Double Irish arrangement

{{anchor|Double Irish}}{{anchor|Explanation of Double Irish}}Double Irish

Concept and origin (1991)

The Double Irish is an IP–based BEPS tool. Under OECD rules, corporations with intellectual property (IP), which are mostly technology and life sciences firms, can turn this into an intangible asset (IA) on their balance sheet, and charge it out as a tax-deductible royalty payment to end-customers. Without such IP, if Microsoft charged a German end-customer $100, for Microsoft Office, a profit of about $95 (as the cost to Microsoft for copies of Microsoft Office is small) would be realised in Germany, and German tax would be payable on this profit. However, if Germany allows such an intangible asset, Microsoft can additionally charge Microsoft Germany $95 in IP royalty payments on each copy of Microsoft Office, reducing its German profits to zero. The $95 is paid to the entity in which the IP is legally housed. Microsoft would prefer to house this IP in a tax haven; however, higher-tax locations like Germany do not sign full tax treaties with tax havens, and would not accept the IP charged from a tax haven as deductible against German taxation. The Double Irish fixes this problem.

The Double Irish enables the IP to be charged-out from Ireland, which has a large global network of full bilateral tax treaties. The Double Irish enables the hypothetical $95, which was sent from Germany to Ireland, to be sent on to a tax haven such as Bermuda without incurring any Irish taxation. The techniques of using IP to relocate profits from higher-tax locations to low-tax locations are called base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) tools. There are many types of BEPS tools (e.g. Debt–based BEPS tools); however, IP–based BEPS tool are the largest group.

As with all Irish BEPS tools, the Irish subsidiary must conduct a "relevant trade" on the IP in Ireland. A "business plan" must be produced with Irish employment and salary levels that are acceptable to the Irish State during the period the BEPS tool is in operation. Despite these requirements, the effective tax rate (ETR) of the Double Irish is almost 0%, as the EU Commission discovered with Apple in 2016.

Most major US technology and life sciences multinationals have been identified as using the Double Irish. By 2010, US$95 billion of US profits were shifted annually to Ireland, which increased to US$106 billion by 2015. As the BEPS tool with which US multinationals built up untaxed offshore reserves of circa US$1 trillion from 2004 to 2017, the Double Irish is the largest tax avoidance tool in history. In 2016, when the EU levied a €13 billion fine on Apple, the largest tax fine in history, it only covered the period 2004–14, during which Apple shielded €111 billion in profits from U.S (and Irish) tax.

The earliest recorded versions of the Double Irish-type BEPS tools are by Apple in the late 1980s, and the EU discovered Irish Revenue tax rulings on the Double Irish for Apple in 1991. Irish state documents released to the Irish national archives in December 2018 showed that Fine Gael ministers in 1984 sought legal advice on how US corporations could avoid taxes by operating from Ireland. The former Irish Taoiseach, John Bruton, wrote to the then Finance Minister Alan Dukes saying: "In order to retain the maximum tax advantage, US corporations will wish to locate FSCs in a country where they will have to pay little or no tax. Therefore unless FSCs are given favourable tax treatment in Ireland, they will not locate here." Feargal O'Rourke, PwC tax partner in the IFSC (and son of Minister Mary O'Rourke, cousin of the 2008–2011 Irish Finance Minister Brian Lenihan Jnr) is regarded as its "grand architect".

Basic structure (no Dutch sandwich)

--{{ordered list |CORP (X) creates the software. |CORP (X) sells IP to BER1 (H). |BER1 (H) revalues IP higher. |BER1 (H) licenses IP to IRL2 (A). |IRL2 (A) licenses IP to DUT1 (S). |DUT1 (S) licenses IP to IRL1 (B). |IRL1 (B) sells software to customer. --{{ordered list |list-style-type=upper-alpha |Customer pays $100 to IRL1 (B). |IRL1 (B) pays $100 to DUT1 (S) as royalty. |DUT1 (S) pays $100 to IRL2 (A) as royalty. |IRL2 (A) pays $100 to BER1 (H) as royalty. |BER1 (H) accumulates the cash. |BER1 (H) can lend cash to CORP (X).

While there have been variations (e.g. Apple), the standard Double Irish arrangement, in simplified form, takes the following structure (note that the steps below initially exclude the Dutch sandwich component for simplicity, which is explained in the next section; Chart 1 includes the Dutch sandwich): | A US corporate (CORP, or X) develops new software in the US costing $1 to build; | CORP sells it to its wholly owned Bermuda company (BER1, or H) for $1 (at cost, ideally); | BER1 revalues it to $100 (as an intangible asset under GAAP), and books gain in Bermuda (tax free); | BER1 licenses it to its wholly owned Irish subsidiary (IRL1, or B) for $100; | IRL1 then sells it in Germany to a customer for $100; | IRL1 uses the $100 from Germany to pay the $100 royalty to BER1 (no profit in Ireland); | BER1 holds the $100 cash in perpetuity, thus avoiding US 35% tax; | BER1 lends the $100 cash back to CORP (and other subsidiaries).

This structure has a problem. The pre–TCJA US tax code allows foreign income to be left in foreign subsidiaries (deferring US taxes), but it will consider BER1 to be a controlled foreign corporation (or "CFC"), sheltering income from a related party transaction (i.e. IRL1). It will apply full US taxes to BER1 at 35%.

To get around this, the US corporation needs to create a second Irish company (IRL2, or A), legally incorporated in Ireland (so under the US tax code it is Irish), but which is "managed and controlled" from Bermuda (so under the Irish tax code it is from Bermuda). IRL2 will be placed between BER1 and IRL1 (i.e. owned by BER1, and owning IRL1). Up until the 2015 shut-down of the Double Irish, the Irish tax code was one of the few that allowed a company to be legally incorporated in its jurisdiction, but not be subject to its taxes (if managed and controlled elsewhere).

The US corporation will "check-the-box" for IRL1, declaring it a foreign subsidiary selling to non-US locations. Then the US tax code will ignore IRL1 from US tax calculations. However, because the US tax code also views IRL2 as foreign (i.e. Irish), it also ignores the transactions between IRL1 and IRL2 (even though they are related parties). This is the essence of the Double Irish arrangement.

Note that in some explanations and diagrams BER1 is omitted (the Bermuda black hole); however, it is rare for a US corporation to "own" IRL2 directly.

Elimination of Dutch Sandwich (2010)

Main article: Dutch Sandwich

The Irish tax code historically levied a 20% withholding tax on transfers from an Irish company like IRL1, to companies in tax havens like BER1. However, if IRL1 sends the money to a new Dutch company DUT1 (or S), via another royalty payment scheme, no Irish withholding tax is payable as Ireland does not levy withholding tax on transfers within EU states. In addition, under the Dutch tax code DUT1 can send money to IRL2 (an Irish company that is legally incorporated in Ireland, and thus the US-tax code regards it as foreign, but is "managed and controlled" from, say, Bermuda and thus the Irish tax code also regards it as foreign) under another royalty scheme without incurring Dutch withholding tax, as the Dutch do not charge withholding tax on royalty payment schemes. This is called the Dutch Sandwich and DUT1 is described as the "Dutch slice" (sitting between IRL1 and IRL2). Thus, with the addition of IRL2 and DUT1, we have the "Double Irish Dutch Sandwich" tax structure.

