From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Reform of the United Nations Security Council
none
none
.jpg)
Since its creation in 1945, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has undergone one reform in 1965, increasing the amount of non-permanent members from 6 to 10, but there have since been many calls for reform; Some key issues raised are the categories of membership, the question of the veto held by the five permanent members, regional representation, the size of an enlarged Council and its working methods, and the Security Council–General Assembly relationship.
Any reform of the Security Council would require the agreement of two-thirds of all United Nations member states and ratification by two-thirds of Member States. All permanent members of the UNSC (P5), which hold veto rights, must also agree.
Despite a common agreement amongst member states, regional groups, and academics on the need for reform, its feasibility is compromised by the difficulty of drafting a proposal that would garner the necessary support, while also avoiding a veto from any of the five permanent members. Several groups inside and outside the UN have developed many competing reform proposals.
Following their victory in the Second World War, the five permanent member states—France, the United States of America, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China—were considered the best placed to ensure world peace and stability when the UN was established in 1945. Considering the increase of UN member states from 51 states at its creation, to 193 states today, as well as the geopolitical, systematic and normative changes after decolonization and the end of the Cold War, critics judge the Security Council unrepresentative of the current world order.
The Security Council's adequacy in effectively maintaining international peace and security has often been criticized, citing the use of veto power by permanent members against resolutions which go against their national interests, but that could benefit other member states or the international community as a whole. Some examples cited to bolster this criticism are the Council's reaction to the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda and to the Russo-Ukrainian war; draft resolutions on the latter conflict have been consistently vetoed by Russia.
History
The composition of the Security Council was established in 1945. Since then, geopolitical realities have changed drastically, but the council has changed very little. The victors of World War II shaped the United Nations Charter in their national interests, assigning themselves the permanent seats and associated veto power, among themselves. Any reform of the Security Council would require an amendment to the Charter. Article 108 of the Charter states:
1965With the enlargement of the United Nations membership and increasing self-confidence among the new members, going hand in hand with processes of decolonization, old structures and procedures were increasingly challenged. The imbalance between the number of seats in the Security Council and the total number of member States became evident, and the only significant reform of the Security Council occurred in 1965: this included an increase in the non-permanent membership from 6 to 10 members. With Boutros Boutros-Ghali elected as Secretary-General in 1992, the reform discussions of the UN Security Council were launched again as he started his new term with the first-ever summit of the Security Council and then published "An Agenda for Peace". His motivation was to restructure the composition and arguably anachronistic procedures of the UN organ to recognize the changed world.
By 1992, Japan and Germany had become the second and third-largest financial contributors to the United Nations, and started to demand a permanent seat. Also Brazil (fifth largest country in terms of territory) and India (largest country in terms of population) as the most powerful countries within their regional groups and key players within their regions saw themselves with a permanent seat. This group of four countries formed an interest group later known as the G4.
On the other hand, their regional rivals were opposed to the G4 becoming permanent members with a veto power. They favored the expansion of the non-permanent category of seats with members to be elected on a regional basis. Italy, Pakistan, Mexico and Egypt started to form an interest group, known as the "Coffee Club" and later Uniting for Consensus.
Simultaneously, the African Group started to demand two permanent seats for themselves, on the basis of historical injustices and because much of the council's agenda is concentrated in that continent. Those two seats would be permanent African seats, that would rotate between African countries chosen by the African group.
The existing permanent members, each holding the right of veto on Security Council reform, announced their positions reluctantly. The United States supported the permanent membership of Japan and India, and a small number of additional non-permanent members. The United Kingdom and France essentially supported the G4 position, with the expansion of permanent and non-permanent members and the accession of Germany, Brazil, India, and Japan to permanent-member status, as well as more African countries on the council. China supported the stronger representation of developing countries, voicing support for India. Russia has also endorsed India's candidature for a permanent seat on the Security Council.
General Assembly Task Force
The General Assembly Task Force on Security Council Reform has delivered a report (on the question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council) recommending a compromise solution for entering intergovernmental negotiations on reform.
The report builds on existing transitional/intermediary approaches to suggest a "timeline perspective". The "timeline perspective" suggests that Member States begin by identifying the negotiables to be included in short-term intergovernmental negotiations. Crucial to the "timeline perspective" is the scheduling of a mandatory review conference—a forum for discussing changes to any reforms achieved in the near-term, and for revisiting negotiables that cannot be agreed upon now.
Increasing membership
1997 Razali plan
In 1997, Razali Ismail, then president of the UN General Assembly, proposed reforming the Security Council, including expanding the number of permanent members to five new countries without veto power and creating four non-permanent seats. This proposal was part of the debates on reforming the body to make it more representative and legitimate, a topic that remains under discussion to this day. Razali's proposal was in line with the broader debate on the need to reform the Security Council to make it more representative in that global context, with Brazil, Germany, Japan, and India (the G4) seeking permanent seats. However, the 1997 proposal was not implemented, but discussions on reform continued and evolved. Other proposals, such as that of the G4, were presented over the years, also seeking to increase the representativeness of the body, especially of developing countries. But due to pressure from a group of countries led by Egypt, Mexico, Italy, and Pakistan, called the Coffee Club, Razali's project was unable to gain traction and was abandoned. The case is noteworthy because of resolution A/RES/53/30, presented in 1998 after the operation failed, when it was decided that any proposals for changes to the Security Council through resolutions would be subject to approval by a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly. The direct consequence of the resolution was that it became more difficult for a proposal to reform the Security Council to succeed.
2005 Annan plan
On 21 March 2005, the then UN Secretary General Kofi Annan called on the UN to reach a consensus on expanding the council to 24 members, in a plan referred to as "In Larger Freedom". He gave two alternatives for implementation, but did not specify which proposal he preferred.
The two options mentioned by Annan are referred to as Plan A and Plan B:
- Plan A calls for creating six new permanent members, plus three new nonpermanent members for a total of 24 seats in the council.
- Plan B calls for creating eight new seats in a new class of members, who would serve for four years, subject to renewal, plus one nonpermanent seat, also for a total of 24. In any case, Annan favored making the decision quickly, stating, "This important issue has been discussed for too long. I believe member states should agree to take a decision on it—preferably by consensus, but in any case before the summit—making use of one or other of the options presented in the report of the High-Level Panel".
The summit mentioned by Annan is the September 2005 Millennium+5 Summit, a high-level plenary meeting that reviewed Annan's report, the implementation of the 2000 Millennium Declaration, and other UN reform-related issues.
Uniting for Consensus
Main article: Uniting for Consensus
On 26 July 2005, five UN member countries, Italy, Argentina, Canada, Colombia and Pakistan, representing a larger group of countries called Uniting for Consensus led by Italy, proposed to the General Assembly another project that maintains five permanent members and raises the number of non-permanent members to 20.
In May 2011, 120 UN members states participated in a Uniting for Consensus meeting in Rome.
