One person, one language

Reasoning

Traditionally, the “one person, one language” method has been regarded as the best method for bilingual language acquisition free of mixed utterances. The term “one person, one language” was first introduced by the French linguist Maurice Grammont in 1902. He theorized that by separating the languages from the beginning, parents could prevent confusion and code-mixing in their bilingual children.

George Saunders wrote in his book Bilingual Children: From Birth to Teens that the “one person, one language” approach “ensures that the children have regular exposure to and have to make use of each language. This is particularly important for the minority language, which has little outside support."

This method has also been linked to an early development of metalinguistic awareness.

Implementation

In a 1989 study published in the Infant Mental Health Journal, Naomi Goodz found that fathers tend to adhere more strictly to the “one person, one language model" than mothers. Even when parents reported strictly following a “one person, one language” scheme, naturalistic observations found repeated instances of language mixing in both parents in a 1996 study

Masae Takeuchi conducted research on 25 Japanese mothers in Melbourne, Australia who were using the one person, one language approach to support their children's Japanese/English bilingual development. Takeuchi found that consistency is the key to the success of the approach. Most of the children in Takeuchi's study did not end up using Japanese actively after leaving school and only those children who were raised by mothers who consistently insisted on speaking only Japanese went on to use Japanese actively as adults.

Alternatives

Alternatives to "one person, one language" (OPOL) are "minority language at home" (ML@H), "time and place" (T&L = specific language for specific time and/or place), "mixed language policy" (MLP = mixing languages depending on situation, topic, etc.), and individual family-based models.Arancha Ruiz Martín (January 2017): Mixed system 1: A language strategy for bilingual families. Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada. DOI: 10.12795/elia.2017.i17.06.

Christina Bosemark: Raising Bilingual Children: The Different Methods to Success at omniglot.com

Veronika (24 September, 2018): From OPOL to mL@H: Different models of bilingual living. at bilingual-babies.com

References

Notes

Bibliography

• {{Citation |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nDTc9NRAkNMC&q=Barron-Hauwaert,+Suzanne.+%22The+One-Parent-One-Language+Approach.+What+Is+It&pg=PA1 |access-date=2011-01-26
• {{Citation |editor1-last=Fletcher |editor1-first=Paul |editor2-last=MacWhinney |editor2-first=Brian |access-date=2011-01-26 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=g9Zr6U0g6tUC&q=De+Houwer,+Annick.+%22Bilingual+Language+Acquisition.%22+The+Handbook+of+Child+Language.+-Wikipedia&pg=PA219
• Goodz, Naomi S. "Parental Language Mixing in Bilingual Families." Infant Mental Health Journal 10.1 (1989): 25–44. EBSCO. Web. 10 Dec. 2010.
• Saunders, George. Bilingual Children: From Birth to Teens. Philadelphia: Clevedon Avon, 1988. Print.

References

1. Bebe, Team Bilingual. (2022-09-29). ""One Parent, One Language": How It Works".
2. Barron-Hauwaert 2004, p. 2.
3. Saunders 1988, p. 49.
4. De Houwer 1996, sec. 4.2.
5. Goodz 1989, 39.
6. De Houwer 1996, sec. 4.4.
7. Takeuchi, Maesae. (2006). "The Japanese Language Development of Children through the 'One Parent-One Language' Approach in Melbourne". Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development.