From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Iowa Supreme Court case
Iowa Supreme Court case
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. |
| court | Iowa Supreme Court |
| imagesize | 150 |
| full name | John Salsbury, Appellee, v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant. |
| date decided | September 18, 1974 |
| citations | 221 N.W.2d 609, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1120 |
| judges | David Harris, Don LeGrand, W. W. Reynoldson |
| plaintiff | John Salsbury |
| defendant | Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. |
| decision by | David Harris |
Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 221 N.W.2d 609 (IA 1974), was a case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court concerning contract law.
Background
When John Salsbury was helping to establish Charles City College, Northwestern Bell agreed to make a $5,000 contribution for the next three years but only made one payment. The school sued for breach of contract but the telephone company maintained the contract was unenforceable because they received no consideration for the donations.
Decision
The court adopted the position of the Restatement of Contracts, Second that charitable subscriptions can be enforced even without consideration or detrimental reliance.
References
References
- Ayres, I. & Speidel R.E. ''Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition.'' Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 141
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report