Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/railways-by-type

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Light metro

Rail transport system with moderate capacity

Light metro

Summary

Rail transport system with moderate capacity

[[Glasgow Subway
Expo Line
[[Taipei MRT]] – [[Wenhu Line]] (Brown Line)
Toronto]] [[Line 3 Scarborough]] used light metro technology

Light metro, light rapid transit (LRT) or a medium-capacity system (MCS), is a rail transport system with a capacity greater than light rail, but less than rapid transit. It typically resembles a rapid transit system in terms of infrastructure, but typically features shorter (2–4 car) trains and smaller stations, and may have a differing network topology.

Since ridership determines the scale of a rapid transit system, statistical modeling allows planners to size the rail system for the needs of the area. When the predicted ridership falls between the service requirements of a light rail system and a rapid transit system, a light metro project is indicated. A light metro system may also result when a rapid transit system fails to achieve the requisite ridership due to network inadequacies (e.g. single-tracking) or changing demographics.

In contrast with light rail systems, a light metro system runs on an entirely grade separated exclusive right of way, and is therefore completely separated from other traffic. In some cases, the distance between stations is much longer than typically found on rapid transit systems. A light metro system may also be suitable for branch line connections to another mode of a heavy-capacity transport system, such as an airport or a main route of a metro network. However, despite their smaller trains, some light metro systems can rival rapid transit networks in terms of capacity thanks to automatic train operation allowing extremely high-frequency service.

Definition

A [[Docklands Light Railway]] train leaving [[Canary Wharf DLR station
Line 1

Light metro systems typically feature shorter trains and smaller stations than rapid transit; this is typically their defining feature. Automatic train operation is more common on light metro systems than rapid transit systems, which has allowed some systems to achieve extremely high frequency, with headways as close as 90 seconds during peak hours, making them competitive with traditional human-driven metro systems in terms of capacity.

Rubber-tyred metro technology, such as the VAL system used on the Taipei Metro, is sometimes used for light metro systems, due to its low running noise, as well as the ability to climb steeper grades and turn tighter curves, thus allowing more flexible alignments.

Rapid transit systems generally have train headways of 10 minutes or better during peak hours. Some systems that qualify as rapid transit in other technical respects (e.g. are fully grade separated), but which have network inadequacies (e.g. a section of single track rail) which cap headways, resulting in decreased capacity, and thus would be more accurately defined as light metro systems as a result.

Capacity

A report from the World Bank places the capacity of a light metro system at 15,000 to 30,000 p/h/d. For comparison, ridership capacity of more than 30,000 p/h/d has been quoted as the standard for rapid transit systems, while light rail systems have passenger capacity volumes of around 10,000 to 12,000 p/h/d or 12,000 to 18,000 p/h/d. VAL (Véhicule Automatique Léger) systems are categorised as light metro because their manufacturer defines their passenger capacities as being up to 30,000 p/h/d.

However, the capacity boundaries for a line to be categorised as a light metro system varies according to the standard used, sometimes even within a single country. For example, the Taiwan Ministry of Transportation and Communications states that each "medium-capacity system" can board around 6,000 to 20,000 passengers per hour per direction (p/h/d or PPHPD), while the Taiwan Department of Rapid Transit Systems defines a capacity of 20,000 to 30,000 p/h/d, which approaches many rapid transit systems, as "medium-capacity systems".

In Hong Kong, MTR's Ma On Shan line was locally classified as a "medium-capacity system" (as it used shorter 4-car SP1950 trains, compared to 7- to 12-car trains on other MTR lines) but can attain up to 32,000 p/h/d which is comparable to the passenger capacity of some rapid transit systems. However, it was built to the full rapid transit standard as it was designed to be extended. Full-length, 8-car trains were deployed on the line in advance of its extension into the Tuen Ma line in June 2021. Two other lines, the Disneyland Resort line shuttle service since 2005 and the South Island line since December 2016, are also classified as "medium-capacity systems" because of their shorter trains and smaller capacity, however they use the same technology as the other rapid transit lines.

Terminology

Train on the [[Copenhagen Metro
VAL

"Light metro" is a common term in European countries, India, and South Korea.

