Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
technology/computing

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Floating point operations per second

Measure of computer performance


Measure of computer performance

Floating point operations per second (FLOPS, flops or flop/s) is a measure of computer performance in computing, useful in fields of scientific computations that require floating-point calculations.

For such cases, it is a more accurate measure than instructions per second.

Floating-point arithmetic

multipliers

NameUnitValue
kiloFLOPSkFLOPS103
megaFLOPSMFLOPS106
gigaFLOPSGFLOPS109
teraFLOPSTFLOPS1012
petaFLOPSPFLOPS1015
exaFLOPSEFLOPS1018
zettaFLOPSZFLOPS1021
yottaFLOPSYFLOPS1024
ronnaFLOPSRFLOPS1027
quettaFLOPSQFLOPS1030

Floating-point arithmetic is needed for very large or very small real numbers, or computations that require a large dynamic range. Floating-point representation is similar to scientific notation, except computers use base two (with rare exceptions), rather than base ten. The encoding scheme stores the sign, the exponent (in base two for Cray and VAX, base two or ten for IEEE floating point formats, and base 16 for IBM Floating Point Architecture) and the significand (number after the radix point). While several similar formats are in use, the most common is ANSI/IEEE Std. 754-1985. This standard defines the format for 32-bit numbers called single precision, as well as 64-bit numbers called double precision and longer numbers called extended precision (used for intermediate results). Floating-point representations can support a much wider range of values than fixed-point, with the ability to represent very small numbers and very large numbers.

Dynamic range and precision

The exponentiation inherent in floating-point computation assures a much larger dynamic range – the largest and smallest numbers that can be represented – which is especially important when processing data sets where some of the data may have extremely large range of numerical values or where the range may be unpredictable. As such, floating-point processors are ideally suited for computationally intensive applications.

Computational performance

FLOPS and MIPS are units of measure for the numerical computing performance of a computer. Floating-point operations are typically used in fields such as scientific computational research, as well as in machine learning. However, before the late 1980s floating-point hardware (it's possible to implement FP arithmetic in software over any integer hardware) was typically an optional feature, and computers that had it were said to be "scientific computers", or to have "scientific computation" capability. Thus the unit MIPS was useful to measure integer performance of any computer, including those without such a capability, and to account for architecture differences, similar MOPS (million operations per second) was used as early as 1970 as well. Note that besides integer (or fixed-point) arithmetics, examples of integer operation include data movement (A to B) or value testing (If A = B, then C). That's why MIPS as a performance benchmark is adequate when a computer is used in database queries, word processing, spreadsheets, or to run multiple virtual operating systems. In 1974 David Kuck coined the terms flops and megaflops for the description of supercomputer performance of the day by the number of floating-point calculations they performed per second. This was much better than using the prevalent MIPS to compare computers as this statistic usually had little bearing on the arithmetic capability of the machine on scientific tasks.

FLOPS on an HPC-system can be calculated using this equation:

: \text{FLOPS} = \text{racks} \times \frac{\text{nodes}}{\text{rack}} \times \frac{\text{sockets}}{\text{node}} \times \frac{\text{cores}}{\text{socket}} \times \frac{\text{cycles}}{ \text{second}} \times \frac{\text{FLOPs}}{\text{cycle}}.

This can be simplified to the most common case: a computer that has exactly 1 CPU:

: \text{FLOPS} = \text{cores} \times \frac{\text{cycles}}{ \text{second}} \times \frac{\text{FLOPs}}{\text{cycle}}.

FLOPS can be recorded in different measures of precision, for example, the TOP500 supercomputer list ranks computers by 64-bit (double-precision floating-point format) operations per second, abbreviated to FP64. Similar measures are available for 32-bit (FP32) and 16-bit (FP16) operations.