Permanent member proposals

One proposed change is to admit more permanent members. The candidates usually mentioned are Brazil, Germany, India, and Japan. They comprise the group of G4 nations, mutually supporting one another's bids for permanent seats. The United Kingdom, France, Russia and the United States support G4 membership in the U.N. Security Council. This sort of reform has traditionally been opposed by the Uniting for Consensus group, which is composed primarily of nations who are regional rivals and economic competitors of the G4. The group is led by Canada, Turkey and Pakistan (opposing India), and Canada, Italy, Spain and San Marino (opposing Germany), and Canada, Costa Rica, Mexico, Colombia and Argentina (opposing Brazil), and Canada, Indonesia, China, Russia, North Korea and South Korea (opposing Japan). Since 1992, Italy and other members of the group have instead proposed semi-permanent seats or the expansion of the number of temporary seats.
Most of the leading candidates for permanent membership are regularly elected onto the Security Council by their respective continental groups: Brazil and Japan were elected for eleven two-year terms, India for eight terms, and Germany for four terms (as well as West Germany two times, and East Germany once). Brazil has the most recent successful bid being elected to the term 2022–2023, after a gap of eleven years.
In 2017, it was reported that the G4 nations were willing to temporarily forgo veto power if granted a permanent UNSC seat. As of 2013, the current P5 members of the Security Council, along with the G4, account for eight of the world's ten largest defense budgets, according to SIPRI. They also account for 9 of the 10 largest economies by both nominal GDP and Purchasing Power Parity.
The Noble World Foundation proposes a new approach to reform the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). It proposes that membership and veto power be shifted from individual states to sovereignty-pooling organizations, with the European Union (EU) serving as a prime example. This shift is consistent with the UNSC's established practice of selecting non-permanent members based on regional representation. The goal of this proposal is to improve the effectiveness and decision-making capabilities of the UNSC. The EU's model of pooled sovereignty, which was strengthened by a 1964 decision from the European Court of Justice affirming the superiority of EU law over the national laws of member states, supports the idea that regional organizations like the EU can qualify for UN membership. This proposal implies that such a significant reform could be accomplished without requiring amendments to the UN Charter.
| Comparison of G4 and P5 nations | Country data | Brazil | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRA | China | ||||||||||
| CHN | France | ||||||||||
| FRA | Germany | ||||||||||
| GER | India | ||||||||||
| IND | Japan | ||||||||||
| JPN | Russia | ||||||||||
| RUS | United Kingdom | ||||||||||
| U.K. | United States | ||||||||||
| U.S. | 1share of annual UN budget 2share of funding for UN peacekeeping 3Germany takes part in NATO nuclear weapons sharing agreement | ||||||||||
| * G4 nation or* | |||||||||||
| P5 nation** | G4 | P5 | P5 | G4 | G4 | G4 | P5 | P5 | P5 | ||
| Region | **Latin America and | ||||||||||
| Caribbean** | Asia-Pacific | **Western | |||||||||
| Europe** | **Western | ||||||||||
| Europe** | Asia-Pacific | Asia-Pacific | **Eastern | ||||||||
| Europe** | **Western | ||||||||||
| Europe** | North America | ||||||||||
| Population | 2.7% | ||||||||||
| 7th | 17.9% | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 0.9% | ||||||||||
| 20th | 1.1% | ||||||||||
| 19th | 17.9% | ||||||||||
| 1st | 1.6% | ||||||||||
| 11th | 1.9% | ||||||||||
| 9th | 0.9% | ||||||||||
| 21st | 4.2% | ||||||||||
| 3rd | |||||||||||
| Territory | 8 515 767 km2 | ||||||||||
| 5th | 9 596 961 km2 | ||||||||||
| 4th | 640 679 km2 | ||||||||||
| 42nd | 357 114 km2 | ||||||||||
| 62nd | 3 287 263 km2 | ||||||||||
| 7th | 377 973 km2 | ||||||||||
| 61st | 17 098 246 km2 | ||||||||||
| 1st | 242 495 km2 | ||||||||||
| 78th | 9 833 517 km2 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | |||||||||||
| GDP (nominal) (US$trillion) | $2.33 | ||||||||||
| 8th | $18.53 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | $3.13 | ||||||||||
| 7th | $4.59 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | $4.18 | ||||||||||
| 4th | $4.11 | ||||||||||
| 5th | $2.05 | ||||||||||
| 11th | $3.59 | ||||||||||
| 6th | $28.78 | ||||||||||
| 1st | |||||||||||
| GDP (PPP) (US$trillion) | $4.27 | ||||||||||
| 8th | $35.29 | ||||||||||
| 1st | $3.98 | ||||||||||
| 10th | $5.68 | ||||||||||
| 5th | $17.64 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | $6.72 | ||||||||||
| 4th | $5.47 | ||||||||||
| 6th | $4.02 | ||||||||||
| 9th | $28.78 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | |||||||||||
| UN funding1 | 2.95% | ||||||||||
| 8th | 12.01% | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 4.43% | ||||||||||
| 6th | 6.09% | ||||||||||
| 4th | 1.04% | ||||||||||
| 18th | 8.56% | ||||||||||
| 3rd | 2.41% | ||||||||||
| 10th | 4.57% | ||||||||||
| 5th | 22.00% | ||||||||||
| 1st | |||||||||||
| UN peacekeeping funding2 | 0.59% | ||||||||||
| 19th | 15.22% | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 5.61% | ||||||||||
| 6th | 6.09% | ||||||||||
| 4th | 1.1% | ||||||||||
| 17th | 8.56% | ||||||||||
| 3rd | 3.04% | ||||||||||
| 8th | 5.79% | ||||||||||
| 5th | 27.89% | ||||||||||
| 1st | |||||||||||
| UN peacekeepers | 282 | ||||||||||
| 47th | 2,531 | ||||||||||
| 9th | 706 | ||||||||||
| 30th | 504 | ||||||||||
| 37th | 6069 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 6 | ||||||||||
| 105th | 70 | ||||||||||
| 70th | 279 | ||||||||||
| 48th | 33 | ||||||||||
| 78th | |||||||||||
| Defence budget (US$billion) | $20.0 | ||||||||||
| 17th | $292.0 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | $53.0 | ||||||||||
| 8th | $55.8 | ||||||||||
| 7th | $81.4 | ||||||||||
| 4th | $46.0 | ||||||||||
| 10th | $86.4 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | $68.5 | ||||||||||
| 6th | $887.0 | ||||||||||
| 1st | |||||||||||
| Military (active) | 366,500 | ||||||||||
| 13th | 2,185,000 | ||||||||||
| 1st | 203,250 | ||||||||||
| 22nd | 183,500 | ||||||||||
| 27th | 1,455,550 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 247,150 | ||||||||||
| 18th | 1,320,000 | ||||||||||
| 4th | 148,500 | ||||||||||
| 34th | 1,328,100 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | |||||||||||
| Military (reserve) | 1,340,000 | ||||||||||
| 4th | 510,000 | ||||||||||
| 9th | 36,300 | ||||||||||
| 50th | 28,250 | ||||||||||
| 53rd | 1,155,000 | ||||||||||
| 5th | 56,000 | ||||||||||
| 41st | 2,000,000 | ||||||||||
| 2nd | 80,000 | ||||||||||
| 35th | 844,950 | ||||||||||
| 7th | |||||||||||
| Paramilitary (active) | 395,000 | ||||||||||
| 8th | 660,000 | ||||||||||
| 6th | 30,800 | ||||||||||
| 43th | 0 | ||||||||||
| — | 2,526,950 | ||||||||||
| 3rd | 14,350 | ||||||||||
| 60th | 554,000 | ||||||||||
| 60th | 0 | ||||||||||
| — | 0 | ||||||||||
| — | |||||||||||
| Military (total) | 2,101,500 | ||||||||||
| 7th | 4,015,000 | ||||||||||
| 5th | 380,600 | ||||||||||
| 28th | 233,550 | ||||||||||
| 45th | 5,137,500 | ||||||||||
| 4th | 317,500 | ||||||||||
| 37th | 3,874,000 | ||||||||||
| 6th | 275,053 | ||||||||||
| 40th | 2,072,950 | ||||||||||
| 8th | |||||||||||
| Active space program | |||||||||||
| Helicopter carriers projects | |||||||||||
| Aircraft carriers projects | |||||||||||
| Nuclear submarines projects | |||||||||||
| Active nuclear arsenal | 350 | 290 | 3 | 180 | 5,977 | 225 | 5,428 |
Brazil
Main article: Brazil and the United Nations
.jpg)
Brazil is the largest country in Latin America in terms of population, GDP and land area. It has the seventh largest population, ninth largest GDP, eleventh largest defence budget, and has the fifth largest land area in the world. It is one of only five countries that ranks among the top ten globally in terms of physical size, population, and GDP (the others being fellow G4 member India, together with China, Russia and the United States). Furthermore, South America is one of three inhabited continents (the other two being Africa and Oceania) without permanent representation on the Security Council.
