From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Marx After Sraffa
1977 book by Ian Steedman
1977 book by Ian Steedman
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | Marx after Sraffa |
| image | File:Marx after Sraffa.jpg |
| caption | Cover of the first edition |
| author | Ian Steedman |
| country | United Kingdom |
| language | English |
| subjects | Karl Marx, labor theory of value |
| published | 1977 |
| media_type | Print (Hardcover and Paperback) |
| isbn | 978-0902308497 |
Marx after Sraffa is a 1977 book about Marxist economics by the economist Ian Steedman, in which the author argues against the labor theory of value.
Reception
The economist Heinz D. Kurz reviewed Marx after Sraffa in Kyklos. The political scientist David McLellan wrote that Steedman's reading of Marx has been influential. The philosopher Roger Scruton wrote that Steedman provides the most notable argument against the labor theory of value from the New Left. The Marxist theorist Ernest Mandel considered Marx after Sraffa as another critique of Marx's Capital, and accused Steedman of misunderstandings of Marx similar to those made by Paul Sweezy in The Theory of Capitalist Development (1942). Steedman has been criticized for alleged misunderstandings of Karl Marx.
References
Bibliography
;Books
;Journals
References
- [[#Kur78. Kurz 1978]]. pp. 736-738.
- [[#McL95. McLellan 1995]]. p. 273.
- [[#Scr85. Scruton 1985]]. p. 9.
- [[#Man91. Mandel 1991]]. p. 9.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Marx After Sraffa — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report