School voucher

Definition

School vouchers are often distributed to enable students to attend private schools, charter schools, and publicly funded schools. Educational subsidies can also take the form of comprise government-created bank accounts, whose funds are specifically used for educational purposes, and education tax credits.

Government intervention in education typically takes two forms. The first approach is broad, comprising the institution of charter schools, magnet schools, or for-profit schools, and increasing competition. The second approach is individually focused and comprises providing subsidies or loans for individuals.

Economics

Milton Friedman argued for the modern economic concept of vouchers in the 1950s, stating that free market competition among private schools would improve schools, cost less and yield superior educational outcomes than publicly funded schools. Further, proponents of Friedman's theory, including Friedrich Hayek, argue that voucher systems provide consumer sovereignty, thus increasing school performance and accountability. The free-market theory of school vouchers has been analogised to the competition between universities and the provision of government aid or scholarships for university students, which has arguably had a positive impact on research and teaching in higher education. Major proponents of Friedman's theory include Friedman's own non-governmental organisation EdChoice and the Sutherland Institute.

Friedman's reasoning in favor of vouchers gained additional attention in 1980 with the broadcast of his ten-part television series Free to Choose and the publication of its companion book of the same name. Friedman's argument has been criticised for its implicit assumption that the prices of private schools are competitive owing to differences in teaching and administration, rather than its cream-skimming approach to selecting only students who come from wealthy or otherwise advantaged backgrounds.

In contrast, the United States's National Education Association has criticised the random nature of lottery-style voucher allocation systems, the inherent inequality in some students having to attend less preferred and less competitive schools, and the diversion of public funding away from public education, which may in turn weaken public schooling standards.

A random survey of 210 economists of the American Economic Association, found that over two-thirds support giving parents educational vouchers that can be used at government-operated or privately operated schools, particularly for low-income students or students in poorly performing schools.[[File:School Voucher Diagram.svg|thumb|Basic School Voucher Utility Maximization Picture]]

Background

Governments have multiple incentives for intervention in and improvement of public education, including human capital accumulation, the promotion of societal values and norms, and positive externalities such as the reduction of crime and economic development. Families face a bundle of consumption choices that determine how much they will spend on education and private consumption, with the corresponding indifference curve representing how much education an individual will want to consume versus how much private consumption an individual will want to consume. Vouchers are thus typically instituted for two broad economic reasons: to enable consumer choice; and to increase market competition among schools.

Empirical effects

Research has produced mixed results. A 2017 review of the economics literature on school vouchers concluded that "the evidence to date is not sufficient to warrant recommending that vouchers be adopted on a widespread basis; however, multiple positive findings support continued exploration". Some studies, including a 2006 United States Department of Education report, conclude that, after adjusting for demographic factors, private and public schools performed similarly. At the same time, a 2021 meta-analysis found "moderate evidence of positive achievement impacts of private school vouchers, with substantial effect heterogeneity across programs and outcome years" as well as evidence suggesting that "voucher interventions may be cost-effective even for null achievement impacts."

Other studies suggest that voucher programs can contribute to segregation and lack accountability for taxpayer funds. Nonetheless, other research has also shown that under certain circumstances, income and racial segregation can be reduced indirectly by increasing school choice. Additionally, it is possible that private school vouchers may offset the overall budget by way of public school cost savings from lower enrollments. Resulting job losses in the public sector may also, potentially, be offset by the increased demand for jobs in the private sector.

A 2018 study by Abdulkadiroğlu et al. found that disadvantaged students who won a lottery to get vouchers to attend private schools had worse education outcomes than disadvantaged students who did not win vouchers.

Colombia

Studies of Colombia's PACES voucher program indicate the program increased private school attendance and academic outcomes. After three years, lottery winners were 15 percentage points more likely to attend private schools, completed 0.1 more years of schooling on average, and were 10 percentage points more likely to complete eighth grade. Test scores for voucher recipients were 0.2 standard deviations higher than non-recipients, with stronger effects in mathematics for boys compared to girls. The program had no significant effect on dropout rates but was associated with reduced teenage employment and lower likelihood of early marriage or cohabitation among lottery winners.