FLOPSforProcessors

Floating-point operations per clock cycle for various processors

MicroarchitectureInstruction set architectureFP64FP32FP16Intel CPUAMD CPUARM CPUNvidia GPUAMD GPUIntel GPUQualcomm GPUGraphcoreSupercomputerMicroarchitectureInstruction set architectureFP64FP32FP16
Intel 80486x87 (80-bit)0.128
{{plainlistx87 (80-bit)title=home.iae.nlurl=http://home.iae.nl/users/mhx/flops_4.tblaccess-date=website=archive-date=October 19, 2021archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211019032058/http://home.iae.nl/users/mhx/flops_4.tblurl-status=dead }}
{{plainlistx87 (80-bit)title=Computing Power throughout Historyurl=https://www.alternatewars.com/BBOW/Computing/Computing_Power.htmaccess-date=2021-02-13website=alternatewars.comarchive-date=February 28, 2021archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228233003/http://www.alternatewars.com/BBOW/Computing/Computing_Power.htmurl-status=dead}}
Intel P6 Pentium IIISSE (64-bit)2
Intel NetBurst Pentium 4 (Willamette, Northwood)SSE2 (64-bit)24
Intel P6 Pentium MSSE2 (64-bit)12
{{plainlistSSE3 (64-bit)24
{{plainlist{{plainlist48
Intel Atom (Bonnell, Saltwell, Silvermont and Goldmont)SSE3 (128-bit)24
Intel Sandy Bridge (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge)AVX (256-bit)8160
{{ublistIntel Haswell (Haswell, Devil's Canyon, Broadwell)Intel Skylake
(Skylake, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake, Comet Lake, Whiskey Lake, Amber Lake)AVX2 & FMA (256-bit)16320
Intel Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)IMCI (512-bit)16320
{{plainlistAVX-512 & FMA (512-bit)32640
AMD BobcatAMD64 (64-bit)240
{{plainlistAVX (128-bit)480
AMD K10SSE4/4a (128-bit)480
AMD Bulldozer
(Piledriver, Steamroller, Excavator){{ublistAVX (128-bit)
(Bulldozer, Steamroller)AVX2 (128-bit) (Excavator)FMA3 (Bulldozer)FMA3/4 (Piledriver, Excavator)480
{{ublistAMD Zen
(Ryzen 1000 series, Threadripper 1000 series, Epyc Naples)url=http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=838title=Agner's CPU blog - Test results for AMD Ryzen}}
(Ryzen 2000 series, Threadripper 2000 series)AVX2 & FMA
(128-bit, 256-bit decoding)8160
{{ublisturl=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_96stDCb-mk&t=3299title=AMD CEO Lisa Su's COMPUTEX 2019 Keynotearchive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/varchive/youtube/20211211/_96stDCb-mkarchive-date=2021-12-11url-status=livewebsite=youtube.comdate=May 27, 2019 }}
(Ryzen 3000 series, Threadripper 3000 series, Epyc Rome)AMD Zen 3
(Ryzen 5000 series, Epyc Milan)AVX2 & FMA (256-bit)16320
{{ublistAMD Zen 4
(Ryzen 7000 series, Threadripper 7000 series, Epyc Genoa,Bergamo, Siena)AVX-512 & FMA (256-bit)16320
{{ublistAMD Zen 5
(Ryzen 9000 series, Threadripper 9000 series, Epyc Turin)AVX-512 & FMA (512-bit)32640
ARM Cortex-A7, A9, A15ARMv7180
ARM Cortex-A32, A35ARMv8280
ARM Cortex-A53, A55, A57, A72, A73ARMv88160
ARM Cortex-A75, A76, A77, A78ARMv881632
ARM Cortex-X1ARMv8163264
Qualcomm KraitARMv8180
Qualcomm Kryo (1xx - 3xx)ARMv8280
Qualcomm Kryo (4xx - 5xx)ARMv88160
Samsung Exynos M1 and M2ARMv8280
Samsung Exynos M3 and M4ARMv83120
IBM PowerPC A2 (Blue Gene/Q)88
(as FP64)0
Hitachi SH-4SH-4170
Nvidia Curie (GeForce 6 series and GeForce 7 series)PTX8
Nvidia Tesla 2.0 (GeForce GTX 260–295)PTX2
Nvidia FermiPTX
(locked by driver,
1 in hardware)20
Nvidia FermiPTX20
Nvidia FermiPTX120
Nvidia KeplerPTX
(for GK110:
locked by driver,
in hardware)20
Nvidia KeplerPTX20
{{ublistNvidia MaxwellNvidia Pascal
(all except Quadro GP100 and Tesla P100)PTX2
Nvidia Pascal (only Quadro GP100 and Tesla P100)PTX124
Nvidia VoltaPTX12 (FP32) + 2 (INT32)16
Nvidia Turing (only GeForce 16XX)PTX2 (FP32) + 2 (INT32)4
Nvidia Turing (all except GeForce 16XX)PTX2 (FP32) + 2 (INT32)16
Nvidia Ampere (only Tesla A100/A30)PTX22 (FP32) + 2 (INT32)32
{{plainlistPTX2 (FP32) + 0 (INT32)
or
1 (FP32) + 1 (INT32)8
Nvidia HopperPTX22 (FP32) + 1 (INT32)32
AMD TeraScale 1 (Radeon HD 4000 series)TeraScale 10.42
AMD TeraScale 2 (Radeon HD 5000 series)TeraScale 212
AMD TeraScale 3 (Radeon HD 6000 series)TeraScale 314
AMD GCN
(only Radeon Pro W 8100–9100)GCN12
AMD GCN
(all except Radeon Pro W 8100–9100, Vega 10–20)GCN24
AMD GCN Vega 10GCN24
AMD GCN Vega 20
(only Radeon VII)GCN
(locked by driver,
1 in hardware)24
AMD GCN Vega 20
(only Radeon Instinct MI50 / MI60 and Radeon Pro VII)GCN124
{{plainlistRDNA24
AMD RDNA3RDNA?48?
AMD CDNACDNA1url=https://www.amd.com/en/products/server-accelerators/instinct-mi100title=AMD Instinct MI100 Accelerator}}16
AMD CDNA 2CDNA 24
(Tensor)4
(Tensor)16
url=https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/introduction-to-the-xe-hpg-architecture.htmltitle=Introduction to the Xe-HPG Architecture}}Xe?24
Intel Xe-HPG (Arc Alchemist)Xe0216
url=https://allinfo.space/2022/11/09/intel-data-center-gpu-max-ponte-vecchio-starts-in-3-variants-for-supercomputers/title=Intel Data Center GPU Maxdate=November 9, 2022 }}Xe2232
Intel Xe2 (Arc Battlemage)Xe2216
Qualcomm Adreno 5x0Adreno 5xx124
Qualcomm Adreno 6x0Adreno 6xx124
url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2IOyQEIlN6Y&t=1361title=250 TFLOPs/s for two chips with FP16 mixed precisionwebsite=youtube.comdate=October 26, 2018 }}01664
{{plainlist032128
ENIAC @ 100 kHz in 19450.00385
(~)
48-bit processor @ 208 kHz in CDC 1604 in 1960
60-bit processor @ 10 MHz in CDC 6600 in 19640.3
(FP60)
60-bit processor @ 10 MHz in CDC 7600 in 19671.0
(FP60)
Cray-1 @ 80 MHz in 19762
(700 FLOPS/W)
CDC Cyber 205 @ 50 MHz in 1981816
Transputer IMS T800-20 @ 20 MHz in 1987title=IMS T800 Architectureurl=https://www.transputer.net/tn/06/tn06.html#x1-150005access-date=2023-12-28website=transputer.net}}
Parallella E16 @ 1000 MHz in 20122
(5.0 GFLOPS/W)
Parallella E64 @ 800 MHz in 2012url=http://www.hpcwire.com/2012/08/22/adapteva_unveils_64-core_chip/title=Adapteva Unveils 64-Core Chiplast= Feldmanfirst=Michaeldate=August 22, 2012publisher=HPCWireaccessdate=September 3, 2014}}

