Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
law

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Iowa Supreme Court case


Summary

Iowa Supreme Court case

FieldValue
nameSalsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
courtIowa Supreme Court
imagesize150
full nameJohn Salsbury, Appellee, v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Appellant.
date decidedSeptember 18, 1974
citations221 N.W.2d 609, 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1120
judgesDavid Harris, Don LeGrand, W. W. Reynoldson
plaintiffJohn Salsbury
defendantNorthwestern Bell Telephone Co.
decision byDavid Harris

Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co., 221 N.W.2d 609 (IA 1974), was a case decided by the Iowa Supreme Court concerning contract law.

Background

When John Salsbury was helping to establish Charles City College, Northwestern Bell agreed to make a $5,000 contribution for the next three years but only made one payment. The school sued for breach of contract but the telephone company maintained the contract was unenforceable because they received no consideration for the donations.

Decision

The court adopted the position of the Restatement of Contracts, Second that charitable subscriptions can be enforced even without consideration or detrimental reliance.

References

References

  1. Ayres, I. & Speidel R.E. ''Studies in Contract Law, Seventh Edition.'' Foundation Press, New York, NY: 2008, p. 141
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Salsbury v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report