From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Slingsby Falcon 4
British two-seat glider, 1946
British two-seat glider, 1946
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | Falcon 4 |
| image | IWM-ATP-14499B-Kirby-Cadet.jpg |
| caption | Slingsby Falcon 4 (VM109) |
| aircraft_type | Training glider |
| national_origin | United Kingdom |
| manufacturer | Slingsby Sailplanes Ltd. |
| number_built | 3 |
| first_flight | April 1946 |
The Slingsby T.24 Falcon 4 was a two-seat training glider designed in the UK just after World War II for ATC use. It was judged too expensive for production and only three were completed.
Development
Despite the shared name, the Slingsby Falcon 4 was a completely different aircraft from the early Falcon 1, 2 and 3, all derived from the Schleicher Falke from about 1930 and notable for their swept wings. In contrast, the Falcon 4 was a tandem seat training glider intended for an ATC role and built to Air Ministry specification TX.8/45. It used conventional wooden construction; all three Falcon 4s were built by Martin Hearn Ltd. of Hooton Park, Cheshire.
The wing of the Falcon 4 was of quite low aspect ratio, with a straight, unswept leading edge, rounded copper bound tips and straight taper on the trailing edge. The first two aircraft had flaps extending over almost all the trailing edge not occupied by the ailerons, but the third replaced flaps with spoilers. The wings were pylon mounted with lift struts from the spar to the lower fuselage longerons. The pylon only extended forward to the spar, leaving space for the rear, open, cockpit under the wing; the forward cockpit was close to the nose. Behind the wing the pylon dropped away gently above the flat sided fuselage to the tail. The braced, straight tapered tailplane was mounted on top of the fuselage and placed far enough forward that the divided elevators were ahead of the rudder hinge, avoiding the need for a large cut out for rudder movement. The fin was small, but the horn balanced rudder was generous in area, slightly pointed and with a rounded, copper bound trailing edge. The undercarriage was conventional, with a nose skid, fixed monowheel and small tailwheel.
The first flight was in April 1946 and two other prototypes followed, but the aircraft was expensive to produce and offered no advantage over the Slingsby T.21 and no orders resulted. The second prototype was written off in an accident in December 1946, but in 1948, owing to delays in the T21 entering service, the remaining two Falcon 4s were tested in order to allow them to be cleared for service with the ATC. The third prototype was written off during these trials in August 1948, but in 1949, the remaining Falcon 4 entered service with the ATC gliding school at Detling. It was sold in March 1953.
Specifications
|prime units?=imp General characteristics
|max takeoff weight kg= |max takeoff weight lb= |max takeoff weight note= Powerplant
|eng1 kn-ab= |eng1 lbf-ab=
|eng2 kn-ab= |eng2 lbf-ab=
|eng3 kn-ab= |eng3 lbf-ab=
Performance
|never exceed speed kmh= |never exceed speed mph= |never exceed speed kts= |never exceed speed note= |minimum control speed kmh= |minimum control speed mph= |minimum control speed kts= |minimum control speed note= |wing loading kg/m2= |wing loading lb/sqft=3.46 |disk loading kg/m2= |disk loading lb/sqft=
|power/mass= |thrust/weight=
Armament
Notes
References
References
- {{harvnb. Ellison. 1971
- {{harvnb. Ellison. 1971
- {{harvnb. Ellison. 1971
- {{harvnb. Simons. 1994
- {{harvnb. Simons. 1994
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Slingsby Falcon 4 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report