Mark 16

Text

Textual witnesses

Some early manuscripts containing the text of this chapter are:

• Codex Vaticanus (325–350; extant verses 1–8)
• Codex Sinaiticus (330–360; extant verses 1–8)
• Codex Bezae (~400; complete: 1–20)
• Codex Alexandrinus (400–440; complete: 1–20)
• Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (~450; complete: 1–20)

Sources

While some scholars argue that Mark 16 is a Markan composition, others argue that the chapter comes from an older tradition in the pre-Markan passion story. Those arguing in favor of Markan creation point to the numerous time indicators in verse 2, which bear similarities to other phrases in Mark. The scholars who argue in favor of Mark's use of a prior tradition argue that phrases such as "on the first day of the week" instead of the "third day" motif indicate a primitive tradition. Furthermore, many phrases found in Mark 16 seem to be non-Markan in their vocabulary. The fact that Mark 16 is extremely reserved in its theological expression, having no Christological titles, proofs or prophecies, descriptions of the resurrection, and a reserved description of the angel at the tomb indicate a more primitive narrative source.

{{Anchor|Verses 1–8}}Verses 1–8 (the empty tomb)

Verse 1

The Sabbath ended at dusk, on the day known to Christians as Holy Saturday.

Verse 2

Just after sunrise, Mary Magdalene, another Mary, the mother of James, and Salome come with the spices to anoint Jesus' body. Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James the younger and of Joses, and Salome are also mentioned among the women "looking on from afar" in , although those who "saw where the body was laid" in were only Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses.

Luke 24:1 states that the women had "prepared" the spices but seems to say that Nicodemus had already anointed his body. John 20:1 and Matthew 28:1 simply say "Mary Magdalene and the other Mary" came to see the tomb.

Verses 3–4

The women wonder how they will remove the stone over the tomb. Upon their arrival, they find the stone already gone and go into the tomb. According to Jesuit writer John J. Kilgallen, this shows that in Mark's account they expected to find the body of Jesus. Instead, they find a young man dressed in a white robe who is sitting on the right and who tells them that Jesus "has risen" and shows them "the place where they laid him" (verses 5–7).

{{Anchor|Verse 5|Verse 6|Verse 7}}Verses 5–7

The white robe indicates that he is probably an angel: Matthew 28:5 describes him as such, and has him seated on the stone, away from the entrance. In the account in there were two men. John says that Mary Magdalene saw two angels after finding the empty tomb and showing it to the other disciples (; ). She comes back to the tomb, talks to the angels, and then Jesus appears to her.

Jesus had predicted his resurrection and returning to Galilee during the Last Supper in Mark (). Mark uses the passive verb form ēgerthē, translated "he was raised", indicating God raised him from the dead, rather than "he is risen", as translated in the NIV.

Peter, last seen in tears two mornings previously, having denied any knowledge of Jesus (), is mentioned in particular. Gregory the Great notes that "had the Angel not referred to him in this way, Peter would never have dared to appear again among the Apostles. He is bidden then by name to come, so that he will not despair because of his denial of Christ".Saint Gregory the Great's Sermon on the Mystery of the Resurrection, catholicism.org accessed 13 December 2017

The last appearance of Peter's name in verse 7 (also the last among the disciples' names to be mentioned) can be connected to the first appearance of his name (as 'Simon') in Mark 1:16 to form a literary inclusio of eyewitness testimony to indicate Peter as the main eyewitness source in the Gospel of Mark.

Verse 8

Mark 16:1–8 ends with the response of the women: Those women, who are afraid (compare ), then flee and keep quiet about what they saw. Kilgallen comments that fear is the most common human reaction to the divine presence in the Bible. Mike Winger, in his video series on Mark, explains the note that the women "said nothing to anyone, for they were afraid" not as indicating that they never spoke about it, ever, but that on their way to report to the disciples and Peter, they did not stop to pass the time of day or gossip with anyone until they had delivered the message.

This is where the undisputed part of Mark's Gospel ends. Jesus is thus announced to have been raised from the dead, and to have gone ahead of the disciples to Galilee, where they will see Him.

Verses 9–20

Alternate endings

Mark has two additional endings, the longer ending (verse 9–20), and the shorter ending (unversed).

