Nuclear power in the European Union

Stress tests

Stress tests were developed within the EU in the aftermath of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, with the goal of making all 132 operating European reactors follow the same safety standards and have the same safety level for a range of possible catastrophic events (e.g. earthquake, flooding or plane crash). Most reactors proved well during the tests, with just 4 reactors in 2 countries having less than one hour for reactivating safety systems; however, most reactors will also have to undergo a program of safety upgrades. In 2012, the costs of additional safety improvements were estimated to be in the range of €30 million to €200 million per reactor unit. Thus, the total costs for the 132 reactors operating in the EU could be in the order of €10–25 billion for all NPP units in the EU over the coming years.

Energy mix

The EU-27 in 2005 satisfied its primary energy consumption with 36.7% oil, 24.6% gas, 17.7% coal, 14.2% nuclear, 6.7% renewables and 0.1% industrial waste. |access-date=5 August 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090205022749/http://ec.europa.eu/energy/nuclear/doc/brusselsfdemay2002.pdf |archive-date=5 February 2009 |url-status=dead In 2006, nuclear energy provided the largest source (29.5%) of electricity with a production of 990 TWh, and an installed capacity of 134 GWe (17.6% of all installed capacity).

It was the leading electric power source in Belgium, France, Hungary, Lithuania and Slovakia. France, where nuclear is also the largest primary energy source, produced 450 TWh in 2006 – 45% of the EU's total. Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, Italy, Cyprus, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, Austria, Poland and Portugal did not produce any nuclear energy. |access-date=17 October 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081203033148/http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/figures/pocketbook/doc/2007/2007_energy_en.pdf |archive-date=3 December 2008 |url-status=dead

As of June 2013 there were 131 nuclear reactors in the European Union. 112 units of these are located in eight of the western EU countries. Total nuclear energy generation from EU power plants increased by 25% from 1995 to 2005. The majority of this growth occurred in the 1990s. Installed capacities decreased by 2.6% since 1990 and relative contribution to the overall electricity mix decreased from 30.8% in 1990 to 30.2% in 2005.{{cite news |access-date=5 August 2008 |archive-date=13 May 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120513152501/http://www.energy.eu/publications/KSGB07001ENC_002.pdf |url-status=dead

In 2019, there were 106 operational reactors, and production decreased by 16%, primarily due to the shutdown of a number of reactors in Germany.

Nuclear power in France usually provides up to 70% of electricity production. Corrosion in several French nuclear reactors, even the most modern type N4, led to long term shutdowns since October 2021. As of early September 2022, 32 of France's 56 nuclear reactors were shut down due to maintenance or technical problems. In 2022, Europe's driest summer in 500 years had serious consequences for power plant cooling systems, as the drought reduced the amount of river water available for cooling. On 6 July 2022, Paris announced that it will nationalise the Électricité de France (EDF) power utility as a result of the escalating energy crisis on the European continent.

Uranium resources

A small amount of uranium mining is conducted in the European Union, however the majority of uranium is imported into the EU. Denmark, through Greenland, contains the majority of uranium deposits of any EU country but in 2021 most uranium mining was banned by Greenland's parliament due to environmental concerns.{{cite web|title=Greenland bans uranium mining, halting rare earths project

The Euratom Supply Agency aims to ensure access to nuclear energy materials for all countries within the European Atomic Energy Community.{{cite web|url=https://euratom-supply.ec.europa.eu/index_en|title=Supply Agency of the European Atomic Energy Community |access-date=2023-07-17}}

EU-level policy

European nuclear policy is governed by the Euratom Treaty. Therefore, regular EU policy on for example environment or the market does not apply to issues in the nuclear field. Nuclear policy is mainly in the competence of the member states. In the EU level, DG ENER is the main authority for EU nuclear issues.

The European Council is the locus for intergovernmental decisions. The European Parliament does not have authority in the field of nuclear policy other than the right to ask questions to the European Commission.

In case of a radiological emergency, the EU will trigger its ECURIE alert system, which immediately notifies all national authorities of an impending nuclear hazard. This system was installed after the experience with the Chernobyl disaster.

The commission's SET plan mentions the "sustainable nuclear fission initiative" to develop Generation IV reactors as one of the research priorities of the European Union.