In 2010, the Irish government, on lobbying from PwC Ireland's IFSC tax partner, Feargal O'Rourke, relaxed the rules for sending royalty payments to non-EU countries without incurring Irish withholding tax (thus ending the Dutch Sandwich), but they are subject to conditions that will not suit all Double Irish arrangements.

In 2008, O'Rourke's cousin Brian Lenihan became finance minister, setting much of the Revenue's policy. Two years later, after continued entreaties by O'Rourke, the Revenue's office announced that it would no longer impose withholding taxes on such transactions.|Jesse Drucker, Bloomberg, "Man Making Ireland Tax Avoidance Hub Proves Local Hero", 28 October 2013}}

Controversial closure (2015)

The 2014–16 EU investigation into Apple in Ireland (see below), showed that the Double Irish existed as far back as 1991. Early US academic research in 1994 into US multinational use of tax havens identified profit shifting accounting techniques. US congressional investigations into the tax practices of US multinationals were aware of such BEPS tools for many years. However, the US did not try to force the closure of the Double Irish BEPS tool, instead it was the EU which forced Ireland to close the Double Irish to new schemes in October 2014. Nevertheless, existing users of the Double Irish BEPS tool (e.g. Apple, Google, Facebook, Microsoft, amongst many others), were given five more years until January 2020, before the tool would be fully shut-down to all users.

This approach by successive US administrations is explained by an early insight that one of the most cited US academic researchers into tax havens, and corporate taxation, James R. Hines Jr., had in 1994. Hines realised in 1994, that: "low foreign tax rates [from tax havens] ultimately enhance U.S. tax collections". Hines would revisit this concept several times, as would others, and it would guide US policy in this area for decades, including introducing the "check-the-box" rules in 1996, curtailing the 2000–10 OECD initiative on tax havens, and not signing the 2016 OECD anti-BEPS initiative.

By September 2018, tax academics proved US multinationals were the largest users of BEPS tools, and that Ireland was the largest global BEPS hub.

In December 2018, Seamus Coffey, the Chairman of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, told The Times in relation to the closure of the Double Irish that "A lot of emphasis has been put on residency rules and I think that emphasis has been misplaced and the changes didn't have that much [of an] effect". On 3 January 2019, The Guardian reported that Google avoided corporate taxes on US$23 billion of profits in 2017 by using the Double Irish with the Dutch sandwich extension.

Apple's €13 billion EU fine (2016)

Main article: EU illegal state aid case against Apple in Ireland

By 2017, Apple was Ireland's largest company, and post leprechaun economics, accounted for over one quarter of Irish GDP growth. Apple's use of the Double Irish BEPS tool to achieve tax rates

On 29 August 2016 the European Commissioner for Competition concluded Apple had received illegal State aid from Ireland. The commission ordered Apple to pay €13 billion, plus interest, in unpaid Irish taxes on circa €111 billion of profits, for the ten-year period, 2004–2014. It was the largest corporate tax fine in history.

Apple was not using the standard Double Irish arrangement of two Irish companies (IRL1 in Ireland, and IRL2 in Bermuda). Instead, Apple combined the functions of the two companies inside one Irish company (namely, Apple Sales International, or ASI), which was split into two internal "branches". The Irish Revenue issued private rulings to Apple in 1991 and 2007 regarding this hybrid-double Irish structure, which the EU Commission considered as illegal State aid.

{{anchor|Single Malt}}{{anchor|Single malt}}{{anchor|single malt}}{{anchor|Replacement by Single Malt}}Single Malt

Concept and origin (2014)

In an October 2013 interview, PwC tax partner Feargal O'Rourke (see above), said that: "the days of the Double Irish tax scheme are numbered".

In October 2014, as the EU forced the Irish State to close the Double Irish BEPS tool, the influential US National Tax Journal published an article by Jeffrey L Rubinger and Summer Lepree, showing that Irish based subsidiaries of US corporations could replace the Double Irish arrangement with a new structure (now known as Single Malt). If the Bermuda–controlled Irish company (IRL2) was relocated to a country with whom (a) Ireland had a tax treaty, (b) with wording on "management and control" tax residency, and (c) had a zero corporate tax rate, then the Double Irish effect could be replicated. They highlighted Malta as a candidate. The Irish media picked up the article, but when an Irish MEP notified the then Finance Minister, Michael Noonan, he was told to "put on the green jersey".

Basic structure

The Single Malt is also an IP–based BEPS tool, and as a small variation of the Double Irish, required little additional development, except choosing specific locations with the necessary specific wording in their Irish bilateral tax treaties (e.g. Malta and the UAE); thus the basic structure is almost identical to the Double Irish with often a Maltese company replacing BER1 in the earlier example.

Discovery (2017)

A November 2017 report by Christian Aid, titled Impossible Structures, showed how quickly the Single Malt BEPS tool was replacing the Double Irish. The report detailed Microsoft subsidiary LinkedIn, and Allergen's schemes and extracts from advisers to their clients. The report also showed that Ireland was behaving like a "Captured State", and for example had opted out of Article 12 of the 2016 OECD anti-BEPS initiative to protect the Single Malt BEPS tool (it was also later pointed out in September 2018, that Malta had similarly opted out of Article 4 of the initiative to enable it to be the recipient of the Single Malt). The then Irish Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said that it would be investigated; however, questions were raised regarding the Irish State's policy of addressing corporate tax avoidance.

In September 2018, The Irish Times revealed that US medical device manufacturer Teleflex, had created a new Single Malt scheme in July 2018, and had reduced their overall effective corporate tax rate to circa 3%. The same article quoted a spokesman from the Department of Finance (Ireland) saying they had not as yet taken any action regarding the Single Malt BEPS tool, but they were keeping the matter, "under consideration".

Partial closure (2018)

In November 2018, the Irish Government amended the Ireland–Malta tax treaty to prevent the Single Malt BEPS tool being used between Ireland and Malta (it can still be used with the UAE for example); however, the exact closure date of the Irish Single Malt BEPS tool with Malta was deferred until September 2019.

On the same day that the closure was announced, The Irish Times reported that LinkedIn (Ireland), identified as a user of the Single Malt tool in 2017 (see above), had announced in filings that it had sold a major IP asset to its parent, Microsoft (Ireland). Earlier in July 2018, Ireland's Sunday Business Post, disclosed that Microsoft (Ireland) were preparing a restructure of their Irish BEPS tools into a CAIA (or Green Jersey) Irish tax structure.

Rediscovery (2021)

In September 2021, The Irish Times reported that US pharmaceutical firm Abbott Laboratories was still using the Single Malt tool to shield profits on its COVID-19 testing kits.

