Peak ground acceleration

Geophysics

Earthquake energy is dispersed in waves from the hypocentre, causing ground movement omnidirectionally but typically modelled horizontally (in two directions) and vertically. PGA records the acceleration (rate of change of speed) of these movements, while peak ground velocity is the greatest speed (rate of movement) reached by the ground, and peak displacement is the distance moved. These values vary in different earthquakes, and in differing sites within one earthquake event, depending on a number of factors. These include the length of the fault, magnitude, the depth of the quake, the distance from the epicentre, the duration (length of the shake cycle), and the geology of the ground (subsurface). Shallow-focused earthquakes generate stronger shaking (acceleration) than intermediate and deep quakes, since the energy is released closer to the surface.

Peak ground acceleration can be expressed in fractions of g (the standard acceleration due to Earth's gravity, equivalent to g-force) as either a decimal or percentage; in m/s2 (1 g = 9.81 m/s2); or in multiples of Gal, where 1 Gal is equal to 0.01 m/s (1 g = 981 Gal).

The ground type can significantly influence ground acceleration, so PGA values can display extreme variability over distances of a few kilometers, particularly with moderate to large earthquakes. The varying PGA results from an earthquake can be displayed on a shake map. Due to the complex conditions affecting PGA, earthquakes of similar magnitude can offer disparate results, with many moderate magnitude earthquakes generating significantly larger PGA values than larger magnitude quakes.

During an earthquake, ground acceleration is measured in three directions: vertically (V or UD, for up-down) and two perpendicular horizontal directions (H1 and H2), often north–south (NS) and east–west (EW). The peak acceleration in each of these directions is recorded, with the highest individual value often reported. Alternatively, a combined value for a given station can be noted. The peak horizontal ground acceleration (PHA or PHGA) can be reached by selecting the higher individual recording, taking the mean of the two values, or calculating a vector sum of the two components. A three-component value can also be reached, by taking the vertical component into consideration also.

In seismic engineering, the effective peak acceleration (EPA, the maximum ground acceleration to which a building responds) is often used, which tends to be – the PGA.

Seismic risk and engineering

Study of geographic areas combined with an assessment of historical earthquakes allows geologists to determine seismic risk and to create seismic hazard maps, which show the likely PGA values to be experienced in a region during an earthquake, with a probability of exceedance (PE). Seismic engineers and government planning departments use these values to determine the appropriate earthquake loading for buildings in each zone, with key identified structures (such as hospitals, bridges, power plants) needing to survive the maximum considered earthquake (MCE).

Damage to buildings is related to both peak ground velocity (PGV) and the duration of the earthquake – the longer high-level shaking persists, the greater the likelihood of damage.

Comparison of instrumental and felt intensity

Peak ground acceleration provides a measurement of instrumental intensity, that is, ground shaking recorded by seismic instruments. Other intensity scales measure felt intensity, based on eyewitness reports, felt shaking, and observed damage. There is correlation between these scales, but not always absolute agreement since experiences and damage can be affected by many other factors, including the quality of earthquake engineering.

Generally speaking,

• 0.001 g (0.01 m/s2) – perceptible by people
• 0.02 g (0.2 m/s2) – people lose their balance
• 0.50 g (5 m/s2) – very high; well-designed buildings can survive if the duration is short.

Correlation with the Mercalli scale

The United States Geological Survey developed an Instrumental Intensity scale, which maps peak ground acceleration and peak ground velocity on an intensity scale similar to the felt Mercalli scale. These values are used to create shake maps by seismologists around the world.

Other intensity scales

In the 7-class Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale, the highest intensity, Shindo 7, covers accelerations greater than 4 m/s (0.41 g).

PGA hazard risks worldwide

In India, areas with expected PGA values higher than 0.36 g are classed as "Zone 5", or "Very High Damage Risk Zone".

