Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
geography/canada

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Montreal Convention

Multilateral treaty adopted by the ICAO


Multilateral treaty adopted by the ICAO

FieldValue
nameMontreal Convention
long_nameConvention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air
date_signed
location_signedMontreal, Quebec, Canada
date_effective4 November 2003
parties141 (140 states + EU)
depositorInternational Civil Aviation Organization
languagesEnglish, Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish

The Montreal Convention (formally, the Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air) is a multilateral treaty adopted on 28 May 1999 by member states of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and entered into force on 4 November 2003. It updated and replaced parts of the earlier Warsaw Convention and Hague Protocol, which had governed international air travel since the early 20th century. The treaty aims to create clearer and more consistent rules for the international transport of passengers, baggage and cargo, especially regarding airline liability in the event of injury or death. As of April 2025, 140 of the 193 ICAO member states had joined the Convention.

A key feature of the Montreal Convention is a two-tier system for passenger compensation. Airlines are automatically responsible for proven damages up to 128,821 special drawing rights (SDR), equivalent to approximately US$175,000, without the need for passengers or their families to prove fault. For claims above that amount, the airline is only exempt from further liability if it can show that the incident was not caused by its own negligence. This system replaced the older, more limited compensation rules and was designed to simplify legal proceedings for victims and their families.

Damages

Under the Montreal Convention, air carriers are strictly liable for proven damages up to 128,821 special drawing rights (SDR), a mix of currency values established by the International Monetary Fund, equivalent to approximately US$175,000. For claims exceeding this amount, carriers can avoid liability only by proving that the accident was not due to their negligence or was solely caused by a third party. This defense is not available for claims within the 128,821 SDR limit. The convention also amended the jurisdictional provisions of the Warsaw Convention, allowing victims or their families to bring claims in the country of their principal residence, and requires all air carriers to maintain liability insurance.

Lost baggage

The Montreal Convention increased the maximum liability of airlines for lost, damaged, or delayed baggage to 1,288 SDR per passenger. Under the earlier Warsaw Convention, compensation was calculated based on the weight of the baggage. The Montreal Convention also requires airlines to reimburse passengers for the cost of essential replacement items purchased while baggage is delayed, up to the same 1,288 SDR limit. Baggage that remains undelivered after 21 days is considered lost unless recovered and returned by the airline.

Ratifications

As April 2025, there are 141 parties to the convention. Included in this total is 140 of the 193 ICAO Member States plus the European Union. The states that have ratified represent 139 UN member states plus the Cook Islands.

Member stateDate of entry into forceNotes
Afghanistan-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Albania
Algeria-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Andorra
Angola-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Antigua and Barbuda-None International Protocol
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas -Signed. Not ratified
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bhutan-None International Protocol
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi-None International Protocol
Cape Verde
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Republic -Signed. Not ratified
Chad
Chile
People's Republic of ChinaEntry into force for Hong Kong:
Colombia
Comoros-Warsaw Convention
Congo
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic People's Republic of Korea-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Democratic Republic of the Congo
DenmarkDoes not apply to the Faroe Islands.
Djibouti-None International Protocol
Dominica-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea-None International Protocol
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Fiji
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Grenada-Hague Protocol
Guatemala**
Guinea-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Guinea-Bissau-None International Protocol
Guyana
Haiti-None International Protocol
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Iraq-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati-None International Protocol
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Laos-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Liberia-Warsaw Convention
Libya-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands-None International Protocol
Mauritania-Warsaw Convention
Mauritius
Mexico
Federated States of Micronesia-None International Protocol
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar-Warsaw Convention
Namibia
Nauru-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Nepal
Kingdom of the Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau-None International Protocol
Panama
Papua New Guinea-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
South Korea
Moldova
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis-None International Protocol
Saint Lucia-None International Protocol
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
San Marino-None International Protocol
São Tomé and Príncipe-None International Protocol
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Somalia-None International Protocol
South Africa
South Sudan-None International Protocol
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Tajikistan-None International Protocol
Thailand
Timor-Leste-None International Protocol
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan-Warsaw Convention
Tuvalu-None International Protocol
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Tanzania
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Vanuatu
Venezuela-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Vietnam
Yemen-Warsaw Convention & Hague Protocol
Zambia-Signed. Not ratified
Zimbabwe

Criticism

Exclusion of psychiatric injuries

The Montreal Convention does not provide compensation for psychiatric injury unless it is directly linked to physical injury. Article 17, which defines carrier liability for accidents, refers specifically to "bodily injury." As a result, claims for purely psychiatric harm, such as post-traumatic stress disorder without accompanying physical injury, are generally excluded from compensation. This limitation has been the subject of criticism from accident survivors, legal scholars, and affected families.

The issue gained public attention in Australia following the case of Karen Casey, a nurse who experienced psychological trauma after the medical evacuation flight she was attending crashed off Norfolk Island. Australia had amended its laws to align with the Montreal Convention’s terminology, replacing references to "personal injury" with "bodily injury" under the Civil Aviation (Carriers' Liability) Act to ensure consistency with the treaty regarding international flights. However, the amendment also precludes claims for mental injuries unless accompanied by additional physical or property damage. The case and the broader issue were featured in a March 2015 episode of the investigative program Four Corners, which examined concerns about the exclusion of psychiatric injury from compensation claims.

Mobility equipment for disabled passengers

The liability limit of 1,288 SDR for lost, damaged, or delayed baggage also applies to mobility equipment such as wheelchairs, which can present challenges for passengers with disabilities. The value of such equipment often exceeds the compensation cap, and its loss or damage can have a much greater impact on passengers with disabilities than on others losing standard baggage.

The European Commission acknowledged this issue in a communication regarding the liability of air carriers and airports for destroyed, damaged, or lost mobility equipment, issued in connection with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 on the rights of disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility when traveling by air. The report noted that, unlike the European Union, jurisdictions such as the United States and Canada require airlines to fully compensate passengers for damage to mobility equipment as a condition for operating in their airspace. The Commission stated that the EU may consider similar measures if existing regulations prove insufficient.

References

References

  1. Rapoport, David E.. (October 2002). "A 73-Year Odyssey: The Time Has Come For a New International Air Liability System". International Aviation Law Institute, DePaul University College of Law.
  2. "2019 Revised Limits of Liability Under the Montreal Convention of 1999".
  3. "MC99".
  4. "The Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99)".
  5. [http://www.icao.int/secretariat/legal/List%20of%20Parties/Mtl99_EN.pdf Signatures and ratifications].
  6. (28 May 1999). "17 – Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air – Montreal, 28 May 1999".
  7. [[2009 Pel-Air Westwind ditching]]
  8. (22 March 2015). "Pel-Air crash survivor Karen Casey entitled to compensation for psychological trauma, Nick Xenophon says". ABC News.
  9. "Karen Casey, Pel-Air crash survivor tells of PTSD on 4 Corners". News.com.au.
  10. (23 March 2015). "Ditched". Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
  11. "CIVIL AVIATION (CARRIERS' LIABILITY) ACT 1959".
  12. [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32006R1107:EN:NOT (EC)1107/2006].
  13. [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52008DC0510&from=EN Scope of Liability].
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Montreal Convention — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report