From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Naimark's dilation theorem
In operator theory, Naimark's dilation theorem is a result that characterizes positive operator valued measures. It can be viewed as a consequence of Stinespring's dilation theorem.
Some preliminary notions
Let X be a compact Hausdorff space, H be a Hilbert space, and L(H) the Banach space of bounded operators on H. A mapping E from the Borel σ-algebra on X to L(H) is called an operator-valued measure if it is weakly countably additive, that is, for any disjoint sequence of Borel sets { B_i }, we have
: \langle E (\cup _i B_i) x, y \rangle = \sum_i \langle E (B_i) x, y \rangle
for all x and y. Some terminology for describing such measures are:
- E is called regular if the scalar valued measure
: B \rightarrow \langle E (B) x, y \rangle
is a regular Borel measure, meaning all compact sets have finite total variation and the measure of a set can be approximated by those of open sets.
- E is called bounded if |E| = \sup_B |E(B) | .
- E is called positive if E(B) is a positive operator for all B.
- E is called *self-adjoint * if E(B) is self-adjoint for all B.
- E is called spectral if it is self-adjoint and E (B_1 \cap B_2) = E(B_1) E(B_2) for all B_1, B_2 .
We will assume throughout that E is regular.
Let C(X) denote the abelian C*-algebra of continuous functions on X. If E is regular and bounded, it induces a map \Phi _E : C(X) \rightarrow L(H) in the obvious way:
:\langle \Phi _E (f) h_1 , h_2 \rangle = \int _X f(x) \langle E(dx) h_1, h_2 \rangle
The boundedness of E implies, for all h of unit norm
: \langle \Phi _E (f) h , h \rangle = \int X f(x) \langle E(dx) h, h \rangle \leq | f |\infty \cdot |E| .
This shows ; \Phi _E (f) is a bounded operator for all f, and \Phi _E itself is a bounded linear map as well.
The properties of \Phi_E are directly related to those of E:
- If E is positive, then \Phi_E, viewed as a map between C*-algebras, is also positive.
- \Phi_E is a homomorphism if, by definition, for all continuous f on X and h_1, h_2 \in H,
: \langle \Phi_E (fg) h_1, h_2 \rangle = \int _X f(x) \cdot g(x) ; \langle E(dx) h_1, h_2 \rangle = \langle \Phi_E (f) \Phi_E (g) h_1 , h_2 \rangle.
Take f and g to be indicator functions of Borel sets and we see that \Phi _E is a homomorphism if and only if E is spectral.
- Similarly, to say \Phi_E respects the * operation means
: \langle \Phi_E ( {\bar f} ) h_1, h_2 \rangle = \langle \Phi_E (f) ^* h_1 , h_2 \rangle.
The LHS is
: \int _X {\bar f} ; \langle E(dx) h_1, h_2 \rangle,
and the RHS is
: \langle h_1, \Phi_E (f) h_2 \rangle = \overline{\langle \Phi_E(f) h_2, h_1 \rangle} = \int _X {\bar f}(x) ; \overline{\langle E(dx) h_2, h_1 \rangle} = \int _X {\bar f}(x) ; \langle h_1, E(dx) h_2 \rangle
So, taking f a sequence of continuous functions increasing to the indicator function of B, we get \langle E(B) h_1, h_2 \rangle = \langle h_1, E(B) h_2 \rangle, i.e. E(B) is self adjoint.
- Combining the previous two facts gives the conclusion that \Phi _E is a *-homomorphism if and only if E is spectral and self adjoint. (When E is spectral and self adjoint, E is said to be a projection-valued measure or PVM.)
Naimark's theorem
The theorem reads as follows: Let E be a positive L(H)-valued measure on X. There exists a Hilbert space K, a bounded operator V: K \rightarrow H, and a self-adjoint, spectral L(K)-valued measure F on X, such that
:; E(B) = V F(B) V^*.
Proof
We now sketch the proof. The argument passes E to the induced map \Phi_E and uses Stinespring's dilation theorem. Since E is positive, so is \Phi_E as a map between C*-algebras, as explained above. Furthermore, because the domain of \Phi _E, C(X), is an abelian C*-algebra, we have that \Phi_E is completely positive. By Stinespring's result, there exists a Hilbert space K, a *-homomorphism \pi : C(X) \rightarrow L(K), and operator V: K \rightarrow H such that
:; \Phi_E(f) = V \pi (f) V^*.
Since π is a *-homomorphism, its corresponding operator-valued measure F is spectral and self adjoint. It is easily seen that F has the desired properties.
Finite-dimensional case
In the finite-dimensional case, there is a somewhat more explicit formulation.
Suppose now X = {1, \dotsc, n }, therefore C(X) is the finite-dimensional algebra \mathbb{C}^n, and H has finite dimension m. A positive operator-valued measure E then assigns each i a positive semidefinite m × m matrix E_i. Naimark's theorem now states that there is a projection-valued measure on X whose restriction is E.
Of particular interest is the special case when \sum_i E_i = I where I is the identity operator. (See the article on POVM for relevant applications.) In this case, the induced map \Phi_E is unital. It can be assumed with no loss of generality that each E_i takes the form x_ix_i^* for some potentially subnormalized vector x_i \in \mathbb{C}^m. Under such assumptions, the case n is excluded and we must have either
- n = m and E is already a projection-valued measure (because \sum_{i=1}^n x_i x_i^* = I if and only if {x_i} is an orthonormal basis),
- n m and { E_i } does not consist of mutually orthogonal projections. For the second possibility, the problem of finding a suitable projection-valued measure now becomes the following problem. By assumption, the non-square matrix : M = \begin{bmatrix} x_1 \cdots x_n \end{bmatrix} is a co-isometry, that is M M^* = I. If we can find a (n-m) \times n matrix N where :U = \begin{bmatrix} M \ N \end{bmatrix} is a n × n unitary matrix, the projection-valued measure whose elements are projections onto the column vectors of U will then have the desired properties. In principle, such a N can always be found.
Spelling
In the physics literature, it is common to see the spelling “Neumark” instead of “Naimark.” The latter variant is according to the romanization of Russian used in translation of Soviet journals, with diacritics omitted (originally Naĭmark). The former is according to the etymology of the surname of Mark Naimark.
References
- V. Paulsen, Completely Bounded Maps and Operator Algebras, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Naimark's dilation theorem — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report