The European Commission is proposing a stress test for all nuclear power plants in Europe, to prove the nuclear fleet can withstand incidents like those in Fukushima. The European Commission is also proposing tests for countries near the EU that make use of nuclear power.

Nuclear waste

On average, the EU creates about 40,000 cubic meters of radioactive waste per year. Eighty percent of that is short-lived low-level radioactive waste. |access-date = 5 August 2008 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080515212231/http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l27048.htm |archive-date = 15 May 2008 France is currently the only EU country that reprocess waste. The reprocessing is expected to continue in France. The countries that currently use this reprocessed fuel (MOX) include Germany, Belgium, France and Switzerland.{{citation |trans-title=Nuclear power plants in the world |author1-link=Commissariat à l’énergie atomique |access-date=5 August 2008 |archive-date=27 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110927040825/http://www.cea.fr/content/download/4667/27759/file/Elecnuc2007.pdf |url-status=live |access-date=5 August 2008 |archive-date=5 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305103749/http://www.nbcnews.com/id/22755853/ |url-status=live

The EBRD is financing the decommissioning of old nuclear plants in Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia.

EU member states Austria, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Italy, Lithuania, Romania, and Slovenia are working since January 2009 together in the European Repository Development Organisation (ERDO) to address common issues on nuclear waste storage.

ERDO was working early 2010 on a plan to store European nuclear waste somewhere in eastern Europe.

"Some 7,000 cubic meters of high-level nuclear waste are produced across the EU each year. Most Member States store spent fuel and other highly radioactive wastes in above-ground storage facilities that need continuous maintenance and oversight and are at risk of accidents, such as airplane crashes, fires or earthquakes. Hungary and Bulgaria currently ship nuclear waste to Russia."

On 19 July 2011, the European Commission adopted a Directive for regulating and handling nuclear waste in the EU. "Exports to countries outside the EU is allowed under very strict and binding conditions: The third country needs to have a final repository in operation, when the waste is being shipped. Such a repository for highly radioactive waste is internationally defined to be a deep geological repository. At present, such deep geological repositories do not exist anywhere in the world nor is a repository in construction outside of the EU. It takes currently a minimum of 40 years to develop and build one."

The MAX project (2011 to August 2014), funded partly with an almost €3 million European Commission contribution, embodied working on transmuting the waste into less toxic shorter-lived elements. The final report from August 2014 is available. It concludes that one milestone was not achieved.

Nuclear decommissioning

By 2025, it is estimated that over a third of the EU's currently operational reactors will be at the end of their lifecycle and in need of shutdown. At the time of the accession to the EU, Bulgaria, Lithuania and Slovakia agreed to shut down reactors at the sites of Kozloduy, Ignalina and Bohunice respectively: these programs are currently under way. Other decommissioning activities are under way for older reactors, phased out for political reasons (e.g. Italy, Germany) or simply because they reached their end-of-life (e.g. United Kingdom).

In 2016, Reuters reported that the European Commission estimated that the EU's nuclear decommissioning liabilities were seriously underfunded by about 118 billion euros, with only 150 billion euros of earmarked assets to cover 268 billion euros of expected decommissioning costs covering both dismantling of nuclear plants and storage of radioactive parts and waste. Among EU member states still operating nuclear plants, only Britain's operators have enough dedicated assets to cover the expected costs, 63 billion euros, the commission's draft working paper finds. France had the largest shortfall with only 23 billion euros of earmarked assets to cover 74 billion euros of expected costs, while a stress test carried out by Germany's Economy Ministry late last year showed the provisions made by the country's utilities – E.ON, RWE, EnBW and Vattenfall [VATN.UL] – were adequate. Decommissioning costs vary according to reactor type and size, location, the proximity and availability of disposal facilities, the intended future use of the site and the condition of the reactor at the time of decommissioning. Although decommissioning might gradually become cheaper, the cost of final waste depositories is largely unknown and costs could also grow, rather than shrink, over the many decades in question. The European Commission declined to comment on an unpublished document and has not confirmed when the report will be officially published.