Notable earthquakes

References

Bibliography

• {{Cite journal
• {{Cite journal
• {{Cite journal
• {{Cite journal

References

1. Douglas, J. (2003-04-01). "Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates". Earth-Science Reviews.
2. [http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf18.html Nuclear Power Plants and Earthquakes] {{Webarchive. link. (2009-07-22 . Retrieved 8 April 2011.)
3. "ShakeMap Scientific Background. Rapid Instrumental Intensity Maps". United States Geological Survey.
4. Cua, G.. (2010). ""Best Practices" for Using Macroseismic Intensity and Ground Motion Intensity Conversion Equations for Hazard and Loss Models in GEM1". [[Global Earthquake Model]].
5. See also: [[Seismic magnitude scales]]
6. European Facilities for Earthquake Hazard & Risk. (2013). "The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model (ESHM13)". EFEHR.
7. "Explanation of Parameters". United States Geological Survey.
8. (16 July 2001). "Magnitude 6.6 – Near the west coast of Honshu, Japan". United States Geological Survey.
9. "ShakeMap scientific background. Peak acceleration maps". United States Geological Survey.
10. "ShakeMap Scientific Background". United States Geological Survey.
11. Lorant, Gabor. (17 June 2010). "Seismic Design Principles". National Institute of Building Sciences.
12. Masumi Yamada. (July–August 2010). "Spatially Dense Velocity Structure Exploration in the Source Region of the Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake". Seismological Society of America.
13. (4 February 2019). "Extreme Accelerations During Earthquakes Caused by Elastic Flapping Effect". Scientific Reports.
14. "M 9.5 – 1960 Great Chilean Earthquake (Valdivia Earthquake)". United States Geological Survey.
15. Schäfer, Andreas, et al. ''Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology CEDIM Forensic Disaster Analysis Group (FDA)''. 2024, [https://www.cedim.kit.edu/download/FDA_EQ_Japan2024.pdf www.cedim.kit.edu/download/FDA_EQ_Japan2024.pdf], https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000166937. Retrieved 3 Apr. 2024.
16. Erol Kalkan. (17 March 2011). "March 11, 2011 M9.0 Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Preliminary results". United States Geological Survey.
17. "平成23年(2011年)東北地方太平洋沖地震による強震動". Kyoshin Bosai.
18. "2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake, Strong Ground Motion". National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention.
19. "M 9.1 – 2011 Great Tohoku Earthquake, Japan – Origin". United States Geological Survey.
20. "Archived copy of USGS Magnitude 7 and Greater Earthquakes in 2011".
21. "平成23年（2011年）東北地方太平洋沖地震（東日本大震災）について（第162報）（令和4年3月8日）". 総務省消防庁災害対策本部.
22. (21 January 2025). "第007號 1月21日0時17分 規模 6.4 23.23N 120.57E, i.e. 37.9 km SE of Chiayi County". [[Central Weather Administration]].
23. "M 7.7 – 21 km S of Puli, Taiwan". United States Geological Survey.
24. (April 1995). "The Northridge Earthquake of 1994: Ground Motions and Geotechnical Aspects". Northeastern University College of Engineering.
25. "M 6.7 – 1 km NNW of Reseda, CA". United States Geological Survey.
26. "M 7.8 – Pazarcik earthquake, Kahramanmaras earthquake sequence".
27. (3 April 2024). "第019號 4月3日7時58分 規模 7.1 花蓮縣政府南南西方 13.6 公里 (位於花蓮縣壽豐鄉)". [[Central Weather Administration]].
28. (23 February 2011). "Feb 22 2011 – Christchurch badly damaged by magnitude 6.3 earthquake". [[GeoNet (New Zealand).
29. "PGA intensity map". GeoNet.
30. (22 February 2011). "New Zealand Earthquake Report – Feb 22 2011 at 12:51 pm (NZDT)". [[GeoNet (New Zealand).
31. Carter, Hamish. (24 February 2011). "Technically it's just an aftershock". The New Zealand Herald.
32. "M 7.1, Darfield (Canterbury), September 4, 2010". [[GeoNet (New Zealand).
33. {{harvnb. Cloud. Hudson. 1975
34. Katsuhiko, Ishibashi. (11 August 2001). "Why Worry? Japan's Nuclear Plants at Grave Risk From Quake Damage". Asia Pacific Journal.
35. "EERI PERW 2021 – Part 1: Aegean Sea Earthquake". Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
36. "The Mw7.2 15 October 2013 Bohol, Philippines Earthquake". Emi-megacities.org.
37. (1994). "Practical lessons from the Loma Prieta earthquake". [[National Academies Press]].
38. (26 February 2011). "New Zealand quake raises questions about L.A. buildings". Los Angeles Times.
39. {{harvnb. Elnashai. Jig Kim. Jin Yun. Sidarta. 2006
40. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on the Alaska Earthquake, [https://books.google.com/books?id=5EArAAAAYAAJ&dq ''The great Alaska earthquake of 1964, Volume 1, Part 1''], National Academies, 1968 p. 285