Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/pamphlets

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Is the School House the Proper Place to Teach Raw Sex?

American anti-sex-education pamphlet

Is the School House the Proper Place to Teach Raw Sex?

American anti-sex-education pamphlet

Is the School House the Proper Place to Teach Raw Sex? is a pamphlet written in 1968 by Gordon V. Drake and published by Billy James Hargis's Christian Crusade. It was a key document in the conservative fight against sex education in public schools, a cultural issue that contributed to the development of the New Right.

The 40-page document, described by Time magazine as, "an angry little pamphlet," was originally distributed as part of a direct-mail fundraising campaign for the Christian Crusade, so that the organization could lobby against sex education in schools. It became a source of unfounded anecdotes about the supposed horrors of sex education for groups such as Mothers Organized for Moral Stability.

School House targeted the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS), and in particular its director Dr. Mary Calderone. It described her as the "SIECUS Sexpot", and said that the group sought to "toss[...] God aside" and "to teach American youth a new sexual morality independent of church and state." Besides arguing that sex education undermined Christian morality and promoted promiscuity, the document said it is part of a "giant Communist conspiracy." It said, "[If] the new morality is affirmed, our children will become easy targets for Marxism and other amoral, nihilistic philosophies—as well as V.D.!" The pamphlet also identified the National Education Association as an enemy.

The pamphlet was the most widely circulated attack on sex education in the 1960s. Drake estimated that it sold over 90,000 copies in the three months after it was published, while Hargis claimed one million overall. A more conservative estimate is 250,000 copies.

References

References

  1. Moran, Jeffrey P.. (June 2003). "Sex Education and the Rise of the New Right". Reviews in American History.
  2. (2008). "Sexuality Education: Theory and Practice". Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  3. (July 25, 1969). "Sex in the Classroom".
  4. Mass, Lawrence. (1990). "Dialogues of the Sexual Revolution: Homosexuality as behavior and identity". Psychology Press.
  5. (1971). "Sexuality: a search for perspective". Van Nostrand Reinhold Co..
  6. Bruce, William. "The American school board journal, Volume 157". National School Boards Association.
  7. Cornblatt, Johannah. (2009-10-28). "The Sin of Yielding to Impure Desire: a brief history of sex ed in America.". Newsweek.
  8. Mahoney, E.R.. (November 1979). "Sex Education in the Public Schools: A Discriminant Analysis of Characteristics of Pro and Anti Individuals". The Journal of Sex Research.
  9. Moran, Jeffrey P.. (2000). "Teaching Sex: The Shaping of Adolescence in the 20th Century". Harvard University Press.
  10. Irvine, Janice M.. (2004). "Talk about Sex: The Battles over Sex Education in the United States". University of California Press.
  11. (February 16, 1976). "The Sins of Billy James".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Is the School House the Proper Place to Teach Raw Sex? — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report