Scientism

Overview

Francis Bacon has been viewed by some scholars as an early proponent of scientism, but this is a modern assertion as Bacon was a devout Anglican, writing in his Essays, "a little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion."

With respect to the philosophy of science, the term scientism frequently implies a critique of the more extreme expressions of logical positivism and has been used by social scientists such as Friedrich Hayek, philosophers of science such as Karl Popper, and philosophers such as Mary Midgley, the later Hilary Putnam, and Tzvetan Todorov{{cite book| author-link= Tzvetan Todorov| last= Todorov| first= Tzvetan| title= The Imperfect Garden: the legacy of humanism| publisher=Princeton University Press| year= 2001| page= 20| quote= Scientism does not eliminate the will but decides that since the results of science are valid for everyone, this will must be something shared, not individual. In practice, the individual must submit to the collectivity, which 'knows' better than he does.}} to describe (for example) the dogmatic endorsement of scientific methods and the reduction of all knowledge to only that which is measured or confirmatory.

More generally, scientism is often interpreted as science applied "in excess". This use of the term scientism has two senses:

• The improper use of science or scientific claims. This usage applies equally in contexts where science might not apply, such as when the topic is perceived as beyond the scope of scientific inquiry, and in contexts where there is insufficient empirical evidence to justify a scientific conclusion. It includes an excessive deference to the claims of scientists or an uncritical eagerness to accept any result described as scientific. This can be a counterargument to appeals to scientific authority. It can also address attempts to apply natural science methods and claims of certainty to the social sciences, which Friedrich Hayek described in The Counter-Revolution of Science (1952) as being impossible, because those methods attempt to eliminate the "human factor", while social sciences (including his own topic of economics) mainly concern the study of human action.
• "The belief that the methods of natural science, or the categories and things recognized in natural science, form the only proper elements in any philosophical or other inquiry", or that "science, and only science, describes the world as it is in itself, independent of perspective" Tom Sorell provides this definition: "Scientism is a matter of putting too high a value on natural science in comparison with other branches of learning or culture." Philosophers such as Alexander Rosenberg have also adopted "scientism" as a name for the opinion that science is the only reliable source of knowledge.

It is also sometimes used to describe the universal applicability of the scientific method, and the opinion that empirical science constitutes the most authoritative worldview or the most valuable part of human learning, sometimes to the complete exclusion of other opinions, such as historical, philosophical, economic or cultural opinions. It has been defined as "the view that the characteristic inductive methods of the natural sciences are the only source of genuine factual knowledge and, in particular, that they alone can yield true knowledge about man and society". The term scientism is also used by historians, philosophers, and cultural critics to highlight the possible dangers of lapses towards excessive reductionism with respect to all topics of human knowledge.

For social theorists practising the tradition of Max Weber, such as Jürgen Habermas and Max Horkheimer, the concept of scientism relates significantly to the philosophy of positivism, but also to the cultural rationalization for modern Western civilization. Ernesto Sabato, physicist and essayist, wrote in his 1951 essay Hombres y engranajes ("Man and mechanism") of the "superstition of science" as the most contradictory of all superstitions, since this would be the "superstition that one should not be superstitious". He wrote: "science had become a new magic and the man in the street believed in it the more the less he understood it".

Definitions

Reviewing the references to scientism in the works of contemporary scholars in 2003, Gregory R. Peterson detected two main general themes:

• It is used to criticize a totalizing opinion of science as if it were capable of describing all reality and knowledge, or as if it were the only true method to acquire knowledge about reality and the nature of things;
• It is used, often pejoratively, to denote violations by which the theories and methods of one (scientific) discipline are applied inappropriately to another (scientific or non-scientific) discipline and its domain. An example of this second usage is to term as scientism any attempt to claim science as the only or primary source of human values (a traditional domain of ethics) or as the source of meaning and purpose (a traditional domain of religion and related worldviews).

The term scientism was popularized by F. A. Hayek, who defined it in 1942 as the "slavish imitation of the method and language of Science".