Brazil has been elected eleven times to the Security Council. It has contributed troops to UN peacekeeping efforts in the Middle East, the former Belgian Congo, Cyprus, Mozambique, Angola, and more recently East Timor and Haiti. Brazil is one of the main contributors to the UN regular budget.
Prior to the UN's founding in 1945, Franklin D. Roosevelt lobbied for Brazil to be included on the Security Council, but the UK and the Soviet Union refused. The United States has sent strong indications to Brazil that it was willing to support its membership; albeit, without a veto. In June 2011, the Council on Foreign Relations recommended that the U.S. government fully endorse the inclusion of Brazil as a permanent member of the Security Council.
Brazil has received backing from three of the current permanent members, namely France, Russia and United Kingdom. China has expressed support for Brazil taking a bigger role in the United Nations, but has yet to give any direct support for membership in the UNSC. Brazilian elevation to permanent membership is also supported by the Community of Portuguese Language Countries (CPLP), and Brazil and the other G4 nations mutually support each other in their bids. Other countries that advocate permanent Brazilian membership of the UNSC include Australia, Chile, Finland, Guatemala, Indonesia, the Philippines, Slovenia, South Africa, and Vietnam.
Germany
Main article: Germany and the United Nations
Germany is the third largest contributor to the U.N. regular budgets next to Japan, and as such, argues for a permanent Security Council seat. Germany has been elected to the Security Council as a non-permanent member four times as a unified state, as well as three times when it was divided (twice for the West, once for the East).

France has explicitly called for a permanent seat in the UN for its close partner: "Germany's engagement, its ranking as a great power, its international influence—France would like to see them recognized with a permanent seat on the Security Council", French president Jacques Chirac said in a speech in Berlin in 2000. The former German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, also identified Russia, among other countries, as a country that backed Germany's bid. Former President Fidel V. Ramos of the Philippines also expressed his country's support for Germany's bid, together with Japan's. Italy and the Netherlands on the contrary, suggest a common European Union seat in the Council instead of Germany becoming the third European member next to France and the United Kingdom. The former German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer said that Germany would also accept a common European seat, but as long as there is little sign that France will give up her own seat, Germany should also have a seat.
The German campaign for a permanent seat was intensified in 2004. Schröder made himself perfectly clear in August 2004: "Germany has the right to a seat." Its bid is supported by Japan, India, Brazil, France, the United Kingdom and Russia, among other countries. Chancellor Angela Merkel, who had initially been quiet on the issue, re-stated Germany's bid in her address to the UN General Assembly in September 2007. In July 2011, Merkel's trip to Kenya, Angola, and Nigeria was thought to be motivated, in part, by the goal of seeking support from African countries for Germany's bid for a permanent seat on the Security Council.
On 30 June 2021, UK Foreign Minister Dominic Raab and his German counterpart Heiko Maas called in a joint statement for Germany to permanently join the United Nations Security Council, after outgoing German UN ambassador Christoph Heusgen said earlier in the day that needed to happen in order to reflect the shifting global power balance.
India
Main article: India and the United Nations
India is a founding member of the United Nations. India, which joined the U.N. in 1945 (during the British Raj), two years before independence in 1947, is the second-largest and one of the largest constant contributors of troops to the United Nations peacekeeping missions. Foreign Policy magazine states that, "India's international identity has long been shaped by its role in U.N. peacekeeping, with more than 100,000 Indian troops having served in U.N. missions during the past 50 years. Today, India has over 8,500 peacekeepers in the field, more than twice as many as the U.N.'s five big powers combined." In November 2010, then US President Barack Obama publicly supported India's bid for a permanent seat, citing India's "long history as a leading contributor to United Nations peacekeeping missions".
The country currently has the world's largest population and is the world's largest liberal democracy. It is also the world's fifth-largest economy by nominal GDP and third-largest by purchasing power parity. Currently, India maintains the world's second-largest active armed force (after China) and is a nuclear-weapon state. The International Herald Tribune has stated: "Clearly, a seat for India would make the body more representative and democratic. With India as a member, the Council would be a more legitimate and thus a more effective body."
India's bid for permanent member of UNSC is now backed by four of the five permanent members, namely France, Russia, United Kingdom and United States. On 15 April 2011, China officially expressed its support for an increased Indian role at the United Nations, without explicitly endorsing India's Security Council ambitions. A few months later, China endorsed Indian candidacy as a permanent UNSC member provided that India revokes its support for Japanese candidacy, given that Japan has a strained relationship with China.
As part of the G4 nations, India is supported by Brazil, Germany, and Japan for the permanent seat. Many other countries explicitly and openly support India for UNSC permanent seat. As a whole, the African Union also supports India's candidacy for permanent member of the UNSC.
Japan
Main article: Japan and the United Nations
Japan, which joined the UN in 1956, is the third-largest contributor to the UN's regular budget. Its payments had surpassed the sum of those of the United Kingdom, France, China and Russia combined for nearly two decades before 2010. Japan has been one of the largest Official development assistance donor countries. Thus, Japan, along with India, are considered the most likely candidates for two of the new permanent seats. China has stated that it was ready to support India's move for a permanent seat on the UNSC if India did not associate its bid with Japan, which has a strained relationship with China. This may be contrary to the Indian stand since Japan and India are both members of the G4 and support each other's candidature. Japan has been elected to the Security Council for eleven terms as a non-permanent member.
