Robert Bork Supreme Court nomination

Nomination

United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr., was considered a moderate conservative, but referred to as the "swing vote" in close decisions at the time. After he announced his retirement on June 26, 1987, Senate Democrats asked liberal leaders to form a "solid phalanx" to oppose an "ideological extremist" replacement for Powell. Democrats warned Reagan there would be a fight over the nomination if Bork became the nominee.

President Reagan nominated Bork for Powell's seat on July 1, 1987. Bork had long been interested in the position; President Richard Nixon promised him the next seat on the Supreme Court, following Bork's compliance in firing Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox during the controversial "Saturday Night Massacre" of October 1973. Nixon was unable to carry out the promise before his resignation on August 9, 1974. When the next Supreme Court vacancy occurred in 1975 due to the retirement of William O. Douglas, civil rights groups expressed deep opposition to Bork being nominated by President Gerald Ford, and Douglas' seat went to John Paul Stevens. Bork was also a finalist to be nominated in 1986 after Reagan nominated then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist to be Chief Justice of the United States following the retirement of Warren Burger, but Reagan nominated Antonin Scalia for Rehnquist's associate justice seat. Some journalists and correspondents believed that if Reagan had nominated Bork in 1986, Bork would have likely made the Supreme Court as the Senate was led by the Republicans. However, Senate Democrats may still have fought to defeat Bork in 1986, since Republicans' Senate majority at the time was very narrow (53–47). This implies that maybe Bork still would have been defeated in 1986, especially given that all six Republicans who voted against Bork's 1987 nomination were serving in 1986.

Response to the nomination

Within 45 minutes of Bork's nomination to the Court, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) took to the Senate floor with a strong condemnation of Bork in a nationally televised speech, declaring:

Bork responded, "There was not a line in that speech that was accurate." In 1988, an analysis published in the Western Political Quarterly of amicus curiae briefs filed by U.S. Solicitors General during the Warren and Burger Courts found that during Bork's tenure in the position during the Nixon and Ford Administrations (1973–1977), Bork took liberal positions in the aggregate as often as Thurgood Marshall did during the Johnson Administration (1965–1967), and more often than Wade H. McCree did during the Carter Administration (1977–1981), in part because Bork filed briefs in favor of the litigants in civil rights cases 75 percent of the time (contradicting a previous review of his civil rights record published in 1983).

On July 5, 1987, NAACP executive director Benjamin Hooks described their position on the Bork nomination: "We will fight it all the way – until hell freezes over, and then we'll skate across on the ice." A brief was prepared for Joe Biden, head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, called the Biden Report. Bork later said in his book The Tempting of America that the report "so thoroughly misrepresented a plain record that it easily qualifies as world class in the category of scurrility". TV ads produced by People For the American Way, and narrated by Gregory Peck, attacked Bork as an extremist. Along with Kennedy's speech, these ads successfully fueled widespread public skepticism of Bork's nomination. The rapid response of Kennedy's "Robert Bork's America" speech stunned the Reagan White House; conservatives, though they considered Kennedy's accusations slanderous, did not respond for more than two months.

Judiciary Committee review

Confirmation hearings

A heated debate over Bork's nomination ensued, partly fueled by strong opposition by civil and women's rights groups concerned with Bork's perceived willingness to roll back civil rights rulings of the Warren and Burger courts, and his opposition to the federal government's right to impose standards of voting fairness upon the states.

Bork is one of only four Supreme Court nominees to ever be opposed by the ACLU, along with William Rehnquist, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh. Bork was also criticized for being an "advocate of disproportionate powers for the executive branch of Government, almost executive supremacy", particularly the notion of the President of the United States having unrestrained authority, especially unitary executive theory, as demonstrated by his role in the "Saturday Night Massacre" when he fired the then-United States Special Prosecutor, Archibald Cox during Richard Nixon's Watergate scandal to protect Nixon from being investigated in the Watergate scandal. Bork's firing of Cox was ruled illegal in Nader v. Bork, by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia soon afterwards.

During debate over his nomination, a list of videotapes Bork had rented was leaked to the press, which led to the enactment of the 1988 Video Privacy Protection Act as a response. The leak was inspired by Bork's opposition to privacy protections beyond those explicitly outlined in the constitution. His video rental history included titles such as A Day at the Races, Ruthless People, and The Man Who Knew Too Much. The list of rentals was gathered and published by writer Michael Dolan, who worked for Washington, D.C.'s, City Paper.