Mathematician Alexander Grothendieck, in his 1971 essay "The New Universal Church", characterized scientism as a religion-like ideology that advocates scientific reductionism, scientific authoritarianism, political technocracy and technological salvation, while denying the epistemological validity of feelings and experiences such as love, emotion, beauty and fulfillment.

E. F. Schumacher, in his A Guide for the Perplexed (1977), criticized scientism as an impoverished world view confined solely to what can be counted, measured and weighed. "The architects of the modern worldview, notably Galileo and Descartes, assumed that those things that could be weighed, measured, and counted were more true than those that could not be quantified. If it couldn't be counted, in other words, it didn't count."

In 1979, Karl Popper defined scientism as "the aping of what is widely mistaken for the method of science".

In 2003, Mikael Stenmark proposed the expression scientific expansionism as a synonym of scientism. In the Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, he wrote that, while the doctrines that are described as scientism have many possible forms and varying degrees of ambition, they share the idea that the boundaries of science (that is, typically the natural sciences) could and should be expanded so that something that has not been previously considered as a subject pertinent to science can now be understood as part of science (usually with science becoming the sole or the main arbiter regarding this area or dimension). According to Stenmark, the strongest form of scientism states that science does not have any boundaries and that all human problems and all aspects of human endeavor, with due time, will be dealt with and solved by science alone. This idea has also been termed the myth of progress.

Intellectual historian T. J. Jackson Lears argued in 2013 that there has been a recent reemergence of "nineteenth-century positivist faith that a reified 'science' has discovered (or is about to discover) all the important truths about human life. Precise measurement and rigorous calculation, in this view, are the basis for finally settling enduring metaphysical and moral controversies." Lears specifically identified Harvard psychologist Steven Pinker's work as falling in this category. Philosophers John N. Gray and Thomas Nagel have made similar criticisms against popular works by moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, atheist author Sam Harris, and writer Malcolm Gladwell.

Strong and weak scientism

There are various ways of classifying kinds of scientism. Some authors distinguish between strong and weak scientism, as follows:

• Strong scientism: "of all the knowledge we have, scientific knowledge is the only 'real knowledge'" (Moti Mizrahi), or, "the view that some proposition or theory is true and/or rational to believe if and only if it is a scientific proposition or theory" (J. P. Moreland), or, "only science yields epistemically credible data" (Michael W. Austin)
• Weak scientism: "of all the knowledge we have, scientific knowledge is the best knowledge" (Moti Mizrahi), or, "science is the most valuable, most serious, and most authoritative sector of human learning" (J. P. Moreland), or, "scientific knowledge claims are the most credible knowledge claims" (Michael W. Austin)

A 2023 research article by Rik Peels in the journal Interdisciplinary Science Reviews explores the concept of scientism, defining it as the belief that science is the only means of obtaining knowledge and truth. Peels distinguishes between weak scientism, which limits the validity of science to specific areas, and strong scientism, which extends this validity to all fields of knowledge. The author argues that strong scientism is untenable and self-confuting because science itself is based on common sense assumptions and non-scientific principles. He proposes that scientism can be considered a form of fundamentalism, characterized by a Manichean narrative that is reactive against other sources of knowledge. The article suggests that science can learn from mainstream religion when it comes to scientific fundamentalism, by promoting a more open and tolerant approach to other forms of knowledge.

Relevance to debates about science and religion

Both religious and non-religious scholars have applied the term scientism to individuals associated with New Atheism. Theologian John Haught argued that philosopher Daniel Dennett and other New Atheists subscribe to a belief system of scientific naturalism, which includes the dogma that "only nature, including humans and our creations, is real: that God does not exist; and that science alone can give us complete and reliable knowledge of reality." Haught argued that this belief system is self-refuting since it requires its adherents to assent to beliefs that violate its own stated requirements for knowledge. Christian philosopher Peter Williams argued in 2013 that it is only by conflating science with scientism that New Atheists feel qualified to "pontificate on metaphysical issues". Daniel Dennett responded to religious criticism of his 2006 book Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon by saying that accusations of scientism "[are] an all-purpose, wild-card smear ... When someone puts forward a scientific theory that [religious critics] really don't like, they just try to discredit it as 'scientism'. But when it comes to facts, and explanations of facts, science is the only game in town".

