Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/apollo-program

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Saturn C-4

Proposed NASA super-heavy-lift rocket


Proposed NASA super-heavy-lift rocket

FieldValue
imageEarly Saturn rocket on pad.jpg
captionSaturn C-4B on pad
nameSaturn C-4
functionLEO and Lunar launch vehicle
manufacturer{{plainlist
country-originUnited States
cpl43.5 million
cpl-year1985
height269.0 ft
diameter320 in
mass1,023,670 lb
stages3
locationLEO
kilos218,000 lb
locationTLI
kilos70,000 lb
familySaturn
comparableSaturn V
statusProposed (1962)
sitesplanned SLC 37, LC-39; Kennedy Space Center
typestage
stagenoFirst
nameS-IB-4
length113.10 ft
diameter320 in
empty149,945 lb
gross1,599,433 lb
engines4 Rocketdyne F-1
thrust6,000,000 lbf
burntime139 seconds
SI265 sec (sea level)
fuelRP-1/LOX
typestage
stagenoSecond
nameS-II-4
length69.80 ft
diameter320 in
empty54,978 lb
gross449,840 lb
engines4 Rocketdyne J-2
thrust800,000 lbf
burntime200 seconds
SI300 sec (sea level)
fuelLH2 / LOX
typestage
stagenoThird
nameS-IVB
length61.6 ft
diameter21.7 ft
empty29700 lb
gross271000 lb
engines1 Rocketdyne J-2
thrust225,000 lbf
burntime165 + 335 seconds (2 burns)
SI421 isp
fuelLH2 / LOX
  • Boeing (S-IB)
  • North American (S-II)
  • Douglas (S-IV)}} |country-origin = United States |cpl-year = 1985 The Saturn C-4 was the fourth rocket in the Saturn C series studied from 1959 to 1962. The C-4 design was proposed in 1960 for a three-stage launch vehicle that could launch 218,000 lb to low Earth orbit and send 70,000 lb to the Moon via trans-lunar injection. It met the initial requirements for a lunar orbit rendezvous and lunar landing mission.

It would have consisted of three stages; an S-IB-4 first stage, a S-II-4 second stage and a S-IVB third stage. The first and second stages were essentially four-engine variants of the stages that would be used on the Saturn V, while the IVB stage was actually used on both the Saturn V and the Saturn IB.

It would have been capable of sending the 67,000 lb Apollo Command/Service Module into lunar orbit, but it would not have been able to carry the 32,000 lb Apollo Lunar Module as well. Although NASA eventually used the lunar orbit rendezvous method to go to the Moon, it decided to use the larger Saturn V which would provide a reserve payload capacity.

A December 1961 version called Saturn C-4B would have consisted of a IC C-4B first stage, a S-II C-5A second stage and a S-IVB C-5A third stage. It would have been capable of sending a 31,000 kg (68,000 lb) payload to a translunar trajectory.

References

  • Encyclopedia Astronautica Saturn C-4
  • Bilstein, Roger E, Stages to Saturn, US Government Printing Office, 1980. . Excellent account of the evolution, design, and development of the Saturn launch vehicles.
  • Stuhlinger, Ernst, et al., Astronautical Engineering and Science: From Peenemuende to Planetary Space, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964.
  • NASA, "Earth Orbital Rendezvous for an Early Manned Lunar Landing," pt. I, "Summary Report of Ad Hoc Task Group Study" [Heaton Report], August 1961.
  • David S. Akens, Saturn Illustrated Chronology: Saturn's First Eleven Years, April 1957 through April 1968, 5th ed., MHR-5 (Huntsville, AL : MSFC, 20 Jan. 1971).

References

  1. Bilstein, Roger E.. (1996). "Stages to Saturn: a technological history of the Apollo/Saturn launch vehicles". National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA History Office.
  2. "Saturn C-4". Astronautix.com.
  3. (2012-06-17). "Saturn C-4B".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Saturn C-4 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report