Performance records

Single computer records

The NEC SX-2, a supercomputer developed by NEC in 1983, achieved gigaFLOPS (GFLOPS) performance with 1.3 billion FLOPS.

In June 1997, Intel's ASCI Red was the world's first computer to achieve one teraFLOPS and beyond. Sandia director Bill Camp said that ASCI Red had the best reliability of any supercomputer ever built, and "was supercomputing's high-water mark in longevity, price, and performance".

NEC's SX-9 supercomputer was the world's first vector processor to exceed 100 gigaFLOPS per single core.

In June 2006, a new computer was announced by Japanese research institute RIKEN, the MDGRAPE-3. The computer's performance tops out at one petaFLOPS, almost two times faster than the Blue Gene/L, but MDGRAPE-3 is not a general purpose computer, which is why it does not appear in the Top500.org list. It has special-purpose pipelines for simulating molecular dynamics.

By 2007, Intel Corporation unveiled the experimental multi-core POLARIS chip, which achieves 1 teraFLOPS at 3.13 GHz. The 80-core chip can raise this result to 2 teraFLOPS at 6.26 GHz, although the thermal dissipation at this frequency exceeds 190 watts.

In June 2007, Top500.org reported the fastest computer in the world to be the IBM Blue Gene/L supercomputer, measuring a peak of 596 teraFLOPS. The Cray XT4 hit second place with 101.7 teraFLOPS.

