Surf Wiki
Save to docs
law

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

TNA Entertainment, LLC v. Wittenstein

TNA Entertainment, LLC. v. Wittenstein and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. 12-0746-III was a lawsuit filed on May 23, 2012 in Nashville, Tennessee in the Chancery Court by TNA Entertainment, LLC., against former employee Brian Wittenstein and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (doing business as WWE). WWE and TNA were the two largest national professional wrestling promotions in the United States. The suit alleged that Wittenstein violated a non-disclosure agreement and shared confidential information with WWE which represented a comparative advantage in negotiating with wrestling talent under contract with TNA.

The lawsuit was formally withdrawn without prejudice, by the plaintiff, TNA, on January 15, 2013 under a "Notice of Voluntary Nonsuit" which offers no ruling on the merits of the suit and allows TNA to potentially refile at a later date.

Background

Brian Wittenstein signed a severance agreement with TNA, his former employer, on August 3, 2011 which included a non-disclosure agreement preventing him from disclosing certain confidential TNA information (including information regarding talent contracts). Although WWE fired Wittenstein and alerted TNA officials as to the disclosure of the information, TNA claimed that WWE had access to the information for three weeks prior to disclosure and in this time, WWE used secret contract information and attempted to poach their talent in violation of Tennessee's Uniform Trade Secrets Act. The information was alleged to include data regarding wrestler compensation, which was used to recruit contracted TNA talent to work for WWE. One prominent wrestler named in the suit was Ric Flair, whom TNA claims asked for his release from the company in order to sign with WWE following Wittenstein's disclosure of information to WWE.

In TNA's suit, they stated:

Case

At the start of the case, the judge issued a temporary injunction against WWE requiring them to hand over any TNA classified documents they held, which WWE complied with and provided evidence of their servers that they had removed all confidential TNA information from their internal systems. The court also issued a permanent injunction against Wittenstein, requiring him to return all information he had on TNA and prohibited him from revealing the information to any third parties or from breaching any contracts he had with TNA.

During the case, WWE ordered its employees not to have any professional or social contact with anybody related to TNA. They also held off signing El Generico because he had wrestled for TNA. TNA requested an injunction to prohibit WWE from signing any former TNA wrestlers but the judge denied this on the grounds of WWE stated they had no intention to sign Ric Flair.

In January 2013, TNA announced they were dropping the lawsuit, with both sides covering their own legal fees and TNA covering the court costs.

References

References

  1. (September 2024). "Unknown}}{{Dead link".
  2. Caldwell, James. "TNA drops lawsuit vs. WWE this week".
  3. (28 May 2012). "More on TNA-WWE Lawsuit; Internal Reports on Brian Wittenstein - PWMania - Wrestling News".
  4. John Paul Nefflen. "TNA Entertainment LLC - Noncompete Trade Secrets Law". Burr & Forman Blog.
  5. Burke, Sheila. (2012-05-25). "TNA claims WWE tried to poach its wrestlers".
  6. James Caldwell. "PWTorch.com - TNA/WWE News: Details on TNA suing WWE & former TNA employee, Flair central figure in allegations, what's next in court".
  7. "Preparing for a Smack Down: Local Wrestling Company Sues Former Employee and World Wrestling Entertainment for Trade Secrets Violation".
  8. "TNA LAWSUIT VS. WWE OVER, FULL DETAILS | PWInsider.com".
  9. (27 September 2012). "Update on the TNA vs. WWE Lawsuit + DGUSA/Northeast Events".
  10. (27 January 2013). "More details revealed about TNA's lawsuit against WWE".
  11. (7 February 2013). "More Details on the Settled TNA vs. WWE Lawsuit, el Generico".
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

united-states-class-action-case-law total-nonstop-action-wrestling wwe-controversies
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about TNA Entertainment, LLC v. Wittenstein — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report