.jpg)
While U.S. Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, speaking at Sophia University in Tokyo, said, "Japan has earned its honorable place among the nations of the world by its own effort and its own character. That's why the United States unambiguously supports a permanent seat for Japan on the United Nations Security Council." Her predecessor, Colin Powell, had objected to Japanese permanent membership because Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution forbids the country from going to war unless in self-defence. In May 2022, US president Joe Biden stated in a meeting with prime minister Fumio Kishida that “the United States will support Japan becoming a permanent member of a reformed security council”.
Some other Asian nations have expressed support for Japan's application, including Mongolia, Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Bangladesh, the Philippines, and Vietnam—all major recipients of loan and/or foreign investment from Japan. The other G4 countries—Germany, Brazil, and India, who are also bidding for Security Council seats—along with France and the United Kingdom, also back Japan's bid. Australia, the Cook Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu support Japan since Japan agreed to increase financial aid to the region. However, much opposition come from its East Asian neighbor South Korea and China due to Japan's reluctance to accept its militant past.
Veto reform
Main article: United Nations Security Council veto power
The UNSC "power of veto" is frequently cited as a major problem within the UN. By wielding their veto power (established by Chapter V of the United Nations Charter), any of the UNSC's five permanent members can prevent the adoption of any non-procedural UNSC draft resolution not to their liking. Even the mere threat of a veto may lead to changes in the text of a resolution, or it being withheld altogether (the so-called "pocket veto"). As a result, the power of veto often prevents the council from acting to address pressing international issues and affords the "P5" great influence within the UN institution as a whole.
For example, the Security Council passed no resolutions on most major Cold War conflicts, including the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia, the Vietnam War, and the Soviet–Afghan War. Resolutions addressing more current problems, such as the conflict between Israel and Palestine or Iran's suspected development of nuclear weapons, are also heavily influenced by the veto, whether its actual use or the threat of its use. Additionally, the veto applies to the selection of the UN's Secretary-General, as well as any amendments to the UN Charter, giving the P5 great influence over these processes. China has exercised its veto several times on India's resolutions to put Masood Azhar on a list of global terrorists; Azhar is the head of Jaish-e-Mohammed, which has been designated as a terrorist group by the United Nations.
Discussions on improving the UN's effectiveness and responsiveness to international security threats often include reform of the UNSC veto. Proposals include: limiting the use of the veto to vital national security issues; requiring agreement from multiple states before exercising the veto; abolishing the veto entirely; and embarking on the transition stipulated in Article 106 of the Charter, which requires the consensus principle to stay in place. Any reform of the veto will be very difficult. Articles 108 and 109 of the United Nations Charter grant the P5 veto over any amendments to the Charter, requiring them to approve of any modifications to the UNSC veto power that they themselves hold.
In 2013, France proposed self-regulation by the five permanent members of the Security Council to refrain from using it against taking action to stop mass atrocities.
Overall positions on reforming the Security Council
Brazil
As stated by then President of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva at the General Debate of the 63rd Session of the United Nations General Assembly:
As stated by then President of Brazil Jair Bolsonaro in a state visit to India:{{cite news |title=Índia e Brasil confirmam interesse em ampliar Conselho de Segurança da ONU
As stated by the President of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva in a state visit to Portugal:
India
As per the official website of India's Permanent Mission to the UN:
According to a formal statement by Prime Minister of India Manmohan Singh at the General Debate of the 59th Session of the United Nations General Assembly:
According to a formal statement by Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi at the General Debate of the 69th Session of the United Nations General Assembly: Next year we will be seventy, we should ask ourselves whether we should wait until we are 80 or 100. Let us fulfill our promise to reform the United Nations Security Council by 2015. Let us fulfil our pledge on a post-2015 Development Agenda so that there is new hope and belief in us around the world. Let us make 2015 also a new watershed for a sustainable world. Let it be the beginning of a new journey together.|Narendra Modi, 27 September 2014}}
As per the official letter send to president of UN general assembly by India's Permanent Mission to the UN: It also included the common letter send by G4 nations which demands concrete action on UNSC reforms. The process has lagged on for over a decade.
According to a formal statement by Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi at the General Debate of the 75th Session of the United Nations General Assembly : Reform in the responses, in the processes, and in the very character of the UN is the need of the hour. It is a fact that the faith and respect that the UN enjoys among the 1.3 billion people in India is unparalleled.|Narendra Modi, 26 September 2020}}
According to a formal statement by Foreign secretary of India Harsh Vardhan Shringla at UNSC high-level meeting on “Maintenance of international peace and security: upholding multilateralism and the United Nations-centered international system”:{{cite web|url=https://news.abplive.com/news/world/india-reiterates-call-for-unsc-reform-calls-out-narrow-representation-and-privileges-given-to-few-1457318
Today, the UN has 193 Member States, nearly a fourfold increase from 1945. The narrow representation and privileges of a few in the primary decision-making organ of the UN poses a serious challenge to its credibility and effectiveness. How can we explain the contradiction of Africa not being represented in the Security Council in the permanent category, even though African issues dominate its agenda?
Speaking on the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the UN last year, the Prime Minister of India gave a clarion call for UN reform, and I quote: "For how long will India be kept out of the decision-making structures of the United Nations? Reform in the responses, in the processes, and in the very character of the UN is the need of the hour. It is a fact that the faith and respect that the UN enjoys among the 1.3 billion people in India is unparalleled.”
|Harsh Vardhan Shringla, 7 May 2021}}According to a formal statement by Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi at the G7 session in Hiroshima: According to an interview on India's G20 presidency, Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi, while "strongly" calling for reforms at the UNSC, said to the Press Trust of India:
A mid-20th century approach cannot serve the world in the 21st century. So, our international institutions need to recognise changing realities, expand their decision-making forums, relook at their priorities and ensure representation of voices that matter.
When this is not done on time, then smaller or regional forums begin to attain more importance.|author=Narendra Modi, September 2023}}At the Eightieth session of the United Nations General Assembly on 27 September, 2025, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar called for urgent reforms to the UNSC, emphasizing the need to expand both its permanent and non-permanent memberships to make it more representative. He questioned the effectiveness of the UN in addressing contemporary global challenges such as conflicts, economic disruptions, and climate change, and described the organization as "gridlocked." Jaishankar stated that India is ready to assume greater responsibilities within a reformed UNSC and highlighted the country's contributions to international peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, and development initiatives across various regions.
