Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/rotational-symmetry

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Rotation operator (quantum mechanics)

Quantum operator


Summary

Quantum operator

This article concerns the rotation operator, as it appears in quantum mechanics.

Quantum mechanical rotations

With every physical rotation R, we postulate a quantum mechanical rotation operator \widehat{D}(R) : H\to H that is the rule that assigns to each vector in the space H the vector | \alpha \rangle_R = \widehat{D}(R) |\alpha \rangle that is also in H. We will show that, in terms of the generators of rotation, \widehat{D} (\mathbf{\hat n},\phi) = \exp \left( -i \phi \frac{\mathbf{\hat n} \cdot \widehat{\mathbf J }}{ \hbar} \right), where \mathbf{\hat n} is the rotation axis, \widehat{\mathbf{J}} is angular momentum operator, and \hbar is the reduced Planck constant.

The translation operator

Main article: Translation operator (quantum mechanics)

The rotation operator \operatorname{R}(z, \theta), with the first argument z indicating the rotation axis and the second \theta the rotation angle, can operate through the translation operator \operatorname{T}(a) for infinitesimal rotations as explained below. This is why, it is first shown how the translation operator is acting on a particle at position x (the particle is then in the state |x\rangle according to Quantum Mechanics).

Translation of the particle at position x to position x + a: \operatorname{T}(a)|x\rangle = |x + a\rangle

Because a translation of 0 does not change the position of the particle, we have (with 1 meaning the identity operator, which does nothing): \operatorname{T}(0) = 1 \operatorname{T}(a) \operatorname{T}(da)|x\rangle = \operatorname{T}(a)|x + da\rangle = |x + a + da\rangle = \operatorname{T}(a + da)|x\rangle \Rightarrow \operatorname{T}(a) \operatorname{T}(da) = \operatorname{T}(a + da)

Taylor development gives: \operatorname{T}(da) = \operatorname{T}(0) + \frac{d\operatorname{T}(0)}{da} da + \cdots = 1 - \frac{i}{\hbar} p_x da with p_x = i \hbar \frac{d\operatorname{T}(0)}{da}

From that follows: \operatorname{T}(a + da) = \operatorname{T}(a) \operatorname{T}(da) = \operatorname{T}(a)\left(1 - \frac{i}{\hbar} p_x da\right) \Rightarrow \frac{\operatorname{T}(a + da) - \operatorname{T}(a)}{da} = \frac{d\operatorname{T}}{da} = - \frac{i}{\hbar} p_x \operatorname{T}(a)

This is a differential equation with the solution

\operatorname{T}(a) = \exp\left(- \frac{i}{\hbar} p_x a\right).

Additionally, suppose a Hamiltonian H is independent of the x position. Because the translation operator can be written in terms of p_x, and [p_x,H] = 0, we know that [H, \operatorname{T}(a)]=0. This result means that linear momentum for the system is conserved.

In relation to the orbital angular momentum

Classically we have for the angular momentum \mathbf L = \mathbf r \times \mathbf p. This is the same in quantum mechanics considering \mathbf r and \mathbf p as operators. Classically, an infinitesimal rotation dt of the vector \mathbf r = (x,y,z) about the z-axis to \mathbf r' = (x',y',z) leaving z unchanged can be expressed by the following infinitesimal translations (using Taylor approximation): \begin{align} x' &= r \cos(t + dt) = x - y , dt + \cdots \ y' &= r \sin(t + dt) = y + x , dt + \cdots \end{align}

From that follows for states: \operatorname{R}(z, dt)|r\rangle = \operatorname{R}(z, dt)|x, y, z\rangle = |x - y , dt, y + x , dt, z\rangle = \operatorname{T}_x(-y , dt) \operatorname{T}_y(x , dt)|x, y, z\rangle = \operatorname{T}_x(-y , dt) \operatorname{T}_y(x , dt) |r\rangle

And consequently: \operatorname{R}(z, dt) = \operatorname{T}_x (-y , dt) \operatorname{T}_y(x , dt)

Using T_k(a) = \exp\left(- \frac{i}{\hbar} p_k a\right) from above with k = x,y and Taylor expansion we get: \operatorname{R}(z,dt)=\exp\left[-\frac{i}{\hbar} \left(x p_y - y p_x\right) dt\right] = \exp\left(-\frac{i}{\hbar} L_z dt\right) = 1-\frac{i}{\hbar}L_z dt + \cdots with L_z = x p_y - y p_x the z-component of the angular momentum according to the classical cross product.

To get a rotation for the angle t, we construct the following differential equation using the condition \operatorname{R}(z, 0) = 1 :

\begin{align} &\operatorname{R}(z, t + dt) = \operatorname{R}(z, t) \operatorname{R}(z, dt) \[1.1ex] \Rightarrow {} & \frac{d\operatorname{R}}{dt} = \frac{\operatorname{R}(z, t + dt) - \operatorname{R}(z, t)}{dt} = \operatorname{R}(z, t) \frac{\operatorname{R}(z, dt) - 1}{dt} = - \frac{i}{\hbar} L_z \operatorname{R}(z, t) \[1.1ex] \Rightarrow {}& \operatorname{R}(z, t) = \exp\left(- \frac{i}{\hbar}, t , L_z\right) \end{align}

Similar to the translation operator, if we are given a Hamiltonian H which rotationally symmetric about the z-axis, [L_z,H]=0 implies [\operatorname{R}(z,t),H]=0. This result means that angular momentum is conserved.

For the spin angular momentum about for example the y-axis we just replace L_z with S_y = \frac{\hbar}{2} \sigma_y (where \sigma_y is the Pauli Y matrix) and we get the spin rotation operator \operatorname{D}(y, t) = \exp\left(- i \frac{t}{2} \sigma_y\right).

Effect on the spin operator and quantum states

Main article: Spin (physics)#Rotations

Operators can be represented by matrices. From linear algebra one knows that a certain matrix A can be represented in another basis through the transformation A' = P A P^{-1} where P is the basis transformation matrix. If the vectors b respectively c are the z-axis in one basis respectively another, they are perpendicular to the y-axis with a certain angle t between them. The spin operator S_b in the first basis can then be transformed into the spin operator S_c of the other basis through the following transformation: S_c = \operatorname{D}(y, t) S_b \operatorname{D}^{-1}(y, t)

From standard quantum mechanics we have the known results S_b |b+\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2} |b+\rangle and S_c |c+\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2} |c+\rangle where |b+\rangle and |c+\rangle are the top spins in their corresponding bases. So we have: \frac{\hbar}{2} |c+\rangle = S_c |c+\rangle = \operatorname{D}(y, t) S_b \operatorname{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle \Rightarrow S_b \operatorname{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2} \operatorname{D}^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle

Comparison with S_b |b+\rangle = \frac{\hbar}{2} |b+\rangle yields |b+\rangle = D^{-1}(y, t) |c+\rangle.

This means that if the state |c+\rangle is rotated about the y-axis by an angle t, it becomes the state |b+\rangle, a result that can be generalized to arbitrary axes.

References

  • L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz: Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory, Pergamon Press, 1985
  • P.A.M. Dirac: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press, 1958
  • R.P. Feynman, R.B. Leighton and M. Sands: The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, 1965
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Rotation operator (quantum mechanics) — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report