Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/cognitive-biases

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Reactive devaluation

Cognitive bias

Cognitive bias

Reactive devaluation is a cognitive bias that occurs when a proposal is devalued if it appears to originate from an antagonist. The bias was proposed by Lee Ross and Constance Stillinger (1988).

Reactive devaluation could be caused by loss aversion or attitude polarization, or naïve realism.

Studies

In an initial experiment, Stillinger and co-authors asked pedestrians in the US whether they would support a drastic bilateral nuclear arms reduction program. If they were told the proposal came from President Ronald Reagan, 90 percent said it would be favorable or even-handed to the United States; if they were told the proposal came from a group of unspecified policy analysts, 80 percent thought it was favorable or even; but, if respondents were told it came from Mikhail Gorbachev only 44 percent thought it was favorable or neutral to the United States.

In another experiment, a contemporaneous controversy at Stanford University led to the university divesting of South African assets because of the apartheid regime. Students at Stanford were asked to evaluate the University's divestment plan before it was announced publicly and after such. Proposals including the actual eventual proposal were valued more highly when they were hypothetical.

In another study, experimenters showed Israeli participants a peace proposal which had been actually proposed by Israel. If participants were told the proposal came from a Palestinian source, they rated it lower than if they were told (correctly) the identical proposal came from the Israeli government. If participants identified as "hawkish" were told it came from a "dovish" Israeli government, they believed it was relatively bad for their people and good for the other side, but not if participants identified as "doves".

References

References

  1. Lee Ross, Constance A. Stillinger, "Psychological barriers to conflict resolution", Stanford Center on Conflict and Negotiation, Stanford University, 1988, [https://books.google.com/books?id=R2QrAQAAIAAJ&q=reactive p. 4]
  2. (1991). "Barriers to Conflict Resolution". Negotiation Journal.
  3. Ross, Lee. (1995). "Barriers to Conflict Resolution". WW Norton & Co.
  4. Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). [https://web.archive.org/web/20160617085604/https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/child-page/370999/doc/slspublic/Naive%20Realism.pdf Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding]. In T. Brown, E. S. Reed & E. Turiel (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. {{ISBN. 9780805815214
  5. (2002). "Reactive Devaluation of an "Israeli" vs. "Palestinian" Peace Proposal". Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

cognitive-biases
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Reactive devaluation — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report