Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/ultimate-fate-of-the-universe

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Heat death of the universe

Possible fate of the universe


Possible fate of the universe

Note

the entropic exhaustion of the universe

The heat death of the universe (also known as the Big Chill or the Big Freeze) is a scientific hypothesis regarding the ultimate fate of the universe which posits the universe will evolve to a state of no thermodynamic free energy and, having reached maximum entropy, will therefore be unable to sustain any further thermodynamic processes. Heat death does not imply any particular absolute temperature; it only requires that temperature differences or other processes may no longer be exploited to perform work. In the language of physics, this is when the universe reaches thermodynamic equilibrium.

If the curvature of the universe is hyperbolic or flat, or if dark energy is a positive cosmological constant, the universe will continue expanding forever, and a heat death is expected to occur, | publication-date = 16 October 2008 | author-link = Phil Plait | title-link = Death from the Skies!

The theory of heat death stems from the ideas of Lord Kelvin who, in the 1850s, took the theory of heat as mechanical energy loss in nature (as embodied in the first two laws of thermodynamics) and extrapolated it to larger processes on a universal scale. This also allowed Kelvin to formulate the heat death paradox, which disproves an infinitely old universe.

Origins of the idea

The idea of heat death stems from the second law of thermodynamics, of which one version states that entropy tends to increase in an isolated system. From this, the hypothesis implies that if the universe lasts for a sufficient time, it will asymptotically approach a state where all energy is evenly distributed. In other words, according to this hypothesis, there is a tendency in nature towards the dissipation (energy transformation) of mechanical energy (motion) into thermal energy; hence, by extrapolation, there exists the view that, in time, the mechanical movement of the universe will run down as work is converted to heat because of the second law.

The conjecture that all bodies in the universe cool off, eventually becoming too cold to support life, seems to have been first put forward by the French astronomer Jean Sylvain Bailly in 1777 in his writings on the history of astronomy and in the ensuing correspondence with Voltaire. In Bailly's view, all planets have an internal heat and are now at some particular stage of cooling. Venus, for instance, is still too hot for life to arise there for thousands of years, while Mars is already too cold. The final state, in this view, is described as one of "equilibrium" in which all motion ceases. |author-link = Stephen G. Brush

The idea of heat death as a consequence of the laws of thermodynamics, however, was first proposed in loose terms beginning in 1851 by Lord Kelvin (William Thomson), who theorized further on the mechanical energy loss views of Sadi Carnot (1824), James Joule (1843) and Rudolf Clausius (1850). Thomson's views were then elaborated over the next decade by Hermann von Helmholtz and William Rankine.

History

The idea of the heat death of the universe derives from discussion of the application of the first two laws of thermodynamics to universal processes. Specifically, in 1851, Lord Kelvin outlined the view, as based on recent experiments on the dynamical theory of heat: "heat is not a substance, but a dynamical form of mechanical effect, we perceive that there must be an equivalence between mechanical work and heat, as between cause and effect."

In 1852, Thomson published On a Universal Tendency in Nature to the Dissipation of Mechanical Energy, in which he outlined the rudiments of the second law of thermodynamics summarized by the view that mechanical motion and the energy used to create that motion will naturally tend to dissipate or run down. The ideas in this paper, in relation to their application to the age of the Sun and the dynamics of the universal operation, attracted the likes of William Rankine and Hermann von Helmholtz. The three of them were said to have exchanged ideas on this subject. |author-link2 = M. Norton Wise

The clock's example shows how Kelvin was unsure whether the universe would eventually achieve thermodynamic equilibrium. Thomson later speculated that restoring the dissipated energy in "vis viva" and then usable workand therefore revert the clock's direction, resulting in a "rejuvenating universe"would require "a creative act or an act possessing similar power". Starting from this publication, Kelvin also introduced the heat death paradox (Kelvin's paradox), which challenged the classical concept of an infinitely old universe, since the universe has not achieved its thermodynamic equilibrium, thus further work and entropy production are still possible. The existence of stars and temperature differences can be considered an empirical proof that the universe is not infinitely old.

In the years to follow both Thomson's 1852 and the 1862 papers, Helmholtz and Rankine both credited Thomson with the idea, along with his paradox, but read further into his papers by publishing views stating that Thomson argued that the universe will end in a "heat death" (Helmholtz), which will be the "end of all physical phenomena" (Rankine). |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110522124507/http://webplaza.pt.lu/fklaess/html/HISTORIA.HTML |archive-date = 22 May 2011

Current status

Proposals about the final state of the universe depend on the assumptions made about its ultimate fate, and these assumptions have varied considerably over the late 20th century and early 21st century. In a theorized "open" or "flat" universe that continues expanding indefinitely, either a heat death or a Big Rip is expected to eventually occur. If the cosmological constant is zero, the universe will approach absolute zero temperature over a very long timescale. However, if the cosmological constant is positive, the temperature will asymptote to a non-zero positive value, and the universe will approach a state of maximum entropy in which no further work is possible. |author-link = Lisa Dyson |author-link2 = Matthew Kleban |author-link3 = Leonard Susskind

Thermodynamic heat death is a classical-physics concept, but has been extended to quantum physics. Even when thermodynamic entropy has reached its maximum, other quantities such as quantum circuit complexity continue to increase, eventually also reaching a maximum value.