On June 26, 2007, IBM announced the second generation of its top supercomputer, dubbed Blue Gene/P and designed to continuously operate at speeds exceeding one petaFLOPS, faster than the Blue Gene/L. When configured to do so, it can reach speeds in excess of three petaFLOPS.

On October 25, 2007, NEC Corporation of Japan issued a press release announcing its SX series model SX-9, claiming it to be the world's fastest vector supercomputer. The SX-9 features the first CPU capable of a peak vector performance of 102.4 gigaFLOPS per single core.

On February 4, 2008, the NSF and the University of Texas at Austin opened full scale research runs on an AMD, Sun supercomputer named Ranger,{{cite web |access-date = September 13, 2010 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090801102108/http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/hpcsystems/ |archive-date = August 1, 2009 the most powerful supercomputing system in the world for open science research, which operates at sustained speed of 0.5 petaFLOPS.

On May 25, 2008, an American supercomputer built by IBM, named 'Roadrunner', reached the computing milestone of one petaFLOPS. It headed the June 2008 and November 2008 TOP500 list of the most powerful supercomputers (excluding grid computers). The computer is located at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. The computer's name refers to the New Mexico state bird, the greater roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus).

In June 2008, AMD released ATI Radeon HD 4800 series, which are reported to be the first GPUs to achieve one teraFLOPS. On August 12, 2008, AMD released the ATI Radeon HD 4870X2 graphics card with two Radeon R770 GPUs totaling 2.4 teraFLOPS.

In November 2008, an upgrade to the Cray Jaguar supercomputer at the Department of Energy's (DOE's) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) raised the system's computing power to a peak 1.64 petaFLOPS, making Jaguar the world's first petaFLOPS system dedicated to open research. In early 2009 the supercomputer was named after a mythical creature, Kraken. Kraken was declared the world's fastest university-managed supercomputer and sixth fastest overall in the 2009 TOP500 list. In 2010 Kraken was upgraded and can operate faster and is more powerful.

In 2009, the Cray Jaguar performed at 1.75 petaFLOPS, beating the IBM Roadrunner for the number one spot on the TOP500 list.

In October 2010, China unveiled the Tianhe-1, a supercomputer that operates at a peak computing rate of 2.5 petaFLOPS.

the fastest PC processor reached 109 gigaFLOPS (Intel Core i7 980 XE) in double precision calculations. GPUs are considerably more powerful. For example, Nvidia Tesla C2050 GPU computing processors perform around 515 gigaFLOPS in double precision calculations, and the AMD FireStream 9270 peaks at 240 gigaFLOPS.

In November 2011, it was announced that Japan had achieved 10.51 petaFLOPS with its K computer. It has 88,128 SPARC64 VIIIfx processors in 864 racks, with theoretical performance of 11.28 petaFLOPS. It is named after the Japanese word "kei", which stands for 10 quadrillion, corresponding to the target speed of 10 petaFLOPS.

On November 15, 2011, Intel demonstrated a single x86-based processor, code-named "Knights Corner", sustaining more than a teraFLOPS on a wide range of DGEMM operations. Intel emphasized during the demonstration that this was a sustained teraFLOPS (not "raw teraFLOPS" used by others to get higher but less meaningful numbers), and that it was the first general purpose processor to ever cross a teraFLOPS.

On June 18, 2012, IBM's Sequoia supercomputer system, based at the U.S. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), reached 16 petaFLOPS, setting the world record and claiming first place in the latest TOP500 list.

On November 12, 2012, the TOP500 list certified Titan as the world's fastest supercomputer per the LINPACK benchmark, at 17.59 petaFLOPS. It was developed by Cray Inc. at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and combines AMD Opteron processors with "Kepler" NVIDIA Tesla graphics processing unit (GPU) technologies.

On June 10, 2013, China's Tianhe-2 was ranked the world's fastest with 33.86 petaFLOPS.

On June 20, 2016, China's Sunway TaihuLight was ranked the world's fastest with 93 petaFLOPS on the LINPACK benchmark (out of 125 peak petaFLOPS). The system was installed at the National Supercomputing Center in Wuxi, and represented more performance than the next five most powerful systems on the TOP500 list did at the time combined.

In June 2019, Summit, an IBM-built supercomputer now running at the Department of Energy's (DOE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), captured the number one spot with a performance of 148.6 petaFLOPS on High Performance Linpack (HPL), the benchmark used to rank the TOP500 list. Summit has 4,356 nodes, each one equipped with two 22-core Power9 CPUs, and six NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPUs.

