Fear, uncertainty, and doubt

{{anchor|IBM}}Etymology

The similar formulation "doubts, fears, and uncertainties" first appeared in 1693. The phrase "fear, uncertainty, and doubt" first appeared in the 1920s. It is also sometimes rendered as "fear, uncertainty, and disinformation".

By 1975, "FUD" was appearing in contexts of marketing, sales, and in public relations:

FUD was first used with its common current technology-related meaning by Gene Amdahl in 1975, after he left IBM to found Amdahl Corp.

This usage of FUD to describe disinformation in the computer hardware industry is said to have led to subsequent popularization of the term.

As Eric S. Raymond wrote:

By spreading questionable information about the drawbacks of less well-known products, an established company can discourage decision-makers from choosing those products over its own, regardless of the relative technical merits. This is a recognized phenomenon, epitomized by the traditional axiom of purchasing agents that "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM equipment". The aim is to have IT departments buy software they know to be technically inferior because upper management is more likely to recognize the brand.

Examples

Public policy

Manufacturing controversy has been a tactic used by ideological and corporate groups to "neutralize the influence of academic scientists" in public policy debates. Cherry picking of favorable data and sympathetic experts, aggrandizement of uncertainties within theoretical models, and false balance in media reporting contribute to the generation of FUD. Alan D. Attie describes its process as "to amplify uncertainties, cherry-pick experts, attack individual scientists, marginalize the traditional role of distinguished scientific bodies and get the media to report "both sides" of a manufactured controversy."

Those manufacturing uncertainty may label academic research as "junk science" and use a variety of tactics designed to stall and increase the expense of the distribution of sound scientific information. Delay tactics are also used to slow the implementation of regulations and public warnings in response to previously undiscovered health risks (e.g., the increased risk of Reye's syndrome in children who take aspirin). Chief among these stalling tactics is generating scientific uncertainty, "no matter how powerful or conclusive the evidence", to prevent regulation.

Another tactic used to manufacture controversy is to cast the scientific community as intolerant of dissent and conspiratorially aligned with industries or sociopolitical movements that quash challenges to conventional wisdom. This form of manufactured controversy has been used by environmentalist advocacy groups, religious challengers of the theory of evolution, and opponents of global warming legislation.

Ideas that have been labeled as manufactured uncertainty include:

• Denial of the depletion of the ozone layer
• Climate change denial
• Contesting the development of skin cancer from exposure to ultraviolet radiation via sunlight and tanning lamps
• Denial of the Armenian genocide by the government of Turkey
• Rwandan genocide denial
• Vaccination controversies, particularly those alleging a causative relationship between the MMR vaccine or thiomersal in the development of autism spectrum disorders.
• AIDS denialism
• "Teach the Controversy" efforts of intelligent design supporters
• Denial of the carcinogenicity of hexavalent chromium

Tobacco industry

Legal effects

In the United States, the generation of manufactured uncertainty about scientific data has affected political and legal proceedings in many different areas. The Data Quality Act and the Supreme Court's Daubert standard have been cited as tools used by those manufacturing controversy to obfuscate scientific consensus.

Concerns have been raised regarding the conflicts of interest inherent in many types of industry regulation. For example, many industries, such as the pharmaceutical industry, are a major source of funding for the research necessary to achieve government regulatory approval for their product. In developing regulations, agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency rely heavily on unpublished studies from industry sources that have not been peer reviewed. This can allow a given industry control over the extent of available research, and the pace at which it is reviewable, when challenging scientific research that may threaten their business interests.

Software producers

Microsoft

In the 1990s, the term became most often associated with Microsoft. Roger Irwin said:

In 1996, Caldera, Inc. accused Microsoft of several anti-competitive practices, including issuing vaporware announcements, creating FUD, and excluding competitors from participating in beta-test programs to destroy competition in the DOS market.

