Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
law

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Solicitors Regulation Authority

English and Welsh regulator of legal practice


Summary

English and Welsh regulator of legal practice

FieldValue
nameSolicitors Regulation Authority
imageSolicitors Regulation Authority (logo).png
abbreviationSRA
formation
typeProfessional body
headquartersThe Cube, Birmingham, England
region_servedEngland and Wales
leader_titleChief Executive
leader_namePaul Philip
main_organBoard
affiliationsChartered Institute of Legal Executives
num_staff783
websitewww.sra.org.uk

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales.

It is responsible for regulating the professional conduct of more than 125,000 solicitors and other authorised individuals at more than 11,000 firms, as well as those working in-house at private and public sector organisations.

The SRA, based in Birmingham with offices in London and Cardiff, is led operationally by a Chief Executive and Senior Management Team, with a Board and Board Sub-Committees providing strategic direction.

The SRA was formed in January 2007 by the Legal Services Act 2007 to act as the independent regulator of solicitors. While formerly an arm of the Law Society, the SRA is a statutory creation and operationally independent of the Law Society. In a report by Sir David Clementi of all legal services in England and Wales, he recommended that professional bodies holding both regulatory and representative responsibilities should separate those roles. The government adopted this recommendation.

The Law Society remains the representative body for solicitors.

In October 2024, an investigation conducted by Carson McDowell LLP concluded that the SRA failed to act adequately, effectively and efficiently with regard to its investigation of Axiom Ince, a law firm which subsequently collapsed in 2023, with the loss of 1,400 jobs and over £60 million in client money. Insurance contributions on solicitors firms have risen by 270% to meet the costs of the resulting shortfall. The LSB has confirmed that it will initiate enforcement action against the SRA to ensure that the SRA learn appropriate lessons from this grotesque incompetence, and that such a disaster will never be repeated. The SRA's chair and chief executive, Anna Bradley and Paul Philip respectively, each refused to accept the outcome of the independent investigation. Accordingly, pressure grew on these individuals to resign. Philip duly announced his resignation in February 2025.

Revelations of further incompetence swiftly followed. In Octobder 2025, it was revealed that, for five years, the SRA had ignored red flags concerning the failed firm SSB Law. Following the same, the Government announced that it was stripping the SRA of its ability to regulate AML enforcement, since its competence could no longer be trusted. Bradley has continued to resist calls that she take accountability for these failures and resign.

Background

The profession of solicitor has been self-regulated for centuries. The Law Society acquired its first Royal Charter in 1831 and the new Charter in 1845 defined the Society as an independent, private body servicing the affairs of the profession like other professional, literary and scientific bodies. In 1834, the Society first initiated proceedings against dishonest practitioners. By 1907, the Society possessed a statutory disciplinary committee, and was empowered to investigate solicitors' accounts and to issue annual practising certificates. In 1983, the Society established the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors to deal with complaints about solicitors.

Following the Clementi review, the SRA was formed as a Board of The Law Society, but it regulates and enforces regulation completely independently of the Law Society. It is not representative of, or responsive to, the profession, and it is headed by non-lawyers. The current Chief Executive, Paul Philip, is a career regulator who previously served the General Medical Council. This arrangement has produced the anomaly that in England and Wales, unlike most common law jurisdictions, solicitors are admitted by non-lawyers and receive admission certificates signed by a regulatory bureaucrat who is not a lawyer or a judge. The Law Society remains the approved regulator, although following the Legal Services Act 2007 a new body, the Legal Services Board (chaired by Sir Michael Pitt, a government appointee) oversees all the approved regulators including the Bar Council, which has also divested its regulatory functions into the Bar Standards Board.

Function

The SRA regulates solicitors, other authorised professionals and the firms they work in throughout England and Wales. Scotland and Northern Ireland are separate legal jurisdictions and have their own regulatory regimes.

A solicitor is someone who carries out specific legal activities, having undergone specialist studies and training. These specific services are called reserved legal activities. In England and Wales, the current reserved legal activities are:

  • Administration of oaths
  • Advocacy
  • Conveyancing
  • Litigation
  • Notary
  • Probate

There are other regulators within England and Wales, who regulate other providers of legal services. The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers, for example, while the other regulators are:

  • CILEx
  • Notaries
  • Council for Licensed Conveyancers
  • Intellectual Property Regulation Board
  • Costs Lawyer Standards Board All regulators report to the overarching Legal Services Board. Regulatory work is designed to ensure all work in legal services achieves the eight regulatory outcomes.

