teams and all clubs in all UEFA competitions. The ranking assessment period was also changed in 2015, and is now from 1 July to 30 June the following year. For the transitional season of 2015–16, the ranking assessment period covered all matches between 1 May 2015 and 30 June 2016).

Criteria

Teams are judged on the following criteria:

  • Yellow and red cards: If no cards are shown the score will be 10. Every yellow card will deduct this total by 1. A red card will cost a team 3 points in the ranking. If the red card is the result of a second yellow card, the deductions of the second yellow card will be ignored. But if a player gets a direct red card after he got a yellow card earlier, the yellow card will be counted as a deduction. This score could become negative.
  • Positive play: e.g. attacking tactics, acceleration of the game, efforts to gain time, and continued pursuit of goals. A team can score a maximum of 10 points and a minimum of 1 point
  • Respect to the opponent: e.g. returning the ball to the opponent at a throw-in, helping an injured opponent: maximum 5 points, minimum 1 point
  • Respect to the referee: maximum 5 points, minimum 1 point
  • Behaviour of the team officials: maximum 5 points, minimum 1 point
  • Behaviour of the fans: maximum 5 points, minimum 1 point

The total number of points are divided by the maximum number of points, 40 (or 35 if there are a negligible number of fans), and multiplied by 10 which will result in a score between 0 and 10. The score is calculated to two decimal points and not rounded up.

2014–15 final ranking

The ranking below covers matches from 1 May 2014 to 30 April 2015 and is the final ranking.

The top three associations (Netherlands, England, Republic of Ireland) gained an extra qualification berth for the 2015–16 UEFA Europa League first qualifying round.

RankMember associationTotal pointsMatches played
1NED Netherlands8.151110
2ENG England8.146160
3IRL Republic of Ireland8.14466
4FIN Finland8.14168
5DEN Denmark8.12888
6GER Germany8.123146
7NOR Norway8.11371
8ISL Iceland8.08953
9SWE Sweden8.087110
10SCO Scotland8.08395
11ESP Spain8.039159
12AUT Austria8.01571
13NIR Northern Ireland8.00347
14SUI Switzerland8.00196
15BEL Belgium7.967107
16FRA France7.960115
17ITA Italy7.953147
18CZE Czech Republic7.92875
19WAL Wales7.92452
20POL Poland7.91172
21KAZ Kazakhstan7.87959
22RUS Russia7.872126
23FRO Faroe Islands7.86843
24ARM Armenia7.86472
25SVN Slovenia7.84871
26ISR Israel7.84355
27LTU Lithuania7.82455
28ROU Romania7.81180
29CYP Cyprus7.79069
30POR Portugal7.768128
31SVK Slovakia7.76576
32CRO Croatia7.76086
33EST Estonia7.75352
34SRB Serbia7.74976
35BIH Bosnia and Herzegovina7.74255
36HUN Hungary7.73868
37UKR Ukraine7.700122
38GRE Greece7.69484
39GEO Georgia7.68445
40BLR Belarus7.67883
41MDA Moldova7.64253
42TUR Turkey7.61590
43MLT Malta7.60045
44MNE Montenegro7.59244
45LVA Latvia7.56549
46MKD Macedonia7.50051
47AZE Azerbaijan7.44159
48ALB Albania7.34838
50GIB Gibraltar7.80921
51LIE Liechtenstein7.76718
52LUX Luxembourg7.72024
53SMR San Marino7.48524
54AND Andorra6.92232

Cut-off: 37 matches played

Group 1: 37 or more matches played; Group 2: fewer than 37 matches played.

Winners (1995–2015)

The UEFA Fair Play winners in the rankings by year since 1995 to 2015 were:

YearFirst associationNominated teamSecond associationNominated teamThird associationNominated teamReferencesYearTop associationNominated teamDrawnReferencesAssociationNominated teamAssociationNominated teamYearTop associationNominated teamSecond associationNominated teamThird associationNominated teamReferences
1995NOR NorwayVikingENG EnglandLeeds UnitedLUX LuxembourgAvenir Beggenurl=https://kassiesa.net/uefa/fairplay.htmltitle=Fair Play Rankingpublisher=Bert Kassesaccess-date=14 April 2011}}
1996SWE SwedenMalmöRUS RussiaCSKA MoscowFIN FinlandJazz Pori
1997NOR NorwayBrannENG EnglandAston VillaSWE SwedenÖrebro
1998ENG EnglandAston VillaFIN FinlandFinnPaNOR NorwayMolde
1999SCO ScotlandKilmarnockNOR NorwayBodø/GlimtEST EstoniaJK Viljandi Tulevik
2000SWE SwedenNorrköpingBEL BelgiumLierseESP SpainRayo Vallecano
2001BLR BelarusShakhtyorFIN FinlandMYPASVK SlovakiaMatador Púchov
2002NOR NorwaySK BrannENG EnglandIpswich TownCZE Czech RepublicSigma Olomouc
2003ENG EnglandManchester CityFRA FranceLensDEN DenmarkEsbjerg
2004SWE SwedenÖsterARM ArmeniaMikaUKR UkraineIllichivets Mariupol
2005NOR NorwayVikingGER GermanyMainz 05DEN DenmarkEsbjerg
2006SWE SwedenGefleBEL BelgiumRoeselareNOR NorwayBrann
2007SWE SwedenHäckenFIN FinlandMYPANOR NorwayLillestrøm
2008ENG EnglandManchester CityGER GermanyHertha BSCDEN DenmarkNordsjælland
2009NOR NorwayRosenborgDEN DenmarkRandersSCO ScotlandMotherwell
2010SWE SwedenGefleDEN DenmarkRandersFIN FinlandMYPA (a)
2011NOR NorwayAalesundENG EnglandFulhamSWE SwedenHäcken
2012NOR NorwayStabækFIN FinlandMYPANED NetherlandsTwente
2013SWE SwedenGefleNOR NorwayTromsøFIN FinlandMariehamn
2014NOR NorwayTromsøSWE SwedenBrommapojkarnaFIN FinlandMYPA
2015NED NetherlandsGo Ahead EaglesENG EnglandWest Ham UnitedIRL Republic of IrelandUCD