Japan
According to a formal statement by Toshimitsu Motegi, Japanese Minister of Foreign Affairs, at the High-level Meeting to Commemorate the Seventy-fifth Anniversary of the United Nations:{{blockquote|For a stronger UN, Security Council reform cannot wait any longer. I regret to say that, today, the system designed seventy-five years ago does not fully deliver on the purposes of the Charter. I’m convinced that Member States having the capacity and willingness to take on major responsibilities should hold seats on an expanded Security Council. Only then will the Council be revived as an effective and representative organ. Japan is fully prepared to fulfill such responsibilities as a permanent member of the Security Council and contribute to ensuring peace and stability of the world. In the Declaration of this High-Level Meeting, we commit ourselves to instilling new life in the discussions on the Council reform. To fulfill that commitment and take a step forward, I call on all Member States to launch text-based negotiations.| Toshimitsu Motegi, 21 September 2020}}
Lithuania
According to a formal statement by Antanas Valionis, former Lithuanian Minister of Foreign Affairs, at the General Debate of the 58th session of the United Nations:
Malaysia
According to a formal statement by Prime Minister of Malaysia Mahathir Mohamad at the General Debate of the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly:{{blockquote|Five countries on the basis of their victories 70 over years ago cannot claim to have a right to hold the world to ransom forever. They cannot take the moral high ground, preaching democracy and regime change in the countries of the world when they deny democracy in this organisation. I had suggested that the veto should not be by just one permanent member but by at least two powers backed by three non-permanent members of the Security Council. The General Assembly should then back the decision with a simple majority.|Mahathir Mohamad, 28 September 2018}}
Portugal
As stated by former Prime Minister of Portugal José Sócrates:
Russia
As stated by then–President of Russia Dmitry Medvedev at the General Debate of the 64th Session of the United Nations General Assembly:
As stated by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi:
As stated by the Minister of Foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov after RIC virtual conference summit:
As stated by the President Vladimir Putin at the Valdai Discussion Club What countries are these? One is India, with a population of over 1.5 billion and an economy growing by over 7 percent, or more precisely, 7.4 or 7.6 percent. It is a global giant. It is true that many people there still need support and assistance, but India’s high-tech exports are growing with rapid strides. In short, it is a powerful country that is growing stronger every year under the guidance of Prime Minister Modi. Or take Brazil in Latin America, with a large population and rapidly growing influence. There is also South Africa. Their global influence should be taken into account, and their weight in decision-making on key international issues must increase.|Vladimir Putin, 10 October 2024}}
South Africa
According to a formal statement by South Africa's International Relations Minister Maite Nkoana-Mashabane speaking in the South African parliament in Cape Town:
Turkey
According to a formal statement by Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in a recorded message to congratulate the U.N. General Assembly (UNGA) on its 75th anniversary:
United Kingdom and France
The United Kingdom and France hold similar views on reform to the United Nations Security Council. According to a formal statement made by 10 Downing Street: Reform of the UNSC, both its enlargement and the improvement of its working methods, must therefore succeed. We reaffirm the support of our two countries for the candidacies of Germany, Brazil, India and Japan for permanent membership, as well as for permanent representation for Africa on the Council. We regret that negotiations towards this goal remain in deadlock and are therefore ready to consider an intermediate solution. This could include a new category of seats, with a longer term than those of the current elected members and those terms would be renewable; at the end of an initial phase, it could be decided to turn these new types of seats into permanent ones. We will work with all our partners to define the parameters of such a reform. UNSC reform requires a political commitment from the member states at the highest level. We will work in this direction in the coming months with a view to achieving effective reform.| Part of a joint UK-France Summit Declaration—27 March 2008}}
United States
According to a formal statement by the United States Department of State:
According to a formal statement by US President Barack Obama in an address to a Joint Session of the Indian Parliament:
In 2022, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, ambassador to the UN, pledged that the United States would push to reform the UNSC so that it would "better reflect the current global realities and incorporate more geographically diverse perspectives."
In 2024, the United States is proposing the creation of two permanent seats on the Security Council without the power of veto for African countries, in the event of an expansion of the Security Council.
Costa Rica
Costa Rica commented the cluster "Working methods of Security Council" with regard to the proposal of 14 June 2024 with a short remark: "Navigating the dark corridors of the endless labyrinth of the Security Council's working methods is an ordeal that all elected members have suffered and will suffer in the Security Council until the political will of its NON-elected members so determines." And it did underline that the Intergovernmental negotiations are the prominent member state mechanism to mobilize the political will of the UN-member states.
References
Notes
Citations
References
- "Can the UN Charter be amended, and how many times has this occurred?".
- link. (19 December 2009)
- (July 2011). "Squaring the circle? Collective and distributive effects of United Nations Security Council reform". The Review of International Organizations.
- (May 2021). "Projecting General Assembly Voting Records onto an Enlarged Security Council: An Analysis of the G4 Reform Proposal". Global Policy.
- Hurd, Ian. (2008-08-12). "Myths of Membership: The Politics of Legitimation in UN Security Council Reform". Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations.
- White, Nigel. (2004-01-01). "The Security Council - an impediment to international justice?". Amicus Curiae.
- Murithi, Tim. (July 2022). "The Failure of the United Nations Security Council in Creating the Framework Conditions for Mediation in the Russia-Ukraine Crisis". Strategic Review for Southern Africa.
- [http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/security-council-reform.html "Security Council Reform"]. Global Policy Forum. Retrieved 21 May 2013.
- "Frequently Asked Questions about the Repertoire | Security Council".
- "UNSC Article 108".
- "English General Assembly Resolutions Resolutions of previous sessions 1965". United Nations.
- Weiss, Thomas G. [http://www.ony.unu.edu/The%20Illusion%20of%20UN%20Security%20Council%20Reform.pdf The Illusion of UN Security Council Reform], Washington Quarterly, Autumn 2003
- (26 June 2004). "Amending the UN Charter". Mainstream.
- [http://www.centerforunreform.org/system/files/Managing+Change+-+1.+Reform+of+the+Security+Council.pdf Microsoft Word – FINAL C.rtf] {{Webarchive. link. (24 January 2009 . (PDF). Retrieved 13 November 2010.)
- "China ready to support Indian bid for UNSC".
- (14 April 2011). "China, Russia support India's UNSC bid".
- "\ Tracking Developments -> Ensuring Transparency and Accountability". Reformtheun.org.
- "\ Tracking Developments -> Ensuring Transparency and Accountability". Reformtheun.org.
- "\ Task Force Suggests "Timeline" Solution for Security Council Reform, States Remain Divided". Reformtheun.org.
- "Archive: 3 reforms the UN needs as it turns 70". [[World Economic Forum]].
- [https://press.un.org/en/1997/19970320.ga9228.html ASSEMBLY PRESIDENT PROPOSES INCREASE IN SECURITY COUNCIL MEMBERSHIP TO 24 BY ADDING 5 PERMANENT, 4 NON-PERMANENT MEMBERS], UN, 20 March 1997
- [https://www.un.org/en/ga/screform/77/pdf/L69InteractiveHandBook_11feb.pdf Draft resolution presented by PGA, Razali Ismail (Malaysia). In: Handbook on Security Council Reform: 25 years of Deliberations], UN, 2018, p. 69-72
- [https://www.un.org/en/ga/screform/77/pdf/L69InteractiveHandBook_11feb.pdf Resolution A/RES/53/30 on the majority required for decisions on reform of the Security Council. In: Handbook on Security Council Reform: 25 years of Deliberations, UN, 2018, p. 75]
- "Business & Financial News, U.S & International Breaking News | Reuters".
- Karen A. Mingst and Margaret P. Karns, The United Nations in the 21st Century (United States: Westview Press, 2012),51.
