Fidelity bond

First-party vs. third-party fidelity bonds

There are two types of fidelity bonds: first-party and third-party. First-party fidelity bonds protect businesses against intentionally wrongful acts (fraud, theft, forgery, etc.) committed by employees of that business. Third-party fidelity bonds protect businesses against intentionally wrongful acts committed by people working for them on a contract basis (e.g., consultants or independent contractors).

In business partnerships, it is the responsibility of the business working as a contractor or subcontractor to carry third-party fidelity bond coverage, though it is typically the other party who requests or requires such coverage. In many cases, businesses in finance or banking require their contractors to carry third-party fidelity bond coverage to prevent losses from theft.

Commercial crime vs. financial institution bonds

The fidelity bond marketplace is, generally speaking, split into two main type of policies; financial institution bonds (to protect financial institutions such as banks, stock brokers, insurance companies etc.) and commercial crime policies (non-financial institutions). Within each category there are different policy forms designed for specific types of institutions. These include:

• Financial Institution Bonds, Standard Form No. 14 for Brokers/Dealers
• Financial Institution Bonds, Standard Form No. 15 for Mortgage Bankers and Finance Companies
• Credit Union Blanket Bond, Standard Form No. 23 for Credit Unions
• Financial Institution Bonds, Standard Form No. 24 for Commercial Banks, Savings Banks and Savings and Loan Associations
• Financial Institution Bonds, Standard Form No. 25 for Insurance Companies
• Commercial Crime Policy
• Commercial Crime Policy for Public Entities

Emerging trends

Fidelity insurers need to not only understand the threat posed to companies from traditional elements such as employee dishonesty, robbery or cheque forgery, they need to stay informed of emerging trends or evolving threat vectors.

Social engineering fraud

Also known as business email compromise (BEC) or impersonation fraud (and by a variety of other names), social engineering fraud typically involves someone impersonating a person close to the insured company (an employee, an executive, a vendor or a client) and tricking the company into transferring funds to the fraudster. These funds are often then quickly transferred offshore, making recovery very challenging. Despite the pervasiveness of this threat (the FBI estimated that between January 2015 and February 2017, over $3 billion have been lost by companies around the world to this scam), most traditional insurance policies do not cover this type of loss. Many policyholders have challenged insurance companies' assertions that this is not a covered loss in court; however a series of recent (2017) North American cases support the insurers' positions, notably American Tooling Center, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, The Brick Warehouse LP v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, and Taylor & Lieberman v. Federal Insurance Company.

The industry has responded to these events by making an extension of coverage available but they are typically subject to additional premium, robust underwriting questions, and are often sublimited.

By country

Australia

In Australia, this type of employer protection is usually called employee dishonesty insurance coverage. (Other names, such as "Fidelity Cover" may also be used by specific insurance agencies or brokers.)

Nigeria

Several forms of fidelity guarantee cover are available: an individual policy or "floater policy", relating to a named employee; a collective policy, covering a group of employees; or a "blanket policy" which would cover a generic category of employee, such as those who handle the company's cash.

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, this type of employee dishonesty insurance is called fidelity guarantee insurance coverage.

United States

In the United States, various service providers to pension plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) are required to obtain and maintain fidelity bond coverage in prescribed amounts.

References

References

1. "Standard Form No. 14 (Revised to May, 2011) - The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA)".
2. "Standard Form No. 15".
3. "Standard Form No. 23 (Revised to May, 1950) - The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA)".
4. "Standard Form No. 24 (Revised to May, 2011) - The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA)".
5. "Standard Form No. 25 (Revised to May, 2011) - The Surety & Fidelity Association of America (SFAA)".
6. "Business E-Mail Compromise".
7. (2017-08-10). "American Tooling Center: U.S. District Court finds no Coverage for Social Engineering Fraud Loss under Crime Policy's Computer Fraud Insuring Agreement". FCL FIDELITY BLOG.
8. (2017-07-13). "The Brick: Alberta Court of Queen's Bench finds no Coverage for Social Engineering Fraud Loss under Crime Policy's Funds Transfer Fraud Insuring Agreement". FCL FIDELITY BLOG.
9. (2017-04-03). "Taylor & Lieberman: Ninth Circuit finds No Coverage under Crime Policy for Client Funds lost in Social Engineering Fraud". FCL FIDELITY BLOG.
10. eInsurance Nigeria, [https://www.einsurance.com.ng/all-about-fidelity-guarantee-insurance/ All About Fidelity Guarantee Insurance], accessed 5 June 2022
11. Lemke and Lins, ''ERISA for Money Managers'' §§2:39 - 2:41 (Thomson West, 2013).