From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Oxford Latin Dictionary
Classical Latin dictionary by Oxford
Classical Latin dictionary by Oxford
| Field | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| name | Oxford Latin Dictionary | |
| image | Oxford Latin Dictionary.jpg | caption = |
| author | P. G. W. Glare | |
| country | United Kingdom | |
| language | English | |
| publisher | Oxford University Press | |
| release_date | 1968 to 1982; reprinted with corrections 1996; 2nd edition 2012 | |
| media_type | Print (Hardcover) | |
| pages | 2,400 | |
| isbn | 978-0-19-958031-6 | |
| dewey | 473/.21 19 | |
| congress | PA2365 .E5 O9 2012 |
The Oxford Latin Dictionary (or OLD) is the standard English lexicon of Classical Latin, compiled from sources written before AD 200. Begun in 1933, it was published in fascicles between 1968 and 1982; a lightly revised second edition was released in 2012.
The dictionary was created in order to meet the need for a more modern Latin-English dictionary than Lewis & Short's A Latin Dictionary (1879),{{Cite web | access-date = 2013-10-19
History
Although Lewis and Short's Latin Dictionary was widely used in the English world by the end of the nineteenth century, its faults were widely felt among classicists.{{Cite journal | access-date = 19 October 2013 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20130327035452/http://www.oupjapan.co.jp/upload/samples/9780199580316_Introduction.pdf | archive-date = 27 March 2013 | url-status = dead
Other members of the editorial staff included C.O. Brink (1938–42), E.A. Parker (1939–46), M. Alford (1942–45), J. Chadwick (1946–52), B.V. Slater (1947–49), D.C. Browning (1949–50), W.M. Edwards (1950–69), J.D. Craig (1952–53), C.L. Howard (1952–58), G.E. Turton (1954–70), R.H. Barrow (1954–82), S. Trenkner (1955–57), R.C. Palmer (1957–82), G.M. Lee (1968–82), and D. Raven (1969–70).
In 2012, a second edition of the dictionary was published in two volumes (the binding of the 1982 single-volume edition tends to fall apart under the paper's weight); it removes some English translations now considered to be archaic and presents the material in a clearer fashion using the Arno typeface.
Comparison with other dictionaries
Although the OLD was intended as a replacement for the Lewis and Short dictionary from 1879, the decision to exclude Latin written after AD 200 has drawn criticism from users.{{Cite book
The Thesaurus Linguae Latinae has a far more ambitious scope than the OLD, but after more than 100 years, only two-thirds of this comprehensive dictionary has been published.{{Cite journal | access-date = 2013-10-19 | url-access = subscription
References
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Oxford Latin Dictionary — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report