Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/algebras

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Frobenius theorem (real division algebras)

Theorem in abstract algebra


Theorem in abstract algebra

In mathematics, more specifically in abstract algebra, the Frobenius theorem, proved by Ferdinand Georg Frobenius in 1877, characterizes the finite-dimensional associative division algebras over the real numbers. According to the theorem, every such algebra is isomorphic to one of the following:

  • R (the real numbers)
  • C (the complex numbers)
  • H (the quaternions) These algebras have real dimension 1, 2, and 4, respectively. Of these three algebras, R and C are commutative, but H is not.

Proof

The main ingredients for the following proof are the Cayley–Hamilton theorem and the fundamental theorem of algebra.

Introducing some notation

  • Let D be the division algebra in question.
  • Let n be the dimension of D.
  • We identify the real multiples of 1 with R.
  • When we write a ≤ 0 for an element a of D, we imply that a is contained in R.
  • We can consider D as a finite-dimensional R-vector space. Any element d of D defines an endomorphism of D by left-multiplication, we identify d with that endomorphism. Therefore, we can speak about the trace of d, and its characteristic- and minimal polynomials.
  • For any z in C define the following real quadratic polynomial:
:Note that if *z* ∈ **C** ∖ **R** then *Q*(*z*; *x*) is irreducible over **R**. ### The claim The key to the argument is the following :**Claim.** The set V of all elements a of D such that *a*2 ≤ 0 is a vector subspace of D of dimension *n* − 1. Moreover as **R**-vector spaces, which implies that V generates D as an algebra. **Proof of Claim:** Pick a in D with characteristic polynomial *p*(*x*). By the fundamental theorem of algebra, we can write :p(x) = (x-t_1)\cdots(x-t_r) (x-z_1)(x - \overline{z_1}) \cdots (x-z_s)(x - \overline{z_s}), \qquad t_i \in \mathbf{R}, \quad z_j \in \mathbf{C} \setminus \mathbf{R}. We can rewrite *p*(*x*) in terms of the polynomials *Q*(*z*; *x*): :p(x) = (x-t_1)\cdots(x-t_r) Q(z_1; x) \cdots Q(z_s; x). Since *zj* ∈ **C** ∖ **R**, the polynomials *Q*(*zj*; *x*) are all irreducible over **R**. By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem, and because D is a division algebra, it follows that either for some i or that for some j. The first case implies that a is real. In the second case, it follows that *Q*(*zj*; *x*) is the minimal polynomial of a. Because *p*(*x*) has the same complex roots as the minimal polynomial and because it is real it follows that :p(x) = Q(z_j; x)^k = \left(x^2 - 2\operatorname{Re}(z_j) x + |z_j|^2 \right)^k for some *k*. Since *p*(*x*) is the characteristic polynomial of a the coefficient of *x* 2*k* − 1 in *p*(*x*) is tr(*a*) up to a sign. Therefore, we read from the above equation we have: if and only if , in other words if and only if {{math|*a*2 −*zj*2 So V is the subset of all a with . In particular, it is a vector subspace. The rank–nullity theorem then implies that V has dimension *n* − 1 since it is the kernel of \operatorname{tr} : D \to \mathbf{R}. Since **R** and V are disjoint (i.e. they satisfy \mathbf R \cap V = \{0\}), and their dimensions sum to n, we have that . ### The finish For *a*, *b* in V define . Because of the identity , it follows that *B*(*a*, *b*) is real. Furthermore, since *a*2 ≤ 0, we have: *B*(*a*, *a*) 0 for *a* ≠ 0. Thus B is a positive-definite symmetric bilinear form, in other words, an inner product on V. Let W be a subspace of V that generates D as an algebra and which is minimal with respect to this property. Let *e*1, ..., *ek* be an orthonormal basis of W with respect to *B*. Then orthonormality implies that: :e_i^2 =-1, \quad e_i e_j = - e_j e_i. The form of D then depends on k: If , then D is isomorphic to **R**. If , then D is generated by 1 and *e*1 subject to the relation . Hence it is isomorphic to **C**. If , it has been shown above that D is generated by 1, *e*1, *e*2 subject to the relations :e_1^2 = e_2^2 =-1, \quad e_1 e_2 = - e_2 e_1, \quad (e_1 e_2)(e_1 e_2) =-1. These are precisely the relations for **H**. If *k* 2, then D cannot be a division algebra. Assume that *k* 2. Define and consider . By rearranging the elements of this expression and applying the orthonormality relations among the basis elements we find that . If D were a division algebra, implies , which in turn means: and so *e*1, ..., *e**k*−1 generate D. This contradicts the minimality of W. ## Remarks and related results - The fact that D is generated by *e*1, ..., *ek* subject to the above relations means that D is the Clifford algebra of **R***n*. The last step shows that the only real Clifford algebras which are division algebras are Cℓ0, Cℓ1 and Cℓ2. - As a consequence, the only commutative division algebras are **R** and **C**. Also note that **H** is not a **C**-algebra. If it were, then the center of **H** has to contain **C**, but the center of **H** is **R**. - - This theorem is closely related to Hurwitz's theorem, which states that the only real normed division algebras are **R**, **C**, **H**, and the (non-associative) algebra **O**. - **Pontryagin variant.** If D is a connected, locally compact division ring, then , or **H**. ## References - Ray E. Artz (2009) [Scalar Algebras and Quaternions](http://www.math.cmu.edu/~wn0g/noll/qu1.pdf), Theorem 7.1 "Frobenius Classification", page 26. - Ferdinand Georg Frobenius (1878) "[Über lineare Substitutionen und bilineare Formen](http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C3%9Cber_lineare_Substitutionen_und_bilineare_Formen.djvu)", *Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik* 84:1–63 (Crelle's Journal). Reprinted in *Gesammelte Abhandlungen* Band I, pp. 343–405. - Yuri Bahturin (1993) *Basic Structures of Modern Algebra*, Kluwer Acad. Pub. pp. 30–2 . - Leonard Dickson (1914) *Linear Algebras*, Cambridge University Press. See §11 "Algebra of real quaternions; its unique place among algebras", pages 10 to 12. - R.S. Palais (1968) "The Classification of Real Division Algebras" American Mathematical Monthly 75:366–8. - Lev Semenovich Pontryagin, Topological Groups, page 159, 1966. ::callout[type=info title="Wikipedia Source"] This article was imported from [Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_theorem_(real_division_algebras)) and is available under the [Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/). Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the [article history page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenius_theorem_(real_division_algebras)?action=history). ::
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Frobenius theorem (real division algebras) — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report