To pro-choice legal groups, Bork's originalist views, and his belief that the Constitution does not protect a "right to privacy" were viewed as a clear signal that, should he become a justice of the Supreme Court, he would vote to completely overrule the Supreme Court's 1973 decision Roe v. Wade. These groups also claimed that Bork's marriage to Mary Ellen Pohl, a former Roman Catholic nun and anti-abortion supporter would allow her to influence his decisions on the abortion issue. Accordingly, a large number of left-wing groups mobilized to press for Bork's rejection, and his confirmation hearings became an intensely partisan battle. Bork was faulted for his bluntness before the committee, including his criticism of the reasoning underlying Roe v. Wade. Simultaneously, however, his supporters expressed frustration that some of Bork's most controversial and conservative views, including those on the scope of the First Amendment and the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as expressed in his writings and past opinions, had been suddenly moderated for his testimony before the committee.

As Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Joe Biden presided over Bork's hearing. Biden stated his opposition to Bork soon after the nomination, reversing an approval in an interview of a hypothetical Bork nomination he had made the previous year and angering conservatives who thought he could not conduct the hearings dispassionately. At the close of the hearings, Biden won praise for conducting the proceedings fairly and with good humor and courage, as his 1988 presidential campaign collapsed in the middle of the hearings. Rejecting some of the arguments that other Bork opponents were making, Biden framed his discussion around the belief that the Constitution provides rights to liberty and privacy that extend beyond those explicitly enumerated in the text, and that Bork's strong originalism was ideologically incompatible with that view.

Committee vote

On October 6, the Senate Judiciary Committee held two votes on the Bork nomination. The committee first voted on a motion to send the nomination to the floor with a favorable recommendation, which was defeated 5–9. It next voted on a motion to send the nomination to the floor with an unfavorable recommendation, which passed 9–5. Republican Arlen Specter voted with the Democratic majority on both votes.

|}

|}

Following the decisive vote, Bork's political support in the Senate quickly eroded, making the nomination's ultimate defeat all but certain, and it was widely expected that he would withdraw his name from further consideration. Nonetheless, on October 9, Bork announced his belief that:

Full Senate vote

On October 23, 1987, the Senate rejected Robert Bork's nomination to the Supreme Court by a vote of 42–58. Altogether, two Democrats and 40 Republicans voted in favor of confirmation, whereas 52 Democrats and six Republicans voted against.

|}

Impact

The following month, President Reagan nominated Judge Anthony Kennedy for the position on the Court (after the name of a second nominee, Douglas H. Ginsburg, was withdrawn). He was subsequently confirmed by the Senate by a 97–0 vote.

The Bork confirmation vote was one of the most controversial votes on a Supreme Court nominee in Senate history. Unhappy with his treatment during the nomination process, Bork resigned his appellate court judgeship the following year.

In 2011, New York Times columnist Joe Nocera claimed that "[t]he Bork fight, in some ways, was the beginning of the end of civil discourse in politics. The anger between Democrats and Republicans, the unwillingness to work together, the profound mistrust – the line from Bork to today's ugly politics is a straight one." Nocera cited Democratic activist Ann Lewis, who wrote that if Bork's nomination "were carried out as an internal Senate debate, we would have deep and thoughtful discussions about the Constitution, and then we would lose."

Decades later, the failure of Bork's nomination is seen through a deeply partisan lens:

"Bork" as a verb

William Safire of The New York Times attributes "possibly" the first use of bork as a verb to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution of August 20, 1987. In fact, the word had appeared a few days earlier, in a newspaper opinion piece dated August 11. Safire defines "to bork" by reference "to the way Democrats savaged Ronald Reagan's nominee, the Appeals Court judge Robert H. Bork, the year before". This definition stems from the history of the fight over Bork's nomination. In March 2002, the word was added to the Oxford Dictionary under "bork"; its definition extends beyond judicial nominees, stating that people who bork others "usually [do so] with the aim of preventing [a person's] appointment to public office".

A notable use of the verb to bork occurred in July 1991 at a conference of the National Organization for Women in New York City. Feminist Florynce Kennedy addressed the conference on the importance of defeating the nomination of Clarence Thomas to the U.S. Supreme Court. She said: "We're going to bork him. We're going to kill him politically ... This little creep, where did he come from?" Thomas was subsequently confirmed after a contentious confirmation hearing.

