From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Public interest
"Common well-being" or "general welfare"
"Common well-being" or "general welfare"
In social science and economics, public interest is "the welfare or well-being of the general public" and society.
While it has earlier philosophical roots and is considered to be at the core of democratic theories of government, often paired with two other concepts, convenience and necessity, it first became explicitly integrated into governance instruments in the early part of the 20th century.
The public interest was rapidly adopted and popularised by human rights lawyers in the 1960s and has since been incorporated into other fields such as journalism and technology.
Overview
Economist Lok Sang Ho, in his Public Policy and the Public Interest, argues that the public interest must be assessed impartially and, therefore, defines the public interest as the "ex ante welfare of the representative individual". Under a thought experiment, by assuming that there is an equal chance for one to be anyone in society and, thus, could benefit or suffer from a change, the public interest is by definition enhanced whenever that change is preferred to the status quo ex ante. This approach is "ex ante", in the sense that the change is not evaluated after the fact but assessed before the fact without knowing whether one would actually benefit or suffer from it.
This approach follows the "veil of ignorance" approach, which was first proposed by John Harsanyi but popularized by John Rawls in his 1971 Theory of Justice. Historically, however, the approach can be traced to John Stuart Mill, who, in his letter to George Grote, explained that "human happiness, even one's own, is in general more successfully pursued by acting on general rules, than by measuring the consequences of each act; and this is still more the case with the general happiness, since any other plan would not only leave everybody uncertain what to expect, but would involve perpetual quarrelling..."
This approach is attractive because only under impartiality can there be the possibility of consensus. This of course is still conditional: i.e., conditional on everybody doing the same thought experiment as Rawls suggested. Other than this, if everybody considers his own private interests from his point of view, then social welfare will have to be defined in an ex post fashion by summing up or otherwise defined over individually rated welfares or social states that would come about because of different social choices. This is the approach of social welfare functions. Whether these functions are based on individually ranked social states or individual cardinal uitilities, the absence of consensus over social welfare functions is unavoidable.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales argues that applying a detailed definition is likely to result in unintended consequences, in Acting in the Public Interest(2012). Instead, each circumstance needs to be assessed based on criteria such as the relevant public, wants, and constraints. The key to assessing any public interest decision is transparency of the decision-making process, including balancing competing interests.
The need to consider the circumstances carefully in all dimensions is well taken, as is the need for transparency of the standards and procedures for policy making. It needs to be noted that in practice adversarial politics means that "balancing competing interests" amounts to politicians navigating through the web of divergent interests to procure their best political interests. The outcome will be a contest of political clout among different competing interests. Whether this promotes the public interest remains controversial.
Governments
US
Public interest has been considered as the core of "democratic theories of government” and often paired with two other concepts, "convenience" and "necessity". In the United States, public interest, convenience and necessity appeared for the first time in the Transportation Act of 1920 and also appeared in the Radio Act of 1927. After that, these three concepts became critical criteria for making communication policies and solving some related disputes.
India
Indian constitution invokes the term "public interest" at nine places in its Articles 22 (6), 31A (b) and 31A (c) of fundamental rights of people, 263, 302, Entries 52, 54 and 56 of union list and Entry 33 of the concurrent list. Article 282 says the revenues of the Union or a State may be spent for public purposes. When a scheme or project is taken up under public interest by the Union instead of a State, such scheme should be a popular demand of the nationwide public without any opposition from the directly affected stakeholders before the implementation of such scheme. Otherwise, it becomes a public purpose scheme that would serve greater part of society but some would suffer from the implementation of such scheme. In the absence of interpretation (Dos and don'ts) of the term "public interest" by the courts in India, these Articles are being misused by the union lawmakers to usurp the constitutional powers of the state governments and the rights of people in contrast to the meaning of "public interest". To legally establish a scheme or project to be taken under public interest or national interest, the proposal can be passed by the Rajya Sabha with a two-thirds majority in its favor per Article 249.
References
References
- "Definition of public interest {{!}} Dictionary.com".
- Routledge, 2012 (first published in 2011).
- "Public Policy and the Public Interest: 1st Edition (Hardback) - Routledge".
- Rawls, John (1971) ''A Theory of Justice'', Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Francis E. Mineka and Dwight N. Lindley (ed.), ''The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Volume XIV - The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill 1849-1873 Part I'', Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1972, Vol. XV, p. 762, 1862.
- Napoli, Philip M. (2001). Foundations of Communications Policy. Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
- (11 August 2017). "Who defines the public interest".
- "Code of Ethics {{!}} National Society of Professional Engineers".
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2023). "Open Government: Concept, Definitions and Implementation".
- "Government IT Initiatives".
- "U.S. Digital Corps".
- "Library of Congress".
- Office of Personnel Management. "Open Government".
- "THE NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF HISTORY". The New England Journal of History.
- Carson, Andrea. (14 June 2017). "Explainer: what is public interest journalism?".
- The Charitable Journalism Project. (29 January 2020). "What is Public Interest Journalism?".
- "PIJI - Public Interest Journalism Initiative".
- "Center for Cooperative Media {{!}} Montclair State University".
- "publicinterest.media".
- Freedman Consulting. (November 7, 2018). "Here to There: Lessons Learned from Public Interest Law".
- Simon, Clea. "Putting compassion into action".
- "Social Justice and Public Interest".
- Selbin, Jeffrey. (November 15, 2021). "Jeffrey Selbin".
- NASA. (2023). "Eclipse Soundscapes".
- (2023-02-15). "At 25, Backyard Bird Count shows power of citizen science".
- "A Brief History of the Field {{!}} Program in Science, Technology & Society".
- (2020). "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency".
- "University of Massachusetts Amherst Announces New Certificate in Public Interest Technology – Public Interest Technology Initiative".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Public interest — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report