From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Lotus 112
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Car_name | Lotus 112 |
| Category | Formula One |
| Constructor | Lotus |
| Designer | Chris Murphy |
| Predecessor | 109 |
| Team | Team Lotus |
| Technical ref | |
| Chassis | Carbon fibre and aluminium monocoque |
| Front suspension | Double wishbones, pushrod |
| Rear suspension | Double wishbones, pushrod |
| Wheelbase | 2950 mm |
| Track | Front: 1650 mm |
| Rear: 1600 mm | |
| Engine name | Mugen-Honda MF-351HC, |
| Configuration | V10, |
| Capacity | 2,998 cc, |
| Turbo/NA | NA, |
| Engine position | mid-engine, longitudinally mounted |
| Gearbox name | Lotus / Xtrac |
| Gears | 6-speed |
| Type | semi-automatic |
| Fuel | Mobil 1 |
| Tyres | Goodyear |
| Races | 0 |
| Wins | 0 |
| Cons_champ | 0 |
| Drivers_champ | 0 |
| Poles | 0 |
| Fastest_laps | 0 |
| Podiums | 0 |
Rear: 1600 mm | Turbo/NA = NA, |}}
The Lotus 112 was the proposed 1995 Formula One car of Team Lotus.
Conception
The Lotus 112 was Team Lotus' planned entry to the 1995 Formula One season. It was a stillborn project conceived by chief designer Chris Murphy throughout their final Formula One campaign in 1994. Originally the designation of Type 112 was to be for the model that became the Lotus Elise. However, that car was given type number 111 instead, in homage to the original Lotus Eleven.
As a project little had been confirmed about the car’s final specification. It was rumoured that Lotus were intending to include the promising higher-spec Mugen-Honda ZA5D engine, which had shown great promise at its first outing during the 1994 Italian Grand Prix at Monza. However, in an attempt to reduce the costs associated with an exclusive engine deal Lotus may have had to use a Ford (Cosworth) unit.
Team Lotus were planning to retain their final 1994 driver line-up of Alessandro Zanardi and Mika Salo.
In appearance the 112 was broadly similar to other Chris Murphy-designed Lotuses. It incorporated a new and distinctive arrow nose and an unusual pushrod arrangement on the front suspension. Despite this radical departure, the car’s construction retained certain characteristic hallmarks. The tub would have been constructed from the traditional Lotus composite of carbon aluminium honeycomb, with the bodyshell being processed out of carbon fibre. A scale model for wind tunnel testing was produced which was later to be found in the aeronautical engineering department of City University. Wind tunnel tests were promising, with the car producing a lot more downforce compared to the 109. The 112 also passed the mandated FIA crash tests.
Team Lotus demise
On 17 January 1995 new owner David Hunt (younger brother of 1976 world champion James) was forced to close down Team Lotus in the face of crippling debt and lack of sponsorship for the forthcoming season.
The Lotus 112 therefore became the last Team Lotus type designation.
David Hunt effectively merged what was left of Team Lotus with Pacific Grand Prix with that team renamed Pacific Team Lotus for 1995. The season was unsuccessful with Pacific also going under at the end of the year.
References
References
- "Lotus 109".
- (27 November 2018). "Unraced projects of the 1995 season".
- (18 August 2016). "The last twenty Five years of Team Lotus Part 1".
- "Historie: Haven't made the grid: De Lotus 112 Mugen Honda uit 1995".
- "Lotus (Team Lotus)".
- (28 February 1995). "Pacific forms alliance with Lotus".
- (19 November 2017). "The untold story of Pacific Grand Prix in the F1".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Lotus 112 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report