- [https://www.un.org/largerfreedom/sg-statement.html SG statement to GA, 21 March 2005] {{webarchive. link. (19 November 2005 . United Nations. (21 March 2005). Retrieved 13 November 2010.)
- [http://www.un-ngls.org/MDG/unaction.htm UN-NGLS Millennium Development Goals – MDG summit +5]. United Nations-ngls.org (31 May 2005). Retrieved 13 November 2010.
- [https://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2005/ga10371.doc.htm 'Uniting For Consensus' Group Of States Introduces Text On Security Council Reform To General Assembly]. United Nations. (26 July 2005). Retrieved 13 November 2010.
- (16 May 2011). "Riforma ONU: Frattini, il Consiglio di Sicurezza sia più rappresentativo". [[Minister of Foreign Affairs (Italy).
- Nigro, Vincenzo. (15 May 2011). "Consiglio di sicurezza Onu: Roma con 120 voti sfida Berlino". [[La Repubblica]].
- "Archive: UNSC Reform is Too Long Overdue: Ban Ki-Moon". [[Outlook (Indian magazine).
- de Nesnera, Andre. (1 November 2006). "UN Security Council Reform May Shadow Annan's Legacy". Voice of America.
- (11 November 2024). "The Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United NationsInformation Section11-11-2024".
- [http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/cluster1/2005/04italianmodel.pdf] {{webarchive. link. (15 May 2007)
- (14 October 2024). "컨트리볼 80화 G4 vs 커피클럽 countryballs".
- "India Offers To Temporarily Forgo Veto Power If Granted Permanent UNSC Seat". [[HuffPost]].
- (15 December 2023). "The urgent need for UNSC reform: A path to global peace".
- (14 February 2023). ""The European Union: The World's Biggest Sovereignty Experiment", CFR World 101".
- "Country Comparison :: Population — The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency".
- "GDP (current US$) {{!}} Data". World Bank.
- [http://www.mre.gov.br/ingles/politica_externa/grupos/onu/onu_organiza.asp "Brazil and the United Nations"] {{webarchive. link. (27 September 2007 Ministry of Foreign Relations of Brazil. Retrieved 28 June 2009.)
- [http://www.globalpolicy.org/finance/tables/reg-budget/large07.htm "Regular Budget Payments of Largest Payers: 2007"] Global Policy Forum. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
- (7 July 2010). "Commentary: Brazil Seeking Security". The National Interest.
- [http://origin.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134527,00.html "Powell: Brazil Not Developing Nukes"] {{webarchive. link. (11 July 2011 [[Fox News Channel]]. Retrieved 28 June 2009.)
- "Global Brazil and U.S.-Brazil Relations | Council on Foreign Relations".
- [http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/country-files_156/brazil_444/index.html "France and Brazil"] {{webarchive. link. (10 January 2008 , Ministry of Foreign Affairs of France. Retrieved 28 June 2009.)
- [http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/832/41/ "Putin in Brazil"] {{webarchive. link. (24 July 2009 , ''Brazzil''. Retrieved 28 June 2009.)
- [http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100511105408/http://number10.gov.uk/news/latest-news/2009/03/uk-backs-brazil-as-permanent-security-council-member-18798 "UK backs Brazil as permanent Security Council member"], 10 Downing Street., 27 March 2009. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
- (14 November 2019). "BRICS divulga "Declaração de Brasília"".
- [http://noticias.uol.com.br/ultnot/lusa/2006/09/12/ult611u73031.jhtm "Chanceleres lusófonos discutem reforma das Nações Unidas"], Uol Notícias. Retrieved 28 June 2009. {{in lang. pt
- [http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/200/41186.html "G4 Nations Bid for Permanent Security Council Seat"], Global Policy Forum. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
- [http://www.brazzilmag.com/content/view/5039/ "Brazil Gets Australia's Backing for UN Security Council Seat"] {{webarchive. link. (15 October 2008 , ''Brazzil''. Retrieved 18 January 2009.)
- [http://sul21.com.br/jornal/2010/09/presidente-do-chile-pede-ingresso-do-brasil-no-conselho-de-seguranca-da-onu/ "Presidente do Chile pede ingresso do Brasil no Conselho de Segurança da ONU"] {{webarchive. link. (23 July 2011 , Sul21. Retrieved 4 April 2011)
- [http://www.agenciabrasil.gov.br/noticias/2007/09/04/materia.2007-09-04.4731856554/view "Brasil e Finlândia farão acordo para disseminação de fontes limpas de energia"] {{webarchive. link. (19 April 2012 , [[Agência Brasil]]. Retrieved 28 June 2009. {{in lang). pt
- [http://br.noticias.yahoo.com/s/afp/090602/mundo/guatemala_brasil_onu "Brasil e Guatemala acertam apoio mútuo para Conselho de Segurança"]{{dead link. (September 2017). pt
- [https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2000932&Itemid=2 "PGMA, Brazilian President Lula agree to further strengthen RP-Brazil relations"], Republic of the Philippines. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
- [http://english.people.com.cn/90001/90777/90852/6386221.html "Slovenia backs Brazil as permanent member of UNSC"], ''People's Daily''. Retrieved 18 January 2009.
- {{usurped. [https://web.archive.org/web/20110606125514/http://www.hinduonnet.com/2004/03/06/stories/2004030603541200.htm "South Africa to support India, Brazil for Security Council seat"], ''The Hindu''. Retrieved 28 June 2009.
- pt
- (27 June 2000). "Chirac pushes two-speed Europe". BBC News.
- (2003). "Philippines-Japan Relations". Ateneo De Manila University Press.
- "[http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,1302199,00.html German Hopes for U.N. Security Council Seat Dampened]", Deutsche Welle, 20 August 2004. Retrieved 14 May 2006.
- Odhiambo, Allan. (13 July 2011). "Germany shops for U.N. seat, business in Africa visit". Business Daily.
- (30 June 2021). "UK supports Germany's UN Security Council ambitions".
- (30 June 2021). "For UN to stay legitimate, we need a Council seat, German envoy says".
- (2024-01-24). "'India, a mature and respected UN member,' affirms UNGA Prez on India's permanent UNSC seat". The Economic Times.
- (14 December 2022). "UK, France, UAE support India's bid for permanent membership at UNSC".
- [http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2009/01/2009124102523525626.html UN says peacekeepers overstretched – Americas]. Al Jazeera English (27 January 2009). Retrieved 13 November 2010.
- Lynch, Colum. (14 June 2011). "India threatens to pull plug on peacekeeping". Foreign Policy.
- (12 October 2010). "General Assembly 65th Session, 28th Plenary Meeting".
- [http://zeenews.india.com/news661197.html India wins UNSC seat with highest votes in 5 yrs]. Zee News (13 October 2010). Retrieved 13 June 2011.
- (15 October 2019). "World Economic Outlook Database, October 2019". [[International Monetary Fund]].
- (2 December 2016). "U.K., France back UNSC permanent seat for India". The Hindu.
- "Latest India News".
- (4 December 2004). "Putin backs India's UN seat bid". BBC News.