Ui-Sinseol Line]] train leaving Solbat Park station in Seoul, South Korea

In some countries, however, light metro systems are conflated with light rail. In South Korea, "light rail" is used as the translation for the original Korean term, "경전철" – its literal translation is "light metro", but it actually means "Any railway transit other than heavy rail, which has capacity between heavy rail and bus transit". For example, the U Line in Uijeongbu utilises the VAL system, categorized as a variant of light metro by the LRTA and other organizations, though the operator itself and South Korean sources refer to the U Line as "light rail". Busan–Gimhae Light Rail Transit is also akin to a light metro system in its appearance and features, thought the operator refers it as a "light rail". Likewise, Malaysian officials and media commonly refer to the Kelana Jaya, Ampang and Sri Petaling lines as "light rail transit" systems; when originally opened, the original Malay abbreviations for the lines, PUTRA-LRT (Projek Usahasama Transit Ringan Automatik/Automatic Light Transit Joint Venture Project) and STAR-LRT (Sistem Transit Aliran Ringan/Light Flow Transit System) did not clearly distinguish between light rail and light rapid transit. Some articles in India also refer to some "light metro"-type systems as "light rail". The Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA), a nonprofit organisation, also categorises several public transport systems as "light metro".

Advantages and disadvantages

The main reason to construct a light metro system instead of a rapid transit system is to reduce costs, mainly because this system employs shorter vehicles and shorter stations.

Light metro systems may operate faster than rapid transit systems due to shorter dwell times at stations, and the faster acceleration and braking of lighter trains. For example, express trains on the New York City Subway are about as fast as the Vancouver SkyTrain, but these express trains skip most stops on lines where they operate, while the shorter automated SkyTrains make all stops.

Light metro systems have restricted growth capacities as ridership increases. For example, it is difficult to extend station platforms once a system is in operation, especially for underground railway systems, since this work must be done without interfering with traffic. Some railway systems, like Hong Kong and Wuhan, may make advance provisions for longer platforms, for example, so that they will be able to handle more spacious trains when demand warrants them. The Taipei Metro, for example, constructed extra space for two extra cars in all its Wenhu Line stations. Alternatively, automatic train operation may be introduced, or at least provided for, allowing for very tight headways, increasing capacity through frequency rather than vehicle size.

List of light metro systems

The following is the list of currently-operating light metro systems as categorized by the Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA) , unless otherwise indicated. The lists do not include monorails and urban maglev, despite most of them also being "medium-capacity" rail systems.