{{anchor|CAIA}}Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA){{anchor|capital allowances for intangible assets}}{{anchor|Backstop of capital allowances}}{{anchor|Backstop of Capital Allowances}}

Concept and origin (2009)

The Double Irish and Single Malt BEPS tools enable Ireland to act as a confidential "Conduit OFC" rerouting untaxed profits to places like Bermuda (e.g. it must be confidential as higher-tax locations would not sign full tax treaties with locations like Bermuda), the Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) BEPS tool (also called the Green Jersey), enables Ireland to act as the terminus for the untaxed profits (e.g. Ireland becomes Bermuda, a "Sink OFC"). The CAIA uses the accepted tax concept of providing capital allowances for the purchase of assets. However, Ireland turns it into a BEPS tool by providing the allowances for the purchase of intangible assets, and especially intellectual property assets, and critically, where the owner of the intangible assets is a "connected party" (e.g. a Group subsidiary).

For example, in Q1 2015, Apple used the CAIA tool when its Irish subsidiary purchased US$300 billion in intangible assets from an Apple subsidiary based in Jersey. The CAIA tool enabled Apple to write-off the US$300 billion price as a capital allowance against future Irish profits (e.g. the next US$300 billion of profits Apple books in Ireland are free of Irish tax). The CAIA capitalises the effect of the Double Irish or Single Malt BEPS tools, and behaves like a corporate tax inversion of a US multinational's non-US business. However, the CAIA is more powerful, as Apple demonstrated by effectively doubling the tax shield (e.g. to US$600 billion in allowances), via Irish interest relief on the intergroup virtual loans used to purchase the IP. While Apple's CAIA had an ETR of 0%, some have an ETR of 2.5%.

In June 2009, the Irish State established the Commission on Taxation, to review Ireland's tax regime, and included Feargal O'Rourke, the "grand architect" of the Double Irish tool. In September 2009, the commission recommended that the Irish State provide capital allowances for the acquisition of intangible assets, creating the CAIA BEPS tool. The 2009 Finance Act, materially expanded the range of intangible assets attracting Irish capital allowances deductible against Irish taxable profits. These "specified intangible assets" cover more esoteric intangibles such as types of general rights, general know-how, general goodwill, and the right to use software. It includes types of "internally developed" group intangible assets and intangible assets purchased from "connected parties". The control is that the intangible assets must be acceptable under GAAP (older 2004 Irish GAAP is used), and auditable by an Irish IFSC accounting firm, like PwC or Ernst & Young.

In the 2010 Finance Act, on the recommendation of the Department of Finance's Tax Strategy Group, the CAIA BEPS tool was upgraded, reducing the amortisation and "clawback" period from 15 to 10 years, and expanding the range of intangible assets to include "a broader definition of know-how". In the 2011 and 2012 Finance Acts, the Tax Strategy Group made additional amendments to the rules regarding the acquisition of intangible assets from "connected parties", and the "employment tax" users of the CAIA BEPS tool must pay. The 2012 Finance Act removed the minimum amortisation period for the acquired intangible assets, and reduced the "clawback" to 5 years for CAIA schemes set up after February 2013.

The first known user of the CAIA BEPS tool was by Accenture, the first US corporate tax inversion to Ireland in 2009.

By March 2017, Bloomberg would report that Ireland had become the most popular destination for US corporate tax inversions in history, and would have the largest Medtronic (2015), 3rd-largest Johnson Controls (2016), 4th-largest Eaton Corporation (2012) and 6th-largest Perrigo (2013) US corporate tax inversions in history.

Basic structure

The CAIA follows the first three steps of the Double Irish, and Single Malt, basic structure (see above, except in this case the example is not a per-unit example, but for the entire sales of a block of intellectual property), namely:

| A US corporate (CORP) develops new software in the US costing $1 million to build; | CORP sells it to its wholly owned Bermuda company (BER1) for $1 million (at cost, ideally); | BER1 revalues it to $1 billion (as an intangible asset under GAAP), and books gain in Bermuda (tax-free); | An Irish subsidiary, IRL1, purchases this intangible asset from BER1, for $1 billion; | Under the CAIA rules, IRL1 can write-off the $1 billion paid for this group intangible asset against Irish tax; | Additionally, BER1 gives IRL1 a $1 billion 10-year inter-group loan to buy the intangible asset, at an interest rate of circa 7%; | Over the next 10 years IRL1 claims tax relief on both the $1 billion purchase (under CAIA), and the inter-group loan interest; | During the 10 years, IRL1 charges out this asset to end-customers globally (as per step v. in the Double Irish), accumulating profits; | During the 10 years, CORP in line with its product cycle, has created new software and repeated step i. to iii. above; | At the end of the 10 years, IRL1 has shielded $1.7 billion of Irish profits against Irish tax; | At the end of the 10 years, BER1, who received the $1 billion purchase price, and $0.7 billion in loan interest, has paid no tax; | At the end of the 10 years, IRL1, repeats steps iv. to ix. above, and buys a new intangible asset from BER1 for $1 billion.

The CAIA and Double Irish (and Single Malt) share the same basic components and techniques (e.g. an intangible asset needs to be created and significantly re-valued in a tax haven). The key differences between the CAIA BEPS tool and the Double Irish (and Single Malt) BEPS tools are noted as follows:

• CAIA * capitalises* the effect of the Double Irish in the Irish national accounts, leading to even greater ;
• While the ETR of the Double Irish is close to zero, the Irish State has from time-to-time capped the level of allowances under CAIA to 80%, giving an ETR of 2.5%;
• By providing the inter-group finance to purchase the intangible asset (step vi. above), the tax avoided by CAIA is almost twice that of the Double Irish;
• While the loophole behind the Double Irish has been closed, CAIA is a more established tax concept internationally, although only for tangible assets.

As with all Irish BEPS tools, the Irish subsidiary must conduct a "relevant trade" on the acquired IP. A "business plan" must be produced with Irish employment and salary levels that are acceptable to the Irish State during the period capital allowances are claimed. If the Irish subsidiary is wound up within 5 years, the CAIA intangible capital allowances are repayable, which is called "clawback".

Marketing of the CAIA BEPS tool

Irish BEPS tools are not overtly marketed, as brochures showing near-zero effective tax rates (ETR) would damage Ireland's ability to sign and operate bilateral tax treaties (i.e. higher-tax countries do not sign full treaties with known tax havens). However, in the Irish financial crisis, some Irish tax law firms in the IFSC produced CAIA brochures openly marketing that its ETR was 2.5%.

Apple's "leprechaun economics" (2015)

Main article: Leprechaun economics

The EU Commission's 30 August 2016 findings against Apple's hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool, Apple Sales International (ASI), covered the period from 2004 to end 2014 (see above). The EU's August 2016 report on Apple, notes that Apple had informed the commission at the start of 2015 that they had closed their hybrid–Double Irish BEPS tool. In January 2018, Irish economist Seamus Coffey, Chairman of the State's Irish Fiscal Advisory Council, and author of the State's 2017 Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code, showed Apple restructured ASI into the CAIA BEPS tool in Q1 2015.

During Q1 2018, Coffey and international economists, proved Ireland's 2015 "leprechaun economics" GDP growth of 33.4%, was attributable to Apple's new CAIA BEPS tool. Coffey noted the significance of Apple's endorsement of the CAIA BEPS tool, given Apple's status as one of the longest users of the Double Irish BEPS tool, and one of the largest users of BEPS tools worldwide.

