Tamil Nadu Legislative Council

History and evolution

Origin

The first Indian Councils Act 1861 set up the Madras Legislative Council as an advisory body through which the colonial administration obtained advice and assistance. The act empowered the provincial governor to nominate four non-English Indian members to the council for the first time. Under the act, the nominated members were allowed to move their own bills and vote on bills introduced in the council. However, they were not allowed to question the executive, move resolutions or examine the budget. Also they could not interfere with the laws passed by the Central Legislature. The governor was also the president of the council and he had complete authority over when, where and how long to convene the council and what to discuss. Two members of his Executive Council and the Advocate-General of Madras were also allowed to participate and vote in the council. The Indians nominated under this act were mostly zamindars and ryotwari landowners, who often benefited from their association with the colonial government. Supportive members were often re-nominated for several terms. G. N. Ganapathy Rao was nominated eight times, Humayun Jah Bahadur was a member for 23 years, T. Rama Rao and P. Chentsal Rao were members for six years each. Other prominent members during the period included V. Bhashyam Aiyengar, S. Subramania Iyer and C. Sankaran Nair. The council met infrequently and in some years (1874 and 1892) was not convened even once. The maximum of number of times it met in a year was eighteen. The governor preferred to convene the council at his summer retreat Udhagamandalam, much to the displeasure of the Indian members. The few times when the council met, it was for only a few hours with bills and resolutions being rushed through.

Expansion

In 1892, the role of the Council was expanded by the Indian Councils Act 1892. The act increased the number of additional members of the council to a maximum of 20, of whom not more than nine had to be officials. The act introduced the method of election for the council, but did not mention word "election" explicitly. The elected members were officially called as "nominated" members and their method of election was described as "recommendation". Such "recommendations" were made by district boards, universities, municipalities and other associations. The term of the members was fixed at two years. The council could also discuss the annual financial statement and ask questions subject to certain limitations. Thirty eight Indian members were "nominated" in the eight elections during 1893-1909 when this Act was in effect. C. Jambulingam Mudaliar, N. Subba Rao Pantulu, P. Kesava Pillai and C. Vijayaraghavachariar representing southern group of district boards, Kruthiventi Perraju Pantulu of the northern group of municipalities, C. Sankaran Nair and P. Rangaiah Naidu from the Corporation of Madras and P. S. Sivaswami Iyer, V. Krishnaswamy Iyer and M. Krishnan Nair from the University of Madras were some of the active members. However, over a period of time, representation by Indian members dwindled, for example, the position of Bashyam Iyengar and Sankaran Nayar in 1902 was occupied by Acworth and Sir George Moore. The council did not meet more than nine days in a year during the time the act was in effect.

Further expansion

The Indian Councils Act 1909 (popularly called as "Minto-Morley Reforms"), officially introduced the method of electing members to the Council. But it did not provide for direct election of the members. It abolished automatic official (executive) majorities in the Council and gave its members the power to move resolutions upon matters of general public interest and the budget and also to ask supplementary questions. There were a total of 21 elected members and 21 nominated members. The Act allowed up to 16 nominated members to be official and the remaining five were required to be non-officials. The Governor was also authorised to nominate two experts whenever necessary. As before, the Governor, his two executive council members and the Advocate-General were also members of the Council. P. Kesava Pillai, A. S. Krishna Rao, N. Krishnaswami Iyengar, B. N. Sarma, B. V. Narasimha Iyer, K. Perraju Pantulu, T. V. Seshagiri Iyer, P. Siva Rao, V. S. Srinivasa Sastri, P. Theagaraya Chetty and Yakub Hasan Sait were among the active members.

Diarchy (1920–37)

Based on the recommendations of the Montague-Chelmsford report, the Government of India Act 1919 was enacted. The act enlarged the provincial legislative councils and increased the strength of elected members to be greater than that of nominated and official members. It introduced a system of dyarchy in the Provinces. Although this act brought about representative government in India, the Governor was empowered with overriding powers. It classified the subjects as belonging to either the Centre or the Provinces. The Governor General could override any law passed by the Provincial councils. It brought about the concept of "Partial Responsible Government" in the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two categories - reserved and transferred. Education, Sanitation, Local self-government, Agriculture and Industries were listed as the transferred subjects. Law, Finance, Revenue and Home affairs were the reserved subjects. The provincial council could decide the budget in so far it related to the transferred subjects. Executive machinery dealing with those subjects was placed under the direct control of provincial legislature. However, the provincial legislature and the ministers did not have any control over the reserved subjects, which came under the governor and his executive council.

