From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Management fad

Pejorative term for organizational practice

Summary

Pejorative term for organizational practice

Management fad is a term used to characterize a change in philosophy or operations implemented by a business or institution. It amounts to a fad in the management culture of an institution.

The term is subjective and tends to be used in a pejorative sense, as it implies that such a change is being implemented (often by management on its employees, with little or no input from them) solely because it is (at the time) "popular" within managerial circles, and not necessarily due to any real need for organizational change. The term further implies that once the underlying philosophy is no longer "popular", it will be replaced by the newest "popular" idea, in the same manner and for the same reason as the previous idea.

Alternatively, the pejorative use of the term expresses a cynical belief that the organization desires change that would be resisted by the rank and file if presented directly, so it is dressed up in a dramatic change of management style, to remain in place only as long as it serves the underlying agenda.

Several authors have argued that new management ideas should be subject to greater critical analysis, and for the need for greater conceptual awareness of new ideas by managers. Authors Leonard J. Ponzi and Michael Koenig believe that a key determinant of whether any management idea is a "management fad" is the number and timing of published articles on the idea. In their research, Ponzi and Koenig argue that once an idea has been discussed for around 3–5 years, if after this time the number of articles on the idea in a given year decreases significantly (similar to the right-hand side of a bell curve), then the idea is most likely a "management fad".

Common characteristics

Management fads are often characterized by the following:

New jargon for existing business processes.
External consultants who specialize in the implementation of the fad.
A certification or appraisal process performed by an external agency for a fee.
Amending the job titles of existing employees to include references to the fad.
Claims of a measurable business improvement via measurement of a metric (e.g. key performance indicator) that is defined by the fad itself.
An internal sponsoring department or individual that gains influence due to the fad's implementation.
Big words and complex phrases (puffery).

Origins

Like other fashions, trends in management thought may grow, decline, and recur. Judy Wajcman sees the human relations movement of the 1930s as a precursor of the later fashion of "transformational management". | author-link1 = Judy Wajcman | publication-date = 2013 | access-date = 12 August 2021

Examples

The following management theories and practices appeared on a 2004 list of management fashions and fads compiled by Adrian Furnham, who arranged them in rough chronological order by their date of appearance, 1950s to 1990s:

Management by objectives
Matrix management
Theory Z
One-minute management
Management by wandering around
Total quality management
Business process reengineering
Delayering
Empowerment
360-degree feedback

Other theories and practices which observers have tagged as fads include:

Six Sigma
Knowledge management
DevOps | publication-date = 2018 | access-date = 12 August 2021
Transformational leadership | editor1-last = Bratton | editor1-first = John | publication-date = 2020 | access-date = 12 August 2021
Agile software development
Enterprise architecture frameworks
"thriving on chaos" | author-link1 = Adrian Furnham | publication-date = 2012 | access-date = 2016-09-17
Open-plan offices
Stack ranking, where employees are encouraged to rat each other out in order to secure their own advancement and budget
Consensus management
Best practice
anti-authoritarian management |access-date = 14 February 2025
The Tao of Leadership | publication-date = 2021 | access-date = 12 August 2021

References

Christensen, Clayton M. and Michael E. Raynor, "Why Hard-Nosed Executives Should Care About Management Theory," ''Harvard Business Review'', Vol. 81, No. 9, Sept. 2003, pp. 66-74.
[http://informationr.net/ir/8-1/paper145.html Ponzi, Leonard J. and Michael Koenig, "Knowledge Management: Another Management Fad?," ''Information Research'', Vol. 8, No. 1, Oct. 2002, paper no. 145.]
Furnham, Adrian, ''Management and Myths: Challenging Business Fads, Fallacies and Fashions'', Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, U.K., 2004, p. 17.
[https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-8-stupidest-management-fads-of-all-time/ The 8 Stupidest Management Fads of All Time], CBS Money
"Wilson, T.D., "The Nonsense of 'Knowledge Management'," ''Information Research'', Vol. 8, No. 1, Oct. 2002, paper no. 144.".
[[Agile software development#Criticism]]
James, Geoffrey. (2018-07-16). "It's Official: Open-Plan Offices Are Now the Dumbest Management Fad of All Time".
James, Geoffrey. (2013-05-10). "World's Worst Management Fads".

Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

business-terms management-theory

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Management fad — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report