Time frame for heat death

Main article: Future of an expanding universe

The theory suggests that from the "Big Bang" through the present day, matter and dark matter in the universe are thought to have been concentrated in stars, galaxies, and galaxy clusters, and are presumed to continue to do so well into the future. Therefore, the universe is not in thermodynamic equilibrium, and objects can do physical work. | author-link = Fred Adams | author-link2 = Gregory P. Laughlin See in particular equation (27) in {{Cite journal | author-link = Don Page (physicist)

It has been hypothesized that, over vast periods of time, a spontaneous entropy decrease could eventually occur via the Poincaré recurrence theorem, thermal fluctuations, | author-link = Max Tegmark

Opposing views

Max Planck wrote that the phrase "entropy of the universe" has no meaning because it admits of no accurate definition. | editor-last = Greven | editor-first = Andreas | editor-last2 = Warnecke | editor-first2 = Gerald | editor-last3 = Keller | editor-first3 = Gerhard In 2008, Walter Grandy wrote: "It is rather presumptuous to speak of the entropy of a universe about which we still understand so little, and we wonder how one might define thermodynamic entropy for a universe and its major constituents that have never been in equilibrium in their entire existence." | author-link = László Tisza | author-link = Hans Adolf Buchdahl | author-link = Giovanni Gallavotti In Peter Landsberg's opinion: "The third misconception is that thermodynamics, and in particular, the concept of entropy, can without further enquiry be applied to the whole universe. ... These questions have a certain fascination, but the answers are speculations."

A 2010 analysis of entropy states, "The entropy of a general gravitational field is still not known", and "gravitational entropy is difficult to quantify". The analysis considers several possible assumptions that would be needed for estimates and suggests that the observable universe has more entropy than previously thought. This is because the analysis concludes that supermassive black holes are the largest contributor. | publication-date = 3 February 2010 | author-link = Lee Smolin | publication-date = 30 January 2017 | publication-date = 8 February 2020 | article-number = 100031 | doi-access = free

Philosophical views

The discovery of the principle of the heat death of the universe led to philosophical reevaluation of the place of man in the universe. In 1856, Hermann von Helmholtz suggest that it compelled humans to complete a moral destiny. Philipp Mainländer, another philosopher whose 1875 work Die Philosophie der Erlösung has been associated with the philosophy of pandeism, saw the expected heat death of the Universe as "a different, redemptive destiny for humanity: an end of suffering".

References

References

  1. [http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_fate.html WMAP – Fate of the Universe], ''WMAP's Universe'', [[NASA]]. Accessed online July 17, 2008.
  2. Dyer, Alan. (2007-07-24). "Insiders: Space". [[Simon & Schuster]] Books for Young Readers.
  3. Thomson, Sir William. (1851). [https://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/on_the_dynamical_theory_of_heat.html "On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, with numerical results deduced from Mr Joule's equivalent of a Thermal Unit, and M. Regnault's Observations on Steam"] Excerpts. [§§1–14 & §§99–100], ''[[Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh]]'', March 1851, and ''[[Philosophical Magazine. Philosophical Magazine IV]]'', 1852. This version from ''Mathematical and Physical Papers'', vol. i, art. XLVIII, pp. 174.
  4. Thomson, Sir William (1852). [https://zapatopi.net/kelvin/papers/on_a_universal_tendency.html "On a Universal Tendency in Nature to the Dissipation of Mechanical Energy"] ''[[Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh]]'' for 19 April 1852, also ''[[Philosophical Magazine]]'', Oct. 1852. This version from ''Mathematical and Physical Papers'', vol. i, art. 59, pp. 511.
  5. Harold I. Sharlin. (13 December 2019). "William Thomson, Baron Kelvin". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  6. (2002). "Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century: An Anthology".
  7. ''[https://www.britannica.com/science/thermodynamics/Entropy-and-heat-death Laws of Thermodynamics]'' Thompson and Clausius, [[Oxford University Press]], 2015.
  8. Consolmagno, Guy. (2008-05-08). "Heaven or Heat Death?".
  9. Musser, George. (6 June 2023). "In New Paradox, Black Holes Appear to Evade Heat Death". [[Quanta Magazine]].
  10. Poincaré, Henri. (1890). "Sur le problème des trois corps et les équations de la dynamique.". Acta Mathematica.
  11. Kellis, Devin M.. (August 2025). "Existential Health Care Ethics". AMA Journal of Ethics.
  12. "PNC Story - IOP Wiki".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Heat death of the universe — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report