European nuclear industry

Advanced new reactors under construction in Finland and France, which were meant to lead a nuclear renaissance, have been delayed and are running over-budget. There has been a 15-year gap in building reactors, which has meant that there are difficulties in manufacturing the high quality parts required for a reactor. The new reactor also represents an advance over existing technologies, with better reliability and safety over Generation II reactors. Finally, they are "first-of-a-kind" industrial plants, having then all the kinds of problems and delays that should be avoided in following projects.

The European nuclear industry is working to develop Generation IV nuclear reactors. Foratom is a Brussels-based trade organisation that bills itself as the "voice of the nuclear industry".

Along with companies and trade organisations like Foratom, General Electric, Hitachi, and Toshiba are all partners in the European Nuclear Industry. Other partners may include TEPCO from Japan and KEPCO from South Korea. The nuclear industry is regulated by governments and financing is often provided to private contractors who do the work.

Nuclear Safety is an ongoing discussion in the EU. The Western European Nuclear Regulators Association has members from 17 states or European countries. Nuclear safety faces many challenges. WENRA addresses these challenges and commits itself to objective reporting. An example of a report is the 2011 publication, "Stress tests" specifications: Proposal by the WENRA Task Force

Future plans

Currently, nine European countries are building new reactors, or seriously planning to build new ones:

• France
• Finland
• Slovakia
• Poland
• Hungary
• Romania
• Bulgaria
• Czech Republic
• Sweden

Slovenian government has issued an energy permit for building a new nuclear power plant in 2021. Additionally, a 20 years life extension of the existing Krško Nuclear Power Plant is currently underway.

EPR new reactors under construction in Finland and France have been delayed and are running over-budget. Similar problems are for new VVR reactors under construction in Mochovce, Slovakia, which are anyway closing to completion.

Power companies are building nuclear reactors in Finland and France and the French state continues to fund nuclear power, with a €1 billion added to help research for fourth-generation technology and nuclear safety.

Several countries, among the ones owning nuclear power plants, have anyway expanded their nuclear power generation capacity by just upgrading existing reactors. Such upgrades granted from 10% to 29% more power per unit.

Following the Fukushima nuclear disaster, Germany has permanently shut down eight of its reactors and pledged to close the rest by 2022; but difficulties, costs and subsequent critics of planned energy transition could potentially harm this policy. Italy voted twice, in 1987 to make more difficult to build new plants (the vote was extensively interpreted by following governments as a total repeal of nuclear power plants, leading to the sudden shut down of all Italian operating reactors within few years), and in 2011 to keep their country non-nuclear. Switzerland and Spain have banned the construction of new reactors. Belgium is considering phasing out its nuclear plants.

As said, the 2011 Japanese Fukushima nuclear disaster has led some European energy officials to re-think nuclear power generation, especially in Germany and Switzerland. Switzerland has abandoned plans to replace its old nuclear reactors and will take the last one offline in 2034. Anti-nuclear movement intensified in Germany. In the following months the government decided to shut down eight reactors immediately (6 August 2011) and to have the other nine off the grid by the end of 2022. Renewable energy in Germany is believed to be able to compensate for much of the loss. In September 2011 Siemens, which had been responsible for constructing all 17 of Germany's existing nuclear power plants, announced that it would exit the nuclear sector following the Fukushima disaster and the subsequent changes to German energy policy. Chief executive Peter Löscher has supported the German government's planned Energiewende, its transition to renewable energy technologies, calling it a "project of the century" and saying Berlin's target of reaching 35% renewable energy sources by 2020 was feasible. Despite this, the phasing out of nuclear energy seems to be much more difficult and costly than expected. The transition is tending more towards polluting fossil fuel plants than clean renewable energies, sparking several critics. Actually, transition plans did not meet their short-term goals and will hardly meet their medium-term goals; fossil fuel prices and technology are still more efficient, cheaper and easier to implement than heavily state-subsidised solar and wind power generation.

In February 2024, the European Commission launched the European Industrial Alliance on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), aiming to accelerate deployment and support a new generation of nuclear technologies as part of the EU’s clean energy transition.

