District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act

History

Proposals to eliminate slavery in the District of Columbia date back at least to the gag rules of the later 1830s. In 1849, when he was a representative, Lincoln introduced a plan to eliminate slavery in Washington, D.C., by compensated emancipation. The bill failed. The Compromise of 1850 outlawed the sale and purchase of enslaved people in the District of Columbia. However, the ownership of enslaved people in the capital was not affected, and District of Columbia residents could still buy and sell enslaved people in neighboring Virginia and Maryland.

Emancipation in the District of Columbia became possible in 1861 after the departure of the senators and representatives from the seceding states who had blocked the ending of slavery in the district, not wanting emancipation to be law anywhere. In December 1861, a bill was introduced in Congress to abolish slavery in Washington, D.C. Written by US Army Colonel Thomas Marshall Key, a former Democratic state senator from Ohio who was serving as George McClellan's top legal advisor (Judge Advocate), and sponsored by Senator Henry Wilson of Massachusetts, the bill passed the Senate on April 3 by a vote of 29 in favor and 14 opposed. It passed the House of Representatives on April 11. Lincoln had wanted the bill to include a provision to make emancipation effective only after a favorable vote from the citizens of the District of Columbia. He also wanted the bill to delay implementation until a certain amount of time after enactment. amid ongoing Congressional debate over an emancipation plan for the border states. Following the bill's passage, Lincoln proposed several changes to the act, which Congress approved. The commissioners appointed to implement the bill later made a report to Congress listing the names of slaveholders who applied for compensation, the names of people emancipated, and the amounts paid. According to one account, enslavers sold nearly 2000 people from the District in the spring of 1862 in hopes of evading emancipation and getting higher prices from Confederates than the government was offering.

The passage of the Compensated Emancipation Act came nearly nine months before the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation. The act immediately emancipated enslaved people in Washington, D.C., and set aside $1 million to compensate slaveholders loyal to the U.S. government. The law allocated an additional $100,000 to pay each formerly enslaved person $100 if they chose to leave the United States for places such as Haiti or Liberia, which accepted Black American immigration.

Outcome

The emancipation plan relied on a three-person Emancipation Commission to distribute the allotted funding. To receive compensation, former slave owners were required to provide written evidence of their ownership and state their loyalty to the Union. Most of the petitioners were white, but some blacks filed for compensation, having once bought their family members away from other owners. In the end, almost all of the $1 million appropriated in the act was spent. As a result of the act's passage, 3,185 people were freed from slavery. However, fugitive slave laws still applied to people who had fled slavery from Maryland to Washington, D.C. until their 1864 repeal.

Although the U.S. government never expanded the compensated emancipation model beyond the District of Columbia, the act, along with the prohibition of slavery in the federal territories a few months later, foreshadowed the later demise of slavery in the United States. The act was the only compensated emancipation plan enacted in the United States.

The District of Columbia has celebrated April 16 as Emancipation Day since 1866, holding an annual parade to commemorate the signing of the act until 1901, when a lack of financial and organizational support forced the tradition to stop; it restarted in 2002. In 2000, the Council of the District of Columbia made April 16 a private holiday (i.e. one on which city employees are not given a free day off) and on July 9, 2004, council member Vincent Orange proposed making the day a public holiday. The District of Columbia first celebrated Emancipation Day as an official city holiday in 2005.

"When Congress passed the DC Emancipation Act in April 1862, giving compensation to 'loyal' owners, Coakley [Gabriel Coakley, a leader of the black Catholic community in Washington] successfully petitioned for his wife and children, since he had purchased their freedom in earlier years. He was one of only a handful of black Washingtonians to claim this. The federal government paid him $1489.20 for eight people he 'owned'; he had claimed their value at $3,300."

File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 1.jpg|Page 1 File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 2.jpg|Page 2 File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 3.jpg|Page 3 File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 4.jpg|Page 4 File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 5.jpg|Page 5 File:An Act of April 16, 1862 (For the Release of Certain Persons Held to Service or Labor in the District of Columbia), 04-16-1862, page 6.jpg|Page 6

Supplemental legislation

Following Lincoln's concerns over the version of the bill that he signed, Congress approved a supplement to the original Compensated Emancipation Act. The amendment passed on July 12, 1862, allowing formerly enslaved people to petition for compensation if their former owners had not done so. Under the supplemental act, claims made by blacks and whites were weighted equally, whereas previously, the testimonies of blacks—enslaved or free—were discarded if challenged by a white person.

File:Supplemental Act of July 12, 1862, page 1.jpg|Page 1 File:Supplemental Act of July 12, 1862, page 2.jpg|Page 2

Video

• {{citation

References

Citations

Sources

References

1. {{harvnb. Guelzo. 2009
2. {{harvnb. Reiner. 2006
3. (October 27, 2009). "Compromise of 1850".
4. {{harvnb. Burgess. 1901
5. Wheeler, Linda. [https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/house-divided/wp/2014/04/14/the-true-author-of-d-c-s-emancipation-act-is-uncovered/ "The true author of D.C.'s Emancipation Act is uncovered"], ''[[The Washington Post]]'' (April 14, 2014).
6. (April 4, 1862). "Emancipation in the District". The New York Times.
7. (April 12, 1862). "Abolition in the District of Columbia". The New York Times.
8. {{harvnb. McQuirter. 2009
9. (April 15, 1862). "Emancipation in the District—Mr. Lincoln's Opinions". The New York Times.
10. (November 5, 1860). "Mr. Lincoln's Views on Slavery—His Course Towards the South". The New York Times.
11. (April 17, 1862). "Thirty-Seventh Congress—First Session". The Baltimore Sun.
12. {{harvnb. Burgess. 1901
13. "Emancipation in the District of Columbia," House Executive Document 42, 38th Congress, 1st session; online at: https://hdl.handle.net/2027/uc1.31158001111896?urlappend=%3Bseq=781%3Bownerid=13510798902483858-785.
14. Colby, Robert K. D.. (2024). "An Unholy Traffic: Slave Trading in the Civil War South". Oxford University Press.
15. {{harvnb. Rodriguez. 2007
16. {{harvnb. Burgess. 1901
17. {{harvnb. McQuirter. 2009
18. {{harvnb. Zavodnyik. 2011
19. "Emancipation in the Federal Territories, June 19, 1862".
20. "The District of Columbia Emancipation Act". [[National Archives and Records Administration]].
21. {{harvnb. Gay. 2007
22. Gillespie, Lisa. (April 5, 2011). "D.C. Statehood & Emancipation Day Linked". Georgetown Media Group.
23. Aarons, Dakarai I.. (July 10, 2004). "Emancipation Day May Go Public". [[The Washington Post]].
24. {{harvnb. Gay. 2007
25. White, Jonathan W., ''A House Built by Slaves: African American Visitors to the Lincoln White House'', Rowman & Littlefield, 2022, p. 106.
26. {{harvnb. Basler. 2008
27. "Supplemental Act of July 12, 1862". National Archives and Records Administration.
28. {{harvnb. McQuirter. 2009