Sweden

A 2004 study found that competition from independent schools improved public school performance. However, Sweden's PISA rankings declined in the 2000s, though some attribute this to factors unrelated to the voucher system. A 2015 study reported that a higher share of independent school students correlated with improved educational outcomes, largely due to increased competition. According to Susanne Wiborg, Sweden's voucher system introduced in 1992 has "augmented social and ethnic segregation, particularly in relation to schools in deprived areas".

United States

A 2003 study by the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research concludes that public schools located near private schools that were eligible to accept voucher students made significantly more improvements, including in academic test scores, than similar schools not located near eligible private schools. Caroline Hoxby studied the effects of vouchers in Milwaukee and of charter schools in Arizona and Michigan on nearby public schools, finding that public schools forced to compete made greater test-score gains than schools not faced with such competition, and that the so-called effect of cream skimming did not exist in any of the voucher districts examined.

A CATO Institute study of public and private school per pupil spending in Phoenix, Los Angeles, D.C., Chicago, New York City, and Houston found that public schools spend 93% more than the estimated median private schools.

A 2013 study of Milwaukee's Parental Choice Program, which funds vouchers for both religious and nonreligious private institutions, posited that the use of vouchers increased the probability that a student would graduate from high school, go to college, and stay in college. A 2015 paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that participation in Louisiana's voucher program "substantially reduces academic achievement", which may reflect the poor quality of private schools in the program. A 2014 analysis of the competitive effects of school vouchers in Florida suggests that more competition improves performance in regular public schools.

Historically, data suggests that voucher programs have been used to further segregate Americans. Further, some data has shown that the effects of voucher programs such as the New York City School Choice Scholarship Program, are marginal when it comes to increasing student achievement.

History

When France lost the Franco-Prussian War (1870–1871) many blamed the loss on its inferior military education system. Following this defeat, the French Assembly proposed a voucher that they hoped would improve schools by allowing students to seek out the best. This proposal never moved forward due to the reluctance of the French to subsidize religious education. Despite its failure, this proposal closely resembles voucher systems proposed or used in many modern countries.

The oldest extant school voucher programs in the United States are the Town Tuitioning programs in Vermont and Maine, respectively beginning in 1869 and 1873. Because some towns in these states operate neither local high schools nor elementary schools, vouchers provide for students in these towns to attend either public schools in other towns or secular private schools.

A system of educational vouchers was introduced in the Netherlands in 1917. , more than 70% of pupils attend privately run but publicly funded schools, mostly split along denominational lines.

In some Southern states during the 1960s, school vouchers were used as a way to perpetuate segregation. In a few instances, public schools were closed outright and vouchers were issued to parents. Many of the vouchers were only good at new, private and segregated schools, known as segregation academies.

Implementations

Colombia

The Colombian government launched the PACES voucher program in 1991 to support low-income secondary school students in neighborhoods within the two lowest socioeconomic strata. From 1991 to 1997, the program distributed 125,000 vouchers, valued at approximately US$190 in 1998, though students typically incurred additional costs averaging US$340 for private school fees. Students were selected by lottery, with vouchers renewable annually based on satisfactory academic progress.

Chile

In 1981, Chile introduced a universal school voucher system for elementary and secondary students, leading to the establishment of over 1,000 private schools and a 20–40% increase in private school enrollment by 1998, exceeding 50% in some urban areas. Urban private school enrollment grew 11% faster than in rural areas from 1981 to 1988. Unlike public schools, which accepted all students, private voucher schools could be selective, and voucher values were not income-based. Low international test scores prompted major educational reforms in 2008, including changes to the voucher system.

The 2008 Preferential School Subsidy Law adjusted vouchers to account for family income, providing 50% higher vouchers to students from the lowest 40% income bracket, deemed "priority students." Schools with more priority students received additional per-student bonuses. The program initially covered preschool through fourth grade, expanding annually. Most public schools and two-thirds of private subsidized elementary schools participated in 2008. Participating schools could not charge fees to priority students, select students based on academic ability, or expel them for academic reasons, and they were required to join an accountability system monitoring financial and academic performance.

