From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Natural prolongation principle
The natural prolongation principle or principle of natural prolongation is a legal concept introduced in maritime claims submitted to the United Nations.
The phrase denotes a concept of political geography and international law that a nation's maritime boundary should reflect the 'natural prolongation' of where its land territory reaches the coast.
Oceanographic descriptions of the land mass under coastal waters became conflated and confused with criteria that are deemed relevant in border delimitation. The concept was developed in the process of settling disputes if the borders of adjacent nations were located on a contiguous continental shelf.
An unresolved issue is whether a natural prolongation defined scientifically, without reference to equitable principles, is to be construed as a "natural prolongation" for the purpose of maritime border delimitation or maritime boundary disputes.
History
The phrase natural prolongation was established as a concept in the North Sea Continental Cases in 1969.
The relevance and importance of natural prolongation as a factor in delimitation disputes and agreements has declined during the period in which international acceptance of UNCLOS III has expanded.
The Malta/Libya Case in 1985 is marked as the eventual demise of the natural prolongation principle being used in delimiting between adjoining national maritime boundaries.
The Bay of Bengal cases in the early 2010s (Bangladesh v Myanmar) and (Bangladesh v India) likewise dealt a blow to natural prolongation as the guiding principle for delimitation of the continental shelf more than 200 nautical miles beyond baselines.
References
Sources
- Capaldo, Giuliana Ziccardi. (1995). Répertoire de la jurisprudence de la cour internationale de justice (1947-1992). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ; ; ; OCLC 30701545
- Dorinda G. Dallmeyer and Louis De Vorsey. (1989). Rights to Oceanic Resources: Deciding and Drawing Maritime Boundaries. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ; OCLC 18981568
- Francalanci, Giampiero; Tullio Scovazzi; and Daniela Romanò. (1994). Lines in the Sea. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ; OCLC 30400059
- Kaye, Stuart B. (1995). Australia's maritime boundaries. Wollongong, New South Wales: Centre for Maritime Policy (University of Wollongong). ; OCLC 38390208
References
- Highet, Keith. (1989). "Whatever became of natural prolongation," in {{Google books. X2DssQNCz-sC. ''Rights to Oceanic Resources: Deciding and Drawing Maritime Boundaries,'' (Dorinda G. Dallmeyer ''et al.'', editors), pp. 87–100.
- Capaldo, Giuliana Ziccardi. (1995). {{Google books. esfISSxc13cC. ''Répertoire de la jurisprudence de la cour internationale de justice (1947–1992).'' p. 409.
- North Sea Continental Shelf Cases (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands) [1969] ''ICJ Reports'' 4 at 42.
- Highet, {{Google books. X2DssQNCz-sC. pp. 89–90.
- Kaye, Stuart B. (1995). ''Australia's maritime boundaries,'' pp. 12, 172.
- Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta) (Judgment) [1985] ''ICJ Reports'' 13 at 29
- Highet, {{Google books. X2DssQNCz-sC. pp. 91–95.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Natural prolongation principle — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report