Longer ending

Longer ending

Text and interpretation

In this 12-verse passage, the author refers to Jesus' appearances to Mary Magdalene, two disciples, and then the Eleven (the Twelve Apostles minus Judas). The text concludes with the Great Commission, declaring that believers that have been baptized will be saved while nonbelievers will be condemned, and pictures Jesus taken to Heaven and sitting at the Right Hand of God.

: Jesus appears to Mary Magdalene, who is now described as someone whom Jesus healed from possession by seven demons. She then "tells the other disciples" what she saw, but no one believes her.

: Jesus appears "in a different form" to two unnamed disciples. They, too, are disbelieved when they tell what they saw.

: Jesus then appears at dinner to all the remaining eleven Apostles. He rebukes them for not believing the earlier reports of his resurrection and tells them to go and "proclaim the good news to all creation. The one who believes and is baptised will be saved; but the one who does not believe will be condemned." Belief and non-belief are a dominant theme in the Longer Ending: there are two references to believing (verses 16 and 17) and four references to not believing (verses 11, 13, 14 and 16). Johann Albrecht Bengel, in his Gnomon of the New Testament, defends the disciples: "They did believe: but presently there recurred to them a suspicion as to the truth, and even positive unbelief."Bengel's Gnomon of the New Testament on Mark 16, accessed 14 December 2017

: Jesus states that believers will "cast out demons" and "speak in new tongues". They will also be able to handle snakes, be immune from any poison they might happen to drink, and will be able to heal the sick. Kilgallen, picturing an author putting words in Jesus' mouth, has suggested that these verses were a means by which early Christians asserted that their new faith was accompanied by special powers. According to Brown, by showing examples of unjustified unbelief in verses 10–13, and stating that unbelievers will be condemned and that believers will be validated by signs, the author may have been attempting to convince the reader to rely on what the disciples preached about Jesus.

: Jesus is then taken up into heaven where, Mark states, he sits at the right hand of God. The author refers to Psalm 110:1, quoted in Mark 12:36, about the Lord sitting at the right hand of God.

: the eleven leave and are dispersed throughout the world, "proclaim[ing] the good news everywhere" while the works with them; the medieval feast of the Dispersion of the Apostles celebrated this event. Several signs from God accompanied their preaching. The word "Amen" was added in some ancient versions.

Shorter ending/conclusio brevior

The "Shorter Ending" or "conclusio brevior" (first manuscript c. 3rd century), with slight variations, is usually unversed, and runs as follows:

Some texts add "Amen" at the end.

While the New Revised Standard Version places this verse between verse 8 and 9, it could also be read as verse 21. The women, in this passage, fulfill the instructions given in verse 7, but this obedience would appear to contradict the silence reported of them in verse 8, unless their fear was only temporary.Smith, B. C., , updated 3 April 2019, archived 22 February 2022, accessed 26 March 2023

Manuscripts

The earliest extant complete manuscripts of Mark, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two 4th-century manuscripts, do not contain the last twelve verses, 16:9–20, nor the unversed shorter ending. Codex Vaticanus (4th century) has a blank column after ending at 16:8 and placing kata Markon, "according to Mark". There are three other blank columns in Vaticanus, in the Old Testament, but they are each due to incidental factors in the production of the codex: a change to the column-format, a change of scribes, and the conclusion of the Old Testament portion of the text. The blank column between Mark 16:8 and the beginning of Luke, however, is deliberately placed.

