Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/telephone-numbers

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

E.161

ITU-T Recommendation for keypads and dials


Summary

ITU-T Recommendation for keypads and dials

FieldValue
titleE.161
long_nameArrangement of digits, letters and symbols on telephones and other devices that can be used for gaining access to a telephone network
imageTelephone-keypad.svg
captionA standard E.161 keypad
statusIn force
year_started1988
version(02/01)
version_dateFebruary 2001
organizationITU-T
domaintelecommunication
licenseFreely available
websitehttps://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-E.161

E.161 is an ITU-T Recommendation that defines the arrangement of digits, letters, and symbols on telephone keypads and rotary dials. It also defines the recommended mapping between the basic Latin alphabet and digits (e.g., "DEF" on 3). Uses for this mapping include:

  • Multi-tap and predictive text systems.
  • Forming phonewords from telephone numbers.
  • Using alphabetic characters (e.g. as a mnemonic) in a personal identification number.

Keypads are specified both in the common 4 × 3 and several variations, such as 6 × 2 and 2 × 5. E.161 also specifies the dimensions and characteristics of the star and square, referred to in the standard as the 'star' and 'square' keys, respectively. (In practice, the 'square' key is almost invariably replaced by the number sign. and the sextile symbol is the more common choice for the star key.)

The standard also recommends that a tactile identifier be placed on the 5 key to make it easier to use the keypad in low-light conditions or by the visually impaired, as well as multiple alternative methods to implement a recall button.

ETSI ETS 300 640 and ISO 9995-8 also address keypad layout. Language-specific letters (e.g. ü, é, å, ä, ö) as well as other characters (e.g. ‘€’ or ‘@’) are not addressed, which has led to a variety of inconsistent solutions for European languages.

The E.161 layout is primarily based on the layout used on American telephones since the 1930s for telephone exchange names. Until the 1990s, Q and Z were not included in the standard layout, and since the letters served mainly as mnemonic devices, they were not necessary (Q and Z were not used in phonewords); telephones either omitted them, placed Q and Z onto the 1 key, or included Q and Z on the current locations, with PRS on 7 and WXY on 9. The development of text messaging on mobile phones, which required the full range of the alphabet, led to the need to standardize locations for Q and Z on mobile devices. E.161 adopted the current layout in response to this.

Notes

References

References

  1. "E.161 : Arrangement of digits, letters and symbols on telephones and other devices that can be used for gaining access to a telephone network".
  2. [http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=54083 ISO 9564-1:2011 ''Financial services — Personal Identification Number (PIN) management and security — Part 1: Basic principles and requirements for PINs in card-based systems''], Annex B.4 Alpha-to-numeric mapping
  3. "Mathematical operators". Unicode.org.
  4. Pentzlin, Karl. "Proposal to incorporate two telephony symbols into Unicode by glyph and annotation changes".
  5. "Standardization Supporting Cultural Diversity: Character Repertoires, Ordering and Assignment to the 12-key Telephone Keypad for European Languages and Languages Used in Europe".
Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about E.161 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report