In June 2022, the United States' Frontier was the most powerful supercomputer on TOP500, reaching 1102 petaFlops (1.102 exaFlops) on the LINPACK benchmarks.

In November 2024, the United States’ El Capitan exascale supercomputer, hosted at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, displaced Frontier as the world's fastest supercomputer in the 64th edition of the Top500 (Nov 2024) and kept its place in the June 2025 list.

Distributed computing records

Distributed computing uses the Internet to link personal computers, and sometimes supercomputers to achieve more FLOPS:

  • , a group of computer scientists and astronomers have performed a star-forming simulations on a heterogeneous grid of 5 workstations distributed across the Netherlands, several including GPU. The calculation was performed by combining AMUSE with Ibis.

  • , the CosmoGrid simulation, a cosmological 8589934592-particle dark-matter simulation, was run concurrently across 3 supercomputers to address the question of the Galactic missing satellite problem. Using supercomputers in Espoo (Finland), Edinburgh (UK), and Amsterdam (the Netherlands), with 19644 compute cores they achieved 80% of the hardware's peak efficiency.

  • , the Folding@home network has over 2.3 exaFLOPS of total computing power. It is the most powerful distributed computer network, being the first ever to break 1 exaFLOPS of total computing power. This level of performance is primarily enabled by the cumulative effort of a vast array of powerful GPU and CPU units.{{cite press release |access-date = December 11, 2008 |url-status = dead |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090131082202/http://www.scei.co.jp/corporate/release/081106de.html |archive-date = January 31, 2009

  • , the entire BOINC network averages about 31 petaFLOPS.

  • , SETI@home, employing the BOINC software platform, averages 896 teraFLOPS.

  • , Einstein@Home, a project using the BOINC network, is crunching at 3 petaFLOPS.

  • , MilkyWay@home, using the BOINC infrastructure, computes at 847 teraFLOPS.

  • , GIMPS, searching for Mersenne primes, is sustaining 1,354 teraFLOPS.

Cost of computing

Hardware costs

DateApproximate USD per GFLOPSPlatform providing the lowest cost per GFLOPSCommentsUnadjusted
1945$1.265T$TENIAC: in 1945 and $ in 2023./ . First-generation (vacuum tube-based) electronic digital computer.
1961$18.672B$BA basic installation of IBM 7030 Stretch had a cost at the time of each.The IBM 7030 Stretch performs one floating-point multiply every . Second-generation (discrete transistor-based) computer.
1964$2.3B$BBase model CDC 6600 price: $6,891,300.The CDC 6600 is considered to be the first commercially successful supercomputer.
1984$18,750,000$Cray X-MP/48$15,000,000 / 0.8 GFLOPS. Third-generation (integrated circuit-based) computer.
1997$30,000$Two 16-processor Beowulf clusters with Pentium Pro microprocessors
$1,000$Bunyip Beowulf clusterBunyip was the first sub- computing technology. It won the Gordon Bell Prize in 2000.
$640$KLAT2KLAT2 was the first computing technology which scaled to large applications while staying under .
$83.86$KASY0KASY0 was the first sub- computing technology. KASY0 achieved 471 GFLOPS on 32-bit HPL. At a cost of less than $39,500, that makes it the first supercomputer to break $100/GFLOPS.
$48.31$MicrowulfAs of August 2007, this "personal" Beowulf cluster can be built for $1256.
$1.80$HPU4ScienceThis $30,000 cluster was built using only commercially available "gamer" grade hardware.
75¢$Quad AMD Radeon 7970 SystemA quad AMD Radeon 7970 desktop computer reaching 16 TFLOPS of single-precision, 4 TFLOPS of double-precision computing performance. Total system cost was $3000; built using only commercially available hardware.
21.68¢¢Sony PlayStation 4The Sony PlayStation 4 is listed as having a peak performance of , at a price of $399
16.11¢¢AMD Sempron 145 & GeForce GTX 760 systemBuilt using commercially available parts, a system using one AMD Sempron 145 and three Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 reaches a total of for a total cost of .
12.41¢¢Pentium G550 & Radeon R9 290 systemBuilt using commercially available parts. Intel Pentium G550 and AMD Radeon R9 290 tops out at grand total of .
7.85¢¢Celeron G1830 & Radeon R9 295X2 systemBuilt using commercially available parts. Intel Celeron G1830 and AMD Radeon R9 295X2 tops out at over at a grand total of .
¢AMD Ryzen 7 1700 & AMD Radeon Vega Frontier Edition systemBuilt using commercially available parts. AMD Ryzen 7 1700 CPU combined with AMD Radeon Vega FE cards in CrossFire tops out at over at just under for the complete system.
October 20172.73¢¢Intel Celeron G3930 & AMD RX Vega 64 systemBuilt using commercially available parts. Three AMD RX Vega 64 graphics cards provide just over 75 TFLOPS half precision (38 TFLOPS SP or 2.6 TFLOPS DP when combined with the CPU) at ~$2,050 for the complete system.
November 20203.14¢¢AMD Ryzen 3600 & 3× NVIDIA RTX 3080 systemAMD Ryzen 3600 @ 484 GFLOPS & $199.99
November 20203.88¢¢PlayStation 5The Sony PlayStation 5 Digital Edition is listed as having a peak performance of 10.28 TFLOPS (20.56 TFLOPS at half precision) at a retail price of $399.
November 20204.11¢¢Xbox Series XMicrosoft's Xbox Series X is listed as having a peak performance of 12.15 TFLOPS (24.30 TFLOPS at half precision) at a retail price of $499.
September 20221.94¢¢RTX 4090Nvidia's RTX 4090 is listed as having a peak performance of 82.6 TFLOPS (1.32 PFLOPS at 8-bit precision) at a retail price of $1599.
Mar 20251.23¢1.23¢Radeon RX 9070 XTThe AMD RX 9070 is listed as having a peak performance of 48.7 TFLOPS at a retail price of $599.