In 1991, Microsoft released a beta version of Windows 3.1 whose AARD code would display a vaguely unnerving error message when the user ran it on the DR DOS 6.0 operating system instead of Microsoft-written OSs:

If the user chose to press , Windows would continue to run on DR DOS without problems. Speculation that this code was meant to create doubts about DR DOS's compatibility and thereby destroy the product's reputation was confirmed years later by internal Microsoft memos published as part of the United States v. Microsoft antitrust case. At one point, Microsoft CEO Bill Gates sent a memo to a number of employees, reading

At around the same time, the leaked internal Microsoft "Halloween documents" stated "OSS [Open Source Software] is long-term credible… [therefore] FUD tactics cannot be used to combat it." Open source software, and the Linux community in particular, are widely perceived as frequent targets of Microsoft's FUD:

• Statements about the "viral nature" of the GNU General Public License (GPL).
• Statements that "…FOSS [Free and open source software] infringes on no fewer than 235 Microsoft patents", before software patent law precedents were even established.
• Statements that Windows Server 2003 has lower total cost of ownership (TCO) than Linux, in Microsoft's "Get-The-Facts" campaign. It turned out that they were comparing Linux on a very expensive IBM mainframe to Windows Server 2003 on an Intel Xeon-based server.
• A 2010 video claimed that OpenOffice.org had a higher long-term cost of ownership, as well as poor interoperability with Microsoft's own office suite. The video featured statements such as "If an open source freeware solution breaks, who's gonna fix it?"

''SCO v. IBM''

Main article: SCO v. IBM

The SCO Group's 2003 lawsuit against IBM, funded by Microsoft, claiming $5 billion in intellectual property infringements by the free software community, is an example of FUD, according to IBM, which argued in its counterclaim that SCO was spreading "fear, uncertainty, and doubt".

Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells wrote (and Judge Dale Albert Kimball concurred) in her order limiting SCO's claims: "The court finds SCO's arguments unpersuasive. SCO's arguments are akin to SCO telling IBM, 'sorry, we are not going to tell you what you did wrong because you already know...' SCO was required to disclose in detail what it feels IBM misappropriated... the court finds it inexcusable that SCO is... not placing all the details on the table. Certainly if an individual were stopped and accused of shoplifting after walking out of Neiman Marcus they would expect to be eventually told what they allegedly stole. It would be absurd for an officer to tell the accused that 'you know what you stole, I'm not telling.' Or, to simply hand the accused individual a catalog of Neiman Marcus' entire inventory and say 'it's in there somewhere, you figure it out.

Regarding the matter, Darl Charles McBride, President and CEO of SCO, made the following statements:

1. "IBM has taken our valuable trade secrets and given them away to Linux,"
2. "We're finding... cases where there is line-by-line code in the Linux kernel that is matching up to our UnixWare code"
3. "...unless more companies start licensing SCO's property... [SCO] may also sue Linus Torvalds... for patent infringement."
4. "Both companies IBM and [Red Hat] have shifted liability to the customer and then taunted us to sue them."
5. "We have the ability to go to users with lawsuits and we will if we have to, 'It would be within SCO Group's rights to order every copy of AIX IBM's proprietary [UNIX] destroyed
6. "As of Friday, [13] June [2003], we will be done trying to talk to IBM, and we will be talking directly to its customers and going in and auditing them. IBM no longer has the authority to sell or distribute IBM AIX and customers no longer have the right to use AIX software"
7. "If you just drag this out in a typical litigation path, where it takes years and years to settle anything, and in the meantime you have all this uncertainty clouding over the market..."
8. "Users are running systems that have basically pirated software inside, or stolen software inside of their systems, they have liability."

SCO stock skyrocketed from under a share to over in a matter of weeks in 2003. It later dropped to around —then crashed to under 50 cents on 13 August 2007, in the aftermath of a ruling that Novell owns the UNIX copyrights.

Apple

Apple's claim that iPhone jailbreaking could potentially allow hackers to crash cell phone towers was described by Fred von Lohmann, a representative of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), as a "kind of theoretical threat...more FUD than truth".

Security industry

Main article: Appeal to fear

FUD is widely recognized as a tactic to promote the sale or implementation of security products and measures. It is possible to find pages describing purely artificial problems. Such pages frequently contain links to the demonstrating source code that does not point to any valid location and sometimes even links that "will execute malicious code on your machine regardless of current security software", leading to pages without any executable code.

The drawback to the FUD tactic in this context is that, when the stated or implied threats fail to materialize over time, the customer or decision-maker frequently reacts by withdrawing budgeting or support from future security initiatives.

FUD has also been utilized in technical support scams, which may use fake error messages to scare unwitting computer users, especially the elderly or computer-illiterate, into paying for a supposed fix for a non-existent problem, to avoid being framed for criminal charges such as unpaid taxes, or in extreme cases, false accusations of illegal acts such as child pornography.