Non-religious scholars have also associated New Atheist thought with scientism and/or with positivism. Atheist philosopher Thomas Nagel argued that philosopher Sam Harris conflated all empirical knowledge with scientific knowledge. Marxist literary critic Terry Eagleton argued that Christopher Hitchens possessed an "old-fashioned scientistic notion of what counts as evidence" that reduces knowledge to what can and cannot be proven by scientific procedure. Agnostic philosopher Anthony Kenny has also criticized New Atheist philosopher Alexander Rosenberg's The Atheist's Guide to Reality for resurrecting a self-refuting epistemology of logical positivism and reducing all knowledge of the universe to the discipline of physics.

Michael Shermer, founder of The Skeptics Society, discussed resemblances between scientism and traditional religions, indicating the cult of personality that develops for some scientists. He defined scientism as a worldview that encompasses natural explanations, eschews supernatural and paranormal speculations, and embraces empiricism and reason.

The Iranian scholar Seyyed Hossein Nasr has stated that in the Western world, many will accept the ideology of modern science, not as "simple ordinary science", but as a replacement for religion.

Gregory R. Peterson wrote that "for many theologians and philosophers, scientism is among the greatest of intellectual sins". Genetic biologist Austin L. Hughes wrote in the conservative journal The New Atlantis that scientism has much in common with superstition: "the stubborn insistence that something ... has powers which no evidence supports."

Repeating common criticisms of logical positivism and verificationism, philosopher of religion Keith Ward has said that scientism is philosophically inconsistent or even self-refuting, as the truth of the two statements "no statements are true unless they can be proven scientifically (or logically)" and "no statements are true unless they can be shown empirically to be true" cannot themselves be proven scientifically, logically, or empirically.

Philosophy of science

Main article: Philosophy of science

Anti-scientism

Philosopher Paul Feyerabend, who was an enthusiastic proponent of scientism during his youth, later came to characterize science as "an essentially anarchic enterprise" and argued emphatically that science merits no exclusive monopoly of "dealing in knowledge" and that scientists have never operated within a distinct and narrowly self-defined tradition. In his essay Against Method he depicted the process of contemporary scientific education as a mild form of indoctrination, intended for "making the history of science duller, simpler, more uniform, more 'objective' and more easily accessible to treatment by strict and unchanging rules".

Pro-scientism

Physicist and philosopher Mario Bunge used the term scientism with a favorable rather than pejorative sense in numerous books published during several decades, and in articles with titles such as "In Defense of Realism and Scientism" and "In Defense of Scientism". Bunge said that scientism should not be equated with inappropriate reductionism, and he dismissed critics of science such as Hayek and Habermas as dogmatists and obscurantists:

In 2018, philosophers Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci co-edited a book titled Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism in which a number of chapters by philosophers and scientists defended scientism. In his chapter "Two Cheers for Scientism", Taner Edis wrote:

Rhetoric of science

Main article: Rhetoric of science

Thomas M. Lessl argued that religious themes persist in what he terms scientism, the public rhetoric of science. There are two methods of describing this idea of scientism: the epistemological method (the assumption that the scientific method trumps other ways of knowing) and the ontological method (that the rational mind represents the world and both operate in knowable ways). According to Lessl, the ontological method is an attempt to "resolve the conflict between rationalism and skepticism". Lessl also argued that without scientism, there would not be a scientific culture.

Rationalization and modernity

In the introduction to his collected works on the sociology of religion, Max Weber asked why "the scientific, the artistic, the political, or the economic development [elsewhere] ... did not enter upon that path of rationalization which is peculiar to the Occident?" According to the German social theorist Jürgen Habermas, "For Weber, the intrinsic (that is, not merely contingent) relationship between modernity and what he called 'Occidental rationalism' was still self-evident." Weber described a process of rationalisation, disenchantment and the "disintegration of religious world views" that resulted in modern secular societies and capitalism.

