From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Nixon v. Condon

Field	Value
Litigants	Nixon v. Condon
ArgueDate	January 7
ArgueYear	1932
ReargueDate	March 15
ReargueYear	1932
DecideDate	May 2
DecideYear	1932
FullName	L.A. Nixon v. James Condon and another
USVol	286
USPage	73
ParallelCitations	52 S.Ct. 484; 88 A.L.R. 458; 76 L. Ed. 984; 1932 U.S. LEXIS 597
Prior	34 F.2d 464 (W.D. Tex. 1929), aff'd, 49 F.2d 1012 (5th Cir. 1931), cert. granted, .
Majority	Cardozo
JoinMajority	Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts
Dissent	McReynolds
JoinDissent	Van Devanter, Sutherland, Butler
LawsApplied	U.S. Const., amend. XIV, Tex. Civ. St. art. 3107

Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73 (1932), was a voting rights case decided by the United States Supreme Court, which found the all-white Democratic Party primary in Texas unconstitutional. This was one of four cases brought to challenge the Texas all-white Democratic Party primary. All challenges were supported by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). With Smith v. Allwright (1944) the Supreme Court decisively prohibited the white primary.

Background

In Nixon v. Herndon (1927), the Court had struck down a Texas statute that prohibited blacks from participating in the Texas Democratic primary election. Very shortly after that decision, the Texas Legislature repealed the invalidated statute, declared that the effect of the Nixon decision was to create an emergency requiring immediate action, and replaced the old statute with a new one. The new law provided that every political party would henceforth "in its own way determine who shall be qualified to vote or otherwise participate in such political party".

Under the authority of this law, the executive committee of the Texas Democratic Party adopted a resolution stating that "all white democrats who are qualified under the constitution and laws of Texas" would be allowed to vote. In the 1928 Democratic primary, Dr. L. A. Nixon of El Paso again tried to vote. He was again denied, on the ground that the resolution allowed only whites to vote (Nixon was black). Nixon sued the judges of elections in federal court.

Issue

The defendants argued that there was no state action and therefore no equal protection violation, because the Democratic Party was "merely a voluntary association" that had the power to choose its own membership.

Decision

The Court, however, in a five to four ruling, reasoned that because the Texas statute gave the party's executive committee the authority to exclude would-be members of the party – an authority, the Court said, that the executive committee hitherto had not possessed – the executive committee was acting under a state grant of power. Because there was state action, the case was controlled by Nixon v. Herndon (1927), which prohibited state officials from "discharg[ing] their official functions in such a way as to discriminate invidiously between white citizens and black".

Aftermath

The Court's decision affected all-white primaries in other Southern states.

The Democratic Party in Texas responded by barring blacks from participation in the party nominating conventions, and thus effectively continuing the white primary.

Grovey v. Townsend (1935) and Smith v. Allwright (1944) were additional cases brought by African Americans to challenge Texas white primaries. With the latter, the Supreme Court decisively prohibited white primaries.

References

"Jim Crow Supreme Court Cases: Texas".

Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

united-states-equal-protection-case-law united-states-supreme-court-cases-in-1932 civil-rights-movement-case-law united-states-supreme-court-cases united-states-supreme-court-cases-of-the-hughes-court history-of-voting-rights-in-the-united-states african-american-segregation-in-the-united-states texas-elections texas-democratic-party primary-elections-in-the-united-states history-of-el-paso,-texas united-states-elections-case-law democratic-party-(united-states)-litigation united-states-racial-discrimination-case-law

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Nixon v. Condon — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report