Europe

In most European countries, education for all primary and secondary schools is fully subsidized. In some countries (e.g., Belgium or France), parents are free to choose which school their child attends.

France

In France, parents can choose between public and private schools, with about 20% of students attending private institutions. Most private schools operate under contract with the government, which covers teachers' salaries and requires adherence to the national curriculum. These schools charge low fees for other costs. Non-contracted private schools have more curricular flexibility but charge higher fees, as they fund teacher salaries independently. Homeschooling is permitted but tightly regulated, with restrictions tightened in 2022 to limit it to specific cases, such as for students with disabilities or those in nomadic communities.

Ireland

In Ireland, most schools are state-aided Catholic parish schools, funded through government grants and per-student fees, regardless of whether schools charge additional fees. A minority of fee-paying schools receive state aid, prompting criticism for perceived unfair advantages. Parents and students may choose their schools, and schools failing to attract students risk losing funding and teaching posts. Multi-denominational schools, organized by parents as non-profit entities, have grown in popularity. Free third-level education, introduced in 1995, increased overall university attendance, particularly among lower-income students, though debates persist about reintroducing fees. The system is perceived to have achieved very successful outcomes for most Irish children.

Sweden

Sweden introduced a school vouchers system (skolpeng) in 1992, allowing parents to choose between public and privately run independent schools (fristående skolor). Both school types receive public funding from the local municipality solely based on student enrollment. By 2008, over 10% of students attended independent schools, with enrollment rising rapidly.

Hong Kong

In 2007, Hong Kong implemented a voucher system for children aged three to six attending non-profit kindergartens, providing HK$13,000 per student annually. Of this, HK$10,000 subsidizes school fees, and HK$3,000 supports teacher training. Vouchers are restricted to non-profit kindergartens with annual fees below HK$24,000. The program was later extended to children who were enrolled in for-profit kindergartens before September 2007, with subsidies up to HK$30,000 offered to for-profit kindergartens converting to non-profit status.

Milton Friedman criticised the system, arguing that the point of a voucher system is to provide a competitive marketplace, and thus should not be limited to non-profit kindergartens.

Philippines

In 2015, the Philippines introduced a senior high school voucher program that provides qualifications for students in grades 11–12.

United States

In the 1980s, the Reagan administration promoted school vouchers, as did the George W. Bush administration in its initial education reform proposals leading up to the No Child Left Behind Act. As of December 2016, 14 states and the District of Columbia had school voucher programs. Including scholarship tax credits and education savings accounts, 27 states plus the District of Columbia had private school choice programs, most of them targeting disadvantaged students. By 2014, around 250,000 students were enrolled in voucher or tax-credit scholarship programs, compared with 55 million in public schools.

, the Indiana Choice Scholarships program is the largest school voucher program in the United States.

Supporters of voucher programs include New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, former governor of South Carolina Mark Sanford, billionaire and American philanthropist John T. Walton, Former mayor of Baltimore Kurt L. Schmoke, Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and John McCain.

Legal issues

School vouchers have also been challenged on legal grounds. In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002), the Supreme Court, in a 5–4 decision, held that Ohio's voucher plan did not violate the Establishment Clause merely by giving money to parents who choose to send their child to a religious school. By contrast, the Florida Supreme Court struck down that state's Opportunity Scholarship Program in 2006, ruling that it violated constitutional provisions requiring a uniform system of public schools. In 2013, the Louisiana Supreme Court ruled that Louisiana's use of money earmarked, via the Louisiana Constitution, for public schools to fund Louisiana's voucher program was unconstitutional.

Administrative issues

People who can benefit from vouchers may not know it. In April 2012, a bill passed in Louisiana that made vouchers available to low-income families whose children attended poorly ranked schools. Of the estimated 380,000 eligible students during the school year when the bill was passed, only 5,000 students knew about, applied for, and accepted the vouchers.

Voucher programs often may not be implemented with the necessary safeguards that prevent institutions from discriminating against marginalized communities. In the United States, as of 2016, there are currently no state laws that require voucher programs to not discriminate against marginalized communities.