In January 2018, there was further controversy over Apple's CAIA BEPS tool when Coffey pointed out that it is prohibited under Ireland's tax code (Section 291A(c) of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997), to use the CAIA BEPS tool for reasons that are not "commercial bona fide reasons", and in schemes where the main purpose is "the avoidance of, or reduction in, liability to tax". In addition, it was realised in hindsight, that changes former Finance Minister Michael Noonan made in the Irish 2015 Finance Budget, was to ensure the ETR of Apple's CAIA tool was reduced to zero.

In June 2018, Apple's post Q1 2015 BEPS tax structure in Ireland was labelled "the Green Jersey" by the EU Parliament's GUE–NGL body and described in detail.

Microsoft's Green Jersey (2018)

In December 2017, the Irish Government accepted the recommendation of Coffey that corporation tax relief for the Irish CAIA BEPS tool be capped at 80% for new arrangements, to restore the CAIA's effective Irish corporate tax rate (ETR) back to 2.5%. This was enacted in the 2017 Finance Budget, but only for new CAIA BEPS schemes (e.g. Apple's 2015 CAIA scheme would not be affected). Given the dramatic take-up in the CAIA tool in 2015, when the cap lifted (e.g. the ETR was 0%), Irish commentators challenged Coffey's recommendation. He responded in a paper in late 2017.

In July 2018, it was reported that Microsoft was preparing to execute another "Green Jersey" CAIA BEPS transaction. which, due to technical issues with the TCJA, makes the CAIA BEPS tool attractive to US multinationals. In July 2018, Coffey posted that Ireland could see a "boom" in the onshoring of US IP, via the CAIA BEPS tool, between now and 2020, when the Double Irish is fully closed. In May 2019, it was reported Microsoft moved $52.8bn of IP assets to Ireland. In January 2020, The Irish Times speculated that Google Inc., was also considering using the CAIA BEPS tool.

Effect of BEPS tools on Ireland's economy

In June 2018, academic tax researcher Gabriel Zucman (et alia) estimated Ireland was the world's largest BEPS hub, and also the world's largest tax haven. In September 2018, Zucman and Wright showed that US corporates were the largest users of BEPS tools, representing almost half of all BEPS activity. The concentration of BEPS activity impacted Ireland's economy in a number of ways:

Distortion of Irish GDP/GNP

Main article: Modified gross national income, Leprechaun economics

An "artificially inflated GDP-per-capita statistic", is a feature of tax havens, due to the BEPS flows. In February 2017, Ireland's national accounts became so distorted by BEPS flows that the Central Bank of Ireland replaced Irish GDP and Irish GNP with a new economic measure, Irish Modified GNI*. However, in December 2017, Eurostat reported that Modified GNI* did not remove all of the distortions from Irish economic data. By September 2018, the Irish Central Statistics Office (CSO) reported that Irish GDP was 162% of Irish GNI* (e.g. BEPS tools artificially inflated Ireland's GDP by 62%). In contrast EU–28 2017 GDP was 100% of GNI. Irish public indebtedness changes dramatically depending on whether Debt-to-GDP, Debt-to-GNI* or Debt-per-Capita is used (Per-Capita removes all BEPS tool distortion).

Concentration of US multinationals

Main article: Ireland as a tax haven#Global "knowledge hub" for "selling into Europe"

Tax academics show multinationals from countries with "territorial" tax systems make little use of tax havens like Ireland. Since the UK changed its tax regime to a "territorial" system in 2009–12, Ireland has failed to attract corporates from any other jurisdiction except the US, one of the last "worldwide" tax systems. By September 2018, US–controlled corporates were 25 of Ireland's 50 largest companies, paid 80% of Irish business taxes, and directly employed 25% of the Irish labour force, and created 57% of Irish value-add. The past president of the Irish Tax Institute stated they pay 50% of all Irish salary taxes (due to higher paying jobs), 50% of all Irish VAT, and 92% of all Irish customs and excise duties. The American-Ireland Chamber of Commerce estimated the value of US investment in Ireland in 2018 was €334 billion, exceeding Irish GDP (€291 billion in 2016), and exceeding the combined investment of US investment in the BRIC countries. The US multinational subsidiaries in Ireland, are not simply used for booking EU sales, in most cases, they handle the entire non-US business of the Group. Apart from US corporates, and legacy UK corporates (pre 2009–12), there are no foreign corporates in Ireland's top 50 firms. Academics say Ireland is more accurately described as a "US corporate tax haven", and a shield for non-US profits from the historic US "worldwide" tax system.

Disagreement on Irish ETRs

Main article: Ireland as a tax haven#Effective tax rates

One of the most contested aspects of Ireland's economy is the aggregate "effective tax rate" (ETR) of Ireland's corporate tax regime. The Irish State refutes tax haven labels as unfair criticism of its low, but legitimate, 12.5% Irish corporate tax rate, which it defends as being the effective tax rate (ETR). Independent studies show that Ireland's aggregate effective corporate tax rate is between 2.2% to 4.5% (depending on assumptions made). This lower aggregate effective tax rate is consistent with the individual effective tax rates of US multinationals in Ireland, as well as the IP-based BEPS tools openly marketed by the main Irish tax-law firms, in the IFSC, with ETRs of 0–2.5% (see "effective tax rate").

Effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

US corporate tax haven (to 2017)

Main article: Ireland as a tax haven#Global "knowledge hub" for "selling into Europe"

In June 2018, tax academics showed that Ireland had become the world's largest global BEPS hub, or corporate-focused tax haven. In September 2018, tax academics showed that US multinationals were the largest users of BEPS tools. In 2016, leading tax academic James R. Hines Jr., showed that multinationals from "territorial" tax systems, the system used by almost all global economies bar a handful but which included the US, make little use of tax havens. Hines, and others, had previously quoted the example of the UK, who transitioned from a "worldwide" system to a "territorial" system in 2009–2012, which led to a reversal of many UK inversions to Ireland, and turned the UK into one of the leading destinations for US corporate tax inversions (although Ireland is still the most popular). A similar case study was cited in the switch by Japan in 2009 from a full US "worldwide" tax system (e.g. very high domestic tax rate, partially mitigated by a controlled foreign corporation regime), to a full "territorial" tax system, with positive results.

As discussed in , Hines had shown as early as 1994, that under the US "worldwide" tax system, US multinational use of tax havens and BEPS tools, had increased long-term US treasury returns. Academics point to these facts as the explanation for the extraordinary in Ireland's economy, and the equal failure of Ireland to attract non-US multinationals or any multinationals from "territorial" tax systems. While Ireland sometimes describes itself as a "global knowledge hub for selling into Europe", it is more accurately described as a US corporate tax haven for shielding non-US revenues from the historical US "worldwide" tax system.

US change to a territorial system (post 2017)

In December 2017, the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the US changed from a "worldwide" tax system to a hybrid–"territorial" tax system, to encourage US multinationals to relocate functions back from tax havens. In addition, the US, as the UK had done in 2009–12, aimed to become a favoured destination for foreign multinational to relocate. In their October 2017 report on the proposed TCJA legalisation, the US Council of Economic Advisors, quoted Hines' work on tax havens, and used Hines' calculations, to estimate the quantum of US investment that should return as a result of the TCJA.