The council had a total of 127 members in addition to the ex-officio members of the Governor's Executive Council. Out of the 127, 98 were elected from 61 constituencies of the presidency. The constituencies comprised three arbitrary divisions:

1. communal constituencies such as non-Muhammadan urban, non-Muhammadan rural, non-Brahman urban, Mohamaddan urban, Mohamaddan rural, Indian Christian, European and Anglo-Indian
2. special constituencies such as landholders, Universities, planters and trade associations (South India Chamber of Commerce & Nattukottai Nagarathar Association) and
3. territorial constituencies.

28 of the constituencies were reserved for non-Brahmans. 29 members were nominated, out of whom a maximum of 19 would be government officials, 5 would represent the Paraiyar, Pallar, Valluvar, Mala, Madiga, Sakkiliar, Thottiyar, Cheruman and Holeya communities and 1 would represent the "backward tracts". Including the Executive Council members, the total strength of the legislature was 134.

The first election for the Madras Legislative Council, under this act was held in November 1920. The first sitting of the council was inaugurated by the Duke of Connaught on 12 January 1921. In total, five such councils were constituted (in 1920, 23, 26, 30 and 34). The term of the councils was three years (except for the fourth council which was extended for a year in expectation of abolition of dyarchy ). While the first, second and fourth councils were controlled by Justice Party majorities, the third Council was characterised by a fractured verdict and an independent ministry. The fifth council also saw a fractured verdict and a minority Justice government.

Provincial autonomy (1937–50)

The Government of India Act of 1935 abolished dyarchy and ensured provincial autonomy. It created a bicameral legislature in the Madras province. The Legislature consisted of the Governor and two Legislative bodies - a Legislative Assembly and a Legislative Council. The Assembly consisted of 215 members, who were further classified into general members and reserved members representing special communities and interests. The Council consisted of a minimum of 54 and a maximum of 56 members. It was a permanent body not subject to dissolution by the Governor and one-third of its members retired every three years. 46 of its members were elected directly by the electorate while the Governor could nominate 8 to 10 members. Similar to the council, the electable members were further classified into general and reserved members. Specific number of seats were reserved (allocated) to various religious and ethnic groups. The Act provided for a limited adult franchise based on property qualifications. Seven million people, roughly 15% of the Madras people holding land or paying urban taxes were qualified to be the electorate. Under this Act, two councils were constituted - the first in 1937 and the second in 1946. Both Councils were controlled by Congress majorities.

In Republic of India (1950–86)

After India became independent in 1947 and the Indian Constitution was adopted in 1950, the Legislative Council continued to be the upper chamber of the legislature of the Madras State - the successor to Madras Presidency. It continued to be called as the "Madras Legislative Council". The Council was a permanent body and was not subject to dissolution. The length of a member's term was six years and one-third of the members retired every two years. The strength of the Council was not less than 40 or more than one-third of the strength of the Assembly. The following table illustrates how the members of Council were selected:

The actual strength of the council varied from time to time. During 1952–53, it had a strength of 72. After the formation of Andhra state on 1 October 1953, its strength came down to 51. In 1956 it decreased to 50 and the next year increased again to 63 - where it remained till the council's abolition. Of those 63, local bodies and the assembly elected 21 each, the teachers and graduates elected 6 each and the remaining 9 were nominated. The Council could not pass legislation on its own - it had to approve or disapprove the laws passed by the Assembly. In case of conflict between the Council and the Assembly, the will of the later would prevail. When Madras state was renamed as Tamil Nadu in 1968,{{cite news

Abolition

The legislative council was abolished in 1986 by the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) government of M. G. Ramachandran (MGR). MGR had nominated a Tamil film actress, Vennira Aadai Nirmala (aka A. B. Shanthi) to the Council. Her swearing in ceremony was scheduled for 23 April 1986. Nirmala had earlier declared insolvency and according to Article 102-(1)(c) of the Indian Constitution, an insolvent person can not serve as a member of parliament or state legislature. On 21 April, a lawyer named S. K. Sundaram, filed a public interest writ petition in the Madras High Court challenging Nirmala's nomination to the Council. MGR loaned Nirmala a sum of Rupees 4,65,000 from ADMK's party funds to pay off her creditors,{{cite web | archive-url = https://archive.today/20130125130534/http://www.hinduonnet.com/2002/06/14/stories/2002061404130400.htm | url-status = usurped | archive-date = 25 January 2013 | access-date = 23 December 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070608000850/http://www.hindu.com/2007/06/06/stories/2007060604680400.htm | url-status = dead | archive-date = 8 June 2007 | access-date = 23 December 2009 | access-date = 23 December 2009 | access-date = 23 December 2009 |access-date = 23 December 2009 |author-link = Randor Guy |access-date = 23 December 2009 |author-link = Randor Guy | access-date = 23 December 2009

