Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/group-processes

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Structural ritualization theory


Structural ritualization theory (SRT), a concept related to the fields of sociology and social psychology, emphasizes embedded groups. These are groups located in a larger environment. The taken-for-granted practices of people in these groups are similar to patterns of behavior in the larger environment. When routinely performed, their actions acquire symbolic significance. They become part of a cognitive script that dictates behavior. The members of embedded groups do not just copy the practices. They express them in ways that may confirm patterns of behavior in the larger environment. In other words, the larger environment feeds the embedded group.

Ritualized symbolic practices

With the theory, ritualized symbolic practices (RSPs) are socially standardized actions that are schema-driven. The term schema refers to a cognitive structure or framework. According to the theory, ritual actions shape an actor's thoughts. This helps structural reproduction take place in specific domains of interaction. A domain of interaction is a bounded social arena which contains two or more actors engaged in face-to-face interaction

Structural reproduction

Four factors play an essential role in structural reproduction involving RSPs. They include repetitiveness, salience, homologousness, and resources. Repetitiveness entails the frequency with which an RSP is performed. Salience involves the degree to which an RSP is perceived to be central to an act, action sequence, or bundle of interrelated acts. Homologousness implies a similarity among different RSPs. Resources are materials needed to engage in RSPs which are available to actors. The greater the availability of resources, the more likely an actor will engage in an RSP. Rank is important for analysis. It involves the standing of an RSP in terms of its dominance as measured by the four factors. In other words, a RSP has high rank if it happens often, is important, the same as other rituals, and people have the tangible and/or intangible tools needed to participate.

References

  • Knottnerus, J. David. 2023. Polar Expeditions: Discovering Rituals of Success within Hazardous Endeavors. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Knottnerus, J. David. 2016. Ritual as a Missing Link: Sociology, Structural Ritualization Theory and Research. New York and London: Routledge.
  • Knottnerus, J. David. 1997. "The Theory of Structural Ritualization." pp. 257–279 in Advances in Group Processes, Volume 14, edited by Barry Markovsky, Michael J. Lovaglia and Lisa Troyer. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Ulsperger, Jason S. 2022. The 53: Rituals, Grief, and a Titan II Missile Disaster. Lanham, MD: Lexington.
  • Ulsperger, Jason S. and J. David Knottnerus. 2011. Elder Care Catastrophe: Rituals of Abuse in Nursing Homes. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Structural ritualization theory — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report