State of the art

Origin and history

The concept of the "state of the art" originated at the beginning of the 20th century. The earliest use of the term "state of the art" documented by the Oxford English Dictionary dates back to 1910, from an engineering manual by Henry Harrison Suplee (1856 – after 1943), an engineering graduate (University of Pennsylvania, 1876), titled The Gas Turbine: Progress in the Design and Construction of Turbines Operated by Gases of Combustion. The relevant passage reads: "In the present state of the art this is all that can be done". The term "art" refers to technics, rather than performing or fine arts.

Over time, use of the term increased in all fields where this kind of art has a significant role. In this relation it has been quoted by the author that "although eighteenth-century writers did not use the term, there was indeed in existence a collection of scientific and engineering knowledge and expertise that can be identified as the state of the art for that time".

Despite its actual meaning, which does not convey technology that is ahead of the industry, the phrase became so widely used in advertising that a 1985 article described it as "overused", stating that "[it] has no punch left and actually sounds like a lie". A 1994 essay listed it among "the same old tired clichés" that should be avoided in advertising.

Legal importance

Patent law

Main article: Prior art

In the context of European and Australian patent law, the term "state of the art" is a concept used in the process of assessing and asserting novelty and inventive step, and is a synonym of the expression "prior art". In the European Patent Convention (EPC), "[t]he state of the art shall be held to comprise everything made available to the public by means of a written or oral description, by use, or in any other way, before the date of filing of the European patent application" according to . Due account should be taken of as well, but merely for the examination of novelty.

The expression "background art" is also used in certain legal provisions, such as (previously ), and has the same meaning.

Tort liability

The state of the art is important in the law of tort liability, specifically in the areas of negligence and product liability. With respect to negligence, "an engineer may defend against a claim of negligence by contending that he met the standards of his profession and the state of the art". With respect to product liability, manufacturers generally have strict liability for any injury caused by defects in their products. However, in some jurisdictions a manufacturer may raise as a legal defense the assertion that their product represents the "state of the art", and that the manufacturer therefore could not have made the product any safer in light of the knowledge available at the time. For example, "[u]nder German law, the producer can also raise the state-of-the-art defense: general tort law does not hold him liable if he could not know or discover the defect for lack of fault, and the Product Liability Statute expressly provides for this defense". This defense is available throughout the European Community under the Product Liability Directive, art. 7(e). Pursuant to this article:

In the United States, the state of an industry is "merely evidence of due care rather than a controlling factor", but a number of states have state-of-the-art statutes that "make a manufacturer's compliance with technological feasibility an absolute defense to a products liability suit". Because the state of the art is constantly advancing, the ability of manufacturers to claim that their products are "state-of-the-art" tracks their potential liability when these products are defective. As an industry magazine explained in 1984:

References

References

1. Borchers, Timothy A.. (2022). "Persuasion in the Media Age". Waveland Press.
2. Smith, Jack. (15 June 1988). "Is 'State of the Art' Patently Ill Defined?". [[Los Angeles Times]].
3. Haase, Fee-Alexandra. (2010). "'The State of the Art' as an Example for a Textual Linguistic 'Globalization Effect'. Code Switching, Borrowing, and Change of Meaning as Conditions of Cross-cultural Communication". Revista de Divulgação Científica em Língua Portuguesa, Linguística e Literatura.
4. Suplee, Henry Harrison. (1910). "The Gas Turbine: Progress in the Design and Construction of Turbines Operated by Gases of Combustion". J. B. Lippincott Company.
5. (1939). "The Writings of Washington from the Original Manuscript Sources, 1745–1799". United States Government Printing Office.
6. Anderson, John D. Jr.. (1998). "A History of Aerodynamics and Its Impact on Flying Machines". Cambridge University Press.
7. ''Executive'' (1985), Vol. 27, p. 56.{{Full citation needed. (December 2022)
8. Zweig, Mark C.. (2010). "Management from A to Zweig: The Complete Works of Mark Zweig". ZweigWhite.
9. Under the European Patent Convention: {{EPC Article. 54 and {{EPC Article. 56.
10. (2008). "Biotechnology and Patent Law: Patenting Living Beings". Manupatra.
11. "T 0011/82 (Control Circuit) of 15.4.1983". European Patent Office.
12. (1981). "Engineering Management". McGraw-Hill.
13. Rufe, Philip D.. (2013). "Fundamentals of Manufacturing". Society of Manufacturing Engineers.
14. (2005). "Introduction to German Law". Kluwer Law International.
15. Bergkamp, Lucas. (2003). "European Community Law for the New Economy". Intersentia.
16. Vandall, Frank J.. (2011). "A History of Civil Litigation: Political and Economic Perspectives". Oxford University Press.
17. Standley, Gerald F.. (October 1984). "Don't ignore a 'safer alternative'".