Notes:

  • Teams that performed the best in a given year when compared to the other two Fair Play qualifiers, either by advancing further or earning more points, are listed in italic.
  • (a): Both Randers and MYPA made to the 3rd Qualification round however MYPA had more wins in the tournament.

Most wins

By association

RankAssociation1st2nd3rdTotal212121
1NOR Norway823
2SWE Sweden712
3ENG England350
4NED Netherlands101
SCO Scotland101
6BLR Belarus100
7FIN Finland044
8DEN Denmark023
9BEL Belgium020
GER Germany020
11ARM Armenia010
FRA France010
RUS Russia010
14CZE Czech Republic001
EST Estonia001
LUX Luxembourg001
IRL Republic of Ireland001
SVK Slovakia001
ESP Spain001
UKR Ukraine001

By team

RankTeam1st2nd3rd
1SWE Gefle300
2NOR Brann201
3ENG Manchester City200
NOR Viking200
5NOR Tromsø110
6ENG Aston Villa110
7SWE Häcken101
SWE Malmö100
SCO Kilmarnock100
SWE Norrköping100
BLR Shakhtyor100
SWE Öster100
NOR Rosenborg100
NOR Aalesund100
NOR Stabæk100
NED Go Ahead Eagles100
17FIN MYPA032
18DEN Randers020

Best performances

The furthest that a team progressed from a fair-play entry was the quarter-finals, achieved by Aston Villa (1997–98), Rayo Vallecano (2000–01) and Manchester City (2008–09), with Manchester City being the only team to have progressed beyond the group stage since this was introduced in 2004–05.

Winners (since 2015–16 season)

The UEFA Fair Play winners by category in the rankings (with updated format) are:

SeasonOverall fair playBest spectatorsBest progressionPrize moneyReference2015–162016–172017–182018–19
NOR NorwayEST EstoniaBLR Belarus€50,000 for each
ISL IcelandFIN FinlandGEO Georgia
FIN FinlandFRO Faroe IslandsNIR Northern Ireland€50,000 for each
GEO Georgia

Notes

References

References

  1. (16 February 2015). "New Respect Fair Play reward criteria". [[UEFA]].
  2. "UEFA Fair Play Regulations 2015". UEFA.org.
  3. "UEFA Respect Fair Play Final Rankings 2014/15". UEFA.
  4. (8 May 2015). "Netherlands, England, Ireland get Fair Play bonus". [[UEFA]].
  5. "Fair Play Ranking". Bert Kasses.
  6. (16 December 1995). "English clubs pay for Intertoto fiasco". The Independent.
  7. "FAQ: Qualification and Seeding for the European Cups". Bert Kassies.
  8. "Norway Top Rankings". UEFA.
  9. (3 June 2003). "City Reward for English Fair Play". UEFA.
  10. "Sweden Top Fair Play Ranking". UEFA.
  11. (February 2019). "Sweden Top Fair Play Ranking". Xinhua News Agency.
  12. (29 July 2004). "Söderberg seals Öster success". UEFA.
  13. (1 June 2005). "Viking Rewarded for Fair Play". UEFA.
  14. (1 June 2006). "Sweden Tops Fair Play Ranking". UEFA.
  15. (9 May 2007). "Sweden earn UEFA Cup place via Fair Play ranking". UEFA.
  16. (15 May 2007). "Nordic nations win Fair Play places". UEFA.
  17. (9 May 2008). "England win Fair Play". UEFA.
  18. (13 May 2008). "Fair Play bonus for Germans and Danes". UEFA.
  19. (25 May 2008). "FC Nordsjælland i UEFA Cup'en". Dansk Boldspil-Union.
  20. (13 May 2009). "Norway confirmed as Fair Play winners". UEFA.
  21. (10 May 2010). "Sweden top Fair Play rankings". UEFA.
  22. (16 May 2011). "Fair Play bonus for Norway, England and Sweden". UEFA.
  23. "Fair Play Table {{!".
  24. (7 May 2012). "Norway wins UEFA Respect Fair Play ranking". UEFA.
  25. (13 May 2013). "Respect Fair Play bonus for Sweden, Norway, Finland". [[UEFA]].
  26. (8 May 2014). "Norway, Sweden, Finland top Respect Fair Play table". [[UEFA]].
  27. "UEFA Cup/Europa League Trivia". Rssf.
  28. (9 December 2016). "Lyon to host 2018 UEFA Europa League final". UEFA.
  29. "Georgia's Football Federation receives special UEFA award for best progress".
  30. (22 November 2018). "2017/18 UEFA fair play competition winners". UEFA.
  31. (17 January 2020). "2018/19 UEFA fair play competition winners". UEFA.
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about UEFA Respect Fair Play ranking — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report