Caltex

The FUD tactic was used by Caltex Australia in 2003. According to an internal memo, which was subsequently leaked, they wished to use FUD to destabilize franchisee confidence, and thus get a better deal for Caltex. This memo was used as an example of unconscionable behaviour in a Senate inquiry. Senior management claimed that it was contrary to and did not reflect company principles.

Clorox

In 2008, Clorox was the subject of both consumer and industry criticism for advertising its Green Works line of allegedly environmentally friendly cleaning products using the slogan, "Finally, Green Works." The slogan implied both that "green" products manufactured by other companies which had been available to consumers prior to the introduction of Clorox's GreenWorks line had all been ineffective, and also that the new GreenWorks line was at least as effective as Clorox's existing product lines. The intention of this slogan and the associated advertising campaign has been interpreted as appealing to consumers' fears that products from companies with less brand recognition are less trustworthy or effective. Critics also pointed out that, despite its representation of GreenWorks products as "green" in the sense of being less harmful to the environment and/or consumers using them, the products contain a number of ingredients advocates of natural products have long campaigned against the use of in household products due to toxicity to humans or their environment. All three implicit claims have been disputed, and some of their elements disproven, by environmental groups, consumer-protection groups, and the industry self-regulatory Better Business Bureau.

References

References

1. Michaels D. (2005). "Scientific evidence and public policy". Am J Public Health.
2. [http://www.wordspy.com/words/manufactroversy.asp Manufactroversy] {{Webarchive. link. (2014-07-27 : "A contrived or non-existent controversy, manufactured by political ideologues or interest groups who use deception and specious arguments to make their case", Paul McFedries, Wordspy.com, December 16, 2009)
3. Ceccarelli, Leah. (April 11, 2008). "Manufactroversy: The Art of Creating Controversy Where None Existed". [[Center for American Progress]].
4. (2006). "The Republican war on science". [[Journal of Clinical Investigation]].
5. (2005). "Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment". Am J Public Health.
6. [http://www.slate.com/id/2189178/ "The Paranoid Style in American Science: 3. Contrary Imaginations"], Daniel Engber, ''[[Slate (magazine). Slate]]'', April 17, 2008
7. [http://www.slate.com/id/2189178/entry/2189206/ "The Paranoid Style in American Science: 2. An Uncertain Truth"], Daniel Engber, ''[[Slate (magazine). Slate]]'', April 16, 2008
8. Holthouse, David. (Summer 2008). "State of Denial Turkey Spends Millions to Cover Up Armenian Genocide. Intelligence Report".
9. (2015). "Academic Denial of the Armenian Genocide in American Scholarship: Denialism as Manufactured Controversy". Genocide Studies International.
10. (August 13, 2023). "Manufacturing Controversy : Left-Wing Denial of the Rwandan Genocide". Routledge.
11. Hall, Harriet. (June 3, 2009). "Vaccines & Autism: A Deadly Manufactroversy". [[Skeptic (U.S. magazine).
12. Camargo KR. (December 2009). "Public health and the knowledge industry". Rev Saude Publica.
13. (2006). "Selected science: an industry campaign to undermine an OSHA hexavalent chromium standard". Environ Health.
14. "Beware of tech support scams". UNC Health and UNC School of Medicine.
15. "Spying on the Scammers". [[BBC News]].
16. (1920-05-22). "The Roman Catholic Church Challenged in the Discussion of Thirty-two Questions with the Catholic Laymen's Association of Georgia". The Patriotic Societies of Macon.
17. (1926). "The Patriot Novelist of Poland, Henryk Sienkiewicz". [[E. P. Dutton & Co.]].
18. (1695). "A Practical Discourse of Repentance, Rectifying the Mistakes about it, especially such as lead either to Despair or Presumption. Perswading and Directing to the True Practice of it, and Demonstrating the Invalidity of a Death-Bed Repentance.". [[Samuel Smith (bookseller).
19. (1708). "A Practical Discourse of Repentance, Rectifying the Mistakes about it, especially such as lead either to Despair or Presumption. Perswading and Directing to the True Practice of it, and Demonstrating the Invalidity of a Death-Bed Repentance.". [[Richard Burrough (bookseller).
