From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Nucular
Common, prescribed-against pronunciation of "nuclear"
Common, prescribed-against pronunciation of "nuclear"
Nucular is a common, proscribed pronunciation of the word "nuclear". It is a rough phonetic spelling of . The Oxford English Dictionarys entry dates the word's first published appearance to 1943.
Dictionary notes
This is one of two contentious pronunciations that receive particular mention in the FAQ of the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:
Though disapproved of by many, pronunciations ending in \-kyə-lər\ have been found in widespread use among educated speakers, including scientists, lawyers, professors, congressmen, United States cabinet members, and at least two United States presidents and one vice president. While most common in the United States, these pronunciations have also been heard from British and Canadian speakers.{{cite web | access-date = 2006-10-23 }}
The American Heritage Dictionary notes:
The pronunciation (noo'kyə-lər), which is generally considered incorrect, is an example of how a familiar phonological pattern can influence an unfamiliar one ... [since] much more common is the similar sequence (-kyə-lər), which occurs in words like *particular*, *circular*, *spectacular*, and in many scientific words like *molecular*, *ocular*, and *vascular*.
The Oxford English Dictionary notes:
The colloquial pronunciation British /ˈnjuːkjʊlə/, U.S. /ˈn(j)ukjələr/ (frequently rendered in written form as *nucular*[...]) has been criticized in usage guides since at least the mid 20th century [...] although it is now commonly given as a variant in modern dictionaries.
In his 1999 book The Big Book of Beastly Mispronunciations, logophile Charles Harrington Elster wrote that the vast majority of those he spoke to while writing his book as well as 99% of the 1985 usage panel of Morris & Morris's Harper Dictionary of Contemporary Usage specifically condemned the use of the word and characterized it as a mispronunciation. Elster's own view on the matter derives from the root of the word: "nucleus". Arguing by analogy, Elster suggests that "Molecular comes from molecule, and particular comes from particle, but there is no nucule to support nucular."
Notable users
The U.S. presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and vice president Walter Mondale used this pronunciation. In his 2005 book Going Nucular, linguist Geoffrey Nunberg suggested that the presidents' reasons for their differing pronunciations may be distinct. Whereas Eisenhower's pronunciation most likely arose from lack of familiarity (he first learned the word in midlife), Bush's usage may represent a calculated effort to appeal to populist sentiment, though Nunberg's theory here is rejected by linguist Steven Pinker. This analysis is repeated in the second edition of Elster's Big Book of Beastly Mispronunciations.
Oxford professor Marcus du Sautoy used this pronunciation in a BBC documentary.
The nuclear physicist Edward Teller, "father" of the American hydrogen bomb, supposedly used "nucular", and it does have some currency in the American nuclear research establishment. But in a 1965 interview on Project Plowshare, Teller used the standard pronunciation.
The 17th U.S. Secretary of Energy, Chris Wright, said "nucular" several times in his welcome remarks on February 5, 2025.
Motivation
Pinker has proposed a phonotactic explanation for the conversion of nuclear to nucular: the unusual and disfavored sequence is gradually transformed to a more acceptable configuration via metathesis. But Arnold Zwicky notes that presents no difficulty for English speakers in words such as pricklier and deems the postulation of metathesis unnecessary. He suggests a morphological origin, combining the slang nuke with the common sequence -cular (molecular, particular, etc.). Supporting Zwicky's hypothesis, Geoffrey Nunberg quotes a government weapons specialist: "Oh, I only say 'nucular' when I'm talking about nukes." Nunberg argues that this pronunciation by weapons specialists and by politicians such as Bush may be a deliberate choice. He suggests that the reasons for this choice are to assert authority or to sound folksy.
References
References
- "[http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/258266 nucular, adj.2]". OED Online. September 2013. Oxford University Press. Accessed 10 September 2013.
- (2012-08-31). "nuclear - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary". M-w.com.
- (2013-01-09). "Nuclear - Definition from the American Heritage Online Dictionary". Ahdictionary.com.
- "[http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/128926 nuclear, adj. (and adv.) and n.]". OED Online. September 2013. Oxford University Press. Accessed 10 September 2013.
- [[Charles Harrington Elster. Elster, Charles Harrington]]. ''The Big Book Of Beastly Mispronunciations: The Complete Opinionated Guide for the Careful Speaker''. Houghton Mifflin. Pp.347-350. {{ISBN. 978-0-618-42315-6. 2006.
- ''[https://www.pbs.org/speak/speech/beastly/#Nuclear Do you Speak American?]'' [[PBS]]. 2005.
- Kate Taylor. (18 September 2002). "Why Does Bush Go "Nucular"?". Slate.
- [[Steven Pinker
- [[Geoffrey Nunberg. Nunberg, Geoffrey]]. ''Going Nucular: Language, Politics. and Culture in Confrontational Times''. PublicAffairs. Pp.297-298. {{ISBN. 1586483455. 2009.
- [[BBC]] documentary, "Faster Than the Speed of Light"
- Muller, Richard A. (2008). "Physics for Future Presidents: The Science behind the Headlines". W.W. Norton & Co..
- Teller, Edward. (1965). "Project Plowshare". Ohio State University.
- (February 5, 2025). "Secretary Chris Wright Delivers Welcome Remarks to DOE Staff". [[United States Department of Energy.
- Pinker, Steven. (Oct 4, 2008). "Everything You Heard Is Wrong".
- Zwicky, Arnold. (March 21, 2005). "Axe a stupid question".
- Nunberg, Geoffrey. (October 2, 2002). "Going Nucular".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Nucular — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report