Notes

References

References

1. Fink, Jenni. (September 26, 2020). "How Many Nominees Has the Senate Rejected From Serving on the Supreme Court?".
2. . (October 23, 2018). ["On This Day: Senate rejects Robert Bork for the Supreme Court"](https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/on-this-day-senate-rejects-robert-bork-for-the-supreme-court/). *The National Constitution Center*.
3. (June 26, 1987). "Powell to leave Supreme Court". [[Milwaukee Journal]].
4. Fuerbringer, Jonathan. (June 30, 1987). "Byrd Says Bork Nomination Would Face Senate Trouble". New York Times.
5. (July 2, 1987). "Conservative nominated to court". Eugene Register-Guard.
6. Sherman, Mark. (February 26, 2013). "Bork: Nixon Offered Next High Court Vacancy in '73". Yahoo! News.
7. (November 23, 1975). "A Woman To Replace the 'Irreplaceable[']". [[The San Francisco Examiner]].
8. Somin, Ilya. (December 20, 2012). "The Volokh Conspiracy".
9. Reston, James. (July 5, 1987). "WASHINGTON; Kennedy And Bork". The New York Times.
10. Lexington. (August 29, 2009). "A hell of a senator". The Economist.
11. Segal, Jeffrey A.. (1988). "Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note". SAGE Publications.
12. O'Connor, Karen. (1983). "The Amicus Curiae Role of the U.S. Solicitor General in Supreme Court Litigation". Judicature.
13. (1987-07-06). "NAACP to Fight Bork 'Til Hell Freezes Over'". [[The Philadelphia Inquirer]].
14. Damon W. Root. (2008-09-09). "Straight Talk Slowdown". Reason.
15. Miranda, Manuel. (2005-08-24). "The Original Borking". [[The Wall Street Journal]].
16. Chaddock, Gail Russell. (2005-07-07). "Court nominees will trigger rapid response".
17. "ACLU Opposes Nomination of Judge Alito". American Civil Liberties Union.
18. (July 26, 1987). "New Views Emerge of Bork's Role in Watergate Dismissals". The New York Times.
19. "The Bork Tapes Saga". The American Porch.
20. Peterson, Andrea. (2014-04-28). "How Washington's last remaining video rental store changed the course of privacy law". [[The Washington Post]].
21. . (1987-09-13). ["Robert Bork's Views on a Wide Range of Legal Issues, in His Own Words"](https://www.nytimes.com/1987/09/13/us/robert-bork-s-views-on-a-wide-range-of-legal-issues-in-his-own-words.html). *The New York Times*.
22. Manning, Jason. "34. The Bork Nomination".
23. (2008). "Almanac of American Politics".
24. Bronner, Ethan. (1989). "Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America". W. W. Norton.
25. Greenhouse, Linda. (1987-10-08). "Washington Talk: The Bork Hearings; For Biden: Epoch of Belief, Epoch of Incredulity". [[The New York Times]].
26. "Judiciary Committee Votes On Recent Supreme Court Nominees". U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
27. McMillion, Barry J.. (March 8, 2022). "Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2020: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President". Congressional Research Service.
28. (1987-10-10). "Bork Gives Reasons for Continuing Fight". [[The New York Times]].
29. (October 24, 1987). "Senate's Roll-Call On the Bork Vote". The New York Times.
30. (October 23, 1987). "Senate Rejects Bork, 58–42: Six Republicans Bolt Party Ranks to Oppose Judge". Los Angeles Times.
31. (November 11, 1987). "Reagan, on 3rd Try, Picks Californian for High Court: "Bit Wiser" After Two Defeats". The Los Angeles Times.
32. (February 3, 1988). "Senate confirms Kennedy: Reagan's 3rd choice for Supreme Court OK'd unanimously". The Milwaukee Journal.
33. Nocera, Joe. (October 21, 2011). "The Ugliness Started With Bork". [[New York Times]].
34. (September 22, 2020). "The Ginsburg-Scalia Act Was Not a Farce". The New York Times.
35. Stone, Chuck. (1987-08-11). "Borking the Constitution". Index-Journal.
36. WILLIAM SAFIRE. (May 27, 201). "ON LANGUAGE: Judge fights "borking" needed to stop court packing? THE END OF MINORITY". New York Times.
37. "The Borking Begins". The Wall Street Journal.