- [http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/UNSC_without_India_unrealistic_Brown/articleshow/2972896.cms "UNSC without India unrealistic: Brown]. ''The Economic Times''.
- [https://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/world/asia/09prexy.html?_r=1&src=mv "Countering China, Obama Backs India for U.N. Council"]. ''The New York Times''. 8 November 2010.
- (15 April 2011). "China and Russia officially endorse India's place in UN Security Council". Business Standard.
- (14 April 2011). "China backs India's aspiration for greater role in UN". Daily News and Analysis.
- Krishnan, Ananth. (16 July 2011). "China ready to support Indian bid for UNSC". The Hindu.
- (11 September 2017). "Afghanistan supports India's UNSC bid". Business Standard.
- (14 September 2021). "India's MoS for External Affairs V. Muraleedharan to visit Algeria from Sep 15-17".
- "Armenia supports India's UNSC bid". News.outlookindia.com.
- (8 December 2011). "UNSC seat: Australia supports India". Zeenews.india.com.
- "India-Austria Bilateral Relations".
- (6 October 2009). "India, Bahrain to back each other for UN seat".
- NK. "Top News Stories @ newkerala.com, updated daily with latest Top News Stories news".
- (15 April 2007). "Denying India veto at UNSC is an insult: Belarus". Hindustan Times.
- (22 March 2010). "Belgium supports India's bid for permanent seat in UNSC". [[The Times of India]].
- [http://www.indembassy.org/embassybelize2.html] {{webarchive. link. (25 September 2011)
- (4 March 2009). "India, Benin sign five agreements – Thaindian News". Thaindian.com.
- "India-Barbados Bilateral Relations".
- "Bhutan PM says India deserves permanent seat in UN Security Council". Business Standard India.
- (16 July 2012). "Embajada De La India – Peru – Bolivia". Indembassy.org.pe.
- "National Portal of India". India.gov.in.
- "Joint Declaration by India and Bulgaria on the visit of Prime Minister of Bulgaria".
- "Joint Statement on the State Visit of President of Burundi to India".
- "Cambodia supports India's bid for UN Security Council seat". The Nation.
- [http://en.mercopress.com/2009/03/18/chile-supports-india-as-permanent-member-of-un-security-council "Chile supports India as permanent member of UN Security Council"]. En.mercopress.com. Retrieved 13 November 2010.
- (June 2013). "India-Comoros Relations".
- Parsai, Gargi. (11 June 2010). "Croatia supports India's bid for permanent membership in UNSC". The Hindu.
- ".:: Embassy of India ::".
- Subrahmaniam, Vidya. (1 November 2009). "Cyprus backs India on Security Council seat". The Hindu.
- Parsai, Gargi. (7 June 2010). "Czech Republic to support India's bid for UN seat". The Hindu.
- "Sorry for the inconvenience.".
- (2 February 2011). "Dominican Republic to support India to be a global player". [[The Hindu]].
- "India-Ecuador Relations - Ministry of External Affairs".
- "Hungary, Eritrea back India's bid for permanent UNSC seat". The Economic Times.
- "India-Estonia relations". [[Ministry of External Affairs (India).
- (5 July 2007). "India, Ethiopia sign five pacts – Monsters and Critics". News.monstersandcritics.com.
- "Fiji To Support India's Bid For UN Security Council - July 31, 2015".
- (21 September 2003). "Finland backs India on Security Council seat". [[The Hindu]].
- (27 November 2017). "Greece keen to deepen ties with India, supports UNSC bid".
- "Office of the President of Guyana". Op.gov.gy.
- (15 January 2008). "Hungary supports India's claim for Security Council seat". The Hindu.
- (31 October 2000). "Iceland supports India's candidature for permanent UN Security Council seat". Rediff.com.
- (Feb 17, 2018). "Iranian President supports India's aspiration for a permanent seat in UNSC {{!}} India News - Times of India".
- (1 February 2006). "Israel backs India in expanded UNSC". Hindustan Times.
- "Jordan supports India's bid for permanent membership in UNSC {{!}} News - Times of India Videos".
- (19 November 2007). "Laos supports India's claim for Security Council seat". News.oneindia.in.
- ANI. (2019-08-22). "Naidu returns from Baltic countries; earn their support for India's claim for UNSC seat". Business Standard India.
- "Archived copy".
- "India Liberia Joint Statement on the visit of Dr. Shashi Taroor, Minister of State for External Affairs to Liberia (16-19 September 09)".
- (May 28, 2007). "India's UNSC bid gets Libya's support". [[Hindustan Times]].
- "Archive News".
- (6 August 2015). "India-Luxembourg Relations".
- (9 May 2005). "Kazakhstan back India's candidacy for UNSC". Hindustan Times.
- "India's Strategic Expansion in the Pacific Islands".
- "India-Madagascar Unclassified brief".
- "Brief on India-Malawi bilateral relations". [[Ministry of External Affairs (India).
- (23 January 2010). "Malaysia supports India's UNSC bid". The Indian Express.
- ". Maldives official website – Maldives News Bulletin". Maldivesinfo.gov.mv.
- "Mali: India Loans $100 Million for Power Project".
- (21 September 2018). "Vice President Naidu returns to India after three-nation tour". Business Standard.
- (9 January 2013). "UNSC seat: Mauritius to back India's bid".
- IANS. (2018-08-14). "India, Moldova review bilateral ties". Business Standard India.
- (29 July 2005). "Mongolia to support India's UNSC bid". The Indian Express.
- (13 April 2010). "Morocco supports India's candidature to UNSC". Hindustan Times.
- "Media Statement by Prime Minister during the visit of President of Mozambique to India (August 5, 2015)".
- "Archived copy".
- "Indo-Namibian Relations". [[Ministry of External Affairs (India).
- (13 November 2014). "UK, France, Nepal support India as permanent member of UNSC - Firstpost". Firstpost.
- "Text of the PM's statement in Joint Press Briefing with PM of Netherlands".
- (26 October 2016). "New Zealand assures support for India's UNSC, NSG membership appeal - Firstpost". Firstpost.
- (24 August 2013). "Nicaragua wants India to join in mega canal project". The Hindu.
- "Archived copy".
- (3 November 2006). "Norway supports India's claim for UNSC seat". [[The Times of India]].
- (20 October 2010). "Oman hails UNSC seat for India". The Hindu.
- (2015-05-05). "Palestine backs India's bid for UNSC". The Hindu.
- (May 14, 2018). "Latin America: Visit to help improve bilateral trade with Latin America: Venkaiah Naidu {{!}} India News - Times of India".
- "Untitled Page".
- "Paraguay is an important partner of India in the Latin American and Caribbean region: Vice President".
- "Embajada De La India – Peru – Bolivia". Indembassy.org.pe.
- "Poland supports India UN Security Council bid". Thenews.pl.
- (15 November 2010). "Portugal among first to support India's claim for UNSC seat". Navhindtimes.in.
- "Rwanda Backs India for Permanent UNSC Seat". news.outlookindia.com.
- "India-Sao Tome & Principe Relations - Ministry of External Affairs".