These are:

  • protecting and promoting the public interest
  • supporting the constitutional principle of the rule of law
  • improving access to justice
  • protecting and promoting the interests of consumers
  • promoting competition in the provision of services in the legal sector
  • encouraging an independent, strong, diverse and effective legal profession
  • increasing public understanding of citizens legal rights and duties
  • promoting and maintaining adherence to the professional principles of independence and integrity; proper standards of work; observing the best interests of the client and the duty to the court; and maintaining client confidentiality

The SRA carries out its function by:

  • Creating and maintaining the Solicitors Handbook including the Code of Conduct, which contains the ethical principles that guide solicitors in their work
  • Authorising those that want to work in the profession, including the annual renewal of Practising Certificates that represent a solicitor’s licence to practise
  • Authorising the firms within which individuals carry out reserved legal activities
  • Supervising firms and individuals to ensure they adhere to professional standards
  • Taking enforcement action against those that have breached the code of conduct, to create an effective deterrent and discourage further wrongdoing in the profession. A range of sanctions are available to the SRA, including prosecuting more severe cases at the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
  • Monitoring the quality of training both for those entering the profession and to further increase the standard of those practising within it

Regulating in the public interest

The SRA regulates firms and individuals in the public interest. This means setting the minimum professional standards that solicitors should adhere to so their clients - as consumers - get the service they expect. When these standards are not met, professional sanctions are taken to act as a deterrent.

However, the SRA is not a prescribed person or statutory regulator for the purposes of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (for whistleblowing purposes).

What regulating in the public interest does not mean, however, is acting as means of recourse for individuals that are unhappy with the actions of their solicitor or firm. While the SRA will deal with complaints brought to it by dissatisfied clients as necessary, it does not offer a compensation scheme. This can be achieved through the Legal Ombudsman.

Activity

Enforcement

In 2012, the SRA's Supervision function handled a total of 6,289 issues, while the Forensic Investigations Unit began work on 530 new cases.

The number of interventions, which involves the SRA closing down a firm because it poses risks to clients, was 37. The number of referrals to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal was 289, which resulted in 77 strike-offs, 94 fines and 56 suspensions, among other sanctions.

The Solicitors Compensation Fund accepted 1,321 claims and paid out £18.54 million for those which were successful.

Further information on the SRA's enforcement activity can be found on its Reports and Research pages

Outcomes-focused regulation

In 2011, the SRA moved from a rules-based tick-box approach to regulation and introduced an outcomes-focused regime. This involved creating a whole new Handbook to create a regulatory framework in which law firms could deliver the best outcomes for their clients using a business model adapted specifically for their situation.

Research conducted at the end of 2012 showed that while the number of firms comfortable with the concept of outcomes-focused regulation had increased, the SRA still had work to do to demonstrate the flexibilities offered by the new way of working.

Alternative business structures

The Legal Services Act also allowed for law firms to adopt management models that moved away from the traditional all-partner model. Alternative Business Structures (ABSs) were introduced on 6 October 2011, and the SRA began accepting applications for licences on 3 January 2012. The first licences were awarded on 28 March 2012.

The SRA, in conjunction with the BSB and IPS, has delivered the Legal Education Training Review (LETR), the most comprehensive study on training for legal services in a generation. Each of the regulators will be producing their own response to the findings of the review.

Referral fees in personal injury cases

As part of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, the Government introduced a ban on the payment of referral fees in personal injury cases. Solicitors could no longer pay firms that passed them details of those who had suffered injuries as the Government felt this played a significant part in creating and maintaining the alleged compensation culture. The SRA was tasked with drawing up the rules to outlaw the payments and police the profession in conjunction with the Ministry of Justice and Financial Conduct Authority.

Despite the ban on referral fees, the practice of Claims Management Companies introducing injured clients to solicitors in exchange for a fee remains prevalent in the UK.

A matter of concern with regards to solicitors making payments in exchange for these introductions is the fact that, in many cases, the fee paid is in excess of the costs a solicitor can be paid by the losing party for the work done on some claims. This inevitability of this is that a solicitor must take up the option of deducting up to 25% from the customers compensation in order to cover costs and maintain profitability.

It is of note that the initial ability of solicitors to claim referral fees in personal injury cases was itself introduced by Government in order the ameliorate the effect of removal of access to Legal Aid for personal injury claims.