As well as switching to a hybrid–"territorial" tax system, the TCJA contains a unique "carrot" and a "stick" aimed at US multinationals in Ireland: | As a "carrot", the TCJA enables these firms to charge out their IP globally (just like with a Double Irish or Single Malt arrangement) but from a US base, at a preferential foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) tax rate of 13.125% . In addition, the extra reliefs of 100% capital expensing, and 21% relief on US costs, make the effective FDII rate 1–2% lower again (or 11–12%). | As a "stick", the TCJA’s global intangible low-tax income (GILTI) tax rate forces these firms to pay a minimum US tax rate of 10.5% on their global IP, regardless of where their IP is located. In addition, only getting 80% relief (not 100%), against foreign taxes paid, means that the effective GILTI rate is 1–2% higher again (or 11–12%, similar to the net FDII rate).

In March–April 2018, major US tax law firms showed that pre the TCJA, US multinationals with the IP needed to use Irish BEPS tools, would achieve effective Irish tax rates (ETR) of 0–2.5% versus 35% under the historical US system. However, post the TCJA, these multinationals can use their IP to achieve US ETRs, which net of the TCJA's 100% capital relief provisions, are similar to the ETRs they would achieve in Ireland when the TCJA's new GILTI provisions are taken into account (e.g. ETR of circa 11–12%). In Q1 2018, US multinationals like Pfizer announced in Q1 2018, a post-TCJA global tax rate for 2019 of circa 17%, which is close to the circa 15–16% 2019 tax rate announced by past US corporate tax inversions to Ireland, Eaton, Allergan, and Medtronic.

Early implications for Ireland (2018)

As the TCJA was being passed in December 2017, the new corporate tax provisions were recognised by the Irish media, as a challenge. Donald Trump had "singled out" Ireland in 2017 speeches promoting the TCJA, and Trump administration economic advisor, Stephen Moore, predicted "a flood of companies" would leave Ireland due to the TCJA. Leading US tax academic, Mihir A. Desai in a post–TCJA 26 December 2017 interview in the Harvard Business Review said that: "So, if you think about a lot of technology companies that are housed in Ireland and have massive operations there, they're not going to maybe need those in the same way, and those can be relocated back to the U.S.

In December 2017, U.S technology firm Vantiv, the world's largest payment processing company, confirmed that it had abandoned its plan to execute a corporate tax inversion to Ireland. In March 2018, the Head of Life Sciences in Goldman Sachs, Jami Rubin, stated that: "Now that [US] corporate tax reform has passed, the advantages of being an inverted company are less obvious". In August 2018, US multinational Afilias, who had been headquartered in Ireland since 2001, announced that as a result of the TCJA, it was moving back to the US.

However, in contrast, it was reported in May–July 2018, that US tax academics and tax economists were discovering material technical flaws in the TCJA that incentivise the US use of tax havens like Ireland. Of particular note was the exclusion from the GILTI tax of the first 10% of profits on overseas tangible assets, which incentivises investment in tangible assets abroad. However, a more serious concern, was the acceptance of capital allowances, both tangible and intangible, as deductible against GILTI taxation, which would enable US users of the CAIA BEPS tool to convert their Irish ETR of 0–2.5%, into a final US ETR of 0–2.5%. In May–July 2018, Google and Facebook announced large expansions of their Dublin office campuses in Ireland.

A June 2018 IMF country report on Ireland, while noting the significant exposure of Ireland's economy to US corporates, concluded that the TCJA may not be as effective as Washington expects in addressing Ireland as a US corporate tax haven. In writing its report, the IMF conducted confidential anonymous interviews with Irish corporate tax experts. In July 2018, it was reported that Microsoft was preparing to execute Apple's "Green Jersey" CAIA BEPS transaction. In July 2018, Seamus Coffey, Chairperson of the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council and author of the Irish State's 2016 review of the Irish corporate tax code, posted that Ireland could see a "boom" in the onshoring of US IP, via the CAIA BEPS tool, between now and 2020, when the Double Irish is fully closed.

In February 2019, Brad Setser from the Council on Foreign Relations wrote a New York Times article highlighting material issues with TCJA in terms of combatting tax havens.

Multinationals that used Irish BEPS tools

This is not a comprehensive list as many US multinationals in Ireland use "unlimited liability companies" (ULCs), which do not file public accounts with the Irish CRO.

Double Irish

Major companies in Ireland known to employ the Double Irish BEPS tool, include:

• Abbott Laboratories
• Adobe Systems
• Airbnb
• Apple Inc. original user, and known in operation since the late 1980s
• Eli Lilly and Company
• Facebook
• Forest Laboratories
• General Electric
• Gilead
• Google
• IBM
• Johnson & Johnson
• Medtronic Inc.
• Microsoft
• News Corp
• Oracle Corp.
• Pfizer Inc.
• Starbucks
• Yahoo!

Single malt

Major companies in Ireland known to employ the single-malt BEPS tool, include:

• Microsoft (LinkedIn), using Malta
• Allergan (Zeitiq), using Malta
• Teleflex, using Malta
• Abbott Laboratories, using Malta

Capital allowances for intangible assets

Major companies in Ireland known to employ the capital-allowances for intangible assets (CAIA) BEPS tool, include:

• Apple Inc., started in 2015 with the leprechaun economics affair
• Accenture, started in 2009