20. (1975-10-01). "The search for self". PRADS, Inc..
21. (1998). "The Complete Sales Letter Book". Sharpe Professional.
22. (2002). "Netlingo". NetLingo.
23. (2003-12-29). "FUD". [[The Jargon File]].
24. (2003). "School Mobbing and Emotional Abuse". [[Brunner–Routledge]].
25. (1998). "What is FUD?".
26. (April 1999). ["In the United States District Court - District of Utah, Central Division - Caldera, Inc. vs. Microsoft Corporation - Consolidated statement of facts in support of its responses to motions for summary judgement by Microsoft Corporation - Case No. 2:96CV 0645B"](http://www.maxframe.com/DR/Info/fullstory/factstat.html). [[Caldera, Inc.]].
27. (May 1999). ["In the United States District Court - District of Utah, Central Division - Caldera, Inc. vs. Microsoft Corporation - Case No. 2:96CV 0645B - Caldera, Inc.'s Memorandum in opposition to defendant's motion for partial Summary Judgment on plaintiff's "Technological Tying" claim"](http://www.maxframe.com/DR/Info/fullstory/tech.html). [[Caldera, Inc.]].
28. (1999-04-28). ["Caldera submits evidence to counter Microsoft's motions for partial summary judgment"](http://www.maxframe.com/DR/Info/fullstory/factrel.html). [[Caldera, Inc.]].
29. (September 1993). "Examining the Windows AARD Detection Code - A serious message--and the code that produced it". [[Miller Freeman, Inc.]].
30. (1994). "Undocumented DOS: A programmer's guide to reserved MS-DOS functions and data structures - expanded to include MS-DOS 6, Novell DOS and Windows 3.1". [[Addison Wesley]].
31. (1993-02-24). "msdos detection - hot job for you".
32. (1999-11-05). "How MS played the incompatibility card against DR-DOS - Real bear-traps, and spurious errors". [[The Register]].
33. (1999-04-28). "Microsoft emails focus on DR-DOS threat". CNET News.
34. (2009-11-23). "Exhibits to Microsoft's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment in Novell WordPerfect Case". [[Groklaw]].
35. (2000-01-07). "Settlement agreement - Microsoft Corporation and Caldera, Inc. reach agreement to settle antitrust lawsuit".
36. (2009-11-13). "Microsoft's memorandum in opposition to Novell's renewed motion for summary judgement on Microsoft's affirmative defenses and in support of Microsoft's cross-motion for summary judgement".
37. (2000-01-11). "Microsoft Will Pay $275 Million To Settle Lawsuit From Caldera". [[The Wall Street Journal]].
38. Open Source Initiative. "[http://www.catb.org/~esr/halloween/ Halloween I: Open Source Software (New?) Development Methodology] {{Webarchive. link. (2017-10-06 ")
39. [https://web.archive.org/web/20051211182636/http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/2001/may01/05-03csm.mspx Press release from Microsoft which has viral nature of open-source quote]
40. (2007-05-14). "Microsoft takes on the free world". [[Fortune (magazine).
41. "Legal Pad, MSFT: Linux, free software, infringe 235 of our patents".
42. (2004-08-26). "Microsoft's Linux ad 'misleading'". [[BBC News]].
43. (2004-08-26). "Linux 10 times more expensive? Get the facts, watchdog tells Microsoft". [[CNet]].
44. (2010). "Microsoft posts video of customers criticizing OpenOffice". [[Ars Technica]].
45. (2010). "Considering OpenOffice? Consider this …". [[Microsoft]].
46. {{usurped. Kimball]] J., filed 2004-08-06) Section E, paragraph 22, groklaw.net
47. {{usurped. Kimball]] J., filed 2004-08-06) Section IV, paragraphs 33,34
48. "Show Person".
49. "SCOX: Historical Prices for SCO GRP INC (THE)". [[Yahoo!]] Finance.
50. (13 August 2007). "Investors bailing on SCO stock, SCOX plummets". [[arstechnica]].
51. (2009-07-28). "iPhone Jailbreaking Could Crash Cellphone Towers, Apple Claims".
52. (2003-04-01). "The FUD Factor". [[CXO Media, Inc.]], a subsidiary of [[IDG Enterprise]].
53. (2004-04-28). "New deal helps to heal Caltex wounds". EnergyNewsPremium.
54. (2004-04-23). "Caltex 'bully' memo breached policy". [[Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
55. (2004-01-04). "Caltex in court over Woolies deal". [[Sydney Morning Herald]].
56. (2008-01-14). "Clorox introduces green line of cleaning products". [[SFGate]].
57. (2009-04-22). "4 'green' claims to be wary of". [[MSN]].
58. (2008-08-17). "NAD Tells Clorox to Clean Up Ads". Environmental Leader.