Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/educational-technology

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Structure of observed learning outcome

Model of levels of increasing complexity in understanding

Structure of observed learning outcome
Summary

Model of levels of increasing complexity in understanding

Diagram giving an overview of the SOLO Taxonomy approach.

The structure of observed learning outcomes (SOLO) taxonomy is a model that describes levels of increasing complexity in students' understanding of subjects. It was proposed by John B. Biggs and Kevin F. Collis.

The model consists of five levels of understanding:

  • Pre-structural – The task is not attacked appropriately; the student hasn't really understood the point and uses too simple a way of going about it. Students in the pre-structural stage of understanding usually respond to questions with irrelevant comments.
  • Uni-structural – The student's response only focuses on one relevant aspect. Students in the uni-structural stage of understanding usually give slightly relevant but vague answers that lack depth.
  • Multi-structural – The student's response focuses on several relevant aspects but they are treated independently and additively. Assessment of this level is primarily quantitative. Students in the multi-structural stage may know the concept in tidbits but don't know how to present or explain it.
  • Relational – The different aspects have become integrated into a coherent whole. This level is what is normally meant by an adequate understanding of some topic. At the relational stage, students can identify various patterns & view a topic from distinct perspectives.
  • Extended abstract – The previous integrated whole may be conceptualised at a higher level of abstraction and generalised to a new topic or area. At this stage, students may apply the classroom concepts in real life. NOTOC

Comparison with Bloom's taxonomy

While Bloom's taxonomy categorizes cognitive skills from basic recall to higher-order thinking (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create), the SOLO taxonomy assesses the depth and complexity of understanding, moving from surface to deep learning. Unlike Bloom's fixed hierarchical model, SOLO emphasizes a developmental progression that reflects a student's ability to integrate and generalize knowledge.

References

References

  1. (1982). "Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy (structure of the observed learning outcome)". [[Academic Press]].
  2. (2011). "Teaching for quality learning at university: what the student does". [[McGraw-Hill]]; [[Society for Research into Higher Education]]; [[Open University Press]].
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

educational-technology educational-classification-systems
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Structure of observed learning outcome — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report