On 14 May, a resolution seeking to abolish the council was moved successfully in the legislative assembly. The Tamil Nadu Legislative Council (Abolition) Bill, 1986 was passed by both houses of the Parliament and received the assent of the president on 30 August 1986. The Act came into force on 1 November 1986 and the council was abolished.

Revival attempt

The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) has so far made three unsuccessful attempts to revive the council. Revival of the Legislative Council was one of the promises included in the election manifesto of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) in the 2006 Assembly elections. The DMK won the 2006 assembly election and M. Karunanidhi became Chief minister. In his inaugural address to the 13th Legislative Assembly delivered on 24 May 2006, Governor Surjit Singh Barnala said steps will be taken to move the necessary constitutional amendments for reviving the council. On 12 April 2010, the Legislative Assembly passed a resolution seeking to revive the Council. The DMK's earlier attempts to revive the council, when it was in power during 1989–91 and 1996-2001 were not successful, as it did not possess both the two-thirds majority in the Legislative Assembly and a friendly union government necessary for it to be done.{{cite web | access-date = 23 December 2009

In the 2011 Assembly elections, the AIADMK came out with a sweeping majority. The AIADMK government headed by J.Jayalalithaa expressed its intention not to revive the council. The government once again passed a counter resolution to withdraw the attempt to revive the council.

As on now, despite the fact that there is a specific provision of a Legislative Council in Tamil Nadu in Article 168 of Constitution of India, there is no Legislative Council in Tamil Nadu for want of a resolution by the Tamil Nadu State Legislative Assembly by majority as provided in Article 169 of Constitution of India.

Location

Main article: Fort St. George (India)

Fort St. George has historically been the seat of the Government of Tamil Nadu since colonial times. During 1921–37, the Madras Legislative Council met at the council chambers within the fort. Between 14 July 1937 – 21 December 1938, the assembly met at the Senate House of the University of Madras and between 27 January 1938 - 26 October 1939 in the Banqueting Hall (later renamed as Rajaji Hall) in the Government Estate complex at Mount Road. During 1946–52, it moved back to the Fort St. George. In 1952, the strength of the assembly rose to 375, after the constitution of the first legislative assembly, and it was briefly moved into temporary premises at the government estate complex. This move was made in March 1952, as the existing assembly building only had a seating capacity of 260. Then on 3 May 1952, it moved into the newly constructed assembly building in the same complex. The legislature functioned from the new building (later renamed as Kalaivanar Arangam during 1952–56. However, with the reorganisation of states and formation of Andhra, the strength came down to 190 and the legislature moved back to Fort St. George in 1956. From December 1956 till January 2010, the Fort remained the home to the legislature . In 2004, during the 12th assembly, the AIADMK Government under J. Jayalalithaa made unsuccessful attempts to shift the assembly (the council had been abolished by then), first to the location of Queen Mary's College and later to the Anna University campus, Guindy. Both attempts were withdrawn after public opposition. During the 13th Assembly, the DMK government led by M. Karunanidhi proposed a new plan to shift the assembly and the government secretariat to the a new building in the Omandurar Government Estate. In 2007, the German architectural firm GMP International won the design competition to design and construct the new assembly complex. Construction began in 2008 and was completed in 2010. The assembly functioned in the new assembly building during March 2010 - May 2011. In May 2011, the Tamil Nadu legislature was moved back to Fort St. George.