Notes

References

References

1. Adrian Weckler. (29 November 2017). "Facebook paid just €30m tax in Ireland despite earning €12bn". [[Irish Independent]].
2. David Ingram. (18 April 2018). "Exclusive: Facebook to put 1.5 billion users out of reach of new EU privacy law". [[Reuters]].
3. Simon Bowers. (4 November 2016). "Google pays €47m in tax in Ireland on €22bn sales revenue". [[The Guardian]].
4. (30 September 2013). "Google booked 41% of global revenues in Ireland in 2012; A leprechaun's gold?". Finfacts.ie.
5. Arthur Beesley. (31 January 2018). "Ireland enjoys tax boom but fears a reckoning: Dublin concerned about reliance on revenue from small group of multinational companies". [[Financial Times]].
6. (15 October 2013). "Profit Shifting and "Aggressive" Tax Planning by Multinational Firms". [[Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.
7. (June 2017). "Intellectual Property Tax Planning in the light of Base Erosion and Profit Shifting". University of Tilburg.
8. (3 September 2018). "Revenue: Double Taxation Treaties". [[Revenue Commissioners]].
9. (2015). "Intellectual Property Law Solutions to Tax Avoidance". UCLA Law Review.
10. Jesse Drucker. (23 October 2013). "Ireland: Where Profits Pile Up, Helping Multinationals Keep Taxes Low". Bloomberg.
11. Eric Cederwall. (15 March 2015). "Making Sense of Profit Shifting: Edward Kleinbard". [[Tax Foundation]].
12. (June 2017). "The real story behind U.S. companies' offshore cash reserves". [[McKinsey & Company]].
13. Jill Treanor. (20 May 2016). "U.S. corporate giants hoarding more than a trillion dollars". [[The Guardian]].
14. Rónán Duffy. (29 December 2018). "Fine Gael ministers discussed US corporations paying 'little or no tax' here in the 1980s". [[TheJournal.ie]].
15. Jesse Drucker. (28 October 2013). "Man Making Ireland Tax Avoidance Hub Proves Local Hero". Bloomberg News.
16. Fiona Reddan. (8 May 2015). "Scion of a prominent political dynasty who gave his vote to accountancy". [[The Irish Times]].
17. Jesse Drucker. (3 November 2013). "Controversial tax strategies brainchild of O'Rourke's son". [[Irish Independent]].
18. (29 October 2013). "Feargal O'Rourke Turning Ireland Into 'A Global Tax-Avoidance Hub'". Broadsheet Ireland.
19. Edward Kleinbard. (2011). "Stateless Income". Florida Tax Review.
20. (October 2013). "Fiscal Monitor: Taxing Times". [[International Monetary Fund]].
21. Vanessa Houlder. (9 October 2014). "What is the Double Irish". Financial Times.
22. Rodger Royse. (1 November 2013). "Double Irish Tax Sandwich". Rose Law.
23. (June 2016). "Taxation Guide to Investing in Ireland". A&L Goodbody.
24. (August 2024). "'Dutch Sandwich' saves Google and many other U.S. companies billions in taxes". NBC News.
25. (June 2010). "Treatment of Certain Patent Royalties Paid to Companies Resident Outside the State (e-brief 55/10)". Irish Revenue.
26. (28 October 2013). "Ireland’s most connected tax lobbyist says the “double Irish” will soon be history".
27. Dhammika Dharmapala. (2014). "What Do We Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature". [[University of Chicago]].
28. (February 1994). "Fiscal Paradise: Foreign Tax Havens and American Business". Quarterly Journal of Economics (Harvard/MIT).
29. (18 December 2008). "International Taxation: Large U.S. Corporations and Federal Contractors with Subsidiaries in Jurisdictions Listed as Tax Havens or Financial Privacy Jurisdictions". US GAO.
30. (October 2014). "Brussels in crackdown on 'Double Irish' tax loophole". Financial Times.
31. Anthony Ting. (October 2014). "Ireland's move to close the 'Double Irish' tax loophole unlikely to bother Apple, Google". The Guardian and University of Sydney.
32. (28 November 2018). "Two years after the 'double Irish' was shelved, Google used it to shift billions to Bermuda". [[TheJournal.ie]].
33. James R. Hines Jr.. (2010). "Treasure Islands". [[Journal of Economic Perspectives]].
34. (12 October 2009). "Using Financial Accounting Data to Examine the Effect of Foreign Operations Located in Tax Havens and Other Countries on U.S. Multinational Firms' Tax Rates". [[Journal of Accounting Research]].
35. James K. Jackson. (11 March 2010). "The OECD Initiative on Tax Havens". [[Congressional Research Service]].
36. (8 June 2017). "Treasury Official Explains Why U.S. Didn't Sign OECD Super-Treaty". Bloomberg BNA.
37. (14 July 2014). "International Tax Advisory: Impact of the Multilateral Instrument on U.S. Taxpayers: Why Didn't the United States Choose to Sign the MLI?". [[Alston & Bird]].
38. (10 September 2018). "Half of U.S. foreign profits booked in tax havens, especially Ireland: NBER paper". [[The Japan Times]].
39. (13 June 2018). "Ireland is the world's biggest corporate 'tax haven', say academics". The Irish Times.
40. (10 June 2018). "Zucman:Corporations Push Profits Into Corporate Tax Havens as Countries Struggle in Pursuit, Gabrial Zucman Study Says". The Wall Street Journal.
41. (3 January 2019). "Google shifted $23bn to tax haven Bermuda in 2017, filing shows". [[The Guardian]].
42. (17 April 2018). "Quarter of Irish economic growth due to Apple's iPhone, says IMF". RTE News.
43. (17 April 2018). "iPhone exports accounted for quarter of Irish economic growth in 2017 – IMF". The Irish Times.
44. (May 2013). "Memorandum: Offshore profit shifting and the U.S. tax code – Part 2 (Apple Inc.)".
45. "Senate Probe Finds Apple Used Unusual Tax Structure to Avoid Taxes".
46. (6 November 2017). "After a Tax Crackdown, Apple Found a New Shelter for Its Profits". [[The New York Times]].
47. (6 November 2017). "Apple's cash mountain, how it avoids tax, and the Irish link". The Irish Times.
48. (30 August 2016). "European Commission – Press Releases – Press release – State aid: Ireland gave illegal tax benefits to Apple worth up to €13 billion". EU Commission.
49. (30 August 2016). "Commission Decision of 30.8.2016 on State Aid SA. 38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple". [[EU Commission]].
50. Rana Foroohar. (30 August 2016). "Apple vs the EU is the biggest tax battle in history".
51. Cliff Taylor. "Apple's Irish company structure key to EU tax finding". The Irish Times.
52. (2 August 2017). "The Rotten Apple: Tax Avoidance in Ireland". The International Trade Journal.
53. Colm Kelpie. (30 October 2013). "Days of 'Double Irish' tax scheme are numbered, says PwC's O'Rourke". The Irish Times.
54. (23 October 2014). "Death of the "Double Irish Dutch Sandwich"? Not so Fast.". Taxes Without Borders.
55. Sarah McCabe. (9 November 2014). "Multinationals replacing 'Double Irish' with new tax avoidance scheme". [[Irish Independent]].
56. Oireachtas Record. (23 November 2017). "Dáil Éireann debate – Thursday, 23 Nov 2017". [[Oireachtas.
57. Mike Lewis. (November 2017). "'Impossible' structures: tax outcomes overlooked by the 2015 tax Spillover analysis". Christian Aid.
58. (14 November 2017). "Multinationals replacing 'Double Irish' with new tax avoidance scheme".
59. (15 November 2017). "How often is the 'Single Malt' tax loophole used? The government is finding out".
60. Jack Power. (10 November 2017). "Ireland resists closing corporation tax 'loophole'". The Irish Times.