Some school voucher systems may also lack accountability to taxpayers. At the same time, tax credit systems relating to donations to voucher-distributing non-governmental organisations may be used as a means to reduce taxes without substantially benefitting low-income students.

Trump's 2018 budget

President Donald Trump proposed a 2018 budget that included $250 million for voucher initiatives, state-funded programs that pay for students to go to private school.

Teaching creationism instead of evolution

Some private religious schools in voucher programs teach creationism instead of the theory of evolution. Over 300 schools in the U.S. have been documented as teaching creationism and receiving taxpayer money. A strict definition of state-funded religious education was narrowly deemed constitutional in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002). At least 35 states have passed various Blaine Amendments restricting or prohibiting public funding of religious education. However, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue (2020) ruled that it is unconstitutional to disqualify all religious schools from receiving public funds that other private schools are eligible to get.

References

References

1. (February 2, 2017). "If appointed, Betsy DeVos' views likely to affect public, private schools {{!}} LaGrange Daily News".
2. "US Charter Schools Home". Uscharterschools.org.
3. (December 4, 2007). "What is a Charter School?". Public School Review.
4. Knopp, Sarah. (2008). "Charter schools and the attack on public education". International Socialist Review.
5. "What is an Education Savings Account? - EdChoice".
6. Welner, Kevin Grant. (2008). "NeoVouchers : the emergence of tuition tax credits for private schooling". Rowman & Littlefield.
7. Stephanie Saul. (May 21, 2012). "Public Money Finds Back Door to Private Schools". The New York Times.
8. Gruber, Jonathan. (2015). "Public Finance and Public Policy". Worth Publishers.
9. Friedman, Milton. (1955). "Economics and the Public Interest". Rutgers University Press.
10. "chap06.choice".
11. (F. A. Hayek, in his 1960 book [[The Constitution of Liberty]], section 24.3)
12. "Roads, Education, and Waterways: The Case Against Public Services - Mises Media".
13. "Dollar Voting".
14. "Majority Rule".
15. "Our Legacy".
16. "Federal Pell Grants are usually awarded only to undergraduate students.".
17. "Wondering how the amount of your federal student aid is determined?".
18. "Sutherland Institute | Vouchers Vows & Vexations".
19. "Removing Classrooms from the Battlefield: Liberty, Paternalism, and the Redemptive Promise of Educational Choice, 2008 BYU Law Review 377".
20. "BYU Law Review | Brigham Young University Law Review | Brigham Young University Law School".
21. (1980). "Free to Choose TV". Public Broadcasting Service.
22. (1980). "Free to Choose: A Personal Statement". Harcourt Brace & Company.
23. (1980). "Free to Choose". Public Broadcasting Service.
24. "What Would A School Voucher Buy The Real Cost Of Private Schools". Cato.org.
25. (October 28, 2007). "Are Private Schools More Cost Effective Than Public Ones?". Economics.about.com.
26. (August 27, 2007). "The Gifted Children Left Behind". [[Washington Post]].
27. Pons, Michael. "School Vouchers: The Emerging Track Record". National Education Association.
28. "The Case Against Vouchers". NEA.
29. Bender, Michael C.. (June 13, 2008). "Local News: West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Martin & St. Lucie Counties". The Palm Beach Post.
30. Whaples, Robert. (2006). "Do Economists Agree on Anything? Yes!". [[The Economists' Voice]].
31. Freire-Seren, Maria Jesus. (2001). "Human Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth". Investigaciones Economicas.
32. McMahon, Walter. "Externalities in Education". ''Bureau of Economic and Business Research'' Working Paper, no. 877 (1982):1-7.
33. "Forster, Greg. (2007) Monopoly Versus Markets". Friedmanfoundation.org.
34. (2017-07-27). "Arguments For and Against School Choice in 2017". EdChoice.
35. (2017). "School Vouchers: A Survey of the Economics Literature". Journal of Economic Literature.
36. (July 14, 2006). "Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling". Nces.ed.gov.
