Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
law

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Rajeev Dhavan

Indian lawyer


Summary

Indian lawyer

FieldValue
nameRajeev Dhavan
birth_date(India)
death_date
nationalityIndian
occupationLawyer
known_forCivil rights activity

Rajeev Dhavan (born 4 August 1946) is an Indian Senior Advocate, a human rights activist, and a Commissioner of the International Commission of Jurists. He is the author or co-author of numerous books on legal and human rights topics, and is a regular columnist in the leading newspapers in India.{{cite web |access-date=2012-04-26 |archive-date=12 February 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160212081759/http://indiandemocracy08.berkeley.edu/speakers.html |url-status=dead

Dhavan led the attorney team for the Muslims in the famous Babri Masjid case.

Career

Rajeev Dhavan did his schooling from Boys' High School and College and Sherwood College, Nainital. He studied law at Allahabad University, then at Emmanuel College, Cambridge (where he was elected President of the Cambridge Union) and London University. He has taught at Queen's University Belfast, Brunel University, the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the University of Texas at Austin. He is an Honorary Professor at the Indian Law Institute.

Dhavan is a senior advocate of the Supreme Court of India, as he was designated in 1994. He runs the Public Interest Legal Support and Research Centre, which tries to make youth aware of constitutional and legal subjects. Dhavan was elected to the International Commission of Jurists in 1998 and was a member of the Executive Committee between 2003 and 2007 and from 2009. He was appointed the chairperson of the Executive Committee in 2009.

In March 2003, Dhavan was a signatory to a statement that condemned the American-led invasion of Iraq and called it "unprovoked, unjustified and violative of international law and the United Nations Charter". Other signatories included Rajinder Sachar, Shanti Bhushan, Pavani Parameswara Rao, Kapil Sibal and Prashant Bhushan.

Dhavan has represented the Babri Masjid Action Committee before the Allahabad High Court over the title to the land on which the mosque stood before being destroyed by a mob in 1992. When the Allahabad High Court ruled that the site should be divided between Hindus and Muslims, Dhavan said, "This is Panchayati justice which takes away the legal rights of Muslims and converts the moral sentimental entitlements of Hindus into legal rights".{{cite news |access-date=2012-04-26}} Dhavan also called the tone of the judges as aggressive during the hearing, but later apologized by stating that he had been emotionally carried away during the hearing.

Bibliography

  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book |url-access=registration
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book
  • {{cite book

References

|access-date=2012-04-26}} |access-date=2012-04-26}}

References

  1. [http://www.rajeevdhavan.com/about/ "About Rajeev Dhavan"], ''rajeevdhavan.com''. Accessed 31 July 2020.
  2. (July 2015). "Rajeev Dhavan".
  3. (30 March 2003). "Rajeev Dhawan and Other Signatories".
  4. (2019-09-19). "Ayodhya case: Muslim parties' lawyer Rajeev Dhavan loses cool, terms judge's tone as aggressive".
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Rajeev Dhavan — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report