Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/anthropology

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Symbolic culture

Concept in anthropology


Concept in anthropology

Symbolic culture, or non-material culture, is the cultural realm constructed and inhabited uniquely by Homo sapiens and is differentiated from ordinary culture, which many other animals possess. Symbolic culture is studied by archaeologists, social anthropologists and sociologists. From 2018, however, some evidence of a Neanderthal origin of symbolic culture emerged.

Examples of symbolic culture include concepts (such as good and evil), mythical constructs (such as gods and underworlds), and social constructs (such as promises and football games). Chase. P. G., 1994. "On symbols and the palaeolithic". Current Anthropology 35(5), 627-9.

Evolutionary emergence

It was once thought that art and symbolic culture first emerged in Europe some 40,000 years ago, during the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition – often termed the 'symbolic explosion' or 'Upper Palaeolithic revolution'. Some archaeologists still adhere to this view. Others now accept that symbolic culture probably emerged in sub-Saharan Africa at a much earlier date, during the period known as the Middle Stone Age. The evidence consists of traditions of ground ochre with strong selection for the colour red, examples of so-called ochre 'crayons' which appear to have been used for purposes of design, probably on the body, and geometric engravings on blocks of ochre. All this apparently formed part of a cosmetics industry dated to between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago. One theory is that this constitutes evidence for a ritual tradition. A bone apparently engraved with six lines from ~120 kya is one of the oldest deliberate abstract manifestations produced hominins. In addition, from about 100,000 years ago, there are pierced shells which appear to show signs of wear, suggesting that they were strung together to make necklaces. The controversial theory of female cosmetic coalitions interprets the ochre tradition as evidence that the world's first art, as an aspect of symbolic culture, took the form of personal ornamentation and body-painting. It was initially countered that pigment-only decorative systems are merely individualistic display, not necessarily indicative of ritual, whereas the bead traditions testify to language, institutionalised relationships and full-scale ritual and symbolic culture. More recently, however, those making this criticism have conceded that the evidence for ochre pigment use, stretching back towards 300,000 years ago, must indeed be recognised as the earliest durable media testifying to a collective ritual tradition.

References

References

  1. Marshack, A. 1972. ''The Roots of Civilization. The cognitive beginnings of man's first art, symbol and notation''. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  2. Chase. P. G., 1994. "On symbols and the palaeolithic". ''Current Anthropology'' 35(5), 627-9.
  3. Watts, I., 1999. "The Origins of Symbolic Culture", in R. Dunbar, C. Knight. C. Power, (eds) ''The Evolution of Culture: An Interdisciplinary View,'' Edinburgh University Press.
  4. Geertz, C. 1973. ''Interpreting Cultures.'' New York: Basic Books.
  5. Knight, C. 2010. [http://www.chrisknight.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/The-Origins-of-Symbolic-Culture.pdf The origins of symbolic culture.] In U. Frey, C. Stormer and K. P. Willfuhr (eds), ''Homo Novus - A Human Without Illusions''. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 193-211.
  6. Durkheim, E., 1965 [1912]. ''The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life''. New York (NY): Free Press.
  7. (2018). "U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art". Science.
  8. (2018). "Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals 115,000 years ago". Science Advances.
  9. Henshilwood, C. and C. W. Marean 2003. [http://www.radicalanthropologygroup.org/old/class_text_003.pdf The origin of modern human behavior.] {{Webarchive. link. (2020-07-30 Current Anthropology 44(5): 627-651.)
  10. Knight, C., C. Power and I. Watts, 1995. [http://www.radicalanthropologygroup.org/pub_knight_power_watts_big.pdf The Human Symbolic Revolution: A Darwinian Account.] {{Webarchive. link. (2020-08-01 ''Cambridge Archaeological Journal'' '''5'''(1): 75-114.)
  11. Watts, I. 2009. Red ochre, body painting, and language: interpreting the Blombos ochre. In R. Botha and C. Knight (eds), ''The Cradle of Language.'' Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 62-92.
  12. (20 January 2021). "Early evidence for symbolic behavior in the Levantine Middle Paleolithic: A 120 ka old engraved aurochs bone shaft from the open-air site of Nesher Ramla, Israel". Quaternary International.
  13. Power, C. 2010. Cosmetics, identity and consciousness. ''Journal of Consciousness Studies'' 17, No. 7-8, pp. 73-94.
  14. Henshilwood, C. S. and B. Dubreuil 2009. Reading the artifacts: gleaning language skills from the Middle Stone Age in southern Africa. In R. Botha and C. Knight (eds), ''The Cradle of Language.'' Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 41-61.
  15. Kuhn, S. L. and Stiner, M. C. 2007. Body ornamentation as information technology: towards an understanding of the significance of beads. In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef and C. Stringer (eds), ''Rethinking the Human Revolution,'' Cambridge: McDonald Institute Research Monographs, pp. 45-54.
  16. Kuhn, S. L. 2014. Signaling Theory and Technologies of Communication in the Paleolithic. ''Biological Theory'' '''9''' (1): 42-50.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Symbolic culture — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report