37. "Here's Why Researchers Say Betsy DeVos' Proposed School Voucher Program Won't Work".
38. (August 2008). "School Vouchers and Student Achievement: Recent Evidence, Remaining Questions".
39. (2021-10-02). "The participant effects of private school vouchers around the globe: a meta-analytic and systematic review". School Effectiveness and School Improvement.
40. (29 June 2016). "Dollars to Discriminate: The (Un)intended Consequences of School Vouchers". Peabody Journal of Education.
41. (29 June 2016). "Race and school vouchers: legal, historical, and political contexts". Peabody Journal of Education.
42. (2010). "Universal Vouchers and Racial and Ethnic Segregation". [[Review of Economics and Statistics]].
43. Nechyba, Thomas. (2003). "School Finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities". Journal of Urban Economics.
44. Committee, United States Joint Economic. "The Fiscal Effect of Private-School Vouchers - Analysis - United States Joint Economic Committee".
45. Forster, Greg. "Lost Opportunity: An Empirical Analysis of How Vouchers Affected Florida Public Schools".
46. (2018). "Free to Choose: Can School Choice Reduce Student Achievement?". American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
47. (2002). "Vouchers for private schooling in Colombia: Evidence from a randomized natural experiment". [[American Economic Review]].
48. (February 2005). "School vouchers in practice: Competition will not hurt you". Journal of Public Economics.
49. Shepherd, Jessica. (February 9, 2010). "Swedish-style 'free schools won't improve standards'". The Guardian.
50. (2015). "Independent schools and long-run educational outcomes: Evidence from Sweden's large-scale voucher reform". Economica.
51. Richardson, Hannah. (July 22, 2010). "Free schools 'could widen social divide'". [[BBC News Online]].
52. (March 14, 2001). "Education Working Paper 2 | When Schools Compete: The Effects of Vouchers on Florida Public School Achievement". Manhattan-institute.org.
53. Hoxby, Caroline, "Rising Tide" Education Next, Winter, 2001.
54. Hoxby, Caroline "Analyzing School Choice Reforms that Use America's Traditional Forms of Parental Choice" in Paul E. Peterson and Bryan C. Hassel eds., Learning from School Choice, Brookings Institution, 1998.
55. Schaeffer, Adam. (2010). "They Spend WHAT? (The Real Cost of Public Schools)". Cato Institute.
56. "Vouchers to Pass $100 Million Mark, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, November 21, 2006".
57. (2015). "School Vouchers and Student Neighborhoods: Evidence from the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program". Education Policy Analysis Archives.
58. (August 11, 2011). "Vouchers". Education Week.
59. (2014). "Competitive Effects of Means-Tested School Vouchers". American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
60. (24 July 2014). "Distributional analysis in educational evaluation: a case study from the New York City Voucher Program". Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
61. Molnar, Alex. (2000). "Vouchers, Class Size Reduction, and Student Achievement: Considering the Evidence". Phi Beta Kappa Educational Foundation.
62. "Vermont - Town Tuitioning Program".
63. "Friedman Foundation - Vermont: Town Tuitioning Program".
64. "Maine - Town Tuitioning Program".
65. "Friedman Foundation - Maine: Town Tuitioning Program".
66. Legislatures, National Conference of State. "School Choice: Vouchers".
67. Jozef M. M. Ritzen, Jan van Dommelen and Frans J. De Vijlder. (June 1997). "School finance and school choice in the Netherlands". Economics of Education Review.
68. Vergakis, Brock. (June 4, 2007). "Deseret Morning News - Do vouchers equal segregation?". Deseretnews.com.
69. (2006). "Long-term consequences of secondary school vouchers: Evidence from administrative records in Colombia". [[American Economic Review]].
70. (2006). "The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile's voucher program". [[Journal of Public Economics]].
71. (June 2017). "The consequences of educational voucher reform in Chile". NBER Working Paper No. 23550.
72. "The French education system: a guide for expat parents".
