Gujarat Control of Organised Crime Act

Introduction And Presidential Assent

The bill was drawn on the lines of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (for Maharashtra) and Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act (for Karnataka). It was then sent to the office of the President of India for assent. Originally, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam didn't give assent because of a few controversial points:

1. Clause 16 relates to the confession made before a police officer being admissible in court
2. Substitute the word "may" for "shall" after the words Special Court occurring in clause 20(2) and bring the provision in line with Section 43(d)(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act(Amendment), Clause 20(2) deals with the extension of the detention period
3. Amend Clause 20(4) to bring it in conformity with Section 43(d)(5) of the UAP (Amendment) Act. Clause 20(4) deals with the powers of the court to grant bail.

In July 2009, the bill was re-introduced in the state legislature without the changes suggested by the President, but it failed to pass. In 2019, The Gujarat Control of Terrorism and Organised Crime (GCTOC) bill passed by the Gujarat State Assembly received President Ram Nath Kovind's assent. The bill, which was formulated in 2003 when Prime Minister Narendra Modi was Chief Minister of the State, had been sent for presidential clearance three times. Each time it was rejected over a few controversial provisions.

The bill was successful in its fourth attempt when President Kovind gave his assent on 7 November 2019, almost 16 years after it was first introduced. It was considered controversial for two key reasons: intercepted telephone conversations would be considered legitimate evidence and a confession made before a police officer would also be considered documented evidence. President Ram Nath Kovind passed both. The law provides for the constitution of a special court along with the appointment of special public prosecutors to handle organised crime cases. Furthermore, assets acquired through organised crime could be auctioned and the transfer of assets could be cancelled.

The new law states that any act intended to disrupt or endanger law and order, public order, or the unity, integrity and security of the State, is illegal. Spreading terror in the minds of people also falls into the category of terrorism. The new law is formulated to deal with terrorism and organised crime such as contract killing, ponzi schemes, the narcotics trade, extortion rackets, cybercrime, land-grabbing and human trafficking.

According to state Ministry, the new law has a provision that allows up to life imprisonment for cases involving the crimes listed above. Additionally, if a death occurs in these crimes, capital punishment could apply.

Human Rights Issue

The bill got an outright rejection from President A.P.J Abdul Kalam. In 2008, a second attempt was made at getting the presidential nod, but President Pratibha Patil sent it back over the confession provisions. In 2015, it went before President Pranab Mukherji but was sent back as he sought clarification on some clauses. While other States have similar laws, the provisions in the Gujarat law are widely acknowledged to be harsh, dangerous and part of a larger agenda.

References

References

1. (5 November 2019). "Controversial Gujarat anti-terror law gets President assent on 4th attempt". Indiatoday.
2. "BJP deserters back Modi stance on GUJCOC Bill".
3. "Jaipur blasts revive debate over GUJCOC Bill".
4. (20 June 2009). "Centre returns GUJCOC Bill, asks state to amend 3 clauses".
5. (28 July 2009). "Gujarat passes anti-terror bill, rejects President's suggestions". [[The Times of India]].
6. Katakam, Anupama. (8 November 2019). "President's assent to Gujarat anti-terrorism Bill of 2003".