- (26 January 2005). "Natwar to visit Senegal in March". The Financial Express.
- "Media Statement by Prime Minister and President of Seychelles during the visit of President of Seychelles to India (August 26, 2015)".
- (20 November 2011). "Singapore PM backs India's bid for permanent UNSC seat". Deccan Herald.
- "Vice President returns after a two-nation tour to Africa".
- Mallawaarachchi, Amali. "India will be supported for UNSC permanent seat - Prime Minister".
- "India, Slovenia sign seven MoUs".
- (2012-03-27). "Sudan supports India's case for permanent UNSC seat".
- "Kabinet van de President – Kabinet van de President". Kabinet.sr.org.
- (15 May 2010). "Swaziland sympathetic to India's bid for UN seat". Thaindian News.
- (2 June 2015). "Sweden Supports India's Bid for a Permanent Seat at the UN Security Council".
- "Syria". [[Ministry of External Affairs (India).
- (9 May 2005). "Tajikistan back India's candidacy for UNSC". Hindustan Times.
- link. (19 February 2014 . Agence France-Presse. Retrieved 27 May 2011.)
- "India, Thailand sign six 6 key accords, talk of strategic partnership". The Economic Times.
- "India extends $500,000 assistance to Gambia for skill development, cottage industry projects". The Economic Times.
- "India – Timor Leste Relations - Ministry of External Affairs".
- (5 January 2012). "Trinidad PM to be honoured at Pravasi Bharati Divas". The Times of India.
- (2 May 2017). "Turkey supports India's UNSC bid". The Hindu.
- "Joint Statement on the occasion of the State Visit to India of His Excellency Mr. Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedov, President of Turkmenistan". Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India.
- "Sorry for the inconvenience.".
- "Joint Statement issued during the State Visit of President of Ukraine on 'Forging a Comprehensive Partnership between India and Ukraine'". Mea.gov.in.
- (23 November 2010). "UNSC permanent seat is India's right : UAE". The Hindu.
- "India's bid for permanent UNSC seat gets stronger".
- (18 May 2011). "Uzbekistan supports India's bid for permanent UNSC seat". Yahoo! News.
- "Vietnam supports India's UNSC membership bid - Vietnam supports India's UNSC membership bid - VOVNEWS.VN".
- "India–Yemen Relations".
- "High Commission of India, Lusaka". Hcizambia.com.
- (30 October 2015). "In India, Mugabe lashes out at United Nations".
- (7 July 2007). "African Union backs India's UNSC bid". The Indian Express.
- (2018-12-23). "Japan to sink to third-largest contributor to U.N. as China rises".
- Krishnan, Ananth. (16 July 2011). "{{-'}}China ready to support Indian bid for UNSC{{'-}}". The Hindu.
- "Breaking International News & Views".
- [http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/reform/cluster1/2004/0825bid.htm Koizumi: No Shift in Article 9]. Globalpolicy.org (25 August 2004). Retrieved 13 November 2010.
- (May 23, 2022). "Biden backs Japan joining 'reformed' UN Security Council, Japanese PM says".
- (14 January 1994). "Philippines to support Japan's Security Council membership bid". Manila Standard.
- (5 October 2015). link
- (11 January 2007). "UK backs Japan for UNSC bid". Central chronicle.
- However, much opposition come from its East Asian neighbors due to Japan's reluctance to accept its militant past. Countries South Korea and China oppose Japan's bid into the Security Council.[http://www.matangitonga.to/article/spnews/pacificislands/palm_japan2_290506.shtml Japan increases aid to Pacific Is.] Matangi Tonga Online
- [http://www.matangitonga.to/article/spnews/pacificislands/palm_japan2_290506.shtml Japan increases aid to Pacific Is.] Matangi Tonga Online
- (10 September 2020). "Secretário-geral da ONU diz que Covid-19 deixou o mundo de joelhos". CNN Brazil.
- Chaudhury, Dipanjan Roy. "China uses its power to block India's move to brand Masood Azhar as a terrorist in UN". The Economic Times.
- Schlichtmann, Klaus. "1950–How the opportunity for transitioning to U.N. Collective was missed for the first time". Global Nonkilling Working Papers #11 (14 April 2016).
- étrangères, Ministère de l'Europe et des Affaires. "Why France wishes to regulate use of the veto in the United Nations Security Council".
- (23 September 2008). "Statement by H.E. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil". United Nations.
- (22 April 2023). "Lula diz que EUA, Rússia e europeus desrespeitam Conselho de Segurança da ONU e pede revisão do órgão". [[CNN Brazil]].
- "India's position on UN Reform Process". United Nations.
- "Prime Minister of India's Address at the 59th Session of United Nations General Assembly, New York".
- (27 September 2014). "Prime Minister of India's Address at the 69th Session of United Nations General Assembly, New York". Business Standard India.
- (26 September 2020). "How long will India be kept out of decision-making structures of UN, asks Modi".
- PTI. (2023-05-21). "PM Modi strongly calls for reform of United Nations". The Hindu.
- (2023-09-03). "PM Modi calls for reform of UN; says mid-20th century approach cannot serve the world in the 21st century". The Economic Times.
- "Jaishankar calls for UNSC expansion, says India ready for bigger role, responsibilities".
- Lakshman, Sriram. (2025-09-27). "UN is gridlocked and needs reform, says Jaishankar at United Nations General Assembly". The Hindu.
- (22 September 2020). "Statement by Foreign Minister Motegi at the High-level Meeting to Commemorate the Seventy-fifth Anniversary of the United Nations". [[Ministry of Foreign Affairs (Japan).
- "Lithuania". United Nations.
- (29 September 2018). "In full: Mahathir's speech at the United Nations General Assembly". [[Channel NewsAsia]].
- (25 September 2010). "European leaders press for 'long overdue' UN reform to match changing world". United Nations.
- "Statement by Dmitry A. Medvedev, President of the Russian Federation at the 64th Session of the UN General Assembly".
- "Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov's remarks and answers to questions at a plenary session of the Raisina Dialogue international conference, New Delhi, January 15, 2020".
- "Russia extends support for permanent seat for India in UNSC". Asian News international.
- "Vladimir Putin Meets with Members of the Valdai Discussion Club. Transcript of the Plenary Session of the 20th Annual Meeting".
- (27 March 2008). "Joint UK-France Summit Declaration". British Prime Minister's Office.
- (20 June 2005). "U.S. Priorities for a Stronger, More Effective United Nations". U.S. Department of State.
- [https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2010/11/08/remarks-president-joint-session-indian-parliament-new-delhi-india " Barack Obama in an address to a Joint Session of the Parliament of India"], Lok Sabha, India, 9 November 2010
- Nichols, Michelle. (2022-09-08). "Biden to host food security summit at U.N. later in September". Reuters.
- (12 September 2024). "United States Backs Africa's U.N. Security Council Bid, With a Catch".
- [https://estatements.unmeetings.org/estatements/10.0010/20240620150000000/eF8KjYDpMmkn/J_HYjwXHU_en.pdf Comment of Costa Rica, 20 June 2024, afternoon session].
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Reform of the United Nations Security Council — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report