73. "Legal status and resources on homeschooling in France". Home School Legal Defense Association.
74. "Sous-section 3 bis : Modalités de délivrance de l'autorisation d'instruction dans la famille (Articles R131-11 à D131-11-13) - Légifrance".
75. (2021-08-27). ""La limitation drastique de l'école à la maison est un coup porté aux libertés"".
76. "Irish Government Department of Education website". Education.ie.
77. "Microsoft Word - Irish report 02_04_07.doc".
78. (June 12, 2008). "Making money from schools: The Swedish model". The Economist.
79. (2008). "Made in Sweden: the new Tory education revolution".
80. Baker, Mike. (October 5, 2004). "Swedish parents enjoy school choice". BBC.
81. (2008). "Embracing private schools: Sweden lets companies use taxes for cost-efficient alternatives". Washington Times.
82. Munkhammar, Johnny. (May 25, 2007). "How choice has transformed education in Sweden". The Telegraph.
83. Chi, Christina. (March 20, 2025). "DepEd finds one school with 98% possible 'ghost students' in voucher program". [[The Philippine Star]].
84. (June 23, 2020). "Senior High School Voucher Program's fate uncertain amid limited budget".
85. Legislatures, National Conference of State. "Interactive Guide to School Choice Laws".
86. Stephanie, Simon. (2014-03-24). "Special report: Taxpayers fund creationism in the classroom".
87. "Behning: Indiana's bold vision for universal school choice {{!}} State of Indiana House of Representatives".
88. "SC Biz News".
89. "Godspeed John Walton". Blackfive.
90. (August 20, 1999). "Civic Bulletin 20 | Why School Vouchers Can Help Inner-City Children, by The Honorable Kurt L. Schmoke". Manhattan-institute.org.
91. "Candidate - Mitt Romney". Our Campaigns.
92. "U.S. Senator John McCain".
93. "Getting an Education - The Voucher Controversy - School, Public, Schools, Charter, Private, and Vouchers". Libraryindex.com.
94. (October 30, 2008). "Vouchers". NEA.
95. (November 13, 2008). "List of NEA beliefs and legal fights against vouchers". Nea.org.
96. "Legal Summary of U.S. Supreme Court decision in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 436 U.S.".
97. Friden, Terry. (July 27, 2002). "Supreme Court affirms school voucher program". CNN.
98. (January 16, 2006). "Court Throws Out Florida School Voucher Program".
99. "Florida Supreme Court Official Opinion: SC04-2323 – John Ellis "Jeb" Bush, Etc., Et Al. v. Ruth D. Holmes, Et Al.".
100. "United States Court of Appeals, Twelfth Circuit".
101. Strauss, Valerie. (May 7, 2013). "Louisiana Supreme Court rules school voucher funding unconstitutional". Washington Post.
102. "See Tidmore, C. (2012, April 10). Voucher bill passes".
103. Mooney, K.. (March 12, 2012). "Louisiana legislature prepares to debate expansion of voucher program". The Pelican Post.
104. Louisiana State Department of Education website for its Louisiana Scholarship program.[http://www.louisianabelieves.com/schools/louisiana-scholarship-program]
105. (2009). "When Private Schools Take Public Dollars: What's the Place of Accountability in School Voucher Programs?". Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
106. See Leader, Barbara (July 2, 2012). Email exchange reveals voucher scheme. [http://www.thenewsstar.com/article/20120702/NEWS01/207020308/Email-exchange-reveals-voucher-scheme] {{Webarchive. link. (August 4, 2013)
107. White, Jr, Lamar. (July 8, 2013). "Audit reveals systemic, widespread problems in Louisiana's school voucher program".
108. Sentell, Will. (June 30, 2013). "Ruston school banned from accepting voucher students". [[The Advocate (Stamford).
109. Welner, Kevin G.. (2008). "NeoVouchers: The Emergence of Tuition Tax Credits for Private Schooling". Rowman & Littlefield.
110. "Here's Why Researchers Say Betsy DeVos' Proposed School Voucher Program Won't Work".
111. "FACT SHEET: President Trump's FY 2018 Budget".
112. "Hundreds of Voucher Schools Teach Creationism in Science Classes {{!}} Blog {{!}} Independent Lens".
113. Kopplin, Zack. (January 16, 2013). "Creationism spreading in schools, thanks to vouchers". MSNBC.
114. Denniston, Lyle. (January 19, 2016). "Constitution Check: Are the states' "Blaine Amendments" on shaky ground?". [[National Constitution Center]].