61. Suzanne Lynch. (14 November 2017). "Paschal Donohoe says Government will examine 'Single Malt' loophole". The Irish Times.
62. Cantillion. (16 November 2017). "Three years of silence on 'Single Malt' tax loophole raises questions". The Irish Times.
63. Peter Hamilton. (26 September 2018). "Ireland's 'Single Malt' still aiding tax avoidance". The Irish Times.
64. Barry O'Halloran. (28 November 2018). "Revenue to close 'single malt' tax loophole". The Irish Times.
65. Paul O'Donoghue. (28 November 2018). "Corporate tax loophole closure 'won't stop firms'". The Times.
66. Charlie Taylor. (28 November 2018). "LinkedIn's Irish subsidiary pays $127m on $2.67bn profit". The Irish Times.
67. (15 September 2021). "Pharma giant Abbott using Irish 'single-malt' scheme to avoid tax on profits". The Irish Times.
68. (15 September 2021). "How Abbott Labs devised its formula for 'single Malt' taxation". The Irish Times.
69. (4 December 2017). "Intellectual Property Tax". KPMG.
70. Patrick Syth. (13 September 2019). "Explainer: Apple's €13bn tax appeal has huge implications". The Irish Times.
71. (April 2015). "Ireland as a Location for Your Intellectual Property Trading Company". Arthur Cox Law.
72. (2016). "MNE Tax Strategies in Ireland". [[Trinity College Dublin]].
73. (September 2009). "Commission on Taxation report 2009". UCD Archives.
74. (7 September 2009). "Commission on Taxation Report Ireland 2009: Proposed property tax, a carbon tax, and domestic water charges as part of overhaul of Irish tax system". FinFacts.
75. (2018). "Corporate Taxation in Ireland 2016". Industrial Development Authority (IDA).
76. (2010). "Intangible Assets Scheme under Section 291A Taxes Consolidation Act 1997". Irish Revenue.
77. (September 2017). "Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets "Specified Assets"". Irish Revenue.
78. (June 2011). "Ireland's Tax Regime for Investing in Intellectual Property". FGS Partnership.
79. (October 2016). "Ireland's Intellectual Property Regime". BDO Ireland.
80. (2016). "Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) tax diagnostic toolkit". PriceWaterhouseCoopers.
81. (10 June 2011). "Department of Finance Tax Strategy Group: Irish Corporate Taxation".
82. (19 November 2012). "Department of Finance Tax Strategy Group: Irish Corporate Taxation".
83. (2016). "Irish Revenue Note for Guidance on Intangible Assets". Chartered Accountants of Ireland.
84. Emily Stewart. (22 July 2017). "As Treasury Moves to Bring Back Inversions, Here are 7 of the Biggest Recent Deals". TheStreet.
85. (April 2013). "World IP Day: Ireland'S 2.5% IP Tax Rate (Section 4.1.1)". Mason Hayes and Curran (Law Firm).
86. (February 2018). "Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets under section 291A of the Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 (Part 9 / Chapter 2)". Irish Revenue.
87. (15 September 2017). "Capital allowances for intangible assets". Irish Revenue.
88. (18 October 2017). "'Big Seven' Irish law firms earned €720m last year". Irish Independent.
89. (January 2012). "Uses of Ireland for German Companies: Irish "Intellectual Property" Tax of 2.5% ETR". Arthur Cox Law Firm.
90. Vincent Ryan. (24 January 2012). "Firm gets tax relief on $7bn rights: Accenture". Irish Examiner.
91. (February 2018). "Maples and Calder Irish Intellectual Property Tax Regime – 2.5% Effective Tax". [[Maples and Calder]] Law Firm.
92. (18 January 2018). "Chairman, Fiscal Advisory Council: 'There's been a very strong recovery – we are now living within our means'". Irish Independent.
93. (21 September 2017). "Minister Donohoe publishes Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code". Department of Finance.
94. (30 January 2017). "Review of Ireland's Corporation Tax Code, Presented to the Minister for Finance and Public Expenditure and Reform by Mr. Seamus Coffey". Department of Finance.
95. Seamus Coffey [[Irish Fiscal Advisory Council]]. (24 January 2018). "What Apple did next". Economic Perspectives, [[University College Cork]].
96. Brad Setser. (25 April 2018). "Tax Avoidance and the Irish Balance of Payments". [[Council on Foreign Relations]].
97. Brad Setser. (30 October 2017). "Apple's Exports Aren't Missing: They Are in Ireland". [[Council on Foreign Relations]].
98. (21 June 2018). "Apple's Irish Tax Deals". [[European United Left–Nordic Green Left]] EU Parliament.
99. Naomi Fowler. (25 June 2018). "New Report on Apple's New Irish Tax Structure". [[Tax Justice Network]].
100. (11 October 2017). "Tax break for IP transfers is cut to 80pc". Department of Finance.
101. (2 February 2018). "Revenue eBrief No. 016/18 Capital allowances for specified intangible assets". Irish Revenue.
102. Cliff Taylor. (8 November 2017). "Change in tax treatment of intellectual property and subsequent and reversal hard to fathom". The Irish Times.
103. (19 December 2017). "Intangibles, taxation and Ireland's contribution to the EU Budget". Seamus Coffey.
104. (19 October 2017). "Irish Economy: Intangibles, taxation and Ireland's contribution to the EU Budget". irisheconomy.ie.
105. Ian Guider. (24 June 2018). "Irish Microsoft firm worth $100bn ahead of merger". [[The Sunday Business Post]].
106. Seamus Coffey, [[Irish Fiscal Advisory Council]]. (18 July 2018). "When can we expect the next wave of IP onshoring?". Economics Incentives, [[University College Cork]].
107. Mark Paul. (25 May 2019). "Microsoft moves $52.8bn of assets and its Asian trading operation to Ireland". The Irish Times.
108. David Chance. (3 January 2020). "Why Google might still benefit from Irish tax breaks". The Irish Times.
109. (June 2018). "The Missing Profits of Nations". [[National Bureau of Economic Research]], Working Papers.
110. (September 2018). "The Exorbitant Tax Privilege". [[National Bureau of Economic Research]].
111. Richard Rubin. (10 June 2018). "Corporations Push Profits Into Tax Havens as Countries Struggle in Pursuit, Study Says". [[The Wall Street Journal]].
112. (March 2018). "OECD Ireland Survey 2018". [[OECD]].
113. (17 July 2017). "Ireland's deglobalised data to calculate a smaller economy". Financial Times.
114. (December 2017). "Globalisation at work in statistics — Questions arising from the 'Irish case'". [[EuroStat]].
115. "Real GDP per capita". [[Eurostat]].
116. (4 June 2015). "Who owes more money – the Irish or the Greeks?". The Irish Times.
117. (7 March 2017). "Why do the Irish still owe more than the Greeks?". The Irish Times.
118. Fiona Reddan. (12 September 2018). "Who still owes more, Ireland or the Greeks". The Irish Times.
119. (24 October 2016). "Corporate Inversions: A Policy Primer". [[Wharton University]].
120. (2016). "Multinational Firms and Tax Havens". [[The Review of Economics and Statistics]].
121. (April 2017). "An Analysis of 2015 Corporation Tax Returns and 2016 Payments". Revenue Commissioners.
122. (2017). "Ireland Trade and Statistical Note 2017". OECD.
123. Heike Joebges. (January 2017). "Crisis Recovery in a Country With a High Presence of Foreign-Owned Companies: The Case of Ireland". IMK Macroeconomic Policy Institute, [[Hans-Böckler-Stiftung]].
