Romantic orientation

Theoretical background

The origin of the concept of romantic attraction comes from a theory in psychology explaining the motivations behind human attraction. Scholars have proposed that the concepts of sexual attraction and romantic attraction are different due to evolutionary reasons. The purpose of sexual attraction is for breeding and reproduction, whereas the purpose of romantic attraction is for long-term bonding between partners. This concept helps explain why a person could feel romantic feelings for someone they do not find sexually attractive or sexual feelings towards someone they are not romantically attracted to.

Separating these two concepts has helped researchers better understand attraction in aromantic individuals.

Romantic identities

People may or may not engage in purely emotional romantic relationships. The main identities relating to this are:

• Aromantic, meaning someone who experiences little to no romantic attraction (aromanticism).
  • For identities within the aromantic spectrum, see Aromantic spectrum.
• Alloromantic or zedromantic: Not aromantic (alloromanticism or zedromanticism).
  • Monoromantic: Romantic attraction towards person(s) of only one gender (monoromanticism).
    • Androromantic: Romantic attraction towards men or masculinity (androromanticism).
    • Gyneromantic or gynoromantic: Romantic attraction towards women or femininity (gyneromanticism or gynoromanticism).
    • Heteroromantic: Romantic attraction towards person(s) of the opposite gender (heteroromanticism).
    • Homoromantic: Romantic attraction towards person(s) of the same gender (homoromanticism).
  • MultiromanticMultiromantic or pluriromantic: Romantic attraction towards person(s) of multiple genders (multiromanticism or pluriromanticism).
    • Biromantic or ambiromantic: Romantic attraction towards two genders, or person(s) of the same and other genders (biromanticism or ambiromanticism). Sometimes used the same way as panromantic or multiromantic.
    • Panromantic or omniromantic: Romantic attraction towards person(s) regardless of gender or of any, every, and all genders (panromanticism or omniromanticism).
    • : Romantic attraction towards person(s) of various, but not all, genders (polyromanticism).
  • Ceteroromantic Skolioromantic or ceteroromantic: Romantic attraction towards genderqueer or non-binary person(s) (skolioromanticism or ceteroromanticism).
• Abroromantic: Fluid between romantic identities or in romantic attraction (abroromanticism). Not to be confused with aroflux.
• Pomoromantic: Rejecting preexisting romantic labels (pomoromanticism).

Split attraction model

The split attraction model refers to the concept that sexual and romantic orientation are separate routes of attraction. It says that because they are separate from each other, they can be labeled separately and discussed as separate concepts. The split attraction model is often used by people in the asexual and aromantic communities. It can also be used by anyone who experiences sexual attraction and romantic attraction separately.

It is useful to help clarify different ways that people experience attraction.

Relationship with sexual orientation and asexuality

Main article: Split attraction model

The implications of the distinction between romantic and sexual orientations have not been fully recognized, nor have they been studied extensively. It is common for sources to describe sexual orientation as including components of both sexual and romantic (or romantic equivalent) attractions. Publications investigating the relationship between sexual orientation and romantic orientation are limited. Challenges in collecting information result from survey participants having difficulty identifying or distinguishing between sexual and romantic attractions.

Asexual individuals experience little to no sexual attraction (see gray asexuality); however, they may still experience romantic attraction. Lisa M. Diamond states that a person's romantic orientation can differ from whom the person is sexually attracted to. While there is limited research on the discordance between sexual attraction and romantic attraction in individuals, the possibility of fluidity and diversity in attractions have been progressively recognized. Researchers Bulmer and Izuma found that people who identify as aromantic often have more negative attitudes in relation to romance. While roughly 1% of the population identifies as asexual, 74% of those people reported having some form of romantic attraction.

A concept commonly used by people that experience discordant romantic and sexual attraction is the split attraction model, which tries to explain that romantic and sexual attractions are not exclusively tied together and is often used by people of the asexual and aromantic community to explain their differing romantic versus sexual orientations. The abbreviation aroace (or aro-ace) can be used for someone who is both aromantic ('aro') and asexual ('ace').