Habermas is critical of pure instrumental rationality, arguing that the "Social Life–World" of subjective experiencing is better suited to literary expression. Where the sciences select experiences that can be expressed in formal language using general definitions, the literary arts select private, unrepeatable experiences where definitions are generated through "intersubjectivity of mutual understanding in each concrete case". Habermas quoted writer Aldous Huxley in order to juxtapose the "social life-world" and the "worldless universe of facts" underscoring the duality of literature and science: The world with which literature deals is the world in which human beings are born and live and finally die; the world in which they love and hate, in which they experience triumph and humiliation, hope and despair; the world of sufferings and enjoyments, of madness and common sense, of silliness, cunning and wisdom; the world of social pressures and individual impulses, of reason against passion, of instincts and conventions, of shared language and unsharable feelings and sensations. [...] [The scientist] is the inhabitant of a radically different universe--not the universe of given appearances, but the world of inferred fine structures, not the experienced world of unique events and diverse qualities, but the world of quantified regularities.

References

Bibliography

• .
• .

References

1. (1999). "Glossary Definition: Scientism".
2. (July 2020). "How {{em". [[Metaphilosophy]].
3. "Scientism". Merriam-Webster.
4. (2019). "Eric Voegelin Today: Voegelin's Political Thought in the 21st Century". Lexington Books.
5. Bacon, Francis. (1625). "The Essayes Or Counsels, Ciuill and Morall, of Francis Lo. Verulam, Viscount St. Alban". Iohn Hauiland.
6. Rey, Abel. (1909). "Review of ''La Philosophie Moderne''". The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods.
7. Maslow, Abraham. (1962). "Toward a Psychology of Being".
8. Hayek, Friedrich. (1980). "The Counter Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason". Liberty Fund.
9. Hacohen, Malachi Haim. (2002). "Karl Popper: the formative years, 1902–1945: politics and philosophy in interwar Vienna". Cambridge University Press.
10. Beale, Jonathan. (January 2019). "Scientism and scientific imperialism". [[International Journal of Philosophical Studies]].
11. Putnam, Hilary. (1992). "Renewing Philosophy". Harvard University Press.
12. Outhwaite, William. (2009). "Habermas: Key Contemporary Thinkers". Polity Press.
13. Ryder, Martin. (2005). "Scientism". Macmillan Reference USA.
14. Blackburn, Simon. (2005). "Scientism". Oxford University Press.
15. Bannister, Robert. (1998). "Behaviorism, Scientism and the Rise of The 'Expert'".
16. Haack, Susan. (2003). "Defending Science Within Reason: Between Scientism and Cynicism". Prometheus Books.
17. Sorell, Thomas 'Tom'. (1994). "Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science". Routledge.
18. Rosenberg, Alex. (2011). "The Atheist's Guide to Reality". W. W. Norton.
19. Quinton, Anthony. (1999). "Scientism". [[HarperCollins Publishers]].
20. Collins, Michael. (March 20, 1983). "A Critical Analysis of Competency-based Systems in Adult Education". Adult Education Quarterly.
21. Chargaff, Irwin. (December 1997). "In Dispraise of Reductionism". [[BioScience]].
22. Sawyer, R Keith. (2000). "Connecting Culture, Psychology and Biology: Essay Review on Inghilleri's From Subjective Experience to Cultural Change". Human Development.
23. Wieseltier, Leon. (4 September 2013). "Crimes Against Humanities".
24. Lears, T.J. Jackson. (6 November 2013). "Get Happy!!".
25. Brunkhorst, Hauke. (1995). "On Max Horkheimer: New Perspectives". The MIT Press.
26. Sabato, Ernesto. (2003). "Hombres y engranajes". Editorial Planeta / Seix Barral.
27. Peterson, Donald R. (June 2004). "Science, Scientism, and Professional Responsibility". Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
28. Hakfoort, C. (1992). "Science deified: Wilhelm Osstwald's energeticist world-view and the history of scientism". Annals of Science.