START OF A BUNCH OF DELETED STUFF

|- |Q4 2018 |$0.02 |$ |$20 |Nvidia Jetson AGX Xavier

The Jetson AGX Xavier Developer Kit provides more than 30 TOPS (trillion operations per second) combined for deep learning and computer vision tasks at $699 and 30 Watts: a 512-core Volta GPU with Tensor Cores gives up to 11 TFLOPS FP16 or 22 TOPS INT8 compute, dual NVDLA engines give 10 TOPS INT8 or 5 TFLOPS FP16. It also has high-performance eight-core ARM64 CPU with additional dedicated co-processors for accelerating computer vision tasks: one image processor, a video processor and a vision processor.

| | $0.42 | Ambric AM2045 | |- | | $0.13 (single precision) | ATI Radeon R800

The first high-performance 40 nm GPU from ATI. It can reach speeds of 3.04 TFLOPS when running at 950 MHz. Price per GFLOPS is slightly inaccurate as it is single precision and includes only the cost of the card.

| | $0.13 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 Overclocked |Floating-point performance (peak): 5.40 TFLOPS. Price: $699.

}

| | $0.12 | $0.12 | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | The AMD Radeon HD 7990 is a GPU with single precision computing performance reaching 8.2 TFLOPS. It was released on April 24, 2013 with a price point of $1000.

