Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

General ticket

Type of block voting


Type of block voting

The general ticket or party block voting (PBV), is a type of block voting in which voters opt for a party or a team of candidates, and the highest-polling party/team becomes the winner and receives 100% of the seats for this multi-member district. The party block voting is usually applied with more than one multi-member district to prevent one team winning all seats. This system has a winner-take-all nature similar to first-past-the-post voting for single-member districts, which is vulnerable to gerrymandering and majority reversals.

A related system is the majority bonus system, where a block of seats is awarded according to the winner of party-list proportional representation.

Usage

Philippines

From 1941 up to 1949 elections, the Philippines elected its officials under this system, then known as block voting. A voter can write the name of the party on the ballot and have all of that voter's votes allocated for that party's candidates, from president to local officials; there is still an option for a voter to split one's ticket down ballot and not write the name of the party. This led to landslides for the Nacionalista Party in 1941, for the Liberal Party in 1949. The law was amended in time for the 1951 election, having voters to vote for each office separately.

Singapore

Main article: Group representation constituency

In Singapore, the general ticket system, locally known as the party block vote, elects by far most members of the Parliament of Singapore from multi-member districts known as group representation constituencies (GRCs), on a plurality basis. This operates in parallel with ordinary single-member district and nominations. This system is moderated by a requirement for racial diversity; every candidate "team" must include at least one member from a minority ethnic group. According to the government, this serves to enshrine minority representation in Parliament.

United States

Ticket voting is used to elect electors for the Electoral College for presidential elections, except for some of the electors in Maine and Nebraska who are elected by first-past-the-post in districts covering just part of each state. Under ticket voting, votes for any non-overall winning party's candidates do not receive any representation by elected members.

Coexistence

The following countries use party block voting in coexistence with other systems in different districts.

CountryLegislative bodyLatest election (year)(Seats perElectoral systemTotal seatsShare of seats elected by PBVConstituencies
Cote d'Ivoire Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast)National Assembly2021First-past-the-post (FPTP/SMP) in single-member districts and party block voting (PBV) in multi-member districts255
Egypt EgyptHouse of Representatives20201 (local districts), 42–100 (list districts)Two-round system (TRS) and party block voting (PBV/General ticket)59
Singapore SingaporeParliament20251 (single-member districts), 4–5 (multi-member districts)First-past-the-post (FPTP/SMP) in single-member districts and party block voting (PBV) in multi-member districts108 (97 directly elected)
United States United StatesUnited States Electoral College20201–54The electors of the Electoral College (who have opportunity to elect the President of the United States) are elected by general ticket in 48 states based on state-wide party vote tallies.538

Superposition

Countries using party block voting in parallel with proportional representation.

CountryLegislative bodyLatest election (year)(Seats perElectoral systemTotal seatsShare of seats elected by PBVConstituencies
Andorra AndorraGeneral Council20192 (local districts) / 14 (nationwide constituency)Parallel voting / superposition (MMM):2850%
Cameroon CameroonNational Assembly20201–7Coexistence+conditional supermixed/hybrid:180(50%/100%)
Chad ChadNational Assembly2011UnknownCoexistence+conditional supermixed/hybrid:188(50%/100%)
Djibouti DjiboutiNational Assembly20183–28Fusion / majority jackpot (MBS):6580%

History

Historically party block voting was used in the US House of Representatives before 1967 but mainly before 1847; and in France, in the pre-World War I decades of the Third Republic which began in 1870.

France

The scrutin de liste (Fr. scrutin, voting by ballot, and liste, a list) was, before World War I, a system of election of national representatives in France by which the electors of a department voted for a party-homogeneous slate of deputies to be elected to serve it nationally. It was distinguished from the scrutin d'arrondissement, also called scrutin uninominal, under which the electors in each arrondissement returned one deputy.

United States

The following is a table of every instance of the use of the general ticket in the United States Congress. General ticket system was common until limited to special use by the 1842 Apportionment Bill and locally implementing legislation which took effect after the 1845–47 Congress. Until the Congress ending in 1967 it took effect in rare instances, save for a two cases of ex-Confederate States – for one term – these had tiny delegations, were for top-up members to be at-large allocated pending redistricting, or were added to the union since the last census.