1. Ends Mark at verse 8 (Shortest/Abrupt Ending): Codex Sinaiticus (4th century), Codex Vaticanus (4th century), Syriac Sinaiticus (4th century), Codex Bobiensis (Latin translation, around 400), one Coptic manuscript from the 5th century, many Armenian manuscripts, some Georgian manuscripts, Minuscule 304 (12th century), Eusebius of Caesarea (c. 265–339), Hesychius of Jerusalem (5th century), Severus of Antioch (5th century), possibly also Clement of Alexandria (2nd century) and Origen of Alexandria (3rd century).[[File:Codex Washingtonianus W (032) Mk 16,12-17.JPG|thumb|right|301x301px|Mark 16:12–17 on [[Codex Washingtonianus]] (4th/5th century)]]
2. Includes verses 9–20 in its traditional form: The Majority/Byzantine Text (over 1,500 manuscripts of Mark), Family 13, Codex Alexandrinus (5th century), Codex Bezae (5th century), Codex Ephraemi (5th century), Codex Koridethi (9th century), Athous Lavrensis (9th century), Codex Sangallensis 48 (9th century), minuscules: 33, 565, 700, 892, 2674. The Vulgate (380ad) and most of the Old Latin, Syriac Curetonian (5th century), Peshitta (5th century), Bohairic, most Sahidic, Gothic (4th century), the Harklean Syriac (600ad), Epistula Apostolorum (120-140ad), Justin Martyr (160ad), Diatessaron (160–175 AD), Irenaeus (180ad), Hippolytus (died 235ad), Vincentius of Thibaris (256ad), De Rebaptismate (258ad), Acts of Pilate (4th century), Fortunatianus (350ad), Apostolic Constitutions (4th century), Aphrahat (4th century), Ambrose (4th century), Augustine (4th-5th century), Cyril of Alexandria (5th century), Prosper of Aquitane (5th century), Nestorius (5th century), Peter Chrysologus (5th century), Leo the Great (5th century), Eznik of Golb (5th century).
3. Manuscripts including verses 9–20 with a notation: A group of manuscripts known as "Family 1" add a note to Mark 16:9–20, stating that some copies do not contain the verses. Including minuscules: 22, 138, 205, 1110, 1210, 1221, 1582. One Armenian manuscript, Matenadaran 2374 (formerly known as Etchmiadsin 229), made in 989, features a note, written between 16:8 and 16:9, Ariston eritzou, that is, "By Ariston the Elder/Priest". Ariston, or Aristion, is known from early traditions (preserved by Papias and others) as a colleague of Peter and as a bishop of Smyrna in the first century.
4. Manuscripts including verses 9–20 without divisions: A group of manuscripts known as "Family K1" add Mark 16:9–10 without numbered κεφαλαια (chapters) at the margin and their τιτλοι (titles) at the top (or the foot). This includes Minuscule 461.
5. Includes verses 9–20 with the "Freer Logion" (an interpolation after Mark 16:14): Noted in manuscripts according to Jerome (4-5th centuries) and the Codex Washingtonianus (late 4th, early 5th century) includes verses 9–20, and features an addition between 16:14–15, known as the "Freer Logion":

Explanations

Both the shorter and the longer ending are considered to be later writings, which were added to Mark.Julie M. Smith, The Ending of Mark’s Gospel Scholars disagree whether verse 8 was the original ending, or if there was an ending which is now lost. In the early 20th century, the view prevailed that the original ending was lost, but in the second part of the 20th century the view prevailed that verse 8 was the original ending, as intended by the author.{{refn|group=note|Hypotheses on how to explain the textual variations include:

• Mark intentionally ended his Gospel at 16:8, and someone else, later in the transmission-process, composed the "Longer Ending" as a conclusion to what was interpreted to be a too-abrupt account.
• Mark wrote an ending which was accidentally lost, perhaps as the last part of a scroll which was not rewound, or as the outermost page of a codex which became detached from the other pages, and someone in the 100's composed the "Longer Ending" as a sort of patch, relying on parallel-passages from the other canonical Gospels.
• Mark did not intend to end at 16:8, but was somehow prevented from finishing, perhaps by his own death or sudden departure from Rome, whereupon another person finished the work while still in the production-stage, before it was released for church-use, by attaching material from a short Marcan composition about Jesus' post-resurrection appearances.
• Mark wrote an ending, but it was suppressed and replaced with 16:9–20, which are a pastiche of parallel passages from the other canonical Gospels.
• Verses 16:9–20 were written by Mark and were omitted or lost from Sinaiticus and Vaticanus for one reason or another, perhaps accidentally, perhaps intentionally. Possibly a scribe regarded John 21 as a better sequel to Mark's account, and considered the "Longer Ending" superfluous.}}

Ending at verse 8

Although scholars almost universally reject Mark 16:9–20, a debate continues about whether the ending at 16:8 is intentional or accidental.

Intentional

Numerous arguments have been given to explain why verse 8 is the intended ending.