29. Bannister, Robert C. (1991). "Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940". The University of North Carolina Press.
30. Hayek, F. A. v.. (1942). "Scientism and the Study of Society. Part I". Economica.
31. Grothendieck, Alexander. (1971). "The New Universal Church". Survivre et Vivre.
32. Orr, David. (October 1992). "Twelfth Annual EF Schumacher Lectures".
33. Popper, Karl R.. (1979). "Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach". Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Stenmark, Mikael. (2003). "Encyclopedia of science and religion". Thomson Gale.
35. (2004). "Science and the Myth of Progress".
36. Lears, T.J. Jackson. (6 November 2013). "Get Happy!!".
37. Gray, John. (20 April 2012). "The Knowns and the Unknowns".
38. Gray, John. (22 November 2013). "Malcolm Gladwell Is America's Best-Paid Fairy-Tale Writer".
39. Nagel, Thomas. (20 October 2010). "The Facts Fetish".
40. {{harvnb. Mizrahi. 2022
41. (2021). "Philosophy made slightly less difficult: a beginner's guide to life's big questions". IVP Academic.
42. Moreland, James Porter. (2017). "Philosophical foundations for a Christian worldview". IVP Academic, an imprint of InterVarsity Press.
43. (1997). "Love your God with all your mind: the role of reason in the life of the soul". NavPress.
44. (2013). "The Routledge companion to theism". Routledge.
45. Peels, Rik. (2022). "Scientism and scientific fundamentalism: what science can learn from mainstream religion". Interdisciplinary Science Reviews.
46. Robinson, Marilynne. (Nov 2006). "Hysterical Scientism: The Ecstasy of Richard Dawkins". Harper's Magazine.
47. (10 Dec 2015). "Stephen LeDrew on his 'The Evolution of Atheism' an Interview".
48. Haught, John. (2008). "God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens". Westminster John Knox Press.
49. Haught, John. (2008). "God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens". Westminster John Knox Press.
50. Williams, Peter S.. (2013). "C.S. Lewis vs. the New Atheists". Paternoster.
51. Byrnes, Sholto. (10 April 2006). "When it comes to facts, and explanations of facts, science is the only game in town". New Statesman.
52. Nagel, Thomas. (20 October 2010). "The Facts Fetish".
53. Eagleton, Terry. (2010). "Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate". Yale University Press.
54. Kenny, Anthony. (June 2012). "True Believers". Times Literary Supplement.
55. Shermer, Michael. (June 2002). "The Shamans of Scientism". [[Scientific American]].
56. Chittick, William. (2007). "The Essential Seyyed Hossein Nasr". World Wisdom.
57. Hughes, Austin. (Fall 2012). "The Folly of Scientism". The New Atlantis.
58. Ward, Keith. (2006). "Is Religion Dangerous?".
59. Alston, William P. (2003). "The Rationality of Theism". Routledge.
60. Preston, John. (21 September 2016). "Paul Feyerabend".
61. Bunge, Mario. (1983). "Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World". [[D. Reidel]].
62. (1997). "Foundations of Biophilosophy". [[Springer-Verlag]].
63. Bunge, Mario. (2006). "Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism". [[University of Toronto Press]].
64. Bunge, Mario. (2017). "Doing Science: In the Light of Philosophy". [[World Scientific]].
65. Bunge, Mario. (1986). "Annals of Theoretical Psychology". [[Springer-Verlag]].
66. Bunge, Mario. (December 2014). "In defense of scientism". [[Council for Secular Humanism]].
67. Bunge, Mario. (2012). "Evaluating Philosophies". [[Springer-Verlag]].
68. (2017). "Science Unlimited?: The Challenges of Scientism". [[University of Chicago Press]].
69. Lessl, Thomas M.. (Fall 1996). "Naturalizing science: Two episodes in the evolution of a rhetoric of scientism". Western Journal of Communication.
70. Habermas, Jürgen (1990), ''[[The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]]'', Polity Press, {{ISBN. 0-7456-0830-2, pp. 2–3.
71. Olson, R.. (2008). "Science and scientism in nineteenth-century Europe". University of Illinois Press.
72. (1971). "Toward a rational society: student protest, science, and politics". Beacon Press.