Irreparable injury

The irreparable injury rule

It has traditionally been a requirement of equity that no relief can be granted unless there is irreparable injury. This requirement, commonly called the "irreparable injury rule", has been the subject of sustained academic criticism, especially by remedies scholar Douglas Laycock, who has argued at length that the rule does not actually explain the decisions of courts in the United States. Nevertheless, the irreparable injury rule was reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in eBay v. MercExchange, 547 U.S. 388 (2006), a case in which the Court announced a test for injunctive relief that required, among other things, that the plaintiff prove "that it has suffered an irreparable injury".

The concept of irreparable injury in various jurisdictions

The general idea that there are irreparable injuries has been recognized in various jurisdictions.

United Nations

The United Nations Staff Rules recognize the concept for the purpose of employment appeals.

United States

Virtually every state recognizes the concept under common law or equity, including New York Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Utah.

In addition to state law, the federal government takes note of the purpose of an injunction as being to "prevent irreparable damage or injury".

Africa

The East Africa Court of Justice has noted the concept in enjoining an election in Kenya.

Philippines

Philippines law notes the phrase in employment law, in a report regarding indigenous peoples, as well as in agrarian reform.

References

References

1. [http://dictionary.law.com/default2.asp?selected=1031&bold=%7C%7C%7C%7C Law Dictionary].
2. Douglas Laycock, The Death of the Irreparable Injury Rule (Oxford Univ. Press 1991).
3. "Serious Injury Attorney".
4. See [https://www.un.org/jab/faqs.html U.N. Joint Appeals Board web site], citing, Law Dictionary, ''supra''.
5. [http://www.cityinjurylawyer.com/glossary.html Private law firm's web site glossary].
6. [http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=39090 Oklahoma case]
7. [http://www.state.sd.us/puc/commission/dockets/telecom/2006/tc06-010/confidentialityagreement.pdf S.D. Public Service Commission web site]
8. "Attorney General of Utah web site".
9. [http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/azd/courtinfo.nsf/court/files/$file/glossary+of+terms.pdf D.Ariz. official web site] {{Webarchive. link. (2006-09-24 .)
10. "N.D.Tex. official web site".
11. [http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/kidspage/glossary.html DOJ Web site, Kid's page].
12. [https://www.e5quirelaw.com/ e5quire Law], 17 January 2023
13. [http://www.eac.int/news_2006_11__EACJ_ruling_on_kenya_EALA_mps.pdf EAC web page] {{Webarchive. link. (2007-09-28 .)
14. "DOLE FAQs: Details".
15. See case on [http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/1996/nov1996/110494.htm Philippines Supreme Court official web site] {{Webarchive. link. (2007-09-29 .)
16. [http://lawphil.net/judjuris/juri2002/jul2002/gr_143215_2002.html Philippine Jurisprudence web site]
17. link. (2007-09-28 .)
18. {{usurped