There is scholarly work that suggests the "short ending" is more appropriate as it fits with the 'reversal of expectation' theme in the Gospel of Mark. Having the women run away afraid is contrasted in the reader's mind with Jesus' appearances and statements which help confirm the expectation, built up in , , , and Jesus' prediction during the Last Supper of his rising after his death. According to Brown, this ending is consistent with Mark's theology, where even miracles, such as the resurrection, do not produce the proper understanding or faith among Jesus' followers. Richard A. Burridge argues that, in keeping with Mark's picture of discipleship, the question of whether it all comes right in the end is left open:

Burridge compares the ending of Mark to its beginning:

Kilgallen proposes that maybe Mark gives no description of the resurrected Jesus because Mark did not want to try to describe the nature of the divine resurrected Jesus. Some interpreters have concluded that Mark's intended readers already knew the traditions of Jesus' appearances, and that Mark brings the story to a close here to highlight the resurrection and leave anticipation of the parousia (Second Coming). Others have argued that this announcement of the resurrection and Jesus going to Galilee is the parousia (see also Preterism), but Raymond E. Brown argues that a parousia confined only to Galilee is improbable.

Unintentional

The final sentence in verse 8 is regarded as strange by some scholars. In the Greek text, it finishes with the conjunction γαρ (gar, "for"). It is contended by some who see 16:9–20 as originally Markan that γαρ literally means because, and this ending to verse 8 is therefore not grammatically coherent (literally, it would read they were afraid because). However, γαρ may end a sentence and does so in various Greek compositions, including some sentences in the Septuagint; Protagoras, a contemporary of Socrates, even ended a speech with γαρ. Although γαρ is never the first word of a sentence, there is no rule against it being the last word, even though it is not a common construction. If the Gospel of Mark intentionally concluded with this word, it would be one of only a few narratives in antiquity to do so.

Some scholars argue that Mark never intended to end so abruptly: either he planned another ending that was never written, or the original ending has been lost. The references to a future meeting in Galilee between Jesus and the disciples (in Mark 14:28 and 16:7) could suggest that Mark intended to write beyond 16:8. C. H. Turner argued that the original version of the Gospel could have been a codex, with the last page being especially vulnerable to damage. Many scholars, including Rudolf Bultmann, have concluded that the Gospel most likely ended with a Galilean resurrection appearance and the reconciliation of Jesus with the Eleven, even if verses 9–20 were not written by the original author of the Gospel of Mark. Robert Gundry mentions that only about 10% of Mark's γαρ clauses (6 out of 66) conclude pericopes. Thus he infers that, rather than concluding 16:1–8, verse 8 begins a new pericope, the rest of which is now lost to us. Gundry therefore does not see verse 8 as the intended ending; a resurrection narrative was either written, then lost, or planned but never actually written.

Longer ending

Later addition

Many scholars agree that verses 9–20 were not part of the original text of Mark but are a later addition.

Critical questions concerning the authenticity of verses 9–20 (the "longer ending") often center on stylistic and linguistic issues. On linguistics, E. P. Gould identified 19 of the 163 words in the passage as distinctive and not occurring elsewhere in the Gospel. Dr. Bruce Terry argues that a vocabulary-based case against Mark 16:9–20 is indecisive, inasmuch as other 12-verse sections of Mark contain comparable numbers of once-used words.

Concerning style, the degree to which verses 9–20 aptly fit as an ending for the Gospel remains in question. The turn from verse 8 to 9 has also been seen as abrupt and interrupted: the narrative flows from "they were afraid" to "now after he rose", and seems to reintroduce Mary Magdalene. Secondly, Mark regularly identifies instances where Jesus' prophecies are fulfilled, yet Mark does not explicitly state the twice predicted reconciliation of Jesus with his disciples in Galilee (Mark 14:28, 16:7). Lastly, the active voice "he rose" is different from the earlier passive construction "[he] has been risen" of verse 6, seen as significant by some.

Dating

Because of patristic evidence from the late 100s for the existence of copies of Mark with 16:9–20,{{refn|group=note|Patristic evidence:

• The earliest clear evidence for Mark 16:9-20 as part of the Gospel of Mark is in Chapter XLV First Apology of Justin Martyr (155–157). In a passage in which Justin treats Psalm 110 as a Messianic prophecy, he states that Psalm 110:2 was fulfilled when Jesus' disciples, going forth from Jerusalem, preached everywhere. His wording is remarkably similar to the wording of Mk. 16:20 and is consistent with Justin's use of a Synoptics-Harmony in which Mark 16:20 was blended with Lk. 24:53.
• The Epistula Apostolorum (mid-late 2nd c.) likely incorporates all four Gospels, including the longer ending of Mark in sections 9-10, per the strong thematic, literary, and narrative sequence resemblance between the texts
• Justin's student Tatian incorporated almost all of Mark 16:9-20 into his Diatessaron (160–175), a blended narrative consisting of material from all four canonical Gospels.
• Irenaeus (c. 184), in Against Heresies 3:10.6, explicitly cited Mark 16:19, stating that he was quoting from near the end of Mark's account. This patristic evidence is over a century older than the earliest manuscript of Mark 16.
• Writers in the 200s such as Hippolytus of Rome and the anonymous author of De Rebaptismate also used the "Longer Ending".
• In 305, the pagan writer Hierocles used Mark 16:18 in a jibe against Christians, probably recycling material written by Porphyry in 270.
• Eusebius of Caesarea, in his Gospel Problems and Solutions to Marinus No. 1, writes toward the beginning of the fourth century, "One who athetises that pericope would say that it [i.e., a verse from the ending of Mark] is not found in all copies of the gospel according to Mark: accurate copies end their text of the Marcan account with the words of the young man whom the women saw, and who said to them: 'Do not be afraid; it is Jesus the Nazarene that you are looking for, etc.', after which it adds: 'And when they heard this, they ran away, and said nothing to anyone, because they were frightened.' That is where the text does end, in almost all copies of the gospel according to Mark. What occasionally follows in some copies, not all, would be extraneous, most particularly if it contained something contradictory to the evidence of the other evangelists."}} scholars widely date the composition of the longer ending to the early 2nd century.

Aimed addition or independent longer ending

Scholars are divided on the question of whether the "Longer Ending" was created deliberately to finish the Gospel of Mark, as contended by James Kelhoffer, or if it began its existence as a freestanding text which was used to "patch" the otherwise abruptly ending text of Mark. Metzger and Ehrman note that

Intertextuality

Verses 9–20 share the subject of Jesus' post-resurrection appearances, and other points, with other passages in the New Testament. This has led some scholars to believe that Mark 16:9–20 is based on the other books of the New Testament, filling in details which were originally lacking from Mark. Jesus' reference to drinking poison (16:18) does not correspond to a New Testament source, but that miraculous power did appear in Christian literature from the 2nd century CE on.

Julie M. Smith notes that if there was an original ending, "then the Resurrection accounts in Matthew and/or Luke may contain material from Mark’s original ending.

Shorter ending/conclusio brevior

The shorter ending appears only in a minimal number of manuscripts as the sole ending. It is a quick summary, which contradicts verse 8. It probably originated in Egypt, and diverges from the style of Mark. The shorter ending appears in a manuscript sometime after the 3rd century.

Notes

References

Citations

; Citations to printed sources

; Citations to web sources

Sources

; Printed sources

• Beavis, M. A., Mark's Audience, Sheffield, Sheffield Academic Press, 1989. .
• .
• Elliott, J. K., The Language and Style of the Gospel of Mark. An Edition of C. H. Turner's "Notes on Markan Usage" together with Other Comparable Studies, Leiden, Brill, 1993. .
• Gundry, R. H., Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross, Chapters 9–16, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1992. .
• MacDonald, Dennis R. "The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark" Yale University Press, 2000 .
• Miller, Robert J. (ed.), The Complete Gospels. Polebridge Press, 1994. .