References

References

1. "Share of primary energy consumption from nuclear (Europe, map)".
2. "Share of primary energy consumption from nuclear".
3. Peverieri, Anna. (July 9, 2025). "Solar tops EU power mix for first time in June, Ember says".
4. "EU Electricity Generation Mix 2025 {{!}} Low-Carbon Power Data".
5. (2019-08-05). "Nuclear power plants in Europe".
6. "Understanding the German Nuclear Exit {{!}} Heinrich Böll Stiftung {{!}} Washington, DC Office - USA, Canada, Global Dialogue".
7. "Joint Declaration for a nuclear-free EU Taxonomy - BMUV-Meldung".
8. Kurmayer, Nikolaus J.. (12 November 2021). "Five EU countries form anti-nuclear alliance at COP26".
9. (1 January 2022). "EU moves to label gas and nuclear energy as 'green'".
10. (4 October 2012). "Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the comprehensive risk and safety assessments ("stress tests") of nuclear power plants in the European Union and related activities". Publications Office of the European Union.
11. "Primary energy consumption by fuel (%) in 2005".
12. [http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/Facts-and-Figures/World-Nuclear-Power-Reactors-and-Uranium-Requirements/#.Udaa2Bz-FGg] {{Webarchive. link. (1 October 2017 World Nuclear Association, Facts and Figures)
13. (4 September 2022). "France's EDF plans to restart nation's entire nuclear fleet by early next year". Euronews.
14. (2 September 2022). "EDF to restart all its nuclear reactors this winter - minister". Reuters.
15. (18 August 2022). "Heat and Drought in Europe Strain Energy Supply". [[The New York Times]].
16. (22 August 2022). "Europe's driest summer in 500 years threatens crops, energy production". Reuters.
17. [https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/frances-edf-be-fully-nationalised-borne-2022-07-06/ "France plans full nationalisation of power utility EDF"] Reuters. 6 July 2022.
18. "Shock waves: what will a Spanish ban mean for uranium mining in Europe?".
19. "Does France's emphasis on nuclear power guarantee its energy independence?".
20. (1 April 2011). "Nuclear safety in the EU: In the wake of the Fukushima disaster, there is renewed concern for nuclear safety in the EU - Library briefing".
21. "Nuclear safety [EBRD – Sector]".
22. "ERDO – Working Group".
23. "Eastern Europe, a nuclear dustbin? | Presseurop (English)".
24. "Environment News Service (ENS)".
25. "Press corner".
26. "(see section "Project information")".
27. "MAX and the MYRRHA | Article 4 | Issue 10 | Newsletters | News | EuCARD".
28. "Archived copy".
29. (31 July 2014). "Decommissioning of nuclear facilities".
30. "Nuclear Decommissioning: Decommission nuclear facilities – World Nuclear Association".
31. Christoph Steitz, Barbara Lewis. (16 February 2016). "EU short of 118 billion euros in nuclear decommissioning funds". Reuters.
32. [https://www.reuters.com/article/us-edf-nuclear-flamanville-idUSBRE8B214620121203 EDF raises French EPR reactor cost to over $11 billion] {{Webarchive. link. (19 August 2017 , ''Reuters'', 3 December 2012.)
33. "About us - FORATOM".
34. "About Us: WENRA's mission".
35. (12 April 2011). ""Stress tests" specifications: Proposal by the WENRA Task Force".
36. "World Nuclear Power Reactors | Uranium Requirements | Future Nuclear Power – World Nuclear Association".
37. "Izdano energetsko dovoljenje za projekt JEK2".
38. link. (15 April 2016 ''New York Times'', 28 May 2009.)
39. (27 June 2011). "France nuclear power funding gets 1bn euro boost". BBC News.
40. "Plans for New Nuclear Reactors Worldwide – World Nuclear Association".
41. Annika Breidthardt. (30 May 2011). "German government wants nuclear exit by 2022 at latest". Reuters.
42. SPIEGEL, SPIEGEL Staff, DER. (4 September 2013). "High Costs and Errors of German Transition to Renewable Energy". Der Spiegel.
43. "Three lessons from Germany's energy transition".
44. (13 June 2011). "Italy Nuclear Referendum Results".
45. Henry Sokolski. (28 November 2011). "Nuclear Power Goes Rogue". Newsweek.
46. "Nuclear Energy in Sweden – World Nuclear Association".
47. IAEA. (2011). "Power Reactor Information System".
48. (18 September 2011). "Siemens to quit nuclear industry". BBC News.
49. (30 May 2024). "Small Modular Reactors explained - European Commission". European Commission.