From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Diabetes Health Profile
Health evaluation measure
Health evaluation measure
The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP) is a diabetes-specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM) developed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people living with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes aged 16 years and older. It has been used in community surveys, research studies, clinical trials, and educational interventions both in Europe and completed globally by more than 10,000 patients. The DHP was the diabetes-specific PROM selected by the UK Department of Health for their Long Terms Conditions PROM Pilot Study being carried out by Oxford University.
Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-1)
Based on a conceptual model the DHP-1 was developed for people with Type 1 diabetes to assess the impact of living with diabetes has on patients quality of life1. Developed using a multimethod methodology including, in-depth interviews with patients, clinical consensus and extensive psychometric validation, the DHP-1 comprises 32 items which are summed to provide three domain scores measuring: Psychological distress – (14-items) (dysphoric mood, feelings of hopelessness, irritability, self-harm, feeling of external hostility); Barriers to activity (13-items) (perceived limitation to activity, operant anxiety) and Disinhibited eating (5-items) (lack of eating control, response to food cues and emotional arousal). The observed Flesch Kincaid readability statistic is 5.8 for the DHP-1 and a Flesch reading ease is 74.7. Completion time is approximately 9–12 minutes. The DHP-1 has demonstrates highly satisfactory measurement properties including reliability coefficients 0.80, construct, convergent and criterion validity and ability to discriminate between patients experiencing hypoglycaemic episodes.
Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18, DHP-3D & DHP-5D)
The DHP-18 was developed for people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes to measure the impact of living with diabetes on the patient's quality of life(5). It comprises 18 items which capture the three key domains based on a conceptual model and conceptual framework identified for the DHP-1. These are, Psychological distress – 6-items (dysphoric mood, feelings of hopelessness, irritability); Barriers to activity 7-items ( perceived limitation to activity, operant anxiety) and Disinhibited eating 5-items (lack of eating control, response to food cues and emotional arousal). The observed Flesch Kincaid readability statistic is 4.5 for the DHP-1 and a Flesch reading ease is 83.0. Completion time is approximately 5–6 minutes.
The DHP-18 has demonstrated very good measurement properties including reliability coefficient 0.70 and the ability to discriminate between different treatment and patient groups.
Both the DHP-3D and DHP-5D can be used to provide condition-specific utility values to complement generic utilities from more widely validated measures such as the EuroQol-5 Dimension.
Scoring the DHP
Items are scored using a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0-3. Domain raw scores are transformed to a common score range of 0-100, with 0 representing no dysfunction.
Uses
- Evaluating health improvement and quality of life
- Monitoring population quality of life
- Evaluating health programmes and quality of life
- Evaluating treatment effectiveness and quality of life
- Enhancing doctor-patient communication
- Provide condition-specific utility values to complement generic utilities from more widely validated measures
Language versions
The DHP has been officially adapted for use in 32 languages including:
Bulgarian, Canada (English), Canada (French), Croatian, Czech, Danish, Finnish, Flemish, French, French (Swiss), German, German (Austrian), German (Swiss), Hungarian, Italian, Italian (Swiss), Mandarin, Netherlands, Norwegian, Polish, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish, Swedish, US (English), US (Spanish), Turkish (for Germany), Waloon
Licensing
Clinical Outcomes – an activity within Oxford University Innovation ltd, the technology transfer company of the University of Oxford, manage the licensing and marketing of the Diabetes Health Profile (DHP)
References
References
- [http://www.publichealth.ox.ac.uk/research/hsru/promspilot/generalinfo PROMs Pilot Study, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford] {{Webarchive. link. (2014-12-20 . University of Oxford for Nuffield Department of Population Health. Retrieved 26 November 2014.)
- K. Meadows, N. Steen, E. McColl, M. Eccles, C. Shiels, J. Hewison, A. Hutchinson (April 1996). [https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF00434746 The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychosocial profile of insulin requiring patients - development and psychometric evaluation]. ''Quality of Life Research'' '''Vol 5''' Issue 2. Springer International. Retrieved 26 November 2014.
- [https://archive.today/20130414105920/http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20093281424.html;jsessionid=9C8D1AFEAFAAB4313A965B144A49ED75 Health related quality of life reference values (DHP) in people with diabetes living in France - Entred study, 2001-2003.]. ''cab direct''. Retrieved 26 November 2014.
- [http://www.hqlo.com/content/8/1/124/abstract Factors associated with health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes living in France]. ''HBLO'' Retrieved 26 November 2014.
- "Diabetes AI".
- (2006). "Sex inequalities in access to care for patients with diabetes in primary care: questionnaire survey". Br J Gen Pract.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Diabetes Health Profile — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report