END OF A BUNCH OF DELETED STUFF

References

References

  1. "Understand measures of supercomputer performance and storage system capacity".
  2. "GPU GFLOPS Statistics 2007-2025: NVIDIA AMD Intel". Axiom Gaming.
  3. [http://www.dspguide.com/ch4/3.htm Floating Point] Retrieved on December 25, 2009.
  4. [http://www.analog.com/en/embedded-processing-dsp/content/Fixed-Point_vs_Floating-Point_DSP/fca.html Summary: Fixed-point (integer) vs floating-point] {{Webarchive. link. (December 31, 2009 Retrieved on December 25, 2009.)
  5. (1970). "NASA Technical Note". National Aeronautics and Space Administration..
  6. [http://www.dspguide.com/ch28/4.htm Fixed versus floating point.] Retrieved on December 25, 2009.
  7. [http://www.dspguide.com/ch28/1.htm Data manipulation and math calculation.] Retrieved on December 25, 2009.
  8. Kuck, D. J.. (1974). "Computer System Capacity Fundamentals". U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards.
  9. ""Nodes, Sockets, Cores and FLOPS, Oh, My" by Dr. Mark R. Fernandez, Ph.D.".
  10. "FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS".
  11. "Floating-Point Operations Per Second (FLOPS)".
  12. "home.iae.nl".
  13. "Computing Power throughout History".
  14. (2017). "Theoretical Peak FLOPS per instruction set: a tutorial". Journal of Supercomputing.
  15. "New instructions support for Bulldozer (FMA3) and Piledriver (FMA3+4 and CVT, BMI, TB M)".
  16. "Agner's CPU blog - Test results for AMD Ryzen".
  17. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/03/amds-moment-of-zen-finally-an-architecture-that-can-compete/2/ "each core now has a pair of 128-bit FMA units of its own"
  18. Mike Clark. (August 23, 2016). "A New x86 Core Architecture for the Next Generation of Computing". AMD.
  19. "The microarchitecture of Intel and AMD CPUs".
  20. (May 27, 2019). "AMD CEO Lisa Su's COMPUTEX 2019 Keynote".
  21. "Leadership HPC Performance with 5th Generation AMD EPYC Processors".
  22. (1999). "Entertainment Systems and High-Performance Processor SH-4". [[Hitachi]].
  23. (2000). "SH-4 Next-Generation DSP Architecture for VoIP". [[Hitachi]].
  24. (May 10, 2017). "Inside Volta: The World's Most Advanced Data Center GPU".
  25. (May 14, 2020). "NVIDIA Ampere Architecture In-Depth".
  26. "NVIDIA A100 GPUs Power the Modern Data Center".
  27. Schilling, Andreas. (June 10, 2019). "Die RDNA-Architektur - Seite 2".
  28. "AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Specs".
  29. "AMD Instinct MI100 Accelerator".
  30. "Introduction to the Xe-HPG Architecture".
  31. (November 9, 2022). "Intel Data Center GPU Max".
  32. (October 26, 2018). "250 TFLOPs/s for two chips with FP16 mixed precision".
  33. (October 25, 2017). "Estimation via power consumption that FP32 is 1/4 of FP16 and that clock frequency is below 1.5GHz".
  34. (July 15, 2020). "Introducing Graphcore's Mk2 IPU systems".
  35. "Bow-2000 IPU-Machine".
  36. "Computers of Yore".
  37. "National Museum of the United States Army".
  38. "IMS T800 Architecture".
  39. [http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e16g301/ Epiphany-III 16-core 65nm Microprocessor (E16G301)] // [http://www.adapteva.com/author/admin/ admin] (August 19, 2012)
  40. [http://www.adapteva.com/products/silicon-devices/e64g401/ Epiphany-IV 64-core 28nm Microprocessor (E64G401)] // [http://www.adapteva.com/author/admin/ admin] (August 19, 2012)
  41. Feldman, Michael. (August 22, 2012). "Adapteva Unveils 64-Core Chip". HPCWire.
  42. "【NEC】 SX-1, SX-2". [[Information Processing Society of Japan]].
  43. "Sandia's ASCI Red, world's first teraflop supercomputer, is decommissioned".
  44. Richard Swinburne. (April 30, 2007). "The Arrival of TeraFLOP Computing". bit-tech.net.
  45. (June 23, 2007). "29th TOP500 List of World's Fastest Supercomputers Released".
  46. "June 2008". TOP500.
  47. (October 25, 2007). "NEC Launches World's Fastest Vector Supercomputer, SX-9". NEC.
  48. Sharon Gaudin. (June 9, 2008). "IBM's Roadrunner smashes 4-minute mile of supercomputing". Computerworld.
  49. (November 14, 2008). "Austin ISC08". Top500.org.
  50. Fildes, Jonathan. (June 9, 2008). "Supercomputer sets petaflop pace". BBC News.
  51. Greenberg, Andy. (November 16, 2009). "Cray Dethrones IBM in Supercomputing". Forbes.
  52. (October 28, 2010). "China claims supercomputer crown". BBC News.
  53. Dillow, Clay. (October 28, 2010). "China Unveils 2507 Petaflop Supercomputer, the World's Fastest".