CongressDatesState and
number of representatives
1st1789–1791Connecticut (5), New Jersey (4), New Hampshire (3), Pennsylvania (8)
2nd1791–1793Connecticut (5), New Jersey (4), New Hampshire (3)
3rd1793–1795Connecticut (7), Georgia (2), New Jersey (5), New Hampshire (4), Pennsylvania (13), Rhode Island (2)
4th and 5th1795–1799Connecticut (7), Georgia (2), New Jersey (5), New Hampshire (4), Rhode Island (2)
6th1799–1801Connecticut (7), Georgia (2), New Hampshire (4), Rhode Island (2)
7th1801–1803Connecticut (7), Georgia (2), New Jersey (5), New Hampshire (4), Rhode Island (2)
8th1803–1805Connecticut (7), Georgia (4), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (5), Rhode Island (2), Tennessee (3)
9th to 12th1805–1813Connecticut (7), Georgia (4), New Jersey (6), New Jersey (5), Rhode Island (2)
13th1813–1815Connecticut (7), Delaware (2), Georgia (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2), Vermont (6)
14th to 16th1815–1821Connecticut (7), Delaware (2), Georgia (6), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2), Vermont (6)
17th1821–1823Connecticut (7), Delaware (2), Georgia (6), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2)
18th1823–1825Connecticut (6), Georgia (7), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2), Vermont (5)
19th1825–1827Connecticut (6), Georgia (7), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2)
20th1827–1829Connecticut (6), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2)
21st and 22nd1829–1833Connecticut (6), Georgia (7), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (6), Rhode Island (2)
23rd and 24th1833–1837Connecticut (6), Georgia (9), Missouri (2), Mississippi (2), New Jersey (6), New Hampshire (5), Rhode Island (2)
25th and 26th1837–1841New Hampshire (5), Georgia (9), Missouri (2), Mississippi (2), New Jersey (6), Rhode Island (2)
27th1841–1843Alabama (5), Georgia (9), Missouri (2), Mississippi (2), New Hampshire (5), New Jersey (6), Rhode Island (2)
28th1843–1845New Hampshire (4), Georgia (8), Missouri (5), Mississippi (4)
29th1845–1847Iowa (2), New Hampshire (4), Missouri (5), Mississippi (4)
30th1847–1849Wisconsin (2)
31st to 34th1849–1857California (2)
35th to 37th1857–1863California (2), Minnesota (2)
38th to 42nd1863–1873California (3)
43rd to 47th1873–1883Florida (2), Kansas (3)
48th1883–1885Maine (4)
51st and 52nd1889–1893South Dakota (2)
53rd to 57th1893–1903South Dakota (2), Washington (2)
58th to 60th1903–1909North Dakota (2), South Dakota (2), Washington (3)
61st1909–1911North Dakota (2), South Dakota (2)
62nd1911–1913North Dakota (2), New Mexico (2), South Dakota (2)
63rd1913–1915Idaho (2), Montana (2), Utah (2)
64th1915–1917Idaho (2), Montana (2)
65th to 72nd1917–1933Idaho (2), Montana (2)
73rd1933–1935Kentucky (9), Minnesota (9), Missouri (13), North Dakota (2), Virginia (9)
74th to 77th1935–1943North Dakota (2)
78th to 80th1943–1949Arizona (2), New Mexico (2), North Dakota (2)
81st to 87th1949–1963New Mexico (2), North Dakota (2)
88th1963–1965Alabama (8), Hawaii (2), New Mexico (2)
89th and 90th1965–1969Hawaii (2), New Mexico (2)
91st1969–1971Hawaii (2)

References

Sources

References

  1. The Australian Electoral System, p. 61
  2. Quezon, Manuel III. (November 20, 2006). "Block voting". [[Philippine Daily Inquirer]].
  3. (25 March 2025). "GRCs: How do they affect elections?". Community for Advocacy and Political Education.
  4. (23 September 2015). "Le système électoral au Tchad - Comité de Suivi de l'Appel à la Paix et à la Réconciliation".
  5. {{EB1911
  6. Public Law 90-196, {{usc. 2. 2c
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about General ticket — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report