Financial stability

The Great Recession affected the legal sector in the same way that it affected all others. While some firms found new ways of working or cut their cloth accordingly, others failed to adapt to tighter financial constraints. This was brought into focus early in 2013 with a number of high-profile failures at large practices. The SRA started a programme of work to discover how deeply the financial difficulties lie, and help firms in trouble.

News International

In July 2011 the SRA announced that it would be launching a formal inquiry into the role played by solicitors in the News International phone hacking scandal. The SRA confirmed that its investigation would consider the concerns of Labour MP Tom Watson, who had called upon the SRA to investigate News International's former legal adviser Harbottle & Lewis.

Incompetence

In August 2023, the SRA was fined £75,000 by the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal for bringing a speculative prosecution against a solicitor without a proper basis in law. The SDT further found that the SRA had delayed inordinately in bringing the case.

References

References

  1. "2023-24 Annual report and accounts".
  2. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/how-we-work/management.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, How We Work]
  3. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/how-we-work/board.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Board]
  4. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/how-we-work/board/committees.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Committees]
  5. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/strategy.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Our Strategy]
  6. [http://www.legal-services-review.org.uk/content/report/index.htm National Archives, Clementi Report]
  7. "Axiom Ince - SRA faces enforcement action".
  8. "In depth: SRA compliance conference was exquisitely timed".
  9. (28 November 2024). "Solicitors' regulator chiefs must resign after damning Axiom report".
  10. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/sra-chief-to-step-down/5122484.article
  11. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/ssb-law-sra-ignored-red-flags-for-five-years-damning-report-finds/5124780.article
  12. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/government-strips-sra-of-anti-money-laundering-powers/5124827.article
  13. https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/we-need-continuity-of-leadership-says-sra-chair-after-damning-ssb-report/5124829.article
  14. [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/documents/downloads/royalcharters.pdf Law Society Royal Charters] {{webarchive. link. (2008-11-21)
  15. [http://www.ilex.org.uk/ips/ips_home/about_ips.aspx Chartered Institute of Legal Executives]
  16. [http://www.facultyoffice.org.uk The Faculty Office of the Archbishop of Canterbury]
  17. [http://www.clc-uk.org Council for Licensed Conveyancers]
  18. [http://www.ipreg.org.uk Intellectual Property Regulation Board]
  19. [http://www.clsb.info Costs Lawyer Standards Board]
  20. "Legal Services Board, Regulatory Outcomes".
  21. [http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/handbook/welcome.page Solicitors Regulation Authority Handbook, 2011]
  22. [http://www.sra.org.uk/consumers/solicitor-check/sanctions.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Sanctions]
  23. [http://www.solicitorstribunal.org.uk Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal]
  24. "Whistleblowing: List of prescribed people and bodies".
  25. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/how-we-work/reports.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Quarterly Regulatory Outcomes Reports]
  26. [http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/freedom-in-practice/outcomes-focused-regulation.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Outcomes-focused Regulation] {{webarchive. link. (2013-10-05)
  27. [http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/ofr-goes-live-with-sra-reassurance-that-compliance-officers-are-not-sacrifical-lambs Legal Futures article, OFR Goes Live]
  28. "Solicitors Regulation Authority, The Impact of OFR, one year on".
  29. [http://www.sra.org.uk/solicitors/firm-based-authorisation/abs/abs-search.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, ABSs]
  30. [http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/news/2164198/sra-confirms-debut-trio-licensed-alternative-business-structures Legal Week article, SRA Confirms Debut Trio of ABSs]
  31. [http://www.solicitorsjournal.com/news/hot-picks/referral-fees/onus-firms-show-no-referral-fee-being-paid Solicitors Journal article, Onus on Firms to Show No Referral Fee Being Paid]
  32. [http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/policy/referral-fees-ban.page Solicitors Regulation Authority, Referral Fee Ban] {{webarchive. link. (2013-10-04)
  33. [http://www.legalfutures.co.uk/latest-news/sra-paints-grim-picture-financial-instability-among-law-firms Legal Futures article, Financial Instability Among Law Firms]
  34. (10 May 2013). "SRA Handbook". Solicitors Regulation Authority.
  35. (22 July 2011). "SRA probes solicitors' handling of Hackgate". The Lawyer.
  36. (22 July 2011). "SRA to investigate lawyers' role in phone-hacking as Yates drafts in Carter-Ruck for libel action". Legal Week.
  37. "SRA hit with £75,000 costs bill for 'speculative' prosecution".
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Solicitors Regulation Authority — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report