Currently operating light metro systems

CountryLocationSystemLinesYear openedNotes
ArmeniaYerevanYerevan Metro11981Rolling stock uses 2 and 3-car trains
AustriaViennaVienna U-Bahn – Line 611989Low-floor trains T and T1 built by Bombardier, 27.3 m and 26.8 m long respectively, are operated in 4-car configuration only. The capacity is 776 passengers compared to 882 for the rapid transit lines U1-U5
BulgariaSofiaSofia Metro – Line 312020Driverless vehicle system – 60 m trains; Siemens chosen as technology supplier
CanadaOttawaO-Train1 (+1 under construction)2019While using vehicles typically seen in light rail systems, the line has a higher capacity operating 2-car (100-metre long) Alstom trains. Moreover, the line is fully separated from road traffic.
MontrealRéseau express métropolitain1 (+2 branches under construction)2023Driverless vehicle system. Categorised by itself as a light metro. Trains are 38 metres long.
VancouverSkyTrain31985While using vehicles typically seen in light metro systems, the Expo line approaches the capacity of a rapid transit system since it operates with longer 4- and 6-car Bombardier trains. However, the Canada Line operates with 2-car Rotem trains.
ChinaBeijingBeijing Subway – Capital Airport Express, Yanfang line22008Capital Airport Express uses 4-car L-type trains, 60 m long. Yanfang line uses 4-car B-type trains, 76 m long. Trains from both lines are driverless.
ChangchunChangchun Rail Transit – Line 3, Line 4, Line 832002All three lines use light rail vehicles, with line 3 also having level crossings.
DalianDalian Metro – Line 3, Line 12, Line 1332002Uses 4-car B-type trains, with some trains on line 3 having 2 cars.
FoshanFoshan Metro – Line 1 (Nanhai Tram)12021The line (also called Nanhai New Transit) uses light rail vehicles, 35 m long.
GuangzhouGuangzhou Metro – Line 4, Line 6, Guangfo line, and Zhujiang New Town People Mover42005Lines 4 and 6 use 4-car L-type trains, 67m long. Guangfo line uses 4-car B-type trains, 76 m long. Zhujiang New Town People Mover uses 14 Bombardier's APM 100 cars built in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
NanjingNanjing Metro – Line S6, Line S7, Line S8, Line S942014Lines S6, S7, and S8 use 4-car B-type trains, 76 m long, while line S9 uses 3-car B-type trains, 57 m long.
ShanghaiShanghai Metro – Line 5 (branch), Line 6, and Pujiang Line32003Line 5 branch and line 6 use 4-car, 76 m long, C-type trains. Pujiang line uses 11 Bombardier Transportation's APM 300 cars.
TianjinTianjin Metro – Line 912004Line 9 uses 4-car B-type trains, 76 m long.
WuhanWuhan Metro – Line 112004Line 1 uses 4-car B-type trains, 76 m long.
Hong KongDisneyland Resort Line (Penny's Bay Rail Link)12005Trains: 4 compartments without drivers. Some of the M-Train cars used in the Disneyland Resort line were originally ordered from 1994–1998 as subtype H-Stock train (Phase 3 EMU, A/C 270–291, B/C 486–496). Units A/C274 A/C281 A/C284 A/C289 A/C291 and B/C490 are now used on the Disneyland Resort line.
South Island line12016Trains: 3-car S-Trains. Categorised as a "medium-capacity system".
MacauMacau Light Rapid Transit12019Uses Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Crystal Mover APM vehicles with rubber tyres running on concrete tracks. Mitsubishi supplied 55 two-car trains that are fully automated (driverless) and utilise a rubber-tyred APM system. They have a capacity of up to 476 passengers.
DenmarkCopenhagenCopenhagen Metro42002Driverless vehicle system. Trains: 3-car configuration, 39 m length.
FranceLilleLille Metro21983VAL people mover system. Trains: 2-car configuration, 26 m in length, with a passenger capacity of 208–240 per train (depending on VAL 206 or VAL 208 train). UrbanRail.net describes it as a "new generation of metro systems".
LyonLyon Metro41978Trains: Driverless, 2 or 3-car configuration, 36 m to 54 m long. Can carry 252 to 325 people in a train.
MarseilleMarseille Metro21977Trains: 4-car configuration, 65 m long.
ParisOrlyval11991VAL people mover system, using VAL 206 vehicles.
RennesRennes Metro22002VAL people mover system – while trains have 80 second headways, they can only carry 158 people per train. Described as a "mini-metro line".
ToulouseToulouse Metro21993Although a VAL system, LRTA defines the system as "Metro". On the other hand, UrbanRail.net describes it as a "light metro VAL system".