List of historical locations where the Tamil Nadu Legislative Council has been housed:

Chief Ministers from the Council

During its existence as the upper chamber of Tamil Nadu Legislature, the Council has been used twice to appoint non-members of the Legislature as Chief Minister. In 1952, C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) was nominated by Governor Sri Prakasa to the Council so that Rajaji could become chief minister.{{cite web | archive-url = https://archive.today/20130103014812/http://www.hinduonnet.com/2001/05/31/stories/0231000q.htm | url-status = usurped | archive-date = 3 January 2013 | access-date = 17 December 2009

Presiding Officers

During 1861–1937, the presiding officer of the Madras Legislative Council was known as the "President of the Council". From its establishment in 1861 till dyarchy was introduced in 1921, the Governor of Madras was also the President of the Council. After dyarchy introduced, the first and second council presidents, Perungavalur Rajagopalachari and L. D. Swamikannu Pillai, were appointed by the Governor himself. The presidents who came after them were chosen by the Council itself. During 1937–86, the presiding officer was called as the "Chairman of the Council". The following table lists the presiding officers of the Council. M. P. Sivagnanam 1976 – 1 November 1986

References

References

1. S. Krishnaswamy. (1989). "The role of Madras Legislature in the freedom struggle, 1861-1947". People's Pub. House (New Delhi).
2. K. C. Markandan. (1964). "Madras Legislative Council; Its constitution and working between 1861 and 1909". S. Chand & CO.
3. "The State Legislature - Origin and Evolution". [[Tamil Nadu]] Government.
4. "Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly". Government of India.
5. Rajaraman, P.. (1988). "The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37". Poompozhil Publishers.
6. Mithra, H.N.. (2009). "The Govt of India ACT 1919 Rules Thereunder and Govt Reports 1920". BiblioBazaar.
7. "Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly". Indian Government.
8. Low, David Anthony. (1993). "Eclipse of empire". Cambridge University Press.
9. Christopher Baker. (1976). "The Congress at the 1937 Elections in Madras". Modern Asian Studies.
10. (2008). "Public Administration Special". [[Pratiyogita Darpan]].
11. Sharma, B. K.. (2007). "Introduction to the Constitution of India". PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.
12. (12 April 2010). "Assembly votes for Legislative Council". [[The Hindu]].
13. Ramakrishnan, T. (8 April 2010). "Legislative Council had chequered history". The Hindu.
14. (4 May 2010). "Cabinet clears State Legislative Council proposal". The Hindu.
15. (6 May 2010). "Parliament nod for Council Bill". The Hindu.
16. [http://www.elections.tn.nic.in/tnmlc/dcctno.pdf Delimitation of Council Constituencies (Tamil Nadu), Order 2010] {{Webarchive. link. (21 July 2011)
17. (24 October 2010). "Announcement on electoral roll revision". [[The Hindu]].
18. (22 February 2011). "SC stays TN council elections". [[The Times of India]].
19. Karthikeyan, Ajitha. (22 July 2008). "TN govt's new office complex faces flak". [[The Times of India]].
20. S. Muthiah. (28 July 2008). "From Assembly to theatre". [[The Hindu]].
21. "A Review of the Madras Legislative Assembly (1952-1957) : Section I, Chapter 2". [[Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly]].
22. S, Murari. (15 January 2010). "Tamil Nadu Assembly bids goodbye to Fort St George, to move into new complex". Asian Tribune.
23. Ramakrishnan, T. (11 March 2010). "State-of-the-art Secretariat draws on Tamil Nadu's democratic traditions". The Hindu.
24. Ramakrishnan, T.. (19 April 2008). "New Assembly complex to have high-rise building". [[The Hindu]].
25. Ramakrishnan, T. (13 March 2010). "Another milestone in Tamil Nadu's legislative history". [[The Hindu]].
26. Ramakrishnan, T. (24 May 2011). "After 16 months, Assembly back at Fort St. George". The Hindu.
27. T. V. R. Shenoy. (22 August 2001). "From Rajaji to Jayalalithaa". Rediff.
28. Pushpa Iyengar, Sugata Srinivasaraju. "Where The Family Heirs Loom". Outlook India.
29. Gopal K. Bharghava, Shankarlal C. Bhatt. (2005). "Land and people of Indian states and union territories. 25. Tamil Nadu". Kalpaz Publications.
30. Johari, J. C. (2007). "THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA A Politico-Legal Study". Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
31. Rajaraman, P.. (1988). "The Justice Party: a historical perspective, 1916-37". Poompozhil Publishers.
32. (7 April 2010). "Legislative Council to be revived: Karunanidhi". The Hindu.
33. Naidu, R. Janardhanam. (1974). "Bharani's Madras handbook".
34. "List of Governors of Madras, Provinces of British India". Worldstatesman.