124. (9 September 2016). "FactCheck: How much do multinationals actually contribute in taxes?". thejournal.ie.
125. (21 June 2018). "Denouncing Ireland as a tax haven is as dated as calling it homophobic because of our past". Irish Independent.
126. (14 December 2016). "Irish Taoiseach rebuts Oxfam claim that Ireland is a tax haven". The Irish Times.
127. (13 June 2018). "'Ireland is not a tax haven': Department of Finance dismisses 'tax haven' research findings". thejournal.ie.
128. (April 2014). "Effective Corporate Tax in Ireland: April 2014". Department of Finance.
129. (14 February 2014). "Effective Corporate Tax calculations: 2.2%". The Irish Times.
130. (June 2018). "APPENDIX 1 Table 2 : The Missing Profits of Nations". [[National Bureau of Economic Research]], Working Papers.
131. Jesse Drucker. (October 2013). "Ireland: Where Profits Pile Up, Helping Multinationals Keep Taxes Low". Bloomberg News.
132. (2 January 2018). "'Double Irish' and 'Dutch Sandwich' saved Google $3.7bn in tax in 2016". The Irish Times.
133. (1 September 2016). "Pinning Down Apple's Alleged 0.005% Tax Rate in Ireland Is Nearly Impossible". Bloomberg News.
134. (29 November 2017). "Facebook Ireland pays tax of just €30m on €12.6bn". Irish Examiner.
135. (28 April 2014). "Oracle paid just €11m tax on Irish turnover of €7bn". Irish Independent.
136. (March 2013). "Ireland as a European gateway jurisdiction for China – outbound and inbound investments". [[Matheson (law firm)]].
137. Seamus Coffey, [[Irish Fiscal Advisory Council]]. (18 June 2018). "Who shifts profits to Ireland". Economic Incentives, [[University College Cork]].
138. (2013). "Territorial vs. Worldwide Corporate Taxation: Implications for Developing Countries". IMF.
139. (14 October 2014). "How Tax Reform solved UK inversions". Tax Foundation.
140. (5 April 2016). "The United Kingdom's Experience with Inversions". Tax Foundation.
141. Mike Williams (HMRC Director of International Tax). (23 January 2015). "The inversion experience in the US and the UK". [[HM Revenue and Customs]].
142. (1 March 2017). "Tracking Tax Runaways". [[Bloomberg News]].
143. (26 July 2014). "How to stop the inversion perversion". [[The Economist]].
144. TF Editorial. (13 November 2012). "Japan Disproves Fears of Territorial Taxation". [[Tax Foundation]].
145. Philip Dittmer. (10 August 2012). "A Global Perspective on Territorial Taxation".
146. Kyle Pomerleau. (3 May 2018). "A Hybrid Approach: The Treatment of Foreign Profits under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act". [[Tax Foundation]].
147. Kyle Pomerleau. (13 March 2018). "Inversions under the New Tax Law: Carrot and Stick". [[Tax Foundation]].
148. [[Haynes and Boone]] LLP. (9 March 2018). "Tax Reform – Considerations for U.S. Multinationals". Lexology.
149. (23 April 2018). "Reassessing the Beloved Double Irish Structure (as Single Malt) in Light of GILTI". [[DLA Piper]] and TaxNotes International.
150. Amanda Athanasiou. (19 March 2018). "U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: Corporate tax reform – Winners and Losers". Taxnotes International.
151. Cliff Taylor. (30 November 2017). "Trump's U.S. tax reform a significant challenge for Ireland". The Irish Times.
152. Suzanne Lynch. (17 January 2018). "U.S. corporations could be saying goodbye to Ireland". The Irish Times.
153. Suzanne Lynch. (29 November 2017). "Donald Trump singles out Ireland in tax speech". The Irish Times.
154. (11 November 2017). "'Flood of companies' to leave Ireland due to U.S. tax cuts".
155. (February 2006). "The demand for tax haven operations". [[Journal of Public Economics]].
156. Mihir A. Desai. (26 December 2017). "Breaking Down the New U.S. Corporate Tax Law".
157. (10 December 2017). "Vantiv decides against Inversion". Bloomberg News.
158. Gavin McLaughlin. (31 August 2018). "U.S. tech firm leaves Ireland for U.S. after Trump tax cuts". Irish Independent.
159. (18 June 2018). "How U.S. tax reform rewards companies that shift profit to tax havens". Reuters.
160. Dhammika Dharmapala. (August 2018). "The Consequences of the TCJA's International Provisions: Lessons from Existing Research (RP No. 856)". University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics.
161. Mihir A. Desai. (June 2018). "Tax Reform: Round One".
162. Ben Harris (economist). (25 May 2018). "6 ways to fix the tax system post TCJA". [[Brookings Institution]].
163. Brad Setser. (30 July 2018). "Gone Fishing". [[Council on Foreign Relations]].
164. (26 July 2018). "Google, Facebook and Salesforce.com dramatically expand their Dublin office hubs". Irish Independent.
165. (11 June 2018). "Ireland Selected Issues Section E: The U.S. Tax Reform". IMF.
166. Eoin Burke-Kennedy. (12 September 2017). "Seamus Coffey: Strong Irish corporate tax receipts 'sustainable' until 2020". The Irish Times.
167. [[Brad Setser]], [[Council on Foreign Relations]]. (6 February 2019). "The Global Con Hidden in Trump's Tax Reform Law, Revealed". The New York Times.
168. (28 June 2018). "New report: is Apple paying less than 1% tax in the EU?". [[Tax Justice Network]].
169. (4 July 2018). "Ireland's playing games in the last chance saloon of tax justice". [[Richard Murphy (tax campaigner).
170. Peter Bodkin. (19 March 2019). "How the IDA's top client used Ireland to siphon billions offshore tax-free". [[TheJournal.ie]].
171. (31 May 2013). "Abbott Laboratories Irish subsidiary paid no tax on €1.8 billion profit". The Irish Times.
172. "Abbott subsidiaries paid no tax on €2.9 billion profits". Sligo Today.
173. (6 April 2016). "The Sharing Economy Doesn't Share the Wealth". [[Bloomberg News]].
174. (22 July 2014). "Low Irish taxes boost Airbnb profits". [[Euractiv]].
175. (28 April 2012). "How Apple Sidesteps Billions in Global Taxes". The New York Times.
176. (1 September 2016). "Pinning Down Apple's Alleged 0.005% Tax Rate Is Nearly Impossible".
177. Chitum, Ryan (2007). "How 60 billion are lost in tax loopholes", Bloomberg.
178. (5 December 2013). "'Double Irish' limits Facebook's tax bill to €1.9m in Ireland". Financial Times.
179. (29 November 2017). "Facebook paid just €30m tax in Ireland despite earning €12bn". Irish Independent.
180. Paul O'Donoghue. (26 December 2018). "US pharma giant Gilead uses 'Double Irish' tax loophole". The Times.
181. Jesse Drucker. (21 October 2010). "Google 2.4% Rate Shows How $60 Billion Lost to Tax Loopholes – Bloomberg". www.bloomberg.com.
182. (2 January 2018). "Google's 'Dutch Sandwich' Shielded 16 Billion Euros From Tax". Bloomberg.
183. (4 February 2014). "IBM gooses its sales numbers thanks to overseas tax tricks". [[Ars Technica]].
184. (14 June 2014). "Medtronic's $43 Billion Covidien Buyout Is More Than Just A Tax Saving Deal". Forbes.
185. Glenn R. Simpson. (7 November 2005). "Irish Subsidiary Lets Microsoft Slash Taxes in U.S. and Europe". [[The Wall Street Journal]].
186. (7 November 2005). "Tax Justice Network: Irish Subsidiary Lets Microsoft Slash Taxes in U.S. and Europe". [[Tax Justice Network]].
187. (10 February 2014). "Corporate Tax 2014: Yahoo! joins "Double Irish Dutch Sandwich" club; IDA Ireland wants more members". FinFacts Ireland.