Symbols and Flags

References

References

1. Crethar, H. C. & Vargas, L. A. (2007). ''Multicultural intricacies in professional counseling.'' In J. Gregoire & C. Jungers (Eds.), The counselor’s companion: What every beginning counselor needs to know. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. {{ISBN. 0-8058-5684-6. p.61.
2. (2013). "Sexuality and Gender for Mental Health Professionals: A Practical Guide". [[SAGE Publications.
3. (2014). "Asexualities: Feminist and Queer Perspectives". [[Routledge]].
4. (24 July 2015). "Asexuality: A Multidimensional Approach". The Journal of Sex Research.
5. (13 June 2019). "Queer Intimacies: A New Paradigm for the Study of Relationship Diversity". The Journal of Sex Research.
6. Antonsen, Amy N.. (2020-07-01). "Ace and Aro: Understanding Differences in Romantic Attractions Among Persons Identifying as Asexual". Archives of Sexual Behavior.
7. (May 5, 2015). "LGBTQIA Resource Center Glossary {{!}} LGBTQIA Resource Center".
8. (2021-07-01). "Asexuality, Attraction, and Romantic Orientation".
9. (May 2021). "Composing aromanticism".
10. (2022-02-18). "5 things you should know about aromantic people".
11. (2021-10-29). "Never Been Interested in Romance? You Could Be Aromantic".
12. Josh Salisbury. "Meet the aromantics: 'I'm not cold – I just don't have any romantic feelings' | Life and style". The Guardian.
13. (2020). "Editorial Introduction: The Erotics of Asexualities and Nonsexualities: Intersectional Approaches". Feminist Formations.
14. (11 February 2015). "GLAAD - A is for Asexual, Agender, Aromantic".
15. (2023). "Among the New Words". American Speech.
16. Barron, Victoria. (2023-02-21). "Perfectly Queer: An Illustrated Introduction". Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
17. (23 August 2023). "Aromanticism, asexuality, and relationship (non-)formation: How a-spec singles challenge romantic norms and reimagine family life". Sexualities.
18. (2019-09-19). "Sex, Sexuality, and Trans Identities: Clinical Guidance for Psychotherapists and Counselors". Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
19. Sharmat, Madeline. (2023-06-08). "All Bi Myself: The Relationship Between Bisexuality and Self-Essentialism". College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations.
20. (September 2023). "From continua to kaleidoscopes: How plurisexuality challenges traditional conceptualizations of sexual orientation". The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality.
21. Dyer, Harriet. (2018-05-10). "From Ace to Ze: The Little Book of LGBT Terms". Summersdale.
22. (2 April 2016). "Underexplored Identities: Attending to Asexuality in Therapeutic Contexts". Journal of Family Psychotherapy.
23. Thurer, Shari. (2023). "Beyond the Binary : Essays on Gender". Phoenix Publishing House.
24. (2019). "Wellness in asexual-Identified individuals: The Impact of Social Support and Microaggressions".
25. (2019-09-20). "Rethinking LGBTQIA Students and Collegiate Contexts: Identity, Policies, and Campus Climate". Routledge.
26. (16 November 2016). "What's in a name? Exploring use of the word queer as a term of identification within the college-aged LGBT community". Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment.
27. (2 April 2016). "Underexplored Identities: Attending to Asexuality in Therapeutic Contexts". Journal of Family Psychotherapy.
28. (2023). "Differentiating Sexual Orientation and Romantic Orientation: Exploring Two Inventories of Sexual and Romantic Attraction".
29. (March 2024). "A Networked Model of Ecological Systems Theory to Discuss Concerns in Italian Bisexual+ and Transgender People After the Block of the 'Zan Bill' by Senate". Sexuality Research and Social Policy.
30. (September 2023). "Adverse Childhood Experiences, Mental Health, and Resilience in 2SLGBTQIA + Persons: a Scoping Review". Adversity and Resilience Science.
31. (2015). "The Invisible Orientation: An Introduction to Asexuality". Simon and Schuster.
32. (2023). "A-Spec: Conceptualizing Asexual Identity, Experience, and Phenomenological Form".
33. "What Does Biromantic Mean?".
34. (3 April 2021). "It's Like Bisexuality, but It Isn't: Pansexual and Panromantic People's Understandings of Their Identities and Experiences of Becoming Educated about Gender and Sexuality". Journal of Bisexuality.
35. (September 2020). "'Sex' and the Ace Spectrum: Definitions of Sex, Behavioral Histories, and Future Interest for Individuals Who Identify as Asexual, Graysexual, or Demisexual". The Journal of Sex Research.
36. "Panromantic Asexuality: What Is It?".
37. (May 2013). "Asexuality special theme issue editorial". Psychology and Sexuality.
38. (2019). "The sexual and romantic orientation scale: a measure of sexual and romantic orientation as separate dimensions".
39. (2024-02-22). "The experiences of UK LGBT+ communities during the COVID-19 pandemic".
40. Rasheed, Ali. (2020). "Exploring the Experiences of South Asian Students in Undergraduate Programmes: A Case Study in a New Zealand University". Auckland University of Technology.
41. Rendle, Samantha. (2023-07-21). "Hopeless Aromantic: An Affirmative Guide to Aromanticism". Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
42. Bogaert, Anthony F.. (2015-05-04). "Asexuality: What It Is and Why It Matters". The Journal of Sex Research.
43. (2012). "Understanding Asexuality". Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
44. (2013). "Mostly heterosexual as a distinct sexual orientation group: A systematic review of the empirical evidence". Developmental Review.
45. (2013). "Operationalization of Three Dimensions of Sexual Orientation in a National Survey of Late Adolescents". The Journal of Sex Research.
46. (2015). "Hooking Up: The Psychology of Sex and Dating". [[ABC-CLIO]].
47. (2016). "Introducing the New Sexuality Studies". [[Routledge]].
48. (January 2003). "What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire". Psychological Review.
49. (October 2016). "Examining Concordant and Discordant Sexual and Romantic Attraction in American Adults: Implications for Counselors". Journal of LGBT Issues in Counseling.
50. (3 July 2014). "Cluster Analysis of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid in Clinical and Nonclinical Samples: When Bisexuality Is Not Bisexuality". Journal of Bisexuality.
51. (July 2020). "Ace and Aro: Understanding Differences in Romantic Attractions Among Persons Identifying as Asexual". Archives of Sexual Behavior.
52. "aro-ace".