  54. (March 10, 2010). "Intel's Core i7-980X Extreme Edition – Ready for Sick Scores?: Mathematics: Sandra Arithmetic, Crypto, Microsoft Excel".
  55. "NVIDIA Tesla Personal Supercomputer". Nvidia.com.
  56. "AMD FireStream 9270 GPU Compute Accelerator". Amd.com.
  57. "'K computer' Achieves Goal of 10 Petaflops". Fujitsu.com.
  58. See [[Japanese numerals#Large numbers. Japanese numbers]]
  59. (November 16, 2011). "Intel's Knights Corner: 50+ Core 22nm Co-processor".
  60. "Intel unveils 1 TFLOP/s Knight's Corner".
  61. Clark, Don. (June 18, 2012). "IBM Computer Sets Speed Record". The Wall Street Journal.
  62. (November 12, 2012). "US Titan supercomputer clocked as world's fastest". BBC.
  63. (November 12, 2012). "Oak Ridge Claims No. 1 Position on Latest TOP500 List with Titan | TOP500 Supercomputer Sites". Top500.org.
  64. Montalbano, Elizabeth. (October 11, 2011). "Oak Ridge Labs Builds Fastest Supercomputer".
  65. Tibken, Shara. (October 29, 2012). "Titan supercomputer debuts for open scientific research | Cutting Edge".
  66. (June 17, 2013). "Chinese Supercomputer Is Now The World's Fastest – By A Lot".
  67. Feldman, Michael. "China Races Ahead in TOP500 Supercomputer List, Ending US Supremacy".
  68. "June 2018".
  69. "TOP500".
  70. "June 2025 - TOP500".
  71. "Distributed Multi-Model / Multi-Kernel Simulations: A Case Study in Jungle Computing using eScience Infrastructure and High Speed Networks".
  72. "amusecode.org".
  73. "Ibis".
  74. "CosmoGrid".
  75. "Folding@Home Active CPUs & GPUs by OS".
  76. Folding@home. (March 25, 2020). "Thanks to our AMAZING community, we've crossed the exaFLOP barrier! That's over a 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 operations per second, making us ~10x faster than the IBM Summit!pic.twitter.com/mPMnb4xdH3".
  77. "Folding@Home Crushes Exascale Barrier, Now Faster Than Dozens of Supercomputers - ExtremeTech".
  78. (March 26, 2020). "Folding@Home exceeds 1.5 ExaFLOPS in the battle against Covid-19".
  79. "BOINC Computing Power". BOINC.
  80. "SETI@Home Credit overview". BOINC.
  81. "Einstein@Home Credit overview". BOINC.
  82. "MilkyWay@Home Credit overview". BOINC.
  83. "Internet PrimeNet Server Distributed Computing Technology for the Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search". GIMPS.
  84. "The IBM 7030 (STRETCH)". Norman Hardy.
  85. (July 13, 1997). "Loki and Hyglac". Loki-www.lanl.gov.
  86. "Kentucky Linux Athlon Testbed 2 (KLAT2)".
  87. (August 23, 2003). "Haveland-Robinson Associates - Home Page".
  88. "Microwulf: A Personal, Portable Beowulf Cluster".
  89. Adam Stevenson, Yann Le Du, and Mariem El Afrit. "[https://arstechnica.com/science/news/2011/03/high-performance-computing-on-gamer-pcs-part-1-hardware.ars High-performance computing on gamer PCs]." ''Ars Technica''. March 31, 2011.
  90. Tom Logan. (January 9, 2012). "HD7970 Quadfire Eyefinity Review".
  91. "[https://www.cnbc.com/id/100805004 Sony Sparks Price War With PS4 Priced at $399]." ''CNBC''. June 11, 2013.
  92. "FreezePage".
  93. "FreezePage".
  94. "FreezePage".
  95. (April 8, 2014). "Radeon R9 295X2 8 GB Review: Project Hydra Gets Liquid Cooling".
  96. Perez, Carol E.. (July 13, 2017). "Building a 50 Teraflops AMD Vega Deep Learning Box for Under $3K". Intuition Machine.
  97. "lowest_$/fp16 - mattebaughman's Saved Part List - Celeron G3930 2.9GHz Dual-Core, Radeon RX VEGA 64 8GB (3-Way CrossFire), XON-350_BK ATX Mid Tower".
  98. "System Builder".
  99. "AMD Playstation 5 GPU Specs".
  100. "Xbox Series X | Xbox".
  101. (September 20, 2022). "Nvidia Announces RTX 4090 Coming October 12, RTX 4080 Later".
  102. "Jetson FAQ". NVIDIA Corporation.
  103. [https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/buy/jetson-xavier-devkit NVIDIA Jetson Xavier Developer Kit]
  104. "NVIDIA Jetson AGX Xavier Benchmarks - Incredible Performance On The Edge". Phoronix Media 2018.
  105. Halfill, Tom R.. (October 10, 2006). "Ambric's New Parallel Processor". Reed Electronics Group.
  106. Valich, Theo. (September 29, 2009). "The fastest ATI 5870 card achieves 3TFLOPS!". Bright Side of News.
  107. http://www.hardocp.com/images/articles/1299536835FpEmksdSXb_1_3_l.gif {{Dead link. (February 2022)
  108. Hermida, Alfred. (May 17, 2005). "Sony shows off new PlayStation 3". BBC News.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Floating point operations per second — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report