HungaryBudapestBudapest Metro Line 111896Trains: The line uses 3-car, 30 m long trains that can hold up to 190 people.
IndiaGurgaonRapid Metro Gurgaon12013url = http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/rapid-metrorail-gurgaon-opens.htmltitle = Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon opensjournal = Railway Gazette Internationaldate = 15 November 2013access-date = 2014-12-28archive-date = 2018-04-26archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180426144645/http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/rapid-metrorail-gurgaon-opens.htmlurl-status = dead }} Several articles define the system as "light metro".
IndonesiaJakartalast1=Tabayfirst1=Andytitle=First Jakarta light metro train rolls outurl=https://www.railjournal.com/passenger/metros/first-jakarta-light-metro-train-rolls-out/access-date=14 August 2023work=International Railway Journaldate=29 March 2018language=en}}12019last1=Ramadhanfirst1=Arditotitle=Ini Spesifikasi Kereta LRT yang Tiba di Jakartaurl=https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2018/04/14/05412541/ini-spesifikasi-kereta-lrt-yang-tiba-di-jakartaaccess-date=2 November 2018work=KOMPAS.comdate=14 April 2018language=id}}
Jabodebek LRT22023The elevated standard-gauge line is electrified at 750V dc third rail. It has moving block signalling designed for headways of 2–3 minutes.
PalembangPalembang LRT12018Trains uses 3-car configuration
ItalyBresciaBrescia Metro12013Trains: 3-car configuration, 39 m length.
CataniaCatania Metro11999Single-tracked at-grade section limits headways to 15 minutes. Currently 4.6 km of double track extension are under construction.
GenoaGenoa Metro11990Generally considered to be a "light metro" considering its low frequency, limited hours of operation and reduced transport capacity. It is actually categorised as "light rail" by LRTA.
MilanMeLA
Milan Metro: Line 4 and Line 531999, 2013, 2022Driverless vehicle system. Trains: 4-car configuration, 50.5 m length, capacity for 536 passengers.
NaplesNaples Metro11993Line 6 is categorised as "light metro" system, with only 16 minute headways. Line 1 has a single-tracked tunnel section.
PerugiaMiniMetro12008LRTA defines the system as a "light metro" system, while they regarded the same system in Laon, which ceased in 2016, as a "cable monorail".
TurinTurin Metro12006VAL people mover system.
JapanHiroshimaAstram Line11994Trains: 6-car configuration, operated manually. A small part of the underground section was built as Metro system.
KobeKobe New Transit21981, 1990Trains: Port Island Line and Rokkō Island Line. Both are 4-car configuration (300 people per train), driverless. Platforms were built to accommodate 6-car trains.
OsakaNankō Port Town Line11981Trains: 4-car configuration, driverless vehicle system. Platforms were built to accommodate 6-car trains.
SaitamaNew Shuttle11983Trains: 6-car configuration, operated manually.
TokyoNippori-Toneri Liner12008Trains: 5-car configuration, driverless vehicle system.
Yurikamome11995Trains: 6-car configuration, driverless vehicle system.
YokohamaKanazawa Seaside Line11989Trains: 5-car configuration, driverless vehicle system.
MalaysiaKuala LumpurRapid KL – Kelana Jaya Line, Ampang Line, Sri Petaling Line41998, 1996author=Robert Schwandlurl=http://www.urbanrail.net/as/kual/kuala-lumpur.htmtitle=Kuala Lumpurwebsite=UrbanRail.netyear=2010access-date=2015-08-29}} 4-car configuration fleet
PhilippinesManilaLRT Line 111984url=http://www.lrta.gov.ph/projects/proj_capexIph1.htmtitle=The Line 1 Capacity Expansion Project (Phase I)url-status=deadarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060517095717/http://www.lrta.gov.ph/projects/proj_capexIph1.htmarchive-date=May 17, 2006publisher=Light Rail Transit Authorityaccess-date=21 April 2022}} and procured new 4-car trains in 1999, 2006, and 2022. Line was originally designed for 18,000 p/h/d capacity, increased to 40,000 p/h/d in 2006. Categorised as "light rail" by LRTA.
MRT Line 311999Trains: 3-car configuration, with a max. capacity of 1,182 passengers, and running with 3.5–4 minute headways. 4-car trains with a max. capacity of 1,576 passengers were introduced in 2022. However, line is designed for 23,000 p/h/d capacity, expandable to 48,000 p/h/d.