References

1. (2012-07-23). "Introduction to the New Living Translation, second edition".
2. [[Jerusalem Bible]], footnote at Mark 16:8
3. Crossan, John Dominic, "Empty tomb and absent Lord (Mark 16: 1-8)", The Passion in Mark: Studies on Mark 14, no. 16 (1976): 135-52.
4. MacGregor, Kirk Robert. "The ending of the pre-Markan passion narrative." Scriptura 117 (2018): 1-11.
5. Collins, Adela Yarbro. The beginning of the Gospel: Probings of Mark in context. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001. Pg. 131
6. Allison, Dale C. Jr.. (2005). "Resurrecting Jesus: The earliest Christian tradition and its interpreters". Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
7. Craig, William Lane, "The historicity of the empty tomb of Jesus", ''New Testament Studies'' 31, no. 01 (1985): 39-67.
8. [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+16&version=NCB#fen-NCB-29235b Footnote b at Mark 16:1] in the New Catholic Bible, accessed 25 March 2023
9. [[Richard Bauckham. Bauckham, Richard]], ''Jesus and the Eyewitnesses'' (Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2006), p. 50 n. 43.
10. Tuckett, M., ''57. Mark'' in Barton, J. and Muddiman, J. (2001), [https://b-ok.org/dl/946961/8f5f43 The Oxford Bible Commentary] {{Webarchive. link. (2017-11-22 , p. 920)
11. {{bibleverse. Matthew. 28:2. EXB: [[Expanded Bible]] (2011)
12. (August 30, 2021). "Why Mark's Gospel Has Such a Strange Ending: The Mark Series pt 70 (16:8)".
13. {{bibleverse. Mark. 16:6-8. KJV
14. {{bibleverse. Mark. 16:9-20. KJV
15. [[United States Conference of Catholic Bishops]], [http://www.usccb.org/bible/mark/16 New American Bible]
16. [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+16&version=NRSVA#fen-NRSVA-24886f Footnote f at Mark 16:20 in the NRSV], accessed 20 May 2023
17. Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States of America, [https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+16&version=NRSVA#fen-NRSVA-24874b Footnote b at Mark 16:8] in NRSV, accessed 26 March 2023
18. (1994). "The Complete Gospels: Annotated Scholars Version". Polebridge Press / HarperCollins.
19. Skeat, T. C.. (1999). "The Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus, and Constantine". Journal of Theological Studies.
20. Section 217, Column 6
21. Jr, James Snapp. (2022-06-01). "A Case for the Longer Ending of Mark by James Snapp".
22. Head, Peter M.. (2022-06-14). "A Case against the Longer Ending of Mark by Peter Head".
23. Lunn, Nicholas P.. (2014-10-01). "The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9–20". Wipf and Stock Publishers.
24. (2011-12-09). "Textual Research on the Psalms and Gospels / Recherches textuelles sur les psaumes et les évangiles: Papers from the Tbilisi Colloquium on the Editing and History of Biblical Manuscripts. Actes du Colloque de Tbilisi, 19-20 septembre 2007". BRILL.
25. "Bible Gateway passage: Mark 16:9-11 - New English Translation".
26. (2019-12-02). "The New Testament in Antiquity and Byzantium: Traditional and Digital Approaches to its Texts and Editing. A Festschrift for Klaus Wachtel". Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
27. [[Hermann von Soden]], ''Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments'', I/2, p. 720.
28. Jr, James Snapp. (2022-06-01). "A Case for the Longer Ending of Mark by James Snapp".
29. (2020-09-03). "The Ending of Mark's Gospel {{!}} BYU New Testament Commentary".
30. [[Dennis R. MacDonald. MacDonald, Dennis R.]] ''Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark, by Dennis R. MacDonald'', Pages 42, 70, 175, 213
31. Burridge, Richard A.. (2005). "Four Gospels, One Jesus? A Symbolic Reading". Eerdmans.
32. R. Bultmann, ''History of the Synoptic Tradition'' pp. 284-286.
33. Grundy, Robert. ''Mark: A Commentary on His Apology for the Cross, Chapters 9–16''
34. [[Robert W. Funk. Funk, Robert W.]] and the 1985 [[Jesus Seminar]]. ''The acts of Jesus: the search for the authentic deeds of Jesus.'' HarperSanFrancisco. 1998. "Empty Tomb, Appearances & Ascension" p. 449-495.
35. E. P. Gould, ''A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to St. Mark'' (New York: Charles Scribner's Press, 1896), p. 303.
36. "The Style of the Long Ending of Mark" by Dr. Bruce Terry at http://bterry.com/articles/mkendsty.htm {{Webarchive. link. (2011-07-08)
37. Lunn, Nicholas. ''The Original Ending of Mark''. Pickwick Publications, 2014, 74-75.
38. Kelhoffer, J. ''Miracle and Mission: The Authentication of Missionaries and their Message in the Longer Ending of Mark'', 2000, 169-244.
39. Metzger, Bruce M. and Ehrman, Bart ''The Text of New Testament 4th Edit'', 2005, 327.
40. May, Herbert G. and Bruce M. Metzger. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha. 1977.
41. Tolbert, Mary Ann (2003), ''The Gospel According to Mark'', p. 1844. In: New Interpreter's Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version with Apocrypha, general editor, Walter J. Harrelson, Abingdon Press, 2003