RussiaMoscowMoscow Metro: Line 12 – Butovskaya Line12003Can carry 6,700 p/h/d. Trains: 3-car configuration, ~85 m length
SingaporeSingaporeSingapore MRT: Circle line, Downtown line32009, 2013, 2027The Circle line rolling stock consists of Alstom C830 and C830C trains in 3-car formations with a capacity of 931 passengers. The Downtown line rolling stock consists of Bombardier C951 & C951A trains also in 3-car formations with a capacity of 931 passengers.
South KoreaBusanBusan–Gimhae Light Rail Transit12011Driverless vehicle system. Trains: 2-car configuration. Unmentioned by LRTA, but the operator calls the system "light rail".
GimpoGimpo Goldline12019Each train consists of 2-car trains and runs unmanned.
IncheonIncheon Subway Line 212016Each train consists of 2-car trains and runs unmanned.
SeoulUi LRT12017Each train consists of 2-car trains and runs unmanned.
Sillim Line12022Each train consists of 2-car trains and runs unmanned.
UijeongbuU Line12012
YonginYongin Everline12013Driverless vehicle system applied.
SpainBarcelonaBarcelona Metro: Line 8 and Line 1122003Driverless vehicle system. Trains: 2-car configuration. LRTA also categorises Line 8 as a "light metro" system.
MálagaMálaga Metro12014System contains at-grade intersections on surface section of Line 1. Described as a "light metro" system by at least one rail publication.
Palma, MajorcaPalma Metro: Line M112007Mostly underground line operates with just 15-minute headways and 2-car trains (306 passengers max.); one reference even categorises line as "light rail".
SevilleSeville Metro12000Trains: 31.3 m length with a max. capacity of 280 passengers. Described as a "light metro" by rolling stock manufacturer, CAF.
SwitzerlandLausanneLausanne Métro21991Line M1 uses light rail vehicles, 30 m long. Line M2 has driverless, rubber-tyred trains; 30 m long.
TaiwanTaipeiTaipei Metro: Wenhu/Brown Line and Circular/Yellow Line21996, 2020
TaichungTaichung MRT: Green line120212-car EMU.
ThailandBangkokBangkok MRT: Blue Line and Purple Line22004, 20163-car configuration
TurkeyAnkaraAnkaray Light Metro (A1 Line)11996Trains: 3-car configuration, approx. 90 m length. Categorised as a "light rail" by LRTA, though Current capacity: 27,000 p/h/d.
BursaBursaray22002Uses light rail cars, similar to Frankfurt U-Bahn
IstanbulIstanbul Metro: M1 Line (Istanbul Hafif Metro)11989Trains: 4-car configuration. "Hafif Metro" literally translates as "Light Metro". Categorised as a "light rail" system by the LRTA.
İzmirİzmir Metro: M1 Line (İzmir Hafif Rayli Metro Sistemi)12000Trains: 5-car configuration, upgraded from former 3- and 4-car configurations
AdanaAdana Metro: M1 LineTrains: 4-car configuration.It's poorly designed, and it doesn't reach its expected ridership amount.
United KingdomGlasgowGlasgow Subway11896Gauge: . Trains: 3-car configuration.
LondonDocklands Light Railway71987Driverless vehicle system. Trains: generally 2- to 3-car configuration. Categorised as a "light rail" by LRTA.
Tyne and WearTyne and Wear Metro21980Trains: 2 MU configuration with 7 level crossings.
United StatesDetroitDetroit People Mover11987Considered to be a "people mover".
HonoluluSkyline12023Trains: 4-car Hitachi Rail Italy Driverless Metro trains, 78m (256ft) long.
MiamiMetromover31986Considered to be a "people mover".
PhiladelphiaM (part of the SEPTA Metro)11907Primarily on a surface-level "right-of-way" with partial triple-tracking, allowing for express services. Has been categorised by APTA as "Light rapid rail transit". While it has high platforms and third rail power, all intermediate stops are flag stops and fares must be paid to the operator upon boarding except at the termini. This makes it difficult to categorise, as it has the infrastructure of a light metro but is operated in many ways like a trolley service.
VenezuelaMaracaiboMaracaibo Metro12006Trains: 3-car trainset configuration, ~58 m length (originally designed for Prague Metro). Categorised as a "light rail" by LRTA.
ValenciaValencia Metro12007Trains: 2-car Siemens SD-460 configuration, ~55 m length. Categorised as a "light rail" by LRTA.
VietnamHanoiHanoi Metro22021Trains: 4-car configuration
Ho Chi Minh CityHCMC Metro12024Trains: 3-car configuration, 61.3 m long, (201 ft)

Under construction light metro systems

CountryLocationSystemPlanned openingNotes
KazakhstanAstanaAstana Light Metrotitle=First train delivered to Astana light metrourl=https://www.mainspring.co.uk/industry-news/first-train-delivered-to-astana-light-metro/website=www.mainspring.co.ukaccess-date=15 July 2025language=en-gb}}Trains will operate at a 4 car configuration, totalling only 60m
MalaysiaKuala LumpurShah Alam Line2025Trains will operate at a 3 car configuration
SingaporeSingaporeJurong Region Line2027Hyundai Rotem J151 trains will operate in a 3 car configuration that can carry 600 passengers
RomaniaCluj-NapocaCluj-Napoca Metro2031Romania's second mass transit network. Operated as three-car driverless trains.
United StatesNew York CityInterborough ExpressEarly 2030sLine will be used to connect Brooklyn and Queens.

Former light metro systems

The following is the list of former light metro systems that either developed into a rapid transit system, or which are no longer in operation:

  • Guangzhou, China
    • Line 3 – began with 3-car configuration, changed to 6-car in 2010.
  • Komaki, Japan
    • Peachliner – abandoned on 30 September 2006.
  • Seoul, South Korea
    • Line 9 – trains lengthened from 4 cars to 6 cars in 2019.
  • Sha Tin and Ma On Shan, Hong Kong
    • Ma On Shan Rail – converted from 4- to 8-car configuration and became part of Tuen Ma line.
  • Toronto, Ontario
    • Line 3 Scarborough – Categorised by APTA as being "intermediate rail" (i.e. between "heavy rail" and "light rail"), and categorised as a "light metro" system by LRTA. Scheduled to cease operations in November 2023, service was suspended following a derailment in July 2023 and was not resumed, instead being replaced by an express bus service.

Notes

References

Bibliography

References

  1. (1996). "China's Urban Transport Development Strategy: Proceedings of a Symposium in Beijing, November 8–10, 1995". The World Bank.
  2. (2006). "Joint International Light Rail Conference: A World of Applications and Opportunities, April 9-11, 2006, St. Louis, Missouri". Transportation Research Circular.
  3. (2021). "Leading Light: What Light Rail can do for City Regions". Urban Transport Group.
  4. (2014). "Light rail explained".
  5. Robert Schwandl. (2007). "What is a metro?".
  6. Cledan Mandri-Perrott. (2010). "Private Sector Participation in Light Rail-Light Metro Transit Initiatives". [[The World Bank]].
  7. (2005). "Integrated Transport: The Future of Light Rail and Modern Trams in the United Kingdom". The Stationery Office.
  8. "VAL and NeoVAL". Siemens TS.
  9. "Transportation term definition". Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC).
  10. "Comparison between high capacity and medium capacity systems". Taiwan Department of Rapid Transit Systems, TCG.
  11. "MTR train frequencies of railway lines in different periods, number of cars on each train, train carrying capacity, train loading rates and number of seats". [[MTR]].
  12. (2014-10-24). "Kerala opts for light metro, not monorail". Business Standard India.
  13. (2014-11-21). "BJP promises light metro in Bhopal and Indore".
  14. (2 July 2012). "Korean city opens automatic light metro".
  15. "경전철". [[Korea Rail Network Authority]].
  16. "경전철". Bakmungak(박문각).
  17. "''경전철''". doopedia(두산백과).
  18. "''경전철''". Korea Railway Industry Information Center(철도산업정보센터).
  19. "Busan-Ginhae Light Rail Transit".
  20. (2018-12-31). "RT's 'double loop' system expected to cut waiting time for Kelana Jaya line". [[New Straits Times]].
  21. (2019-04-15). "Kajang-Putrajaya rail link may be revived". [[The Star (Malaysia).
  22. (2017-12-24). "Malaysia enters new era for more efficient transportation network". [[The Sun (Malaysia).
  23. Ajay Kumar. (2012-09-20). "Light rail could be alternative mode of transport in future". India today.
  24. Michael Taplin. (March 2013). "Index of Countries + Totals for each Country". Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA).
  25. Michael Taplin. (March 2013). "A world of trams and urban transit – A complete listing of Light Rail, Light Railway, Tramway & Metro systems throughout the World". Light Rail Transit Association (LRTA).
  26. (21 April 2017). "U-Bahn Wien: Technische Daten aller Typen".
  27. "Metro Sofia". [[Siemens Mobility]].
  28. "Canada and USA are poles apart on transit funding".
  29. "Rolling stock".
  30. "Light metro".
  31. "佛山南海新交通有轨电车预计明年底开通试运营".
  32. Ltd, DVV Media International. "Guangzhou peoplemover enters service".
  33. "上海首条胶轮APM浦江线 3月31日起通车试运营".
  34. (July 2018). "Alstom in Hong Kong".
  35. Leung, Natalie. (31 December 2010). "Mitsubishi wins LRT tender". Macau Daily Times.
  36. (3 March 2011). "MHI Receives Order for Macau Light Rapid Transit (MLRT) Phase 1". Mitsubishi Press Information.
  37. Robert Schwandl. (2004). "Lille".
  38. (2004). "VAL Mini-Metro Line".
  39. Robert Schwandl. (2004). "Toulouse".
  40. (15 November 2013). "Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon opens". [[Railway Gazette International]].
  41. Simon Crompton-Reid. (18 November 2013). "Rapid MetroRail Gurgaon launched".
  42. "Gurgaon automated metro".
  43. (29 March 2018). "First Jakarta light metro train rolls out". International Railway Journal.
  44. Muthiariny, Dewi Elvia. (21 November 2019). "LRT Jakarta Fare to be Valid per December 1". Tempo.
  45. (14 April 2018). "Ini Spesifikasi Kereta LRT yang Tiba di Jakarta". KOMPAS.com.
  46. (16 September 2022). "Jakarta Jabodebek light metro line opening confirmed for June 2023". [[International Railway Journal]].
  47. (9 May 2015). "FOTO {{!}} Metropolitana, il cronoprogramma ufficiale". Mobilita Catania.
  48. "San Raffaele Light Railway ATM, Azienda Trasporti Milanesi".
  49. Schwandl, Robert. (2016-04-27). "Robert Schwandl's Urban Rail Blog: JAPAN - Hiroshima Streetcars & Astram".
  50. Robert Schwandl. (2010). "Kuala Lumpur".
  51. "The Line 1 Capacity Expansion Project (Phase I)". [[Light Rail Transit Authority]].
  52. Amojelar, Darwin G.. (2022-02-25). "LRT-1 to deploy new trains in 2nd quarter". Manila Standard.
  53. (March 9, 2006). "3rd Generation LRV Mock Up on Display". [[Light Rail Transit Authority]].
  54. "World List P-T". Light Rail Transit Association.
  55. Recuenco, Aaron. (March 28, 2022). "MRT-3 starts month-long free ride, deploys 4-car train set". Manila Bulletin.
  56. "About Us – Background". Metro Rail Transit.
  57. "Uijeongbu Light Rail Transit, South Korea".
  58. (27 March 2014). "Malaga metro problems – before work's even started". [[euroweeklynews.com]].
  59. Puente, Fernando. (30 July 2014). "Malaga light metro network opens". [[International Railway Journal]].
  60. "Mallorca Rail Development, Spain".
  61. "Sevilla Light Metro". CAF, Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles, S.A..
  62. (30 August 2017). "台中捷運綠線電聯車測試 每列車可載運536人".
  63. "TEKNİK ÖZELLİKLER". Ankaray LRT.
  64. Meechan, Simon. (2018-08-16). "Why Metro level crossings in Newcastle do not have safety barriers".
  65. (1976). "The Highway Engineer, Volume 23". Institution of Highway Engineers.
  66. (June 1, 2013). "American Public Transportation Association – A MULTIMODAL TOUR OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY". [[American Public Transportation Association.
  67. "First train delivered to Astana light metro".
  68. (7 November 2019). "Trains on Seoul Subway Line 9 lengthened to 6 cars to reduce congestion on infamously busy line".
  69. (3 March 2015). "Transit Ridership Report Fourth Quarter and End-of-Year 2014". [[American Public Transportation Association]] (APTA).
  70. "TTC, City improving Line 3 Scarborough bus shuttle routes as train service set to permanently end".
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Light metro — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report